Avatar

cloudy with a chance of spicy autism

@fogwithwheels / fogwithwheels.tumblr.com

Just another queer disabled person blogging when their brain fog is too bad to do anything else. I swear quite frequently and it's very difficult for me to tag all my swearing. slowly returning from an accidental hiatus. Dangerously poor. If you're able, especially if my activism or words have helped you, or you talk about helping autistics and/or disabled people, consider donating and helping keep me alive and able to continue my advocacy work kofiwidget2.init('Buy Me a Coffee', '#46b798', 'A751BM4');kofiwidget2.draw();

Signs you grew up lonely

- Chasing people who don’t want you

-Making up lots of stories and worlds

-Overtalking whenever there’s someone to talk to

-Excessive reading

-Daydreaming

-Clinging emotionally to others

-Being the ‘disposable’ friend in the group

-Excessive baths

-Talking to oneself

-Obsessive friendships

-Excessive helpfulness

me, finally getting a chance to say something I’ve thought about for twelve days straight: oh, hey, that reminds me, funny thing, this just came to mind but

So I was told that Human Planet had a segment about pigeons in the Cities episode that I might be interested in and I was honestly so underwhelmed. I haven’t finished the episode so maybe there’s more pigeon stuff but I feel like all I saw was more Birds Of Prey Are The Only Cool And Acceptable Birds and pigeons are Trespassers In Our Urban World Who Shit On Everything And Are Useless On Top Of It. Which isn’t true and I’m so tired of this being framed as some horrible burden that humanity must face. Pigeons are the victims here, not us. 

Hate of pigeons didn’t start until the 20th Century. Before that was about 9,900 years of loving them. The rock pigeon was domesticated 10,000 years ago and not only that, we took them freaking everywhere. Pigeons were the first domesticated bird and they were an all-around animal even though they were later bred into more specialised varieties. They were small but had a high feed conversion rate, in other words it didn’t cost a whole lot of money or space to keep and they provided a steady and reliable source of protein as eggs or meat. They home, so you could take them with you and then release them from wherever you were and they’d pretty reliably make their way back. Pigeons are actually among the fastest flyers and they can home over some incredible distances (what fantastic navigators!). They were an incredibly important line of communication for multiple civilisations in human history. You know the first ever Olympics? Pigeons were delivering that news around the Known World at the time. Also, their ability to breed any time of year regardless of temperature or photoperiod? That was us, we did that to them, back when people who couldn’t afford fancier animals could keep a pair or two for meat/eggs. 

Rooftop pigeon keeping isn’t new, it’s been around for centuries and is/was important to a whole variety of cultures. Pigeons live with us in cities because we put them there, we made them into city birds. I get that there are problems with bird droppings and there’s implications for too-large flocks. By all means those are things we should look to control, but you don’t need to hate pigeons with every fibre of your being. You don’t need to despise them or brush them off as stupid (they have been intelligence tested extensively as laboratory animals because guess what other setting they’re pretty well-adapted to? LABORATORIES!) because they aren’t stupid. They’re soft intelligent creatures and I don’t have time to list everything I love about pigeons again. You don’t need to aggressively fight them or have a deep desire to kill them at all. It’s so unnecessary, especially if you realise that the majority of reasons pigeons are so ubiquitous is a direct result of human interference.

We haven’t always hated pigeons though, Darwin’s pigeon chapter in The Origin of Species took so much of the spotlight that publishers at the time wanted him to make the book ONLY about pigeons and to hell with the rest because Victorian’s were obsessed with pigeons (as much as I would enjoy a book solely on pigeons, it’s probably best that he didn’t listen).  My point is, for millenia, we loved pigeons. We loved them so much we took them everywhere with us and shaped them into a bird very well adapted for living alongside us.

It’s only been very recently that we decided we hated them, that we decided to blame them for ruining our cities. The language we use to describe pigeons is pretty awful. But it wasn’t always, and I wish we remembered that. I wish we would stop blaming them for being what we made them, what they are, and spent more time actually tackling the problems our cities face.  

I just have a lot of feelings about how complex and multidimensional hating pigeons actually is

ALL OF THIS

And also pigeon poop was a very valuable fertilizer before we had other options, people would hire guards to stop thieves from stealing their flock’s poop.

