🎪 thomas or julius 🎈 21 🎈 white 🎈he/she/sy 🧃🦐

~ Commissions open here! ~ about me art archive blog toyhouse twitter

artfight

enjoy your stay here at my circus :•)

me an crow are gonna play new star rail chapters in hour and we are gonna go see jing yuan and say hi to her. ^_^

Making cinnamon toast 😇 put it in the oven and everything 😀

What I love about the intuitive eating model is that it places "eating nutritionally" as the least important and final step to consider, and isn't even "supposed" to be followed until it is (mentally, physically, or economically) viable to the person doing the intuitive eating. And someone will hear this and go "What, isn't that encouraging unhealthy eating, to not prioritize nutrition?" When in actuality, the model lessening the importance of "eating nutritionally" IS in the pursuit of the most healthy eating habits of a person.

Intuitive eating is just one of the only eating mindset models that refuses to ignore the reality of disordered eating and diet culture and how we are surrounded by and internalize it all the time, and it takes into account what ACTUALLY fuels EDs. The other base steps of intuitive eating, placing zero restrictions on yourself (aside from allergens and such), eating what you enjoy and eating until you are full, all of these start at the core of untangling the internalized shame and fatphobia which fuels what is fundamentally more unhealthy than "not eating nutritionally", which is not eating at all and having an unhealthy relationship to food.

Intuitive eating understands that the mindset of "eating nutritionally" can easily lead to obsessive tendencies towards restricting and anxiety over eating the "right" foods. And even within the intuitive eating model, eating nutritionally means adding ALONGSIDE what you eat to balance out what nutrients you can, and most importantly to enjoy everything you eat, because eating can and should be pleasurable, not a job or a chore or a domination of the body and soul.

I'd really like to make some sideblogs to indulge in little side interests and hobbies of mine but like i worry about not keeping up with them. And i dont mean "keeping up with" as like an obligation or job, i mean like not having the motivation or energy to pursue and continue said little hobby blogs like i actually really want to.

Did anyone else grow up going by their middle name instead of their first name? For me it was slightly bizarre as I didn't choose to go by my middle name, my Dad just decided it for me and put down my middle name on all important documents and I didnt question it (I only got called my first name when I went to relatives and mom but at school and friends i was my middle name)

Me and Alibi's relationship is so special. I share my radical political views and star rail meta, Alibi tells me about house of leaves and other such intelligent analysis of abstract and thought provoking media, and akechi. It's dialectics or something

making fuckin long posts on my phone is so grueling literally hard manual labor i end up sweaty and shaken when I'm done im a desktop girl at heart. Or boy

Hope you all enjoyed that *pitbull image*

If I lived in the Persona 5 Universe I would...

Eat curry and drink coffee at Café LeBlanc with Ren.

Discuss postmodern theory and the immortal science of Marxism-Leninism with Akechi.

Play Minecraft and Terraria with Futaba.

Paint with and go to the Supermarket to stare at the lobster tank with Yusuke.

Water flowers and look at butterflies with Haru.

Play with laser pointer and feather toy with Morgana.

Send anonymous hate mail to Mishima.

Eat yummy sweet treats like crêpes and cake with Ann.

Go to the movies and just chill out with Ryuji.

Watch Sumire do gymnastics but not participate because I am not that athletic.

Drink juice box and get therapy from Maruki.

I wish I lived in the Persona universe.

Me trying to explain my political and philosophical beliefs: okay so imagine Goro Akechi from Persona 5: Royal,

Re: my last post, to paraphrase Hegel: advancement cannot occur without a thesis meeting its antithesis. Essentially to progress with an idea, or to counter an idea you disagree with, you must confront it with its opposition. Then in the end, you will have either 1. A new solution that contains the best of both thesis and antithesis which addresses each of the other's problems, or 2. You will have a deeper understanding of the antithesis you reject and continue to disagree with, but have concrete reasons as to why

Theres a frustrating element of political discourse where you will discuss a problem or solution and be countered with a reaffirmation of the status quo due to the other party defaulting to the current state of things (usually USAmerican, due to american exceptionalism) being the natural and therefore most optimal way of doing things. Like trying to explain prison abolition and the other person goes "um that will mean violent criminals will be on the streets, your idea is not smart and will fail" and they ignore the entire books and theorists who have examined and proposed ideas and critiques of the prison system.

Anyways my point here. Is that this phenomena happens very often on here, in "leftist" spaces as well. Like defaulting to reactionary thought against certain concepts or communist ideology due to attached justifications that appeal to the "leftist idea" through word association alone (i.e. shoplifting from small businesses is bad because small business is not walmart, therefore they are more working class. This is a false understanding of class dynamics)