Hut in a woods by Max Suleimanov
Puss in Boots: The Last Wish by Joseph Feinsilver
Detail from Venus Verticordia by Dante Gabriel Rossetti, 1868
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
THE SEA OF TIME by MORNCOLOUR
Art by Mathias Loughlin
Question: how do you do the glint/enchantment shine on stuff (like the swords)? It looks very pretty
im gonna assume you already know how to draw swords/metal so it's just the enchantment thing. hope this helps :']
Left: Diego Velázquez - Portrait of Pope Innocent X, c.1650
Right: Francis Bacon - Study after Velázquez’s portrait of Pope Innocent X, c.1953
"We kind of stitched [Eddie's vest] so it would look like he did it himself ... We added a belt buckle that has a handcuff on it ... We gave him a chain on the leather of his jacket, like maybe the zipper broke, and he tried to close it. So we really focused on little details."
idk there’s just something about this dude





