Avatar

Kything... With Style

@dorotheian / dorotheian.tumblr.com

Intermittent fanfic writer & dabbler in language and translation. I ramble about life, sci-fi & fantasy, comics, anime & manga, art, writing, and other assorted interests.
Avatar

Katniss “pretending” to love Peeta back in the first games will NEVER be a selfish action to me. She did it entirely with the goal to save him. At that point she had enough sponsors, no life threatening injuries, she could hunt/gather, and had her bow and arrows. Their romance was for sponsors and Katniss was not the one in need of help when she chose to reciprocate. Peeta was on the brink of death through out almost the entirety of their alliance, for most of it he was a bigger hinderance than help in winning. But Katniss never even considers any option other than staying with him. Maybe she wasn’t “in love” with him yet, but everything she did was still done as an act of deep care for Peeta. Every romantic moment, every kiss they had, Katniss didn’t do it to get herself home. She did it to get Peeta home.

I think a lot of people forget, Katniss can’t act. It’s like her one trait she cannot lie for shit. Before the interview in the first book she can’t play a stereotypical character. They literally give up. She can’t do promo for district 13 because it’s looks fake.

Even if the acts itself were prompted it would’ve looked fake if she didn’t actually mean it

I’m still awed (and also scared?) about the whole set-set debate in Terra Ignota. Because on a rhetorical level, accepting set-sets is framed like any other debate about accepting diversity and difference, respecting neuroatypical people, disabled people, trans people, respecting children’s self-determination.

But on a pragmatic level, set-sets are not about children’s self-determination, they are about parents determining their children, about parents exercising unlimited control over their children. Making a set-set is like… what if your strict, demanding helicopter parents who yell at you for less-then-perfect grades and really want you to be a high-earning lawyer could put you in a lawyer-making vat at the age of two, and then have you emerge at the age of ten, not only equipped with brand new lawyerly cognitive capacities, but also filled with a strong desire to do law, and completely disinterested in doing anything else with your life. A lot of people have shitty parents, and even good parents are often wrong about what’s best for their children. Think about what your parents want for you, what your parents expect from you, and imagine it being indelibly printed into your brain, forming the new core of your self, forever.

That sort of combination indoctrination-and-skills-training is basically what already happens in our present day with regards to competitive gymnasts, equestrians, swimmers, dancers, and beauty-pageant competitors. These are performance fields which require certain shapes from your body and brain, which if you don’t have them by the time you’re old enough to competently make career-planning decisions for yourself, you’re too late to develop them, and you’re mostly locked out of the professional career.

The setting conceit of set-sets merely extends that pattern to mental arts instead of physical.

And so like many things in Terra Ignota, and in speculative fiction, set-sets serve as a mirror by which we see our present-day world, and we are asked: Is this right and acceptable? Where on the sliding scale do we draw the line, and if we draw it there, does the type of line we draw rule out things we don’t want to rule out, like Terra the Moon-Baby?

Yeah, I totlly agree.

And I actually have very strong feelings about child athletes, and most of those feelings are “no.” I mean I think sports can be a very fun and rewarding hobby for a child, I think more kids should have more access to more sports, and I think it’s admirable if a child wants to put a lot of time and effort into getting better at their favourite sport. But training for a career in professional sports is not a hobby, not even an intense hobby, it’s a job, and often it entails a level of control and self-denial that would be fucked-up if you demanded it of a grown adult, a level of control and self-denial you might possibly demand of an enlisted soldier. (My best friend from elementary school got really into speed skating. We drifted apart, partly because she was always at practice, and she eventually quit high school for home schooling to do even more practice. I assumed it was cool. In our late teens, she got a little bit drunk at the party, and started talking about her life, her coach, her training, and it turns out it was not cool. It was basically like if you did Full Metal Jacket to pre-teen girls.)

If a certain athletic achievement can only be reached by taking over a child’s life, depriving them of a well-rounded education, a normal social life and unstructured free time, cutting off all their other options, monitoring their food intake, and subjecting them to injury, not as an accident, but as an inevitability, then we probably don’t need it. Oooh, but this figure skating manoeuvre can only be done by malnourished fourteen-year-olds! Well in that case it’s stupid and nobody should do it.

