🕸️

finally a descriptor for whatever the fuck american animation studios have been doing for years

read the article and agree with this pretty much entirely, but with one minor nitpick:

Is raising one eyebrow not a normal facial expression?? I don’t think i can physically raise both my 2 eyebrows at once all the way up. Like one goes up higher than the other even my neutral expression, like the one eyebrow muscle works the other doesn’t as much.

Is it not normal? I thought it was like how you can be left handed or right handed but with eyebrows

I thought I was just right-eyebrowed

How do you control both your eyebrows at once

Is this like. normal thing?

they should invent a second, earlier nightlife for people who work in childcare & education

SO WHAT IF IT’S 4 PM AND I WANNA GO TO THE BAR TO SCOPE OUT CUTIES DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW SLEEPY I AM GOING TO BE IN A FEW HOURS?

CHEESE ATTACK

me if meowing was a sin tbh

& heres me if meowing was illegal

But it’s not so enjoy

so true, here i am happy and free because nobody can morally or legally stop me from meowing

*unhexes your flexagon*

we need to bring back the word square like i don't think it's problematic that you listen to taylor swift i just kinda think it's lame as hell

public middle school teachers should be paid 3x what they’re earning because I could never do that

not to be pedantic but it annoys me so much when people talk abt how chatgpt is "lying" or "making things up". or esp when people say it "refuses to admit" to lying. like girl that is a toaster oven

"Parent's rights" is as much of a red flag to me as "Family values". When you examine what people actually mean by these terms it always boils down to the usual "the family is a system of domination and many parents want even more control and violence within it".

it's so annoying when people talk about weed like it's a psychedelic you aren't having any kind of breakthrough on it you're just dumb temporarily. weed is for being a dog and eating 40 mcnuggets. or doing anal

americans imagining Land Back as a reverse colonization where your family is violently displaced from their home—just no, and there’s so much projection and anti-indigenous sentiment in that reaction that we need to unpack. in the same way abolishing private property does not equate to taking the personal property/housing from regular human beings, land back deserves your full attention in the actual demands and futurities that native people are calling for. this knee jerk resistance against land back needs to stop inventing hypotheticals instead of engaging with the reality of this which is A. a broader political call to rematriate land to indigenous communities, who currently have limited resources because this is a settler colonial state B. specific calls to return specific lands—often ‘public lands’ i.e. national parks, blm land etc—which often carry cultural significance and also very direct legacies of violence tied to the original displacement. C. a return to indigenous land management strategies, which are place-based and culture-based and offer paths to restoring/reclaiming/reconfiguring the ecologies and human communities most damaged by colonialism/capitalism/the world we currently live in D. land back is deeply tied to the movements protesting oil and gas pipelines, catastrophic mining, etc ongoing destruction of the environment that place indigenous communities on the frontlines yet threatens /everyone/ downstream who drinks water and has a body

reblog this post if you're strong enough to :3 in 2023