Avatar

not archival quality

@hemipelagicdredger / hemipelagicdredger.tumblr.com

Paleontologist, teacher, optimist, general enthusiast, board-certified Disaster Bisexual. Tumblr-old (i.e. 30s) with a doctorate and a kid. Any pronouns but I like "they" best if you're letting me pick; gender best described as "Gethenian". I like long arguments on the beach, scientific breakthroughs, 15th and 16th century music, and weird corners of history. Erratic side blog: @monosyllabicvocabulary
Anonymous asked:

What dinosaur would be best for selective breeding to produce an animal with a lot of edible meat. What dinosaur could become a cow dinosaur

The cop-out answer is, of course, “a turkey”, since birds are dinosaurs. But we both know that’s not what you meant, so let’s get into it!

When looking at animals that are good candidates for livestock, there are a few traits that are necessary:

  1. Herbivorous. There’s a reason you don’t tend to see lion steak at the market. Even discounting the danger factor, farming a carnivore for its meat just doesn’t make sense if you think about it for just a few seconds - you have to put way more meat in than you’ll get out! If you start a T. rex farm, you’ll be feeding them enough hadrosaur meat to last them till they get to full adult size in 12-15 years. And a T. rex is….not much bigger than just one large hadrosaur.
  2. Fast-growing. Jumping off of that, you don’t want your livestock to take a long time to grow up. Cows mature in around 2 years. Elephants would produce a hell of a lot of meat, but they take 10-15 years to reach sexual maturity. In the meantime, you’ve got to take care of, feed, and protect that animal until it’s old enough to produce calves.
  3. Fast-reproducing. Jumping off of that, you want your animal to reproduce fairly readily. Pigs produce an average of 10-11 piglets per litter, and can have two litters per year. This gives the advantage of being able to produce more animals more quickly; elephants, which produce one calf every few years, would not be a good choice. This isn’t super relevant to dinosaurs, though, since (so far as we know) they all laid eggs, and could have fairly large clutch sizes.
  4. Safe/easy to contain. Now, before everyone gets on me about how dangerous cows are - yes, I know. That said, a cow is significantly safer as a farm animal than, say, a hippopotamus would be. I add “easy to contain” to this because something like a giant titanosaur, even if it were entirely docile, would be an absolute nightmare to keep enclosed. 
  5. As large as feasible. This is self-explanatory - more meat.

With these criteria in mind, let’s start looking!

Most theropods are right out by trait #1. As carnivores, farming them for meat would be totally pointless.

Large ceratopsians, ankylosaurs, and stegosaurs are probably ruled out by trait #4. An animal with swords on its head or a tail that’s specifically evolved to smack things it doesn’t like probably aren’t very good choices for farm animals.

Giant sauropods are also probably out by #4. Good luck keeping a Brachiosaurus in a pen (much less figuring out how to safely and humanely kill one).

I’m going to count pachycephalosaurs out by #4 as well. Yes, we have many animals in captivity that use their heads to butt things, but there are other dinosaurs with fewer offencive weapons.

Excluding all other small dinosaurs by #5, we get down to two groups: ornithopods and early sauropodomorphs (the ”prosauropods” of days past).

And so we turn to trait #2! And fortunately, these are both groups for which we have detailed information on their life cycles, from analysing growth rings in bones from hatchlings to adults! 

“Prosauropods” represent a grade - i.e. not a true natural group - of mostly herbivorous dinosaurs related to sauropods. Some species could get in excess of four tonnes; most species were bipedal as adults and had sharp claws on their hands. Massospondylus, a fairly typical “prosauropod”, was still growing at 15 years old. 

Ornithopods are a clade of herbivorous dinosaurs defined by having no distinguishing characteristics whatsoever. The largest are estimated to weigh up to 16 tonnes; hadrosaurs had no offencive weapons, instead probably relying on numbers and size as defence. Maiasaura is estimated to have reached sexual maturity around age 3, and continued growth through year 8.

In conclusion?

Avatar

Weird discussions like this are my favorite part of tumblr

So, I brought this up with my family and they asked about dinosaur eggs. It occurred to me that chickens are dinosaurs and they lay fertilized and unfertilized eggs so it’s possible that ancient dinosaurs did too. So Hadrosaur burgers for lunch and hadrosaur eggs for breakfast!