#LovePigeonsAgain2016

Late night, reblogging, so bear with me here… Thank you for posting much of my thoughts over the past year and a half! I am known by many as “that guy who keeps the raptors”. Yes this is true, I do keep and handle raptors for educational purposes, but what many fail to realize is, I am fascinated with pigeons. My interest with birds began with the obvious, the raptors, corvids, and parrots. Then I discovered pigeons. These wonderful little birds with big attitudes and the incredible ability to thrive among people.  The organization I work with got its first pigeon a little over a year ago. She was a rescue with nowhere else to go. I was quickly drawn to her character and attitude about life. We rarely handled her, but we did spend time with her. She grew attached to our volunteers very quickly because their were no other birds she could socialize with in our facility. 

We never intended to train her for educational programs. It was a job reserved for our raptors. It was our pigeon who decided she would be a part of what we were doing. One day, when we entered her enclosure to change water and food, she decided to fly to my hand and perch like our raptors do. 

No training, no treats, just the reward of being with us. 

What we hadn’t noticed for the couple months prior was her watching us. This brilliant little bird had been watching us every day as we trained and worked with our raptors. Finally she decided she didn’t want to be left out any longer. She made her place on our hands.

This occurred several times before we finally put her on a glove and brought her into the public. Needless to say, she was right at home. She fluffed up and preened the entire evening while people gawked and asked us why we had a pigeon on one glove and a hawk on another. 

Since then, we’ve added 5 more rescued pigeons to our growing flock. And our pigeon (Tybalt) has become a mainstay ambassador for our programs. Each of our pigeons are incredibly fun to watch and interact with. Pigeons simply don’t get enough love. They are marvelous creatures incredibly suited to life alongside people both physically and mentally. 

Raptors my have been my introduction into birds, but pigeons opened my eyes to a new appreciation for them and the fascinating world of bird cognition.

Avatar

NOT ONLY are pigeons very amazing, worth our respect, and INTERESTING (did you read any of that stuff above?), but they are beautiful too! Look how lovely:

Photo by .jocelyn.

They have a complex and fascinating social structure, both within a flock and with other individuals:

Photo by Ingrid Taylar

AND THEY ARE JUST SUPER CUTE, HONESTLY:

Not chickens, but I feel compelled to spread this gospel.

Avatar

hmmm. this is making me rethink my new york pigeon hate

and, AND, haven’t you ever wondered why city pigeons come in a magnificent rainbow of unusual colors?

Most wild animals all look alike within a species, with TINY, RARE individual variations in terms of rare color morphs, unusually big or small animals, different facial markings and other subtleties. But there is no evolutionary benefit to having species where everyone looks slightly different, and in fact, it’s beneficial for species to be similar and consistent, with a distinctive aesthetic. Especially if you’re trying to blend into the environment - a black wolf is all very well, but it looks positively silly in the summer tundra, where its grey/brown/brindley cousins blend in. A white deer has a great aesthetic - and a very short lifespan in the forest. Distinctive Protagonist looks are rare in the wild, simply because natural selection usually comes down heavily on them.

To humans, most wild animals are visually indistinguishable from each other.

As a result, most wild animals are like

“Oh it’s obvious - you can tell the twins apart because Kara has a big nose.”

Wild animals usually have a pretty consistent aesthetic within their species. It’s important to them!

SO WHAT IS GOING ON WITH PIGEONS?

Image

Look, in one small picture you’ve got a red color morph in the center, several melanistic dark morphs, a few solid black birds, a few variations on the wildtype wing pattern, a PIEBALD, a piebald copper color morph…

Like, there are LAYERS UPON LAYERS of pigeon diversity in most flocks you see. Pure white ones with black wingtips. Solid brown ones with pink iridescent patches. Pale pinkish pigeons.

WHY IS THAT? When other wild animals consider “being slightly fluffier than my brother” to be dangerously distinctive in most circumstances? BECAUSE CITY PIGEONS AREN’T TRULY WILD.

MANY OF THEM (POSSIBLY MOST OR ALL) ARE FERAL MIXES.

THEY WERE ONCE BELOVED PETS, SPECIAL MESSENGERS, EXQUISITE SHOW-WINNERS, AND PRIZED LIVESTOCK.

THEIR PRETTY COLORS WERE DELIBERATELY INTRODUCED BY HUMANS.

AND NOW THEIR HUMANS DON’T LOVE THEM ANY MORE.

See, pigeon fanciers bred (and still breed!) a huge array of pigeons. And the resulting swarms of released/discarded/escaped/phased out “fancy” pigeons stayed around humans. What else were they going to do? They interbred with wildtype pigeons.

