Avatar

Help! I don't know what Im doing

@dropbear42

not sure what to say here. I'm a 29old Aussie with a tendency to fall out of trees. I play Hockey(the grass one). i have a bachelor of animal science and now I'm a DVM student. I like cows, Yeah...umm. Computers hate me, I don't even know what half these buttons do. Is this description thing too long? oh hey, there's a spider. I'm gonna catch it n take it out side

It's crazy how humanity invented bicycles and decided to try it with one big wheel and one small wheel BEFORE they tried having two wheels the same size

This is not quite true, though it would be very funny if it was.

The classic "old bicycle" we're all thinking of, which looked like this:

Is actually a technological compromise developed in the early 1870s. The very first bicycle was invented in 1817 and it looked like this:

It had no pedals and the rider would push it along with their feet, the same way toddlers learn to ride bikes today.

In about 1864, a mechanic in france came up with the idea of adding pedals to the front wheel, making the first self-propelled bicycle.

This was a great improvement because it's a lot easier to move and a lot more fun than the Fisher Price version above. It was a big thing for about five years, but there were some drawbacks.

First, because the pedals were directly attached to the front wheel, you couldn't go very fast without moving your legs incredibly quickly, which takes a lot of effort. It also is kind of awkward to steer because your legs are in the way of the wheel.

The other issue was bumps. Roads were not very smooth in the 1870s, most of them were unpaved and full of ruts, potholes, and rocks. And at first there were no rubber tires, just wooden wheels with metal rims. Altogether this made for a very bumpy ride.

The big front wheel, which was made possible by the invention of wire spokes and solid rubber tires, solved all of these problems. A big wheel runs over bumps more easily: think of how rough it is to ride roller skates over bumps in a sidewalk that you would hardly notice on a bike. And the bigger the wheel, the faster you can move with one push of the pedals. Having the seat on top of the wheel, instead of behind, also makes steering less cumbersome.

There are of course drawbacks to this design, in particular being so high up makes it very easy to go over the handlebars if you crash, and more likely to hit your head or break your arm.

drawing of a man falling headfirst off a high-wheel bicycle. Public domain.
ALT

Two more inventions helped drive this comical beast into extinction and bring back a more balanced, and safer, bicycle.

The first was the pneumatic tire, which contains a cushion of air, and makes for a much softer ride compared to a solid tire or a metal one. The cushion effect eliminates the need for a big wheel to smooth out the bumps in the road.

The second invention was the sprocket and chain drive. This lets you put the pedals anywhere you want on the bike, and with a big gear at the pedals and a small one at the wheel, you can get more speed out of a small wheel.

gif of a sprocket and chain. Public domain.gif of a sprocket and chain. Public domain.
ALT

The first modern bicycle to combine a sprocket and pneumatic tires was built in 1879. It was an instant hit, not just because it was much less dangerous, but because the low drag profile and the smooth pneumatic tires made for a faster ride, and the trendsetters in cycling, then as now, were the racing community. There have been plenty of innovations and modifications in the years since, from ten-speed gears to carbon fiber frames, but these are all variations on a theme. The basic form of the bicycle has not changed.

Happy riding.

Okay full disclosure I was high as a kite when I made this post, otherwise I might have fact-checked my joke before posting, but this is awesome. Thank you for the bicycle lore.

One of the more profound things I’ve heard recently came from a Mr. Rogers documentary. In a clip from his show, Mr. Rogers had just visited with a musician, and tells his audience that some people play music, and some people don’t, and that’s okay.

And then he said, “The important thing is to find something you feel good about doing.”

That phrasing struck me. “Something you feel good about doing”. Most people would have phrased it as “something you enjoy doing”. Or “something you’re good at doing”. But Mr. Rogers’ subtly different phrasing leads to a profoundly different connotation. Something you feel good about doingmay not be enjoyable–people who work in hospitals or in disaster zones might not enjoy much of their day, but they probably feel good about helping people. “Something you feel good about doingmay not be something you’re particularly good at–you may be a terrible artist by any objective standard, but if you feel good about making your art, then it’s a worthwhile endeavor. Looking for “something you feel good about doing” can help you find a truly satisfying life path.