So I’ve thought about this way too much.

Now, my determinations are going to be a little wilder because i’m just a paleonerd, my main thing is writing, and all of this is for a kidvid concept around time-displaced monster fighting dinosaur people, so your mileage should vary.

On the one hand, ceratopsians would seem easy to dismiss out of hand. Who wants an ill-tempered, violent animal with points on its head? Except that’s an Aurochs, the ancestor of modern cows. And domesticated pigs were derived from wild boars.

Plus you do have other options in the ceratopsian family that are smaller in size and have fewer nasty pointy bits, and entirely hornless forms like protoceratops. Avaceratops is about the size of a feed pig from this comparison, for instance:

Oviraptor was primarily herbivorous, and in most ways seems pretty emu-ish, which would put their clade and similar on the list.

And of course, we’re talking about domestic animals here. Selective breeding will warp them pretty far from where they start after just a few hundred years of amateur work, provided the reproductive cycle is fast enough. Fat, small-frilled, short-horned ceratopsians, tottering flightless pteranodons sheared for pycnofibers like archosaurian sheep, etc.

But the real protein bonanza of the cretaceous has no spine.

Weighing up to a pound each, the dragonflies of the era are essentially flying, angry sausage. Rich in protein, fast-reproducing, and not terribly picky about what they eat.

So if you have a society that produces, logically, mountains of biological waste, what do you do?

You feel the waste to mealworms, you feed the mealworms to dragonflies, then you deep-fry the dragonflies and serve them with a zesty dipping sauce with a side of tubercakes and a seven gallon soft drink in a tasteful collector’s cup.

Avatar

Two comments on Trent’s addition:

1) Yes, pigs are that big.

2) Meganeura are not dragonflies, they’re morphologically very different once you get past the “silhouette” stage.  The name griffonflies has been suggested for them.

Griffinflies. I like it. Still basically flying angry sausage, and still available with your choice of dipping sauce, or get the sampler pack with thrice the bite for twice the price!

Here’s a distressing thought. Any number of dinosaur species that didn’t have direct survivors could have had evolved a milk analogue and it would be tricky to tell at best, and crop milk is a thing in birds, so who knows what kind of odd excretions one might harvest with the right horrors of natural and unnatural selection.

When my mother forgets a word, she is the queen of coming up with new words. Words that would take a third National Treasure movie to fully decipher. I was talking to her yesterday, and she said this: “You know the time for los jibbities is coming up. You must be so excited!” Oh, is it time for los jibbities already? I must have missed it on my calendar. Are we celebrating something? “Of course! We should all be celebrating, shouldn’t we?” OK, so los jibbities is a happy thing. It’s not like something is giving you the heebie-jeebies, which would have been my one and only guess. “Los heebie-jeebies? Now you’re making things up...and this is my show.” You’re right. The time for los jibbities is coming up. Is this a season? “Yes, the season for love. The season for pride.” OK, los jibbities. “Yeah, sound it out.” Los…jibbities. LGBTs! “Sí, mira cuz you’re gay!” “You couldn’t just say pride season? You couldn’t just… *laughs*

HAPPY LOS JIBBITIES EVERYONE

Avatar

happy pride month to country mama lynn and country mama lynn only

Someone give this woman a damn crown and medal

Happy pride month to country mama lynn and ger gay son only

aint it crazy how many people realize they're queer when they have the language to express how they feel and a support system to encourage self exploration????

I never stop enjoying reading this. Literally everyone's lives improves.

Avatar

Ancient legends say that if you reblog this on June you get 110% gayer and stronger

right at the beginning when she's like how do I help my son feel loved and accepted I'm here shouting "QUEEN YOU ALREADY DID THAT BY TAKING HIS SIDE AND LEAVING THAT NO GOOD HUSBAND FOR HAVING THE AUDACITY TO KICK YOUR BABY OUT!" And Good for her! this is the only response to a man who kicks out a child.

It’s been nagging at me for a while, so I’m going to try to put together my thoughts on the Quetzalcoatlus sequence in Prehistoric Planet 2. In the grand scheme of things it’s tiny, insignificant, and I loved Prehistoric Planet, but I’m not going to turn down the opportunity to talk at length about scavenging birds.

(Spoilers (?) for Prehistoric Planet 2 ahead. Go watch it!)

