Avatar

Unstoppable Horse

@homelmprovement

I just say shit on here and somehow have mutuals despite that | if it’s somehow not evident from my posts: I fucking hate truscum and transmeds. Fuck off

Reblog, click the picture, and prepare for battle.

after a while i became convinced that the words were mocking me

Nothing happened. 

I WAS PROMISED A BATTLE

*throws down gauntlet*

Edit: Went back. This is the best thing to happen to my dashboard ever.

Reblogging again because my followers need to see this. To be clear, rebog, go to your actual blog, then click the picture. 

I’m gonna say if. Don’t bother identifying as bisexual if you’re literally a febfem. All you do is never shut the fuck up about how you hate men and you’re ashamed you’re “forced” to be attracted to them and lick super-sexuality boots because you’re such a cursed little wretch and woe is you for being screwed up instead of fully gay. Grow the fuck up it’s pathetic

You are centering your life around being a half-sie instead of… I dunno, growing a brain and potentially a spine

people are so fucking stupid like 😭 people saying “some 13 year old GENUINELY like dressing up to look like adults and sexualizing themselves bc it makes them feel good about themselves!!1!” like.. have you ever considered why that makes them feel “good” in the first place?? why would a thirteen year old girl spend hours on makeup and tons of her parents money on clothes made for adults if she’s not being influenced to think that that’s what she needs to do to feel good about herself.. i just refuse to believe that any 13 year old girl (or any girl for that matter but that’s a different story) LIKES to sexualize herself without any outside influences. people don’t exist in a vacuum and some of you are GENUINELY stupid

I use to watch makeup videos when everyone was asleep, on the computer in the back room when I was like 13ish and I would go to school with a full face of makeup on and look like an ig baddie and everyone knew me as the girl who did makeup! I had extremely low self esteem at the time and it made me feel good.

I’m 25 years old now and still love makeup but I’ve toned it down obviously. I NATURALLY began to love myself and wear less. Stop sexualizing children you miserable cum rag waste of life mother fuckers.

Your experience is valid and nobody is saying YOU were sexualized because we obviously don’t know you. I’m glad you weren’t sexualized when you were younger.

Please understand the perspective that a thirteen/fourteen/etc.-year-old’s autonomy isn’t free of outside influence including those “ig baddies” and tiktok stars. You and I took similar paths with makeup, unfortunately the attention I garnered was not from my peers for being the “makeup girl”, it was because I looked “sexy” or “hot” or “older”, and I assure you I did not hear most of that that from people who were also thirteen.

Many of us end up being sexualized either internally or externally just like OP is talking about (even offline) and it’s not simply bad apples or bad luck because of the sheer scale it’s on. For a while I actually thought I enjoyed it, because I didn’t understand how predatory it was. Many kids think they do too. We’re conditioned to be flattered by those compliments even as kids, just as we’re conditioned/influenced to want to look or dress or act more mature than we are.

Avatar

Just as a heads up, @persistentlyfem has released a horrible, transphobic, transmisogynistic manifesto. I know she's had a big presence in the butch/fem community on tumblr, so heads up so you can block her

trans women built up the butch/fem community, particularly trans women of color. we’d be nothing without them. trans women always have and will continue to be explicitly welcome in lesbian spaces. in women’s spaces.

this is disgusting and a huge disappointment.

Avatar

Wait, they prescribe puberty blockers to kids PERIOD??? Where was this news when my friends and I all started our periods at age 10???

Not trying to hijack a post about trans oppression, because it's genuinely sick that they acknowledge this as a medical issue for cis people but not trans people, but seriously? This sounds like multiple classes of oppression amd sexism.

They’re generally prescribed to kids who experience precocious puberty, which is puberty when children are under 8/9 years old.

Bro I didn’t like the dick pick bro but it’s not because I don’t like your dick bro. Bro, I like your dick BECAUSE it’s attached to YOU, bro. I want the package deal bro. I love you bro.

Anonymous asked:

Panphobes be like 'How dare you erase bisexuality just by existing! I'm going to retaliate by erasing pansexuality, doing the exact same thing I'm accusing you of doing'

Anon, you hit the nail on the head. Thank you for putting it into words.