Lots of the pigeons you see in public are feral. They’re not wild animals. They’re citizen animals. They’re genetically engineered. And now that’s what “city” pigeons are.

These “wild” horses are all different colors because they’re actually feral. Mustangs in the American West are the descendants of imported European horses - they’re an invasive domestic species that colonized an ecological niche, but they are domestic animals. Their distinctive patterns were deliberately bred by humans. A few generations of running around on the prairie isn’t going to erase that and turn them back into wildtypes. If you catch an adult mustang and train it for a short period, you can ride it and have it do tricks and make it love you. It’s a domestic animal. You can’t really do that with an adult zebra.

No matter how many generations these dogs stay on the street and interbreed with one another, they won’t turn back into wolves. They can’t. They’re deliberately genetically engineered. If you catch one (even after generations of rough living, even as an adult) you can make it stare at your face, care about your body language, and love you.

City pigeons? Well, you don’t have to like them, but they’re in the same boat. They’re tamed animals, bred on purpose, living in a human community. Their very bodies are marked with their former ownership and allegiance; they cannot really return to what they once were; if you caught one, you could make it love you (in a limited pigeon-y way.) They have gone to “the wild,” but not very far from us, and they’d be happy to come back.

So next time you see a flock of city pigeons, spare a moment to note their diversity. The wing patterns. The pied, mottled and brindled. The color types.

All of it was once meant to please you.

I am now on Team Pigeon.  Thank you.

Aww, the pigeon discourse has come home to my dash again! Like a homing pigeon.

Team Pidgeon!!!!

Long post, reblog, pigeon, bird

what do Thanos and Lavender Brown (harry potter character both have in common?

They both were played by Black actors until the point where they had to take centre stage

Damion Poitier played Thanos in the Avengers(2012) post-credit scene

Kathleen Cauley played Lavender brown in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secret and Jennifer Smith played Lavender Brown in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 

In the mid-90s there was this thing that happened in our sort of.. .elementary school parent social culture which I like to call- The Peanut Panic.  

Now, I want to start by saying I think the peanut panic is actually, ultimately, a good thing.  Because suddenly you had this previously unheard of awareness and caution about deadly food allergies springing up in elementary and middle schools.  

.

Suddenly it became seriously not ok to bring in class goodies with nuts of any kind ESPECIALLY peanuts, and those who chose to ignore those warnings were appropriately educated.  One of the kids I went to school with (whose mom was actually my mom’s best friend) went to the ER one day because some kid’s mom decided it wasn’t important enough to keep nuts out of the brownies she sent for the class.  And they were chopped small enough that he didn’t notice and had to be treated for anaphylaxis. (He was ok in the end, but it was pretty terrifying for all involved).

.

But the downside of the peanut panic is that even now, there’s this assumption that food allergies always equal death.  So if you have a mild or even moderate food allergy and you try to avoid it- you can often end up in an endless loop of not being allergic enough to be considered allergic.

.

Celiacs deal with this A TON.  Aside from the obvious battle to just be taken seriously at all (which is bullshit), there is a lot of- “but it’s not like gluten will KILL YOU so it’s not an allergy.”  

.

Except it is.  I have a similar problem with nightshades, so does my sister.  We’re both allergic, in varying degrees, to nightshades. I got lucky and mine is what you might call relapsing/remitting.  (which is a pain in the ass).  Hers though, is not.  For me, when my allergy is active and I eat nightshades (which in case you don’t know is all the delicious veggies like potatoes and tomatoes and peppers and chilis … oh, and eggplant), I end up spending anywhere from  hours to DAYS in the bathroom.  In extreme cases I will not only have… digestive issues? But I’ll also end up throwing up everything I’ve eaten in the last month.  It can get BAD.

.

Odds are though, it won’t ever actually kill me. 

But that doesn’t mean I’m not allergic.  My sister experiences her allergy expression in pain.  Body aches and pains all over, constantly, for days.  She didn’t even figure out what was causing it until I mentioned my allergy and she did an elimination diet to test it.

.

We are both allergic.  We’re not going to die if we eat a tomato, or have french fries.  But you better believe we make sure it’s worth the pain first.

.

The point is- we really need non-allergic people to stop equating all food allergies with death.  Because it’s just not that simple.  And having a non-lethal food allergy is no less valid than having a lethal one.  So when your friend or loved one says, I can’t eat this I’m allergic- don’t flip out and invalidate it just because you know it won’t flat out kill them.  BELIEVE people with food allergies- no matter how severe or uncommon.  And RESPECT those allergies.  Don’t try to be sneaky and slip in things they’ve said they’re allergic to.  Just because it won’t kill them doesn’t make it ok to fuck with someone’s system and you have no idea what kind of misery you’re handing out just because you want to roll your eyes and stay ignorant.