I’m talking about the part where a Tyrannosaurus is driven off from an Alamosaurus carcass (presumably carrion and not killed by the tyrannosaur). The tyrannosaur is expressly stated to be concerned about losing an eye to those Whopping Big Beaks. The pterosaurs aggressively fly over it a few times and honk angrily until the tyrannosaur walks away in Shameful Defeat, leaving the carcass to the pterosaurian pterrors.

And that confused me.

Before I go on, I want to point out that this is not a Who Would Win discussion, I’m not going to argue for or against one or another. Not going to discuss if Tyrannosaurus should really have won because of the massive weight advantage and lack of fragile bones/wings, or if the big landlubber had it coming and the numbers and aerial advantage was too much. I’m not arguing about Quetzalcoatlus being scary or not either (it’s scary as all hell).

No, the issue I had was with the beaks.

This is the Quetzalcoatlus as it appears in the show.

Impressive beak, isn’t it?

But it’s not the beak of a flesh tearer.

Let’s back up a bit. Birds that eat meat by tearing it into manageable chunks typically evolve sharp, hooked beaks to make up for the lack of teeth. Like this eagle for instance.

Majestic. They make the cutest sounds too. Look up golden eagle sounds, don’t believe the red-tailed hawk propaganda.

Raptor bills look intimidating, but they’re not there for killing. They’re cutlery. The talons do all the work, and then the beak tears up the meat into delicious gobbets of protein.

Even shrikes get in on the act. They don’t have killer feet, so they use their ripping bills to impale prey and tear at it.

Aw, look at it, it thinks it’s accipitrids.

The Quetzalcoatlus’ bill, though, doesn’t have that hook. It doesn’t look like the bill of a bird that dismembers its food. The closest thing I could think of to compare it with was stork bills. Specifically the marabou.

Ol’ pickaxe-for-a-face. This is the beak of an animal that stabs smaller prey and swallows them whole with minimum processing.

But a bill this long and pointed, turns out, is good for stabbing but not for tearing meat. Marabous are scavengers, but they won’t tear apart a carcass on their own. The “[b]ill [is] not well designed for dismembering carcasses, so [it] normally steals scraps from vultures or snatches up morsels that are dropped” (del Hoyo, Elliott, and Sargatal, 1992).

As you can see, vultures retained the hallmark accipitrid steak knife face, and are much better at Ripping and Tearing. This one (the lappet-faced vulture) generally goes first, being big and strong enough to Rip and Tear tough hide and get to the fleshy interior.

In fact, “[d]espite its huge bill, the [marabou] stork can rarely dominate a carcass and normally stands by the much more numerous vultures and nips in from time to time to snatch morsels which are dropped by others, though Tawny Eagles (Aquila rapax) in turn often steal food from the stork. The bill is not apparently very effective for cutting up meat and dismemberment is normally carried out quite simply by pulling” (del Hoyo, Elliott, and Sargatal, 1992). And if marabous have trouble with the average carcass, I wouldn’t imagine Quetzalcoatlus would fare much better with a titanosaur, which presumably has rather thick skin too.

One big happy family. That’s a much smaller carcass being shared (with the obligatory squabbling) by a whole bunch of dinosaurs. Neither vultures nor marabou are trying to monopolize it.

So… I don’t see why the big stork pterosaurs would chase away a perfectly good meat processor. I know everyone wants to see Big Prehistoric Animals Fighting With Lethal Intent, and everyone wants to see Tyrannosaurus Getting Knocked Down A Peg By The New Hotness, but I think it would have been a more interesting and believable scene - not to mention more in keeping with Prehistoric Planet’s attempt to be as scientifically believable as possible - if the pterosaurs acted like marabous the size of giraffes, both them and the tyrannosaur keeping a respectful distance of each other, and snapping up bits of meat left behind. And maybe the pterosaurs pulling the dinosaur’s tail for good measure, the way ravens bully eagles.

But it would make for a much less exciting scene. Who wants to watch a bunch of scavengers milling around a carcass and honking at each other as they jockey for the best morsels and settling their differences in ways that involve as little risk as possible? I mean, I do, but I don’t assume the average viewer does.

And that concludes my altogether far too long opinion on a single scene from a great series. Of course, I’m not a paleontologist and never will be, I’m only approaching this with what I know about birds, so please feel free to let me know if there’s any details of Quetzalcoatlus anatomy that do in fact suggest it could rip and tear!

