Avatar

forget the body. i still have my name.

@fantasticalparanoia

Okay fuck it if this post reaches 666k notes by the end of 2023 I'll practise basic self care

Why 666k? Because it's funny and impossible so good fucking luck

Well, OP, I’m officially invested in this shit. Your whiny ass is doing self care if I have to drive to your goddamn house and do it for you.

By Talos this can't be happening

reblog this everyone i wanna see what happens when op’s reverse-hubris forces them to practice basic self care.

why? because it’s funny and completely possible actually so good fucking luck op

I figured out roughly how many notes it's been getting per day and multiplied that by the number of days left until the end of 2023

If we keep it going at this rate we'll be far past 666k

IMPORTANT

Okay so clearly I've underestimated y'all

So how about we make this more interesting?

I will practise self care if this post reaches 666k BY THE END OF 2022

Op you have fuckethed with the devil this post has gained 30,000 notes since I reblogged it last night

the importance of pov and kiriona gaia as gideon nav’s imperialist aspect

others have already made some really smart posts about how kiriona is gideon when she’s lost everything and everyone that made her who she was, and how even in the first two books, gideon was this terrifically sad creature who was disguised by the fact that she was her own narrator.

but I want to expand on that last bit, because yes. kiriona is a gideon who has lost everything, who has had to make tough decisions to survive, who has had to adapt to being primarily around her father (a manipulative asshole) and ianthe (ianthe). but this is also the first time we’re getting to see gideon from a perspective other than her own.

we’ve always known that gideon is a beautifully unreliable narrator - see her complete understatement of the fight before harrow opened the tomb, where she neglects to tell us that she almost killed harrow with her bare hands - but I think that for a lot of us, the introduction of kiriona was when we first felt that.

now, nona is not an objective narrator either (lmao). and she does actively dislike gideon (which is fascinating, and which I could go on about for several posts). but she does offer an outside perspective on gideon that we have, up to this point, been lacking.

because… yeah. sometimes, like anyone, gideon’s kind of mean. we know she’s a good person - her goodness is in many ways one of the central drivers of the plot - but that doesn’t mean she’s nice all of the time. it’s just that when she’s being mean to crux, or ianthe, or even harrow we can say, well that person deserved that. but the truth is, gideon has lived through the kind of hell that very few people could survive with any kind of goodness and softness left intact. she didn’t live through it, in fact. she’s just kind of… existed through it.

I saw another post point this out, and I want to reiterate: gideon’s goal, her whole life, has been to join the cohort. when we first meet her, we’re like, ok, makes sense, that’s the only ‘out’ available to her. and we kind of forget, even as we learn more about the empire, that what gideon wants to join is this actively and horrifically violent imperialist force. when we get to nona, and we meet hot sauce and her gang and joli and the angel and even the edenites, we expect gideon to have kept up with us somehow, to reject the empire. we want her to be one of the “good guys” (goodness in the tlt universe is another longass post I want to write…).

but gideon doesn’t reject the empire. because, crucially, she IS the empire - she is its heir, never mind the fact that that doesn’t really mean anything when the current emperor is immortal.

what I am trying to say is this: kiriona is gideon when you take everything from her, and then replace it with her father and everything he represents, and then take a step back.

that step back is crucial. it is what allows us to remember how imperialism - and by extension, or by metaphor, cruelty - works. gideon becomes cruel because she is in proximity to cruel people, AND because she is not in proximity to us.

THAT is what Muir is saying with kiriona. even the most kind, good, earnest protagonist can become a tool of evil in the right circumstances: and those circumstances include perspective. gideon, like it or not, is currently actively choosing to be a tool of empire. and if we were in her head, we might be able to - or we might be tricked into - accept her justifications for why she’s doing it.

the perspective shift is what allows us to see gideon as she - currently - truly is. it is no accident that this is when we get the outside pov. Muir allows us nowhere to hide; we have to confront what gideon has become and by extension what she always has been.

gideon nav is a good person, and I fully believe that in alecto we will watch her reject her father; I fully believe she will get to be a hero. but in order for that to happen, she - and we - must first undergo radical change and growth in terms of her worldview and attitudes. kiriona is not gideon’s final form. but in the same way that john is described by harrow as having aspects, kiriona is the aspect or facet of gideon that embraces cruelty, that perpetuates empire.