.

And if someone gives YOU shit about your non-lethal food allergy remind them- people don’t generally die because of their seasonal allergies, or allergies to dust- but that doesn’t make them any less allergic.

Also remember: shit can get worse over time.

So those times people screw with you add up.

And things can start having increasingly dangerous consequences.

Never fuck with people’s allergies, and never feel bad telling people off if they try anything.

This might come as a shock to some of you but saying “I’m not informed enough on this particular topic to have an opinion” is about 100 times more respectable than being misinformed

Avatar

I know in school they often teach us that ‘I don’t know’ is the worst possible answer and that you are better off making your best guess than admitting ignorance, but that’s because the educational system is a dumpster fire, and this is a habit that it pays to un-learn.

I figured out a simple guide to the alignment chart last night

Lawful: Rules matter more to me than individuals. Chaotic: Individuals matter more to me than rules.

Good: Other people’s well-being is more important than my own. Evil: My own well-being is more important than other people’s.

Neutrals: My opinion of what is more important is determined on a case-by-case basis.

So a Lawful Good character’s guiding moral philosophy might be “I follow the rules because the rules keep people safe, even if they are sometimes inconvenient or harmful to me or other individuals.” A Chaotic Evil character’s guiding moral philosophy would be like “Screw the rules and screw you.”

This is a very succint way of explaining a long post from a few months ago. It is also kind of how it was originally written, and is what I use. No more “Is he chaotic neutral or chaotic evil” questions.

It also makes Evil a playable alignment

I’m Paige. She/her or they/them.  I have bipolar type 1, ME/CFS, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain syndrome.  I use a cane and a wheelchair, but am mostly homebound and unable to work.  I’m in the super long SSI app process.  Meanwhile, my cripple mum and I are living off her tiny SSDI payments.  I get food stamps, she does not.  I try to get editing work (I have my MA in English), but it’s hard to come by.

My late father’s family has disowned me for identifying as queer/genderqueer (they think it’s a bad word) and “panhandling” (having a fundraiser).  My mother’s family is anti-queer, so we don’t have much support.  I have Celiac disease, and my gluten free food is more expensive than normal; we struggle to pay for food when the food stamps run out.

Please, please RT if you can.  Any donation amount helps; truly.  I am also available to do editing, copywriting, and resumè makeover work.  Thank you.

Being the caregiver of an autistic / disabled person does not give you free reign to mention they still wear diapers.

You aren’t educating anyone when you do that. You’re pity-seeking and you’re embarrassing the disabled / autistic person unless they gave you permission to mention their diapers. If the person’s development progresses in a way to let them be mainstreamed in school (even if part-time), their peers will be relentless. Yes, the stuff you blog is seen by everyone unless your blog is strictly private.

But most caregivers never friggin’ consider that. (Sarcasm) It’s all about them and how they are affected by living with an autistic / disabled person, right? (/sarcasm)

Stephen Hawking managed to go through the last years of his life without the internet knowing what’s under his trousers. I think you caregivers can afford the same dignity to the autistic / disabled person in your life.

If they want to mention their own diapers, fine. That’s their choice. Stop taking it away from them.

Write Your Story

I just showed my 11-year-old son how many coffee shop AUs there are on AO3.

Why?

He sat down the other day to write a Minecraft story about three kids who go through a portal in their back yard and end up in the world of Minecraft where they have to battle all the big bosses (I didn’t even realize there WERE big bosses in Minecraft but that’s beside the point). He wrote three chapters with a little input from me – his first beta – and y'all?

He was fucking excited. To be writing a story.

Today he came home from school and seemed a little down, so I asked him about it only to find out that some little asshole at his school told him, “There is already a Minecraft story.”

Me: Okay? So what?

Lucifer: If there’s already a story, no one will read mine.

Immediately, I dragged him in and pulled up my AO3 account. My boys know I write fanfiction, so I showed him my account and how many subscribers I have. Then I showed him how many Teen Wolf stories there are. And then, because it seemed like the perfect analogy, I said, “What if I wrote a story where two characters meet in a coffee shop and fall in love? No werewolves, nothing at all to do with the actual Teen Wolf universe. Just Stiles and Derek meet in a coffeeshop and fall in love.”