Avatar

You can’t erase a sexuality that shouldn’t exist to begin with. Pansexuality has always erased bisexuality and is a damaging identity. If you could give me one, singularly ONE, definition of pansexuality that wasn’t biphobic, homophobic, or transphobic, I might believe that pansexuality is different. But you literally can’t, because their isn’t one.

“Hearts Not Parts” is assuming any LGB person is just out to date someone for their genitalia.

“Attracted to personality and not gender” is just assuming that people are just going seeing the first person of a gender they are attracted to and are immediately thinking of sleeping with them or dating them without getting to know the person. It also assumes no one has standards but you.

“Well we would date trans people”. If a man is still straight if he dates a trans woman, and a woman is still straight if she dates a trans man, why are bi people automatically pan for being willing to date trans people?

“Well, we would date non-binary people”. So would straight people, gay people, and lesbians. There is no sign above people’s heads saying they are non-binary.

“We don’t have gender preferences though”. That was already covered in so many bisexual sources it’s not even fucking funny at this point. Please check out @cowardly-bisexual if you need more proof, they have all the fucking sources you could ask for.

“We just don’t see gender though”. That’s such a fucking lie. Everyone sees gender. You see gender. I see gender, everyone sees gender.

“But bi means two”. Listen, pansexuality meant you would fuck “all”. And all meant everyone and EVERYTHING. Including animals, children, and inanimate objects. Let’s not start with roots right now because you’ll lose.

And if you really want to try to bring up “pansexual sources”, one of the oldest sources of “pansexuality” was a bi woman who would date interacially. She was called pan strictly because she would date black people.

Now please. Give me a definition of pansexuality that isn’t one of these.

Bisexuality has been defined as “attraction regardless of gender” by the bi community for decades

Pansexuality is a new word for bisexuality popularised by teenagers on the internet who don’t know anything about bisexual community, history or culture and who are struggling with internalised biphobia

Pansexuality is for people who don’t overly sexualize their partners and whatever genitalia they have. They don’t want to be associated with people who do. That’s where the whole phrase “heart not part” comes from. Yes, some pansexuals at misinformed but many pansexuals understand the history and many understand that bisexual is the love of everyone regardless of sex and gender. But many bisexuals obsess over what part their partner has (ex. When they crave a male partner with a penis) Even many bisexuals claim to only love men and women people who ate assigned that way at birth and exclude trans, non-binaries, aces, etc. for their lack of the ‘proper’ parts, lack of association with a gender, and lack of wanting sex. Just as there are pansexuals who lack the understanding of bisexuals, there are also bisexuals who don’t know the own meaning and understanding of their own sexuality and do not realize that it is the love of all genders because they too are misinformed. Do not spread misinformation and do not tag this as being positive when it is not. Do not single out an entire sexuality you do not understand. Do not pretend you do, do not pretend you’re cool, and do not even attempt to try to wiggle your way out of this one. You yourself are panphobic and it is wrong to single out a person or group of persons and be phobic of them for doing nothing wrong.

Avatar

do you fucking hear yourself

“pansexuality is for people who don’t overly sexualize they partners and whatever genitalia they have. They don’t want to be associated with people who do. “ “many bisexuals obsess over what part their partner has (ex. when they crave a male partner with a penis)” “many bisexuals claim to only love men and women people who ate assigned that way at birth and exclude trans, non-binaries, aces, etc. for their lack of the ‘proper’ parts, lack of association with a gender, and lack of wanting sex.”

Gonna start discourse nobody wants to think about

Heterosexuality does not mean attraction to the opposite gender. Hetero- as a Latin root means “different” NOT opposite. A straight guy or woman can date a non-binary person, they don’t have to be bi or pan or whatever.

Which means that someone is straight so long as they aren’t attracted to the same gender.

Hence why bi automatically means you have to be attracted to the same gender/ all genders including your own/ regardless of gender

This post is about non-binary lesbians, gay non-binary people, non-binary bisexuals, and non-binary straight people. Because all four of those labels have famously been accused of being transphobic or non inclusive of non-binary people. Which is clearly wrong when non-binary people identify with those labels.

It’s pretty damn tiring to listen to people tell your friends they deserve to be erased or misgendered for dating someone who uses a “binary” label. That they’ll never be truly non-binary because they’ll always be accepting the love of someone who is inherently misgendering them.