Muir tells us: even the most beautiful-hearted, trod-on girl in the world can become a tool of empire. but I have no doubt that in alecto she will tell us: this is how that girl can destroy it.

help how do we collectively gatekeep babel from the white first world upper middle class booktokers that eat up everything that’s vaguely “dark academia” because vibes and and fashion and nothing else

babel by RF Kuang is the only 2022 dark academia release that matters. this historical fantasy novel tackles the darkest part of academia: the fact that universities in the west are built upon and benefit from the degradation and destruction of the global south (and non-western cultures, resources, and bodies).

rf kuang, an oxford graduate and woc, has lived experience with racism in academic settings and communicates a deep, thorough understanding of the inner workings of universities. her writing is unparalleled. babel will change the way people perceive the romanticization of academia, and that is an incredible thing. this subgenre has already been diluted by books like “if we were villains” (2017) which uses slurs and racist similes, and “a lesson in vengeance” (2021) which positions the only Black character as a didactic tool meant to teach the white protagonist about racism. we need more books like ace of spades (2021) and Babel because, not only should there be diversity in dark academia, but there should be books that acknowledge and condemn the white supremacist roots of western education.

i keep seeing people promote books that attempt to replicate the “vibes” of dark academia but have 0 fucking substance. they are awful and repetitive and follow a formula, and they don’t do anything that hasn’t already been done. the characters tend to be two dimensional and underdeveloped. that’s the danger of romanticizing the aesthetic of something without caring about its history. i lost faith in “dark academia lit” before i read babel because almost all the other books in the subgenre were so bad.

Avatar

Me about the female chracters in my brilliant friend: there are no evil chracters, each of the women face problems and deal with them in their own way. It's not about being a good or bad person such a concept doesn't exist in the series. Either you do something for yourself or for someone else. They can't make everyone happy and I understand them

Me about the males: he is annoying and i hate him

Can Pasquale please stop mansplaining all the women around him? Can he stop being a hypocrite who fucks bourgeois women while later patronizing Lenú for having achieved things in life? Can he stop being such a well portrayed character?

As a person who was active for years in student assemblies and political groups, I have met many Pasquales throughout my life: left-wing men who talk about the revolution, equality and camaraderie, but at the end of the day just want listen to themselves. The political struggle becomes a masculine competition based on egos. The ideals of equality are clouded by their macho personalities and their desire to be above everyone, but mostly above women. When I read the books, I found Pasquale's character very unpleasant precisely because of how well done he was. Authors tend to caricature this type of person, but Ferrante is much more elegant. Ferrante portrayed him as someone like that would be in the real world, and that's the most wonderful thing. The actor who plays Pasquale is an incredible success, very talented. He is so talented that while I was watching the series I was seeing the book, feeling the same animosity towards him, meeting again with those many other Pasquales I had known. An applause.

Avatar

Laying on my bed weeping over the role of the Noniad in HtN… the love and care and passion of a poet being strong enough to summon the spirit he idolizes… the fact that Harrow considers the Noniad a joke and then is the one to recite it at the end… the fact that the poem not only constrains Nonius’ spirit to verse but changes the very rules of the dream… that Nonius’ appearance is the deciding factor in the fight against the Sleeper… as a poet and a writer I am incoherent over this love letter to art and how it can save you

current mood is cackling at this info gege dropped in the fanbook where he confirms that everyone at the kyoto schools LOVES utahime and all i can think about is how the tokyo students would probably sell gojo for a half baked corn chip and maybe some dip

Resenting the male gaze but also being obsessed with how you’re perceived by others

Margaret Atwood /// Susan Sontag /// Real Men - Mitski /// Shame is an Ocean I Swim Across - Mary Lambert /// Birds of Prey (2020) /// post by jitterati /// Liquid Smooth - Mitski /// Jennifer’s Body (2009) /// Bravado - Lorde /// Diagnosis - Cynthia Cruz

l o n e l y

Richard Siken // Alejandra Pizarnik // Edward Hopper // Mary Oliver // Mitski // Edward Hopper // Warsan Shire // R.H.Sin // Little Women // Charles Baudelaire

Listen To Survivors

“Believe survivors” is not a standard for anything.  Believing accusations are true without explanation or context would come across as absurd when discussing anything but sexual assault, especially on the internet.  In the same breath, people on this site will bemoan how easily misinformation spreads and then refuse to look into their own beliefs.

Survivors need to be taken seriously.  Survivors need to be heard.  However, if an accuser can’t present a coherent story about what happened people should be skeptical.  If key details integral to the story are proven false or frequently change, doubting them makes sense.  Why is wanting more information suddenly a radical concept?  Again, imagine how this would sound regarding any other crime.

Blindly believing any accusation regardless of the source does not make you woke or progressive; it makes you gullible.