Avatar

Drawings I guess and Reposts too

@goulishcoffin

22yrs old. They're ( I'm ) pretty shitty right , Just fixed the asks thing if any one cares .. Wow, extra info I just added : I am a straight female , a Virgo , ( apparently rising ) , Year of Dragon ( 2000) , INFJ ( Ni , Fe , Ti , Se ) For now all I know is that my alignment is Lawfully Good , dunno , Said element Earth , I also would like to mention I have ADD . ( will update with more info I guess , just want followers to know a couple things about me )

4th century CE Roman amber pins, found in 2020 at the feet of an individual who was buried in a large sarcophagus at a necropolis in the French city of Autun.

These are stunning pins, crafted with exquisite attention to detail and symmetry…but what’s even more clever about them is the material they are made out of.

Amber is ever so slightly “sticky” as a surface (which makes sense, since it’s age-hardened sap / resin).  It can be polished until it’s virtuall glass-smooth, but when tucked into hair, or into the fibers of a woven garment, it will have just a tiny bit more friction, causing them to have that much more of a chance to remain in place.  As a material for securing things, they are slightly better than metal and bone, if not quite as good as wood (which has a great deal of microscopic texture for hair, etc, to catch on and cling to).

Most forms of amber are very clouded from inclusions when it was still sap, and fractal from the pressures it underwent as it hardened over the aeons.  To be able to find pieces as large and clear as these are makes them all the more rare.  Unlike metal or bone (and somewhat like wood) these pins would feel warmer to the touch, and be more comfortable and comforting for the owner, while being less fragile than wood.  And lastly, amber does have a faint scent as it warms up, making them a natural perfume source.

These are not cheap throwaway objects, folks.  These are indeed treasured posessions, just as much for their functionality & multi-use offerings as for their rarity and beauty.

Reblogging for all that extra amber trivia because it’s fascinating

In the recent Undertale newsletter, Toby Fox showed off an unused scene that would have occurred in the Judgement Hall had the player decided to speedrun the game! This scene features Sans chastising the player for being early and slowly eating an ice cream for about a full minute while an original, slow song plays. I’m sure this would have been quite a headache for speedrunners!

(The scene can be viewed in it’s entirety here)

Avatar

*Chanting * FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAFFNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF FNAF

FNAF!!!!!!!

Reblog if u agree

This got me dying

who paid for this study bruh

it’‘s literally seasoning.  that’s it. that’s what make food taste good.

Bro it’s more complex than just ‘ey they used seasoning’ 

It’s HOW they used seasoning, compared to other areas of the world. 

Indian seasoning does this neat color wheel of flavor, fitting a bunch of spices that are very DIFFERENT from each other, to create a huge range of complex flavor. 

Meanwhile in Italy for instance, they tend to use flavors that are SIMILAR. For instance, Basil and Oregano, or Sweet fish with Sweet wine. It makes foods less likely to contrast weirdly in your mouth, and it’s the basis of why fancy european people pair red wines with steak and white wines with chicken. Savory with Savory, Light with Light.   

“ That like flavors should be combined for better dishes—an unspoken but popular hypothesis stipulated by recipe-building in North American, Western European, and Latin American cultures—is an idea essentially reversed in Indian cuisine. “

well yes, spices need to not just complement the food but contrast against each other. to get maximum flavour when cooking indian food:

1. use whole spices, dry roast small quantities of individual spices together and then grind them to a powder. balance is what you’re looking for, not just chucking in handfuls of seasonings willy nilly because quantity does not equal flavour when it comes to spicing indian food. 

2. whole spices go in the oil first. always. also everything gets fried on its own before it’s chucked into the sauce/curry. even the curry base is started off by frying onions/ginger/garlic/tomatoes or any combination thereof. basically…FRY THAT SHIT. i don’t know of any regional cuisine in india that uses stock for simmering. frying everything individually is how we add flavour instead.  

3. indian food needs to be cooked long and slow for the flavours to really merge. don’t skimp on the cooking time if you can because that makes a huge difference. 

This was so enlightening

I feel a need to mention that the researchers for this study are NOT white, as stated above. They’re Indian. It’s Indian people saying “why does our cuisine work and taste so vastly different than anywhere else in the world?” To quote from the article:

“Researchers Anupam Jaina, Rakhi N Kb, and Ganesh Bagler from the Indian Institute for Technology in Jodhpur ran a fine-tooth comb through TarlaDalal.com—a recipe database of more than 17,000 dishes that self-identifies as “India’s #1 food site”—in attempts to decode the magic of your chicken tikka masala or aloo gobi.”

There’s a major misunderstanding in how a lot of people understand science. There’s this idea that there’s a frontier of stuff we don’t know and a big block of stuff we do. Their first reaction is to scoff because we already “know” that Indian food “uses spices” and that’s why it tastes good. Why waste time re-treading that ground to come to the conclusion you already have?

In reality, the frontiers of knowledge are everywhere. Most of what gets studied is common everyday stuff because we generally have a good grip on what stuff does but the holes are in the “how it does it”. And we don’t know anything to perfect certainty, only degrees of relative certainty, and in varying levels of precision. 

The person who says the Earth is flat isn’t making a terribly large miscalculation of the curviture of the Earth, and on a local scale it may not impact their day to day life, but they are still wrong. The person who says the Earth is round is also wrong, but the model is off from reality significantly less. The one who says the planet is an oblate spheroid futher brings the model into precision, but ultiamtely, the only perfect 1:1 model of the planet, is the planet. 

Every measurement is going to have a margin of error. Doesn’t mean we should just stop at the sphere, or even the oblate spheroid.

I will never forget a book I had as a kid that was basically “scientific answers to everyday phenomena most people cannot explain”. And most of the book was exactly like that. Stuff like why does a plane actually fly or why can’t you cool down the earth by turning up the fridge and air conditioning.

Anyway what always stuck with me from this book is that one of the questions was “why do shower curtains get pulled inwards when you shower” and the chapter listed a couple possible reasons but ended with “but really we cannot fully explain why this happens, probably because nobody gets paid to investigate the behaviour of shower curtains”

reblog the money pigeon for a financially stable future

I reblog  the money pigeon because I love him.