Of course there is a huge grey area here when it comes to children doing difficult things, and children preparing for difficult things, and children making decisions, and parents making decisions for their children: it’s just that I feel that most professional sports are unambiguously on the wrong side of that grey area, and should be covered more strictly under basic child labour laws.

I think somewhere people got confused and now think that "privileged" equals "oppressor" and "having privilege" equals "has the power to oppress".

It doesn't.

Avatar

don't forget during the WGA strike that animation is not covered under the WGA deals and as a result animation has gotten the shortest possible end of the stick in under-staffing, under-paying, and generally turning the field into gig employment.

please sign the petition here for Disney to recognize animation production workers as a union and reblog this post!

gregory house is the man the myth the legend. he’s a genius. he’s babygirl. he’s in his 40s. he has no friends. he has one friend. he has NO friends. he has coworkers and a friend he’s in a constant battle of wits and wills with. he has a pet rat he almost kills with mad science and loves more than life itself. he has a guitar. his guitar got kidnapped. multiple people have tried to murder him in his own workplace. he’s mentally ill he’s the sanest man alive he’s unhinged. he has committed multiple murders technically depending on your definition of murder. he supports murder. he’s a misogynist who supports women. he’s broken up multiple marriages one of which was his own. his dad isn’t his dad. he rides a motorcycle he bought during a midlife crisis. everyone is obsessed with him. two of his best friends are terminally ill. he has NO friends. he and his best friend want to fuck but that’d be way too normal for them. he drove a car into a house. he’s forced his employees to break into countless houses and dig up at least one grave. at least two ghosts have haunted him personally. and he’s bisexual.

There’s a teaching in Judaism that one should carry two notes, one in each pocket. One should say “I am but dust and ashes,” and the other should say “the whole world was created for me.” They are seen as opposites; you check one when you’re feeling down on yourself and the other when you’re feeling especially full of yourself. The idea is to maintain balance, but I think the way to achieve full harmony is to realize how they are saying the same thing.

That’s why I have imagined them as a carbon atom. Carbon is a main component of dust (and ashes), but also one of the main building blocks of life. Carbon simultaneously encompasses all. It’s in us, it’s in the stars, the planets, the trees. We are built to exist, yet we are also the building blocks of existence. If we keep both in mind, we can live in balance all the time.

(May 12, 2023) We are raising money for a crowd funded research project investigating the cause of blueberry hermit crabs in Okinawa, Japan using trash found on the beach as “homes” instead of natural shells. These hermit crabs are endemic to the southern islands of Japan, and they act as coastal environmental engineers. They are endangered on several islands, and we want to try and understand why they are resorting to beach trash for shells. Please consider sharing this post and donating to the project. The fundraising will be active for the next 45 days (until June 26). 

We suspect that areas with high rates of tourism lead to beach combers collecting natural shells leaving nothing for the hermit crabs to use. It’s possible that overfishing of turbo snails which would naturally provide shells for the crabs may also be a factor. We will survey many sites across several islands in Okinawa to try and determine a cause of this behavior. 

We will be working closely with national geographic photographer Shawn Miller (photo credits above) and several researchers in Japan. Additionally, we will complete extensive beach clean ups in the areas we study. Thank you so much for reading! 

A Haiku:

📲 💡

🖼️ 🆔 📖 🗣️

🖥️ 📜

[Image Description: Three lines of Emoji, that can be read as: Icon Idea Image ID Read Aloud Online Poetry End Image Description]

Reminds me of an old internet poem:

< > ! * ' ' #

^ " ` $ $ -

! * = @ $ _

% * < > ~ # 4

& [ ] . . /

| { , , SYSTEM HALTED

The poem can only be appreciated by reading it aloud, as such:

Waka waka bang splat tick tick hash,

Caret quote back-tick dollar dollar dash,

Bang splat equal at dollar under-score,

Percent splat waka waka tilde number four,

Ampersand bracket bracket dot dot slash,

Vertical-bar curly-bracket comma comma CRASH

OH I GOT ONE AS WELL

Behold, the math limerick:

((12+144+20+3*sqrt[4])/7)+5*11=9²+0

A dozen, a gross, and a score,

plus three times the square root of four,

divided by seven,

plus five times eleven

is nine squared and not a bit more

transcript of video by TikTok account thatannamarie from early December 2021

-begin transcript

Here's a word that every queer person should know: homonationalism is not the name of my new synth-pop album. It's a concept from sociology that acknowledges how queer people are used in conversations about global politics.

