“Circe?”
“Yes Odysseus?”
“Where’s my crew?”

Here you can check how I made the background https://www.instagram.com/p/CCjJdHQI1VQ/ Character belongs to https://www.deviantart.com/scourgemangastudios
sanet.cosplay on Instagram
notgrima on Instagram
shellanin_ on Instagram
cutiepiesensei on Instagram
JadeDaGem on Twitter
tygeesensei on Instagram
snitchery on Instagram
mimithenerd on Instagram
in the garage 🙈
My dad said ok but not to touch his power tools or else I’m grounded
😳😳what if we accidentally knocked over his 20 year old cordless drill while kissing in the garage 🙈
*cries while kissing* I'MSOGONNAGETGROUNDEDFORTHIS
😳🙈what if this was all a dream and you woke up in your bed ungrounded and everything was fine? 😳
THEKISSWASN'TREAL
I’m obsessed with this tiktok. He went so hard.
this tiktok really said ‘im superior and you know it’ huh
Bodied the whole internet with this one 😭👏🏽
That was 100% better than the live action movie
i don’t fuck w the whole ‘tattoos have to have a meaning’ wave
if i want a fruitbat tattooed permanently in2 my skin ima get a damn fruitbat tattooed permanently in2 my skin and guess what?? its not gonna mean SHIT
Dab on those fascists
The history you didn’t learn in school (note how the pope was not in fact buddies with and aided Hitler)
You know there are people who scrolled past this on purpose.
Reblogging because I knew Hitler oppressed Christians, but still only ever heard “the Pope was on his side”
I’m about 90% sure the economy is never gonna “improve”
this is capitalism in it’s final form
this is it honey
except, you know, those companies that do a charitable thing for every thing they sell
that’s kinda new and interesting. benevolent capitalism
lmao
Pay attention, class: This is what it looks like when one is unwilling to consider new information.
It’s not new information, though. It’s misinformation.
First, it’s not that new.
Did you know that there was a time in U.S. history—which is by definition recent history—when a corporation was generally intended to have some sort of public interest that they served? I mean, that’s the whole point of allowing corporations to form. Corporations are recognized by the commonwealth or state, and this recognition is not a right but a privilege, in exchange for which the state (representing the people) is allowed to ask, “So what does this do for everyone else?”
The way the economy is now is a direct result of a shift away from this thinking and to one where a corporation is an entity unto itself whose first, last, and only concern is an ever-increasing stream of profits. What you’re calling “benevolent capitalism” isn’t benevolent at all. It’s a pure profit/loss calculation designed to distract from—not even paper over or stick a band-aid on—the problems capitalism creates. And the fact that you’re here championing it as “benevolent capitalism” is a sign of how ell it’s working.
Let’s take Toms, as one example. The shoe that’s a cause. Buy a pair of trendy shoes, and a pair of trendy shoes will be given away to someone somewhere in the world who can’t afford them.
That’s not genuine benevolence. That’s selling you, the consumer, on the idea that you can be benevolent by buying shoes, that the act of purchasing these shoes is an act of charity. The reality is that their model is an inefficient means of addressing the problems on the ground that shoelessness represents, and severely disrupts the local economies of the locations selected for benevolence.
(Imagine what it does to the local shoemakers, for instance.)
The supposed act of charity is just a value add to convince you to spend your money on these shoes instead of some other shoes. It’s no different than putting a prize in a box of cereal.
Heck, you want to see how malevolent this is?
Go ask a multinational corporation that makes shoes or other garments to double the wages of their workers. They’ll tell you they can’t afford it, that it’s not possible, that consumers won’t stand for it, that you’ll drive them out of business and then no one will have wages.
But the fact that a company can give away one item for every item sold shows you what a lie this is. A one-for-one giving model represents double the cost of labor and materials for each unit that is sold for revenue. Doubling wages would only double the labor.
So why are companies willing to give their products away (and throw them away, destroy unused industry with bleach and razors to render them unsalvageable, et cetera) but they’re not willing to pay their workers more?
Because capitalism is the opposite of benevolence.
“Charity” is by definition exemplary, above and beyond, extraordinary, extra. “Charity” is not something that people are entitled to. You give people a shirt or shoes or some food and call it charity, and you’re setting up an expectation that you can and will control the stream of largesse in the future, and anything and everything you give should be considered a boon from on high.
On the other hand, once you start paying your workers a higher wage, you’re creating an expectation. You’re admitting that their labor is more valuable to you than you were previously willing to admit, and it’s hard to walk that back.
Plus, when people have enough money for their basic needs, they’re smarter and stronger and warier and more comfortable with pushing back instead of being steamrolled over. They have time and money to pursue education. They can save money up and maybe move away. They can escape from the system that depends on a steady flow of forced or near-forced labor.
So companies will do charitable “buy one, give one” and marketing “buy one, get one” even though these things by definition double the overhead per unit, but they won’t do anything that makes a lasting difference in the standard of living for the people.
Capitalism has redefined the world so that the baseline of ethics is “How much money can we make?” and every little good deed over and above that is saintly.
But there’s nothing benevolent about throwing a scrap of bread to someone who’s starving in a ditch because you ran them out of their home in the first place.
This is one of the best anti-capitalist posts on the entire site.
OMG she’s the same woman who did the WASP mom at Olive Garden...
Anyone want to try their hand at voice acting and want to do a couple lines for Sven and Leanna ,, or estilil and myrra … so I can practice lip sync animation 👀👀👀 all skill levels allowed! Ill compensate u with money or drawings just lemme know which (I dont have a lot of money but work is work)
♥ Hey lovelies, I have a script ready to go! ♥ This can be an ‘audition’ of sorts I suppose, because I DO want to actually get at least one nice scene done as practice. Please send in as many as you want. Here are Sven and Leanna’s tags for newcomers to get to know them better. They are LotR/Hobbit OCs so their ‘accents’ should be appropriate to that world!
I don’t have a lot of money but I believe work is work, I do give you the option of getting one free sketch as a thank you for participating. But if you’d rather be charged $ for your time, DM me!
El negro Matapacos (black cop killer) was a symbol of fight and hope in the social protests we had last year. He was a stray who marched with the people and defended them from authorities.
He is Chile’s most beloved protest dog.
Here are some murals honoring him from different cities across the country
they even made a statue
Please watch with sound omg
I hate you for this.
I lost it at the computer error.
#notindustrial but i love these noises