Officially bad at weed.
Let’s hope she doesn’t puke until *after* the bong is removed.

Officially bad at weed.
Let’s hope she doesn’t puke until *after* the bong is removed.
US Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction The indiscriminate use of bombs by the US, usually outside a declared war situation, for wanton destruction, for no military objectives, whose targets and victims are civilian populations, or what we now call “collateral damage.”
US Use of Chemical & Biological Weapons The US has refused to sign Conventions against the development and use of chemical and biological weapons, and has either used or tested (without informing the civilian populations) these weapons in the following locations abroad:
And the US has tested such weapons on US civilian populations, without their knowledge, in the following locations:
And the US has encouraged the use of such weapons, and provided the technology to develop such weapons in various nations abroad, including:
US Political and Military Interventions since 1945 The US has launched a series of military and political interventions since 1945, often to install puppet regimes, or alternatively to engage in political actions such as smear campaigns, sponsoring or targeting opposition political groups (depending on how they served US interests), undermining political parties, sabotage and terror campaigns, and so forth. It has done so in nations such as
US Perversions of Foreign Elections The US has specifically intervened to rig or distort the outcome of foreign elections, and sometimes engineered sham “demonstration” elections to ward off accusations of government repression in allied nations in the US sphere of influence. These sham elections have often installed or maintained in power repressive dictators who have victimized their populations. Such practices have occurred in nations such as:
US Versus World at the United Nations The US has repeatedly acted to undermine peace and human rights initiatives at the United Nations, routinely voting against hundreds of UN resolutions and treaties. The US easily has the worst record of any nation on not supporting UN treaties. In almost all of its hundreds of “no” votes, the US was the “sole” nation to vote no (among the 100-130 nations that usually vote), and among only 1 or 2 other nations voting no the rest of the time. Here’s a representative sample of US votes from 1978-1987:
In addition, the US has:
Sampling of Deaths >From US Military Interventions & Propping Up Corrupt Dictators (using the most conservative estimates)
Other Lethal US Interventions CIA Terror Training Manuals Development and distribution of training manuals for foreign military personnel or foreign nationals, including instructions on assassination, subversion, sabotage, population control, torture, repression, psychological torture, death squads, etc.
Specific Torture Campaigns Creation and launching of direct US campaigns to support torture as an instrument of terror and social control for governments in Greece, Iran, Vietnam, Bolivia, Uruguay, Brazil, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, and Panama
Supporting and Harboring Terrorists The promotion, protection, arming or equipping of terrorists such as:
Assassinating World Leaders Using assassination as a tool of foreign policy, wherein the CIA has initiated assassination attempts against at least 40 foreign heads of state (some several times) in the last 50 years, a number of which have been successful, such as: Patrice Lumumba (Congo), Rafael Trujillo (Dominican Republic), Ngo Dihn Diem (Vietnam) Salvador Allende (Chile)
Arms Trade & US Military Presence
This, then, is a sampling of American foreign policies over the last 50 years. The FBI uses the following definition for Terrorism: “The unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group or individual, who has some connection to a foreign power or whose activities transcend national boundaries, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” This sounds like the terrorism we just experienced. It also sounds a lot like the US policies and actions since 1945 that I’ve just described.
This is a version of an an original page atributed to Robert Elias, a US Professor of Political Science , a list which, like so many others, has otherwise ‘disappered’
“US Perversions of Foreign Elections” should also include 2018 Brazil, now that it is confirmed that the FBI directly intervened to have the frontrunner jailed, resulting in the election of Jair Messias Bolsonaro
This has done more positive impact for the autistic community than any autism organization has.
2006-2008 Dodge Ram 1500
everything actually falls on a binary scale of “badass” and “cute” and god punishes me every time I step out of line by being both or neither but I do it anyway this time out of spite
sorry bud… you are fucked…
I think so much of the outlook over fandom would change if many people treated it like it is: a goddamn hobby.
A fandom group is no better nor more revolutionary than a knitting club. It can replicate any real world biases and discriminations and it can also be used to raise money/group people towards causes. It can foster connections that will turn to actual real political action or it can just be a gathering of people who don't know much about each other outside of it.
It can be lovely to experience when you're surrounded by a lovely group and it can be hell when the group is full of cattiness and pettiness . It can be inclusive or it can be exclusive when you're surrounded by bigotry.
Because it's a group of people - it's going to have problems. And when there's a conflict or people are pointing shit out, it needs to be solved so its members aren't spit out in the sake of "avoiding drama". Because it's a group of people, it's not automatically changing the world in a blaze of self grandeur. Because it's a group of people with a common hobby, it can impact its members lives for the better and give them a space to express themselves.
Fandom is a goddamn knitting club. It's not this inherent great, subversive force of good nor this den of evil that's traumatisizing the children. Chill out.
Other examples of that are like... you want to wear a dress but being seen as a girl would be upsetting. You gotta think like "why do I want to wear the dress?"
You like it because it's beautiful? Then you have to remind yourself you'll look beautiful. Regardless of what gender people see you.
Like if you really like it and you really want to wear it, you should focus on that attribute.
Maybe people will think you're a beautiful woman, but the first thing they think will be beautiful. Or if you have a fun shirt, or cool pants, or whatever. People are going to notice that you are fun/cool. For most people gender is background info. It's secondary. And if you love the outfit enough that you want to push back dysphoria, that's what you should remember.
Obviously not everyone can do this, or wants to do this. But for people that do, that's what I think...
Months of work and a discontinued yarn later and I've finished my 🌈 Rainbow Hexagon Blanket. Totally worth it. 😅
there’s no way humans could build the Eiffel Tower
must've been the animals
Peer reviewed and passed.
I think the reason we collectively love the haiku bot so much is because it’s a gentle, persistent reminder that there is poetry in the mundane.
wallace gromited so that chicken run. is this something
well you can’t say i didn’t try ❤️
i’m in spain rn and i said wallace gromited so that chicken run to my friend on the bus and the woman in front of us looked back at us then pulled out english duolingo
[ID: a photo of a ceramic plate on a transparent background. there’s strawberries and flowers painted on it with the words ‘I spread like strawberries’ above it]
The difference between 1/2 cup of rice and 1 cup of rice is like 18 cups of rice
(pt: Closer Nine Inch Nails Stimboard! /end pt)
x.x.x-x.o.x-x.x.x
☼ requested by anon