He laughed.

I showed him Mornings Aren’t For Everyone. Showed him how many hits it had, how many kudos, how many lovely comments.

Then I said, “So do you think, if anyone else wrote a story about those exact same characters meeting in a coffee shop and falling in love… would anyone read it?”

He laughed and said, “No because you already did.”

So I clicked on the Sterek tag and refined to coffee shop AU. His mind was blown to see that they ALL had thousands of hits and kudos and comments. Then I clicked on JUST the coffee shop AU tag and showed him all the fics across all the fandoms written by countless different people.

I’m going to tell you all now what I told him because it applies to everyone.

Write your story. It doesn’t matter that someone else has written a story about that subject. They didn’t write YOUR story. Only you can do that.

And I want to read your story.

Holy crap, this is A+ parenting and such a good lesson.

[PLEASE KEEP ANONYMOUS BC I DON’T WANT TO BE FIRED]

I’m a bra fitter in the UK. Won’t name the store, but it’s one that’s internationally popular so occasionally we get people from abroad coming in to bulk-buy English bras because they fit better and are cheaper.

A few months ago a German woman, who didn’t speak any English, came in for a fitting with her two daughters to translate for her. What she didn’t know was that I speak near-fluent German because I used to work in Bochum as a primary school teacher.

I fitted her for an hour (she wanted a LOT) and she slagged me off the whole time - “she doesn’t know what she’s doing / she’s so young– have they given me an intern? I want a professional / I won’t take fashion advice from a girl that heavy / she’s not using european sizing, is she stupid” - and her daughters translated VERY favourably, both of them clearly quite uncomfortable with the situation.

I put on a brave face for the whole thing, pretending not to notice, and then as I was putting in her customer info (we keep a record of all our customers) one of the daughters complimented me for pronouncing their surname correctly.

I said thanks, and casually dropped into conversation - in perfect German - that I used to live in Germany and spoke the language.

Watching all the colour drain from that woman’s face as she realised what just happened, and seeing her two daughters quietly lose their collective shit behind her, was pretty glorious. Almost made it worth it.

“You didn’t lose a child to autism. You lost a child because the child you waited for never came into existence. That isn’t the fault of the autistic child who does exist, and it shouldn’t be our burden. We need and deserve families who can see us and value us for ourselves, not families whose vision of us is obscured by the ghosts of children who never lived. Grieve if you must, for your own lost dreams. But don’t mourn for us. We are alive. We are real.”

— Jim Sinclair, “Don’t Mourn for Us,” Our Voice, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1993