Homonationalism is when we use LGBT rights as a yardstick to judge how "moral" a society is. It's short for "homonormative nationalism"—say that five times fast—and it was first coined by Jasbir Puar to describe how the US presented itself as LGBT-friendly to contrast itself to "homophobic" Muslims during the War on Terror. It can also be applied to other contexts, like the way we talk about homophobic countries in Africa or the Caribbean while ignoring the role of European colonialism in those regions.

Put a finger down if you've ever heard something like:

  • You know being gay is a crime in Ghana, right?
  • Those Middle Eastern countries are so backwards. Do you know what they do to gay people over there?

Oh it's so weird. [Looks around as if hearing something from outside the room.] My neighbor's dog is going crazy...

You know you've lost the plot when you're talking about homophobia among Muslims, when white American Christians are the ones who made gay marriage illegal, ignored the entire AIDS crisis, and to this day don't have any national policies regarding conversion therapy, a trans-panic defense, or the forcing of trans women into men's prisons and vice-versa.

Barbados just became free of British rule this week; we should not be shocked if they have some homophobic policies.

And while I obviously believe that a more moral society is one with robust protections for queer people, LGBT rights can't be used to judge other countries, to make us feel better about bombing them.

As an aside, I live in Connecticut, an American state where it gets dark at 4pm now, and where LGBT rights are actually pretty good. We were one of the first states to institute gay marriage, transgender health care is part of our state insurance, and we're just generally more legally protected here.

And yet while legal support is very robust in our state, there's very little cultural support. Homophobia and transphobia in day-to-day life is roughly as bad as any other part of the country, and we have no gay cultural infrastructure. Only enough gay bars to count on one hand, and no known queer meeting spaces otherwise. It's obviously not as bad as living in a place where being gay is a crime, but it's still pretty lonely out here.

So for a variety of reasons, I don't appreciate queer and trans people being used as a pawn to further Islamophobia, anti-African sentiment, and general xenophobia. Mainly because it's racist and ignorant; many of these countries have a long, rich history of queer and trans and nonbinary identities before white European colonizers showed up, but also because western "acceptance" of LGBTQ people is very conditional and very limited in terms of material and legal protection.

White supremacy wins when we pit queer people and people of color against each other. We need international solidarity and an acknowledgment of colonialism to achieve equality and equity.

-end transcript

Human: we bred a new pigeon varient! A pigmy pouter pigeon!

God: fucked up a perfectly good rock dove is what you did. Look at it. It has anxiety

Avatar

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT, WHY DOES HE LOOK LIKE THAT. HE LOOKS FAT AND SKINNY AT THE SAME TIME. HE IS A SEMI-INFLATED BALLON. HOW ARE YOU REAL, WHY ARE YOU REAL.

-🦇

Avatar
Avatar

He does not have anxiety, he thinks he is the sexiest man alive. That's the entire point of pouter pigeons.

I am the gal that made the ask, I want to hear your wisdom

Avatar

When pigeons are trying to be Impressive for whatever reason, they puff up their crops/throats/the bit with the shiny feathers. So a pigeon who has a puffed up throat, or inflated crop or inflated globe - if you wanna use some lingo that I’m not 100% on - is really strutting their stuff.

Big pigeon on the block, you see. If they’re scared then they try to be as small as possible, essentially.

Sometimes pigeons want to be Impressive for courtship purposes. Some areas of Being Impressive are:

Loud coo

Big crop

Shiny feathers

So notice these things are emphasized in our friend the pygmy pouter here. He might be small, but boy oh boy is he sexy to lady pigeons.

