Avatar

I've Seen Some Sh*t

@jhernan-dez

Pisces. Chicago. 27. Hufflepuff. Hi, my name is Jessi (bi) and I'm a *deep sigh*... multishipper. (Regina Mills Stan. Daenerys Targaryen Stan. HJP Stan forever!! Clark Kent Stan.) DAENERYS TARGARYEN DESERVED BETTER!!! JON MF SNOW DESERVED BETTER!!! Also STEFAN AND CAROLINE DESERVED BETTER!!! There I said it. My Otps include: Clois. Jonerys. Percabeth. Faberry. Ric&Evelyn. Regina&happiness. Harry James Potter & Happiness
Avatar
reblogged

Been thinking a lot about the brunch scene with Shauna, Jeff, and Jackie’s parents and what it can tell us about the characters. I may be misremembering, but I’m pretty sure Jackie’s dad stays pretty much silent the whole time. Jackie’s mom is clearly the decision-maker in the couple and it seems like he’s along for the ride. He grabs her hand to show solidarity in the offer to pay Callie’s tuition but is pretty irrelevant on his own.

I think that knowing this is Jackie’s main example of love growing up can contextualize a lot of her and Shauna’s dynamic. Jackie’s parents have shown her that love is one person submitting to another. It’s her dad going along with her mom’s decisions and blindly supporting everything she does. It’s her mom taking charge for both of them and not asking for his input. Jackie seems to act like her mom with Shauna and expect Shauna to act like her dad. Their relationship doesn’t even necessarily need to be interpreted as romantic, though I think it can be. Shauna is Jackie’s main person. She seems like the only person that Jackie has any real intimacy with throughout the show. So it makes sense that she’d try to mirror her parents’ relationship with her.

So when Shauna wants to make her own decisions or just disagrees with Jackie, Jackie interprets that as Shauna not loving her. If Shauna loved her, then she would agree no matter what. Of course, that’s not healthy and it makes Shauna feel stifled, but it’s all Jackie knows. And Jackie feels like any indication of Shauna’s independence means she loses her. So Jackie tries to cling harder to her, to control more, which only serves to push Shauna further away. 

And Shauna, the nonconfrontational child of divorce, can’t talk to Jackie about how she feels. Jackie has demonstrated that if Shauna is her own person, Jackie will leave. Shauna disagreed with Jackie’s idea to stay by the plane, and Jackie’s immediate response was to ignore her all day. She even pretended to buddy up to Mari to make Shauna jealous. So Shauna feels like Jackie sees her as replaceable. If she tries to be independent at all, she loses Jackie. And as much as Shauna is resentful of the position Jackie has put her in, she still loves Jackie and doesn’t want to lose her. 

I feel like the show does a good job of giving us enough context on each character to understand why they act the way they do. They make dumb decisions because they’re teenagers and can’t fully understand their own baggage. But at their heart, they’re both desperately trying to maintain their friendship. They lash out when they feel rejected. Jackie’s problem is with the interpretation of Shauna’s actions. She views any disagreement or deviation as rejection. Shauna’s issue is with communication. She thinks that openly admitting her frustrations would make Jackie leave her. 

Plus, the Taylors have made it clear that Jackie can’t just be good. She has to be the best, which means better than Shauna. So Shauna has to be the passive, lesser side kick while Jackie has to remain in control at all times and keep being the best. The funny thing is, they tell Shauna and Jeff how much better than them Jackie would be doing if she was alive, but if Jackie was there, they would probably be telling her she should be doing better. There is no ceiling to being the best so Jackie could never be enough while she was alive. 

I just think it’s very interesting that a pretty short scene with the Taylors can give us so much insight into Jackie as a character. We don’t see Shauna’s parents but their divorce is mentioned which makes it feel relevant. It makes sense that her parents splitting up would contribute to Shauna’s passivity and inability to communicate. Her parents admitted they were unhappy and her family was broken up. If Shauna just never admits she’s unhappy, nothing has to change. 

I really love how layered and morally grey all these characters are. And it’s just so devastating because these were manageable issues that got mixed up with teen angst before being thrown into a life-or-death situation. None of it needed to happen but these girls didn’t know any other way to be. 

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
junkobato

✨Park Min Young appreciation post✨

The one and only rom-com queen, our Park Min Young is in the industry for a while. Here are some iconic works she acted in:

Sungkyunkwan Scandal (2010) one of the best sageuk, loved it

City Hunter (2011)

Healer (2014-15) ahhh this drama... a masterpiece in my opinion

What's wrong with secretary kim ? (2018) they were perfect for each other

Her private life (2019) for all the fangirls out there!

When the weather is nice (2020) best drama to watch in cold days

Forecasting love and weather (2022)

Love in contract (2022) so in love with this drama atm!

Her roles in romantic comedies are probably the most popular ones, but I actually like way more her characters in Healer and When the weather is nice, they are so different from the others and very memorable to me.

Which drama did you enjoy the most? :) let me know!

