Listen up horror/murder writers! You keep on using inaccurate facts when you’re writing and it’s pissing me off!!
1. Chloroform A: the most common inaccurately written tool.
The Problem- We’ve all heard of it and we all know that with a few sniffs the victim will be knocked out, right? WRONG.
The Reality- Chloroform isn’t some miracle drug; it’s kinda fast acting, but it still takes ~5 minutes to actually work. 5 fricking minutes of holding the chloroform soaked cloth in the proper position while the victim is punching and kicking and fighting. Tl;dr IT’S NOT QUICK AND EASY!
2. Chloroform B: Hahaha I’m not done ranting about it yet, because this stupid drug has another flaw!
The Problem- A character drugs someone, actually manages to knock them out with the chloroform, and now they’re doing whatever with the unconscious victim. Most commonly kidnapping them. Hours later, the victim awakes tied up in a warehouse or something. They scream, it’s scary, it’s INCORRECT.
The Reality- A character manages to knock someone out with chloroform. Let’s say it took 5 minutes. Whelp, the character now has around 5 minutes until their victim regains consciousness! Chloroform not only takes time to work, but it also only knocks people out for a time equivalent to how long they were breathing it. It’s “fast” acting and very fast wearing off. You want the character to hold it over their face after their victim has passed out in order to prolong the effect? If you wanna severely increase the risk of brain damage and death, then go for it! If you want an unharmed unconscious victim, however, then you’ll need to find a different drug.
3. Strangulation: Ugghhhh this one really bugs me because I’ve only seen it done correctly a few times.
The Problem- A character puts a bag over the victim’s face (Or just chokes them. Really this happens with all forms), and after the victim passes out they’re determined to be dead.
The Reality: Noooo they are NOT dead yet! They are passed out! Adult humans to have their air cut off for AT LEAST 3-4 full minutes for the brain to even start dying! Keep your characters strangling until the pulse has disappeared and definitely isn’t coming back.
4. Knives: I was so steamed by this one that I literally risked self injury just to prove my point lmao.
The Problem- Writers seem to enjoy gentle mutilation, and honestly, I get it. A bit of fluff to even out the gore can be nice… when it’s done right. There is no “I gently ran the knife along their skin, reveling in the red beads of blood that dribbled up.”
The Reality- A knife “gently” run across the skin isn’t going to do shit. Seriously. I grabbed a freshly sharpened, never used razor blade and after softly attempting to cut myself, I didn’t even leave a scratch, let alone draw blood. A sharp knife can’t do any damage unless you actually apply pressure!!
5. Mind Control: A'ight, the kind of mind control you often see in media isn’t real or possible, but there’s still a way you can screw up writing it.
The Problem- It’s way, way too common for me to read something along the lines of “they wanted to break free and turn away, but they found they couldn’t care enough to do so.”
The Reality- Basically, when you write this, you’re saying they want to do something but at the same time don’t *really* want to or care to do it. This oxymoron is nonsensical, and despite knowing that the writer says this to make the scene more dramatic, all it accomplishes (at least for me) is drawing the reader’s focus away from the story and to the strange way it was written.
6. Duct Tape A: A very inefficient way to shut people up.
The Problem- when writing about kidnapping, it seems a lot of writers believe duct tape is the Go To™ way to shut the victim up. Have you ever had your mouth taped shut? For most writers I’ve seen, the answer is, quite obviously, no.
The Reality- Lemme tell you that 99% of people have tongues, and there is no duct tape in the world strong enough to prevent the victim from sticking out their tongue, wetting the tape, then simply opening their mouth to rip it off. It’s literally so easy to get duct tape off your mouth!! If you still insist on using duct tape to shut the victim up, then have the aggressor wrap that tape around their entire head. Multiple times to be safe. If it goes all the way around, then chances are not only will it be 100x harder to get out of, but they aren’t going to even want to get it off since it’s sticking to their hair as well.
7. Duct Tape B: Admittedly I’ve only ever seen this situation used once, but it was done WRONG so I figured I’d add it in to fix that 100% fail rate lol.
The Problem- a certain favorite game of mine had the aggressor place 2 pieces of duct tape over the main characters face; one piece over the mouth and another over their nose. The purpose was to cut off the main character’s ability to breathe.
The Reality- I wasted multiple pieces of duct tape and could never get it lined up so that it completely blocked off all air. I’m sure using the solution from Duct Tape 1 you could eventually get it to work, but simply sticking two pieces of tape over your breathing holes is not going to suffocate you in 99% of scenarios.
8. Drugs: Whether it’s for kidnapping, murder, torture, or whatever else an aggressor is doing, a lot of writers will include the use of drugs as a means to an end; in many cases said drug is injected while the main character is alone, and they pass out practically instantaneously.
The Problem- This isn’t really a big deal because I know there are indeed fast, nearly immediately acting drugs in existence. The problem I have with this is trope is the type of drug used is never specified because such efficient methods are really hard to obtain unless you’re specifically working with them for your job.
The Reality- Seriously, if you look up fast acting drugs (besides chloroform), the best you’re gonna find is stuff that takes a minimum of like 15 minutes to have any sort of effect. Sure, the aggressor could have designed their own concoction, but then how can they guarantee that it won’t be deadly? It all just seems like a really sketchy and half baked idea, especially if the aggressor has zero knowledge about chemistry, pharmacology, and/or biology.
9. Open Your Mouth: Often used on little kids who don’t want to take their medicine, but kidnappers, abusers, etc have been shown doing it to. The victim will be refusing to open their mouth because they don’t want to ingest medicine or whatever, so the antagonist will holds their nose, stating “you can’t hold your breath forever” or some threatening phrase like that until eventually the victim concedes, opening wide to take a breath and inadvertently allowing the antagonist access to their mouth/throat.
The Problem- You don’t need to open your mouth super wide to breath. Seriously, usually only a child will lack enough common sense to actually fall victim to this “trap.”
The Reality- Try this at home! Close your mouth, hold your nose, and try to breathe through a tiny slit in between your lips. If you purse your lips just right, a person shouldn’t be able to tell your mouth is open at all! Sure your breathing may be a bit more shallow, but it’s still better than getting forcefully drugged!
10. Inject Air Between the Toes: Evade forensic detection by injecting air between a victim’s toes! Many drug addicts inject themselves there so it won’t seem as suspicious, it’s air so there’s nothing to detect in the body, and the body will die after a few hours from an air embolism resulting in heart attack, stroke, or respiratory failure. What could go wrong?
The Problem: No matter how simple this murder method seems, there’s way too many possible ways it could go wrong for it to be considered an effective and viable murder method.
The Reality: Not only is it just based on “luck” that the venous/arterial embolism will actually travel to the right place to cause death, but it has to be more than just a little air to even cause damage. On top of that, the idea that you’re “hiding” the obviousness of an injection is only effective if the victim is already a drug user. Forensic scientists look for causes of death, and though it’s small a single syringe pinprick in a person who doesn’t do drugs would probably be cause for extreme suspicion.