Now, normally humans don’t tend to breed our domesticated species to be more attractive to each other, but there’s a reason these breeds are called “thief pouters”.

Not too long ago, people were much more interested in pigeons, on a grand scale. Pigeon lofts were kept in numerous places, and the pigeons were allowed to fly in and out- kind of like today’s outdoor cats, except pigeons don’t kill for fun. Because pigeons were free flying, that meant that if they didn’t want to go back to their own loft, they wouldn’t.

Normally pigeons DO go back to their home nests. It’s safe, their family’s there, but...

Sometimes you’re flying around and you happen to see...

The sexiest man you have ever seen.

So you follow him home because he is SO sexy.

For humans, this meant that if you had the sexiest pigeons, they would bring in MORE pigeons. For free. Cuz they’re just so irresistible.

In actuality, croppers and pouters are some of the least anxious pigeons out there. Horseman thief pouters actually get extra points if they try to impress the judge.

You wanna see a rock dove with anxiety?

These shiny bois tend to be much more nervous than pouters for sure.

THATS SOME COOL SHIT THANK YOU FOR THE PIGEON FACTS

Avatar

I'm glad you enjoyed. The entire existance of thief pouters is hilarious and I love them

The point shouldn't be to identify for sure 100% what is ai art and what isn't. I keep seeing posts advising one to look out for wonky perspective (as if perspective doesn't routinely trip up even the most experienced artists) or to pay attention to fudged detailing (as if impressionism wasn't one of the most influential artistic movements in history), and I think that's coming from a good place but frankly it's a losing battle. Remember when everyone was on about counting the fingers or counting the teeth, and a week later they had that shit ironed out completely? All you're really doing is giving these people more data points to work with to refine their algorithm. It's just going to be constantly shifting goalposts, and at a certain point real artists are going to get exhausted trying to make their art look as not algorithmically generated as possible. It'll be impossible to keep up.

So what should we do? Honestly, I think old practices are still best practices. Find real artists and follow them. Don't repost art, and dont spread reposted art. If something doesn't have a source, skip it. Support artists you like, either by sharing their work directly or donating. And if someone's work looks suspicious? Maybe give them a second look. See some of their other art before jumping to conclusions.

And yes, that means sometimes, you're gonna be tricked. Some people are going to fly under the radar and pass off ai art as their own. And that sucks, and they're liars, but you can't let the obsession with bad actors police real artists out of their communities, or discourage new artists from entering the scene.

Avatar

i think a lot of media makes the mistake of treating the child as a cardboard cutout of idealized childhood (state of purity, unfiltered joy, innocence) and its only thru corruption of that ideal that the past selves of adults are made complex. which is a very poor view of childhood and it makes child characters profoundly unsatisfactory at its lamest and borderline reactionary at its most egregious

Avatar

a lot of writers are great at writing adults bc they see adults as people with 1. motivations 2. a past 3. a concrete ability to work towards a goal. all of these are things children are presumed to lack, for one reason or another - adults see children as impulsive, distracted by every shiny thing, when not all children are like that, and the impulsiveness of certain children still does not preclude underlying desires that are consistent to them; children have a way higher past:person ratio than the average adult! week for week, children are more profoundly affected by regular experiences because it is all new to them. everything sticks, and they remember. what they don't remember and what they do can be random at times and less random at others, but each child has (again) an underlying logic for what gets held onto harder than other things; children's lack of ability to work towards their goal is in large part why they are so prone to meltdowns. if you couldn't drink a glass of water when you're thirsty - if you had to get someone to help you each time, you'd end up pretty pissed every time they dragged their heels as well. and if that was true for everything you needed? [a/n: i'm aware this is reality for many disabled people! which is why adultism and ableism are so closely entwined as well]. but children ARE capable of working towards many of their goals in their own ways, whether those are emotional or physical goals.

