I’ve been rapping my head around the negative reaction fans had the ending of Amphibia, and I think I understand why.
Mainly, it was an ending Matt had planned out in advance. The issue with those kinds of endings is that they often undermine what came before for the sake of staying on track. As such, the reason the fans hated how the trio left Amphibia permanently, and that the trio split up, was because it wasn’t t built up, like, at all.
The worlds being permanently separated was only necessary in the final episode because of the secret spell and the deity , which that had zero foreshadowing.
While at first I thought it was going to end with the trio loses contact with amphibia, during season 3 I thought it wouldn’t happen, simply because there was no foreshadowing to it(Anne even reassuring sprig that they could still see each other). And yet in all in, the characters out of nowhere act like this was a forgone conclusion.
I certainly didn’t think Marcy was going to move at the end, much less of the trio drifting apart. It would completely contradict their arcs of trying to rectify their friendship. And yet we’re aren’t even shown them drifting apart, just a 1 minute speech. Marcy moving might have been set up since true colors, it she was such an afterthought in season 3 that there wasn’t much time to ruminate on it.
Some people justify this with “they were toxic to each” and “that’s just how real life is”. Yes, the trio were toxic to each other…and the START, but not by the end. Using this reasoning actually contradicts the message of change the show was going for, and tosses aside the trios arc of trying to be better friends.
And even ignoring that the show threw out the realism card long ago, while many friendships do drift apart over the years, there’s just as many that don’t. And in fiction, such drastic changes can come of as unrealistic, even when it happens in real life. Not helped by how the separations only affected the trio, as everyone in Amphibia is still in a tight nit group.
With all this in mind, the message comes off as being way more cynical and nonsensical than intended. I don’t think many people like the idea that permanent, meaningful relationships can’t last, and the best you can do is try to make as many memories with your friends as possible before they inevitably as possible. But that’s the message Matt had in mind, because it was based on his own falling out with his friends.
Maybe if the show had built up these themes more, the backlash wouldn’t be as severe. But like Marcy’s parents, they sprung this change at the last second, and it was just too much for us to handle.