It’s also frustrating to listen to people tell your friends that they’re using a regressive label that deserves to be removed from the acronym, that it’s outdated and it’s cis-pleasing or whatever. That it’s impossible to ever even consider opening a google page to read the THOUSANDS of articles from actual bisexuals both past and present who assert that bisexuality is not as easy as “two” or “binary” and that it’s insulting to even insinuate that bisexuality is those things.

You can be passive aggressive or whatever else on this post, especially if you’re non-binary yourself, but I know why I wrote it. I wrote it because my friend hates themselves and is at war with their identity right now. They’re scared if they marry the person they love they’ll be closeting themselves for the rest of their lives, that they’ll never truly belong in the community or deserve to go to pride.

All because nearly everyone on here seems to think that non-binary people are incapable of being loved by anyone other than someone who uses an “inclusive and progressive” label. Combine that with the fact my friend is also bisexual and you’ve got a burning heap of internalized transphobia and biphobia that even the most performative bi ally posts can’t “you’re valid!” out of existence.

So yeah. Cry me a river.

Good night to Misha Collins, Jensen Ackles, the 5 minutes of 15x20 that got cut, Sebastian Roche’s tweets about the rusty nail, miracle the dog, the version of the 15x18 confession scene that lives on Jensen Ackles’ phone, former tjlc’ers who once again got roped into the spn aftermath, everyone who participated in the destiel marketing studies, anyone who donated to the Castiel Project, the person who edited the destiel phone call on tiktok, anyone who posted a fix-it fic to ao3, eldest daughters who project onto Dean, and all the queer characters who were killed on spn.

Charlie is the only queer character killed in supernatural, twice, but you assholes don’t give a shit about actual gay characters. You just want to see your white favs fuck.

Charlie is also white. Idk what you were trying to say about that.

And they did try to kill Kaia who is with Claire. And Castiel is into men technically.

today i learned about the fact that seraphine (the LoL champion who has a twitter account where she’s an e-girl with depression for parasocial relationship vtuber clout) was allegedly based on an actual person a riot employee dated and reading the story about i have even more disdain and hatred towards riot games

the what champion. what the fuck happened ever since i left that dreaded game 6 years ago

it’s honestly a trip i have no words i feel really, really bad for her if all of this is true

I wouldn’t say it’s a fact so much as a very convincing speculation. There’s no solid proof, considering Seraphine’s character designer claimed she was based off of his own wife, an Asian woman just like Seraphine is. That aside, the contents of this article are still very uncanny and eerie to all be a coincidence…

Was looking for a comment like this, I 100% agree. The guy who actually made the character said in a Tweet that a major inspiration was his wife (who also has pink hair). And I agree there are some weird coincidences I have no doubt the man she dated did suggest ideas and did use her as an inspiration, but to say that the entire character is based off her alone is…there just isn’t enough evidence overall. Even the one screenshot she includes is enough to prove yeah, he most likely did suggest things to the art team, but she said it herself, he was not a character or skin designer. So idk! Very interesting indeed. The comments are a little mean tho!

What it sounds like to me is a somewhat socially inept guy (or maybe a little bit creepy guy) tried to get a girl’s love by impressing her, making claims of things he didn’t really have a hand in, thinking she’d believe him and be flattered. Maybe he made the suggestion about the release date that his friends on the team took, but that’s about it. Her art style is pretty generic. Lots of people have cats. Unless he was pretty high up the hierarchy, giving the instructions and direction to the design and marketing team, this all seems pretty unlikely.

Also, the fact that she’s treating it like this says to me she may have another abusive ex/stalker experience and this may be triggering it.

I feel for her though. She’s got legal counsel, and unless she has other evidence that she didn’t publish for legal reasons (and didn’t even mention its existence), there’s very little chance this will hold up in court, the lawyer knows it and they’re just taking her money.

Girl those glasses and outlandish hair only exist to hide the 4.9/10 that you are. Ain’t nobody basing a character in a multimillion dollar game off of you.

She looks like she’ll lecture me about the wage gap if I wanted to split a bill

Don’t you have some shame to go confess about or something?