but if you don't see children as people, though, all of those things fall apart, and you end up with the...idea of what role this creature is supposed to fill in the lives of people who look at her. this is inherently dehumanizing, make no mistake, it makes the child something that never appears to experience emotions that don't fill that idea or diverge strongly from that role, which in turn makes the character flat and uninteresting. there's no reason for us to care what happens to her, narratively, because the only thing we do have to care about is what happens to the people who care about her. she's not a character, she's an object that furthers the emotions of the other characters. she's a morality pet, or meaninglessly cute, or an aesop. there's nothing outside that for her. you could replace her with a puppy and literally nothing would change.

it's so chilling to walk through an area where the houses are surrounded by blank sterile lawns and see a big lilac bush in full bloom without a single bug on it. No bees, no butterflies, not a stir of activity.

The neighborhood association where I work hires a truck to spray the whole subdivision. It trundles up every driveway and sprays every yard with pesticides. The children excitedly tell me about "the bug man" and know which days he comes on. I know when he's been there, because in the following days I see the beetles, butterflies, bees, and more, all struggling on the pavement, slowly dying. The children do not realize why they are there. They poke at the bugs in fascination. I hate it.

That's. Horrible. I have no words

Like

Those insecticides are toxic to humans as well, many are proven carcinogens, and their residues stick around for years inside homes

But even if that wasn't so, insect populations worldwide are plummeting, and the entire food chain depends on them. Most plants and animals could not exist without insects, period

Keeping the insect ecosystem in balance is important for human health and long term flourishing. Not all species are impacted equally by these toxic chemicals, and the elimination of one species can cause an explosion in another.

For example, some of the major predators of ticks are ants, spiders, and beetles

If you kill all your ants, spiders, and beetles, it'll take a long time for them to re-establish, but ticks can return because of a feral cat walking across your grass

What's more, scientists have found that excluding animals from an area makes the amount of ticks that can be collected in that area to explode. We're talking 2-3 times the amount of ticks actively foraging for things to latch onto. It seems like hungrier ticks seek food sources more and bite people more. This leads to the hypothesis that global defaunation is one of the causes of the explosion in tick borne diseases in recent years

Many birds depend on insects for food, bluebirds specifically eat a ton of mosquitoes

If you wipe out most arthropods, the the small mammals and birds that eat the bugs will visit your yard much less. Guess what that means

Current projections predict that the insect declines will be heavily impactful upon bees, butterflies, and moths, but could increase the populations of...flies and cockroaches.

Not to mention that as all the natural predators of agricultural pest insects suffer, more and more pesticides will be needed to get enough crop yields and it becomes a vicious cycle of poisoning the planet and farm laborers more and more severely to avoid collapse of food systems

Your neighborhood association is creating a bleak, sick, hungry future for those kids and everyone else.

Like, think about it:

If you kill and destroy everything in your surroundings that doesn't benefit you directly, soon the only critters that can live there are the creatures that are parasites on you directly or that compete with you for resources.

And now they don't have any predators to keep them at bay.

reblogging this again because researching ticks changed my brain around

like I thought "Yeah re-wilding will probably increase the risk of ticks but we just need to make tick safety widespread and common knowledge"

but then I RESEARCHED it

and the research was like "Actually tick diseases have increased DRAMATICALLY over the past 40 years, and tick ranges are expanding hugely and it's mostly unrelated to climate change so far. And we did experiments and in areas where there aren't any animals, the number of ticks that catch onto things passing through the area explodes, it's like 2-3 times the number of ticks. Which is like, wait, weird, I thought animals spread ticks. But we think what's happening is that when there's no animals, the ticks engage in more questing behavior to find food."

and I was like "Wait, but if the decline of animals is making the ticks look for food more, wouldn't they...wait. Oh no. OH NO. We're the food!"

and I looked at more research

and the research said "so the main things that kill ticks seems to be spiders, ants, and beetles."

and I was like "spiders, ants, and beetles? the things that people see as pests and try to kill with chemicals that contaminate the whole ecosystem?—OH FUCK"

Basically it's like

Expectation: destroying nature= fewer ticks, which means less disease

Reality: destroying nature= hungrier ticks that want to suck your blood way more and less spiders ants and beetles to eat them for you

Avatar

characters who refuse to heal. characters who change but only for the worse. characters who are trapped by their grief and rage. characters who unravel throughout the narrative. i am putting them in my pocket for later

my writing fundamentally changed forever ten years ago when i realized you could use sentence structure to control people’s heart rates. is this still forbidden knowledge or does everyone know it now

?????? *raises hand* I’ve been writing for years and don’t know this trick by these words! do tell?