The federal and Alberta governments are exploring financial support and other rescue options after Kinder Morgan put the troubled $7.4-billion Trans Mountain expansion project on life support.
The company has set a number of tough conditions that must be met by May 31 for it to commence major construction on the project, including financial protection for Kinder Morgan Canada Ltd. shareholders and an end to the British Columbia government’s threats of obstruction.
As well, the company will proceed only if it gets an unconditional victory in a federal court ruling expected this spring arising from appeals by British Columbia’s government and some First Nations of Ottawa’s project approval, Kinder Morgan’s chief executive Steven Kean told a conference call on Monday.
In B.C., Premier John Horgan was forced to defend his opposition to the project in a testy exchange in the legislature on Monday, as pressure from Ottawa, Alberta and the province’s business community mounted.
Kinder Morgan’s Mr. Kean said the company has already invested more than $1-billion in the project and spending would increase to $300-million a month once construction starts. It won’t take that step without a clear path forward and cannot delay a decision past June 1 without losing an entire year owing to weather constraints.
“We don’t have the ability to just kick the can down the road,” Mr. Kean said. “We needed to make a decision, and we made it.”
The ultimatum by the Houston-based company and its Canadian subsidiary has sent the federal Liberal government and the Alberta government scrambling for answers as they look to rescue a project both have described as being in the national interest.
Both governments indicated on Monday they are considering some sort of financial package, although neither would provide details. Alberta Premier Rachel Notley plans to meet on Wednesday in Toronto with federal officials to pursue a joint strategy.
Ms. Notley spoke of increasing pressure and economic pain on British Columbia later Monday, when she disclosed she has asked Ottawa to withhold funding that would flow to B.C. under the umbrella of the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.
In reaction to needling from Alberta United Conservative Party Leader Jason Kenney in the legislature, the Alberta Premier said “we’ve already made that request to the federal government and I believe that it is under consideration.”
Under fire in the B.C. legislature, Mr. Horgan was defiant, maintaining his government has been transparent about its opposition to the project and that it is appropriate to take that dispute through the courts.
“We stand with British Columbians, in court, making the argument that this project is not in the interests of British Columbia,” he told the House. “We’re not being provocative. We said in an election campaign a year ago this is what we would do. We’re now doing it. And a year later, somehow this is a crisis.”
In an exchange with BC Liberal opposition MLAs, Mr. Horgan dismissed suggestions, including in an editorial in The Globe and Mail, that his government’s conduct is creating an economic and constitutional rift.
“I’m grateful to know that the member still believes that The Globe is running Canada, but it’s not. It’s not. British Columbians are running British Columbia, and the federal government has its responsibilities. I had a very productive discussion with the Prime Minister on the weekend and again last week. These are issues of importance to all Canadians, and we take it very, very seriously.”
The expanded pipeline to Vancouver would increase the ability of Alberta-based oil companies to export to Asian markets and diversify Canadian sales away from the United States, which now accounts for 97 per cent of exports.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said his government is considering “a broad range of options” to get the pipeline construction back on track, without being specific. The Prime Minister said he spoke to Mr. Horgan to reiterate Ottawa’s position that approval of the pipeline falls within federal jurisdiction.
“This is a pipeline in the national interest and it will get built,” Mr. Trudeau told reporters in Montreal on Monday.
“We need to get our resources to new markets. It is in Alberta’s interest of course but it is in the interest of all Canadians and that’s why we’re moving forward with this pipeline in a safe and responsible way.“
Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr said the federal government will work with Alberta to address Kinder Morgan’s concerns, adding B.C.’s obstruction is undermining Canada’s reputation as a good place to invest.
“The federal government will use what is available to us to reinforce the decision we took in the national interest,” Mr. Carr said in an interview. ”And that includes financial and legal and regulatory issues. All of them will be examined and we’ll work with our willing partners to ensure that every reasonable step is take to make sure this project proceeds.“
He refused to discuss specifics, but in the past, Ottawa provided $7-billion in loan guarantees to the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric project in Labrador, and invested directly in the Hibernia oil project to keep its development on track.
It is unclear how the Trudeau government can force Mr. Horgan to reverse course on his opposition to the pipeline. Some opposition politicians have called for Ottawa to use the declaratory power under the Constitution by which the federal government can assert its jurisdiction over a project “for the general advantage of Canada.” However, such a move would likely prompt a lengthy court battle if Ottawa used it to remove from B.C. any role in environmental regulation of the project.
Ms. Notley confirmed her government is considering an investment in the pipeline to reduce the risk to Kinder Morgan shareholders and enhance the political status of the project.
She said she will introduce promised legislation next week that gives Alberta the legal powers to throttle back its energy shipments to B.C., a move that would send gasoline prices sharply higher. Ms. Notley said she had a “frank chat” with her British Columbia counterpart on Sunday and told him time is of the essence. “I made sure he knew our resolve.”
In addition to challenging the federal approval, B.C. has threatened to impose regulations preventing any increase in the flow of oil sands crude through the province, although it later offered to refer the question of jurisdiction to the courts.
While it remains unclear whether B.C. has the jurisdiction to enact such a rule, the very threat of it is causing Kinder Morgan to be reluctant to spend billions of dollars on a project that could be crippled by provincial regulations.
B.C. Environment Minister George Heyman said any action by Alberta to curtail the current flow of energy products as a retaliatory measure would be illegal and could be challenged by his province under Canadian trade laws. He said disputes over jurisdiction should be settled in the courts.
“The only thing that has changed here is decisions by investors in a Texas boardroom,” Mr. Heyman said. “So we are going to continue to seek to define and use British Columbia’s jurisdiction.”
Business executives complained on Monday that the prospect of Trans Mountain’s demise is a black mark on Canada’s reputation as a place to do business. The battle “is now challenging - in the full view of the international investment community - the very ability of our country to govern itself,” said Iain Black, president of the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade.
However, anti-pipeline activists and First Nations leaders are anticipating another victory after the demise of TransCanada’s Energy East pipeline and Enbridge Inc.’s Northern Gateway. “The era of massive new investments in fossil fuel projects is coming to an end,” said Karen Mahon, international campaigns director for Stand.earth, which has operations in Canada and the United States.

social democracy is offering to pay for a gas pipeline so that a rich ass private company doesn’t have to