i have news to break about parasocial relationships. everyone has them. oh did you get happy when you remembered the grocery store clerk who wished you a nice day a year ago? congratulations you've got a parasocial relationship. it's completely normal and something we all do. the word y'all are looking for is "invasive".
i get what you mean but a parasocial relationship describes a legitimate one sided relationship, not thinking fondly about someone you don’t know. you would have to be devoting your energy, time, and emotion to that store clerk and have constructed a persona in your mind of who you believed them to be before it could be classified as parasocial.
that’s why people describe obsessions with celebrities as parasocial, (parasocial relationships can exist with fictional characters) there’s a persona that you are devoted too completely one sidedly. parasocial relationships are also not inherently invasive. someone can be utterly delusionally obsessed with a persona without trying to pry into their inner life. i’m sure personal information sustains a parasocial relationship but equating parasocial to invasive just isn’t entirely accurate.
break parasocial and invasive down to the latin root ->
para (alongside of, beside)
in (in, on, or not,)
i’m thinking you’re probably tired of people misusing or overusing the word parasocial, i get that. but watering down a word that describes a legitimate social phenomenon does us no good! not everyone has parasocial relationships! and in fact i would say a majority of people don’t really have them at all.