Okay, so a few people have asked for me to cite the dark magics at them, and i’m super happy to share because it’s my favorite thing ever. 

so, let’s see if i can explain this the same way that i learned. read a sentence out loud. you come to a full stop when you hit the period, and you take a normal, breath. but, when you hit a comma, you take a slightly longer pause. and when you hit a dash - you take an even longer pause. 

this is a natural rhythm that we pick up when we’re first taught to read; we do it without even thinking. but when you start to think about it, you realize that it can become a tool.

think of your heartbeat. a period is badump. a comma is badump-dump. and a dash is thump badump. one breath. a longer breath. two breaths.

that means what you read automatically affects the rhythm of your breathing and your heartrate. which means that you can control the amount of physical tension your reader feels… by altering your punction and your sentence structure.

for fast paced scenes, you use short sentences. a lot of hard stops. mostly periods, with just a few comma’s thrown in for the full breath. your reader’s heartrate accelerates. their breathing is slightly and unintentionally, on their end, quicker. you hit the dramatic ending of the scene - and your reader’s body phsyically feels the gasp, the breath of fresh air, of these longer sentences.

now, read that paragraph again ant take note of your natural pauses, and how it subtly affects your breathing. 

the same thing can be said of comma’s and dashes. while they can be used as a breath of fresh air, they can also cause a new line of tension as they lead your reader to hold their breath. during this section, you should use longer sentences; breaking up the harshness of the pauses by using variations of punction. read this paragraph out loud from the start and take note of how long you go between pauses and full breaths. 

and then, comes the biggest trick.

the hard stop.

the paragraph.

because while the periods, commas, and dashes are variations on a short stop, the paragraph is a hard stop. you take a full breath. you pause for a moment, then move to the start of the next paragraph.

which means you can create an entirely new sort of dramatic tension. read the sentences that are in bold. see how you take a naturally longer pause at the end of each paragraph?

see how it makes you feel? 

how it makes you breath different? 

how doing it once, twice, or three times creates a different line of tension? 

this little magic trick can be used to cause a reader’s heartrate to speed up during a fight or chase scene. it can be used to cause their breathing to slow down during moments of dramatic tension, sorrow, or softness. and it can be used to create hard breaks that add a new level of physically felt emphasis to your written work.

i hope these examples make sense! it’s my favorite writing trick!

Avatar

while the idea holds water – just as music has notation that tells you how loud or soft, how quick or slow – writing has notation to tell you where to pause, for how long, and the tone of that pause. the problem is you need to be aware of where the interpretation above violates some long-standing conventions.

let’s start with some examples, so you get a sense of what I mean.

Thinking today about how as someone with major texture issues around most fruits and vegetables, it would have helped so much if someone had come to me years ago and said

Hey:

  1. Make it tiny
  2. Mix it with something Good Texture that you like

"Eat healthy!" they say, and then they show you pictures of a smiling woman digging a fork into half a butternut squash or eyeing a bowl of whole blueberries like a ravening wolf and your spine wants to crawl out through your skull at the thought of that Texture in your mouth.

But you know what I can do? Cut zucchini into paper-thin slices and cook it with noodles and marinara. Chop that spinach fine and scramble it with eggs and cheese. If I'm having a day where the thought of a grape popping in my mouth makes me nauseous, I can cut it in half. My chinese takeout gets diced into tiny pieces and mixed into the rice. It doesn't work with everything - seeds are still a Major Problem - but the number of fruits and veg and even world cuisines that I can eat has expanded SO MUCH since I discovered this. YMMV, but it's such a stupidly simple thing to do, and nobody ever told me.