References

del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; and Sargatal, J. eds. (1992) Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.

This guy raised an abandoned moose calf with his Horses, and believe it or not, he has trained it for lumber removal and other hauling tasks. Given the 2,000 pounds of robust muscle, and the splayed, grippy hooves, he claims it is the best work animal he has. He says the secret to keeping the moose around is a sweet salt lick, although, during the rut he disappears for a couple of weeks, but always comes home…. Impressive !! MINNESOTA CLYDESDALE

why are moose so terrifyingly large

Because they’re pretty much legit surviving Ice Age megafauna and almost everything was bigger back then

his moose leaves for a few weeks to Fuck

And comes back because he figures he has a pretty sweet deal.  Oats, salt, probably some treats and scratches, for the price of some basic pulling and advanced not murdering fools?

Sometimes I think people give themselves too much credit for animal domestication.  Sometimes the main character of the domestication story is some terrifying beast who reasons, “But salt though.”

ICYMI, there was fear that companies were scraping public AO3 fics to train their AI without the consent of AO3 or its users. That fear has been confirmed.

AO3 has written about what they’re doing (and what they’re not able to do), and they recommend restricting your work to AO3 registered users only. [Instructions here]

This gross misuse of the archive by techbros is why I’ve locked down my fics for the foreseeable future. I recommend the rest of you do the same.

The "and Ken" sign says so much. Not only do the police identify him as some crazily dressed guy just tagging along with an equally crazily dressed girl who just decked someone in the face, they also cuff him even though it seems like he hasn't done anything because he tagged along with his girlfriend even to get arrested.

He's an accessory even to a convicted Barbie. You do not separate a Ken from his Barbie even in jail. Ken is having the time of his life even in incarceration because he's there with Barbie.

I speak here as the unelected representative of Boyfriends who are Just Like That

Avatar

The Glorious Lilac

Ok, this should definitely have happened yesterday, but can I take this opportunity to talk about the lilac in Night Watch? Because honestly…

THE LILAC.

Yes, it’s a symbol of remembrance for the forgotten watchmen, the hopes they had, the camaraderie they shared, and the tragedy of their story. But what gets me every time I reread the book is that the lilac is even more than that. It’s a lot more than that. A harbinger of death, the spirit of Ankh-Morpork, a symbol of revolution and revolution…

Ok, ok.

For starters, not only is a sprig of lilac the way that Vimes et al remember their fallen friends, but in the context of the book itself, lilac is also constantly, constantly, foreshadowing their doom, and in a way, that doom happens because of it. Perhaps in a universe where the lilac bloomed at a different time of year, things would have turned out differently.

There are a few of these disquieting, environmental harbingers throughout the book - the humidity before the storm, the talk of unrest before we ever see any fighting in the streets - but only the lilac buds on the trees is present (as t’were) in the past and in the future.

And I’ve always loved the way that Vimes tends to smell lilac flowers before he sees them. Those first few pages, it’s all about the nostalgic smell. “The scent rolled over him…” “He sniffed at it. He stood for a moment, staring at nothing,” “He twirled the sprig of lilac in his fingers, and smelled again the heady smell.” “It went with the lilac, scent and song together”.

Similarly, our introduction to the lilac plumes is as amorphous as their scent. We first learn that lilac is used to commemorate something when we see Vimes and Vetinari wearing the sprigs, and it’s given emphasis by Colon’s reaction to Ping’s questions. But crucially, we don’t learn why they wear lilac, and that ignorance persists until:

‘I recall a battle once,’ said Dai Dickens, looking up at a tree. ‘In history, it was.’ … And now, Vimes thought, it ends.

Everything comes full circle.

For a fleeting second, Vimes truly believes that he’ll be able to change the story, but it’s May 25th, and the lilac is in bloom as it is every year, and once the flowers are picked he realises there’s no going back. He can alter so much, he can sacrifice everything, but he can’t change the nature of those irrepressible little flowers. The revolution ends, and the watchmen die. He was there, and all that’s left is the memory, and the lilac. As Vimes tells Ned Coates:

“Don’t put your trust in revolutions. They always come round again. That’s why they’re called revolutions. People die, and nothing changes.”