Avatar
reblogged

Kdramas where the male lead falls first

Weightlifting Fairy Kim Bok Joo

Strong Woman Do Bong Soon

A Business Proposal

What's Wrong With Secretary Kim

So I Married The Anti Fan

Youth Of May

Something In The Rain

Lovestruck In The City

She Would Never Know

The King Eternal Monarch

Avatar

I deadass thought this was 3 Star Wars movies

its called Color Theory and we been knew. “Art is subjective” but there are certain “rules” you can follow to make things more appealing in a subconscious/subliminal kind of way.

once you see it, you cant unsee it.

I can’t believe there are only 9 movies

There are only 9 genders and they are:

  1. Orange and blue action hero
  2. Red dress damsel
  3. Foggy straight couple
  4. Lone guy with sword
  5. Couple leaning on eachother
  6. Eye
  7. Blurry thriller Cop
  8. Sexy Legs™
  9. Orange and black action hero
Avatar
melissa’s very long list of favorite ships (in order of ship name) steroline (stefan salvatore and caroline forbes). “you told me once that i would fall madly in love without realizing it. and that’s what happened. day by day, bit by bit, year by year. with you.”
Avatar
Avatar
bettsfic
Anonymous asked:

i’ve been seeing a lot of posts on my dash about the witcher and it looked pretty interesting to me, but when i went on netflix the description was really vague and unhelpful. in attempt to not accidentally spoil myself by looking on the web, would you mind telling me a little about it?

first of all, to watch the witcher you need to replace your expectation of “good” with “totally unhinged.”

the show is about henry cavill in extremely tight clothing, carrying around a broadsword, facing moral dilemmas, fighting monsters, and having sex. he takes a potion before every fight (which isn’t explained) and no one in the story ages (which also isn’t explained) so people’s parents and grandparents look the same age as their progeny. 

the witcher is not a monster of the week show, nor does it have a coherent ongoing arc. it is not told in chronological order. most of the things that happen are unrelated to everything else that happens. the timeline might happen over weeks, decades, or centuries, and none of that is explained. lore is told in fits and bursts and makes no sense at all. the first episode is absolutely useless and you should not judge the rest of the season based on it, but it has a great sword fight and geralt (that’s henry cavill in extremely tight clothing) talks lovingly to his horse. that’s it. that’s the show.

what is important to know is that the season is adapted from short stories set before the events of the book series. so it’s not season 1 as much as season 0, which is why it feels like nothing is connected or makes sense. it’s a primer to what i’m assuming the next season will be (and i think/hope the fandom will really take off). 

everyone seems to have boners for everyone else. most of the characters are women and they are all absolutely feral. the showrunner is a woman, and most of the eps are written and directed by women. it’s like watching a really wild fanfic come to life. what i love about it is that it’s just so fucking weird. every expectation i had going into it was shattered, and even the moments that were cheesy or boring or cringey or dumb i found somewhat endearing. now that i’m done watching it, i kind of want to watch it again, which is something i rarely do. after every episode i thought, “i really don’t like this, and i don’t want to watch anymore.” and after every episode, i clicked play on the next. 

if you like hot beefy men who are deeply misunderstood as being the bad guy but are actually good-aligned, you’ll like the witcher. if you like complicated, all-powerful, borderline-evil female characters who are greedy and heartless and have ample room for growth, you’ll like the witcher. if you like isolated men who are chased by endearing comedic relief sidekicks, you’ll like the witcher. if you like stories in which seemingly self-centered men are made to become paternal toward helpless beings, you will like the witcher. if you want to ship everyone with everyone else and be totally overwhelmed by attractive people doing attractive things, you will like the witcher. if you like catchy bops that will be stuck in your head for 87 years, you’ll like the witcher.

the only way you will not like the witcher is if you’re expecting it to be good.

Avatar

this is the best summary of the witcher i have seen

As the screenshot my friend sent me says:

can someone explain what “toss a coin to your witcher” means? im assuming a witcher is not just the titular character but is a category of person? how does one possess one? why do they need coins? why are we tossing them; is a witcher like a public fountain?

  1. A witcher is, indeed, a category of person. They’re, like, alchemically-enhanced monster-hunting mutants, or something like that (I haven’t read the books).
  2. One doesn’t possess one, but one can employ one, if one has any monsters that need hunting.
  3. They need coins to exchange for goods and services, just like everyone else.
  4. We are tossing them because that sounds jauntier than just giving them.

hope this helps

Avatar
flootzavut

I laughed so fucking hard at this entire post, it’s perfect.

The Witcher is entirely unhinged and I fucking loved it.

Also if the feral women and beefy men haven’t convinced you, try the adorable bisexual bard:

Avatar
ekjohnston

I loved this show about 4000% more than I was expecting to. The moment at the end of episode one where I realized What Was Going On was great. It very, very much expects viewers to pay attention, and it’s not going to straight up answer your questions. It would much rather you figure it out.

While the above posts are all incredibly correct, the thing that got ME into the show was that it’s the story of a man who refused to make a choice, and he’s been paying for his wilfull inaction ever since. And I love it.

Also, he is the least interesting person and he KNOWS it. That helps a great deal.

I take umbrage at describing Jaskier as merely  “the adorable bisexual bard “ as opposed to the most feral little bastard on the continent.

Avatar
reblogged

i made a college vine compilation b/c Suffering™️

(warning for loud noise in some of them)

It’s funny cause it’s true