That phrase is also helpful with daily decision-making. Too often, I can make choices based on “what feels good.” I put aside tasks that are too stressful or avoid activities that seem too difficult, in favor of mindlessly browsing the internet. And I enjoy myself. I feel good while I’m doing that. But at the end of the day, I don’t feel good about how I spent my time. However, reminding myself to do “something I feel good about doing” can motivate me to accomplish those more difficult tasks. It can push me to do something outside of my comfort zone, to try something new that I might not be much good at. And maybe this is a blindingly obvious philosophy to everyone else. But I’m grateful for the reminder. 

Avatar
Reblogged gurlu

Video of me trying to write the number 3 in professor layton game for 1 minute

this fucking video has two punchlines it's incredible

this is going to be a controversial one but I think the optimal number of cats for facilitating making the bed is not, in fact, "every cat in the house" but perhaps even ... zero

dangerous misinformation

(losing a trinket important to me): it’s just plastic. It’s just material. Someone else will find it and it’ll brighten up their day. If i really want to i can replace it. Loss is natural in love. Life isn’t fair and i’ll tear up earth and sky if i knew i could find you again under the covers of my pillows. But like, it’s $16.67 to replace. I’m okay.

you have to realize that you CAN keep everything perfect and safe, but you’ll never get to fully enjoy them. Sweaters get stretched. Stuffed animals get worn. Earrings get lost. and love turns to grief. If i want to be happy, i have to know that sadness is the little brother who holds her hand.

Nvm. Trinket was found and i’m now keeping it locked up forever so i can’t ever lose it again

Avatar
sapphic-adjunction-deactivated2

Every time I see a duck I think to myself that I want to pick up that duck. There is a sort of quality of the duck that makes it feel like the act of picking up the duck would somehow be analogous to those strange videos where people use knives to cleanly cut through multilayered cakes. There would be a sort of accumulative act even without taking permanent possession of the duck. It would rather be more like pulling the lever on some ancient machine which makes a counter increase by one. The duck is the lever. I hope my meaning is clear to you all?

the duck was designed with affordances that suggest picking it up

Avatar
Reblogged

for c2, the cast gave a matt a bunch of anxious pcs who will bolt at one look of suspicion from anyone with authority. so in the first two episodes, he put them under arrest and on trial for murders they didn't commit. forget putting your blorbos in a jar, matt put them put them in a blender, tossed a few sharp rocks in there and sprinkled some gunpowder for flavor and turned it on max

Avatar
Reblogged

Oh well.

I've just started watching The Mighty Nine. Already experiencing Mighty Crisis.

Butohboy do I love it.

Avatar
Reblogged

Actually the meaning of life is forcing all your friends to watch the extended editions of the lord of the rings at least once. Just so you know.

Avatar
Reblogged
The longest job I held was as a transporter at the hospital where my dad worked—taking people to do X-rays, bringing the deceased down to the morgue. My first day on the job, I had to do that. When I applied to Juilliard, they asked, “What other jobs have you done that qualifies you?” I put the hospital down, because you get to see the extremes of humanity there—life and death.
Avatar
Reblogged

just realized something really fucking sad about mizu and how she parallels/contrasts fowler.

one of the things that makes abijah fowler such a fantastic villian is that he isn’t uniquely evil when compared to other people in the show, right?

he’s racist? so is nearly every other character.

he’s abusive to women? so was boss hamata, hachiman the flesh trader, heiji shindo, and plenty of other men because their society was disgustingly misogynistic.

he killed his bastard children? society didn’t even consider them human in the first place.

he overthrew the shogunate? he didn’t work alone.

he’s a sadist? madame kaji says it herself- “if you killed every man i’ve seen who couldn’t cum til someone bled, you’d wear your blade to a stump.”

he murders, he abuses, he lies and manipulates, he gets off on seeing others suffer. the only uniquely awful thing about him is that he doesn’t hide it. we can find all of his abhorrent behavior in the words or actions of other characters. which, tragically, includes mizu for one specific reason.

if you remember during fowler and mizu’s fight in episode 8, fowler tells mizu that her “bones break like a woman’s”, which carries the terrifying implication that fowler has killed so many people with his bare hands that he knows the difference between the feeling/sound of men’s and women’s bones snapping.

and i realized what makes this line worse is that mizu is the only other character we know of who has killed a women with her bare hands- when she snapped kinuyo’s neck. of course the difference is that abijah is just evil while mizu did it as a mercy killing on madame kaji’s behalf, but it’s still so tragic to me that kinuyo’s death unintentionally brought mizu closer to abijah in a way.

they are the only ones who know how it feels to break an innocent woman’s bones.