I also think lilac is the best way that Pterry tackles both meanings of revolution in one beautiful metaphor. Lilacs, like most flowers, are cyclical - they come and go every year - and they serve as an annual reminder to Vimes:

Overhead, a lilac tree was in bloom. He stared. Damn! Damn! Damn! Every year he forgot. Well, no. He never forgot. He just put the memories away, like old silverware that you didn’t want to tarnish. And every year they came back, sharp and sparkling, and stabbed him in the heart.

But if you pay attention to the way Pterry describes lilac in general, he talks about its growth and resilience, which is uncannily evocative of not only the revolution and social changes, but also the general progression that’s happened in the city over the years:

Up against one wall, lilac trees were growing. That is, at some point in the past a lilac had been planted there, and had given rise, as lilac will, to hundreds of whippy suckers, so that what had once been one stem was now a thicket. Every branch was covered in pale mauve blooms.

And it’s this why this quote (from when he’s in the past) is fast becoming my absolute favourite:

“Lilac was common in the city. It was vigorous and hard to kill and had to be. The flower buds were noticeably swelling. He stood and stared, as a man might stare at an old battlefield…

In those four sentences, Pratchett manages to bring so many themes together. I mean, let me rephrase this: Lilac - like ideas, protesters, entrepreneurial spirit, and all the little things and people working day after day, and even Vimes himself - is common in Ankh-Morpork. And lilac - like the city, and ideas, and protesters, and entrepreneurial spirit, all those people working day to day, and again, Vimes - is vigorous and hard to kill, and it has to be. “Little wheels must spin so the machine can turn”/”When we break down, it all breaks down.” The flower buds are noticeably swelling, forces are in motion, the city is progressing, revolution is looming, the story is beginning. Vimes looks up, and he sees memories that haven’t happened yet, and graves that won’t be dug for a few days yet. He sees both the future and the past, and it’s all in the lilac. (And if you go back to the quote at the end, Dai Dickens looks at the lilac and literally does remember an old battle… ‘in history, it was…’ jfc THIS BOOK)

I just… It’s breath-taking.

I really don’t think I’ll ever stop being blown away by the way Terry Pratchett managed to explore the themes of past, future, history, change, remembrance, and progress the way he did in this book, nor the way he took something as simple as a plume of lilac - common in the city, not a “proper” memorial, not a tableau in bronze - and made it so meaningful to so many people, that we could all hold it up in honour of him.

Avatar

I was planning to drop the items from the linked tweet thread onto this post, but there are SO MANY new bills that it became a wall of text - line after line after line of incredible things Minnesota has enacted in a single session.

  • Marijuana will be fully legal starting in August, but the bill also wipes past criminal records and sets up marginalized communities to benefit from the new incoming profits.
  • voting rights are restored immediately after leaving prison, probation is capped, and phone calls for prisoners are free now.
  • there are so many labor rights being added i can't begin to list them. an end to non-compete clauses, paid sick and family medical leave for the WHOLE STATE, unemployment for seasonal education workers, safety regulations for workers in warehouses and nursing, establishment of minimum wages for gig drivers!
  • carbon free electricity by 2040
  • cutting child poverty by 1/3 immediately
  • price caps for high cost pharmaceuticals
  • more funding for public transit, public defense, education, homelessness prevention, and the removal of ALL lead pipes in the state water system
  • roe v wade is codified, conversion therapy is banned, and other state's anti-trans bills are blocked for anyone receiving gender related care here.
  • undocumented immigrants can get drivers licenses and basic healthcare through the state
  • improvements to our already robust voting rights
  • basic gun safety laws, like background checks and red flag laws

I'm.... actually blown away. the political landscape often feels so hopeless, but the DFL pulled themselves together, getting every member on board for these changes - real changes that are going to protect health, keep people out of jail and housed, and improve work conditions massively. this should be a beacon for every other state democratic party - change doesn't have to be incremental. things can get better and they can get better right now. get crackin'.

(For those outside of Minnesota, DFL=Democratic/Farmer/Laborer party, which is affiliated with the national Democratic party. Farmers and Laborers were a political force in the upper midwest in the early part of the 20th century, and DFL emerged as a merger.)

Good for them! Makes Michigan look like loafers!

Another important thing DFL enacted this session! Minnesota has joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact!

