so there’s this older tv show i’m into
(it aired when my parents were babies, it’s very much the kind of thing my granddad watches)
it’s based on true events, and like most stories based on true events, it fictionalises them a bit. characters are either fictional people playing the roles that real people played or are composites of real people
there is one exception to that, though - one character who is directly inspired by one real person. (they have the same name, it’s not subtle.) and the real person was actually a consultant on the show!
but here’s the thing. all of the fictionalised characters are, like, characters. they have quirks and flaws and foibles and political opinions. this guy, however…doesn’t. he’s bland as hell. he has no opinions and is completely neutral on all but the most basic politics. he doesn’t have flaws. he doesn’t have anything. he’s just blandly Heroic. and that’s prooooobably because they didn’t wanna piss off the real person this character was based on
so why is this in the doctor who tag? because that’s how i feel about the thirteenth doctor. poor jodie was trying her best, but thirteen doesn’t have the same kind of distinct identity like the other new who doctors. and i reckon that’s because dear old chibbers didn’t want to be blamed for making the First Female Doctor anything other than blandly likeable, so he didn’t give her a personality
it’s most evident in all the timeless child stuff, where everyone’s spending their time expositing at thirteen while she stands there making a surprised pikachu face. there’s no personality there, it’s all reaction, and not particularly interesting reaction either. and it’s such a waste!