The Daily Kos notes that it is possible for states representing 285 electoral votes to join by 2028. It’s a long shot, but encouraging!

A better world IS possible- if you vote for it

I keep seeing people being shocked and bewildered about airbnb being so crappy to use now

and it’s giving me the impression not everyone knows that is by design- all of those “disrupter” startups operate exactly the same way. So let me lay it out:

First the company starts with an enormous amount of seed money, and they enter an established industry offering the same product but dirt cheap and with the feel of luxury. They operate at a loss for years. They offer their product at such a reduced rate that they literally cannot profit off of it. They rely on their seed money and investment from other wealthy friends to get by. They do this until the other established companies in the industry are on their knees and begging to be bought out. Once all of the competitors have either collapsed or been bought out, the new disrupter company is safe to jack up its prices and reduce services/perks to get to a level that is profitable. It might end up being much more expansive than the industry was to start with, because now that competitors are gone the disrupter business has more room to squeeze customers dry without fear they’ll go to another company instead. The “we’re shaking this industry up to bring high quality products direct to the consumer” pitch has nothing to do with consumers and is entirely about eliminating competitors, particularly long standing well established ones.

This is how uber works, airbnb, all of those. It’s the same game the laundry mat chain in my neighborhood who offers free drying is playing- driving out competition so they have more freedom to price things higher.

Individual consumers often don’t have the luxury to be so choosy about what companies they buy from, but just be aware going in and don’t get taken by surprise later on.

By the way, Amazon is absolutely playing by this handbook, and so did Wal-Mart before it. It's very, very, very predictable.

Cory Doctorow has coined for this process the word “enshittification”. If you’ve read this far into this post, you shuold probably read that essay too.

This is not like a fully completed thought but yk

So I've done my first aid + CPR a few times. And every single time I try and bring up scenarios for fat folks

Specifically like 'what if someone is too large for me to wrap my arms around then to do the heimleich'

And its incredibly rare I get a decent answer.

How absolutely insane is it that me, as a fat person, is asking how to have MY life saved or to save ANOTHER life, is an impossible feat if someone is fat.

Most of the time they tell me to 'just try anyways uwu'

There has got to be a better option.

Avatar

From a first aid and CPR trainer, who is also fat.

The heimleich is scientifically as effective as slapping someone VERY hard on the back. The only reason it's so well taught is the man that invented it did a lot of great PR for himself. It's also a bit easier for smaller framed people to get the necessary force in, because people are often extremely scared to hurt people, even in life threatening situations.

With larger bodied people, whether they be fat, tall, muscular, etc. If you cannot get your arms around them, literally just slap the shit out of their shoulders. You want hard, open palmed slaps right in the center of the shoulders or slightly below.

If they are too tall for you to reach that high, guide them to lean over the back of a chair, and then slap slap slap slap slap.

It's been proven to be just as effective through many studies. It just doesn't have a trademarked name and a dramatic effect in film.

If you have to do CPR on a larger bodied person, again, fat, body builder, tall and broad, whoever, the trick to finding where you want to put your hands if going to be to take your hand and shove it in their armpit. No seriously. Put your hand in their armpit, then drag it in a straight line towards yourself until you're in the center of the chest, then put your other hand beneath that one. This is where you push. Then you are going to move the arm closest to you out of the way so you can get closer to them, and get the leverage you need to press down for compressions. The more of your body weight that is over your hands, the better the compression will be. Act like you are trying desperately to pack the last of your clothes in a suitcase, and just slam down hard on their chest.

They will make *horrible* noises. You might even break ribs.

But a broken rib is better than being dead.

One day, perhaps, other CPR and First Aid instructors will actually know and teach this shit. But the medical field is filled with people who don't know, don't care, or just outright hate fat people. So while this information won't fix your complaint, I do hope it helps someone out there with saving their loved ones, should it ever be needed.

Avatar

on the announcement that Disney+ is removing a plethora of shows and films from its service, please read these tweets from Willow writer John Bickerstaff. this is not a tax writeoff like Batgirl, because these projects have already been released. this is a move designed to cut off financial support in the form of residuals, and break the spirit of the strike. here is the deadline article that lists the films/shows that will be removed.

as always, donate to the entertainment community fund, vocally support the WGA online and irl, or join a picket in a major US city if you can. let them know they can't keep getting away with things like this.