charles leclerc, pierre gasly, and daniel ricciardo winning at monza + a good song never dies
la fortuna è cieca, ma la sfortuna ci vede benissimo
a tribute to the lucky winners of monza, and the years that came after
Me: I’m tired of cliche romance stuff in media.
Cliche romance stuff: *happens but with a ship I like*
Me:
Someone in the notes of the last Leyendecker post I reblogged mentioned having difficulty telling his work and Rockwell’s apart, and I know from experience that many people get them confused, which is somewhat astonishing as, to my eyes, their styles are very distinct. Leyendecker was Rockwell’s idol and mentor, but they were very different people and were interested in portraying different aspects of humanity, even when the basic subject matter was the same.
Surface-level, here are some differences:
- Leyendecker smoothed out faults and imperfections (in the young. he stylized them in the old); Rockwell exaggerated them to mild or moderate caricature
- Leyendecker approached his paintings as sculpture- even the merest clothing folds are carved out of the paint; Rockwell approached his paintings as drawings- the underlying contour always shines through.
- Leyendecker used broad hatching brushstrokes and areas of smooth shine; Rockwell used more naturalistic texture and lighting
- Leyendecker created idolized, larger-than-life figures that feel Hellenistic in their perfection; Rockwell created intimate scenes populated by figures that feel familiar in their specificity
- Leyendecker’s best and most comfortable work was as a fashion/lifestyle illustrator; Rockwell’s best and most comfortable work was as an editorial/humor illustrator
- Leyendecker created beautiful still lives with his figures; Rockwell told compelling stories
- Leyendecker often created erotic tension in his paintings; Rockwell almost never did.
See below: Two paintings of soldiers with women, but in Rockwell’s there is a clear punchline, and while the poses are contrived for the sake of composition, they’re not self-conscious. The women are pretty- as demanded by the central joke- but not truly sexualized anywhere but in the mind of the young soldier who is being overloaded with cake and attention.
Contrast Leyendecker’s soldiers with a young nurse. Everyone in this image is posing attractively- no one has their mouth full or ears sticking out. Each crease and fold is sharp and sculptural, and the light picks out their best features- in particular the shoulders and posterior of the soldier facing away from the viewer. There is neither joke nor story, merely a group of beautiful young people, portrayed with deft brushwork and graceful lines. (and check out that hatching! That’s indicator #1 that you’ve got a Leyendecker image)
Leyendecker was very comfortable with “hot young things wearing clothes”, and did them very VERY well, but his facility with idealization came at the cost of personalization, which was fine for fashion illustration, but shows in his domestic scenes:
Beautiful, but… cold. (Also, that hand on the left- who holds a baby with their hand like that??? Good lord, J.C.) Compare a Rockwell illustration (for a baby food brand, I believe) of a mother and baby: this is clearly a real and individual young mother and baby, interacting exactly how parents and babies really interact.
Even when they did basically the same content, and putting aside posing or composition or anything other than objective visual analysis, it’s still obvious who is who:
- Red: NR’s smoother rendering vs JCL’s super cool hatching
- Green: NR’s naturalistic cloth folds vs JCL’s sculptural stylization
- Blue: NR’s natural lighting vs JCL’s world where everything is shiny
Now go forth, confident in the knowledge that you’ll never confuse a Rockwell or a Leyendecker ever again, and can refute any claim that their styles are ‘virtually identical’.
Interesting post! I have to agree that their styles are completely different, but I’ve spent a lot of time looking at Leyendecker’s work (which I strongly prefer.) This is a good guide for anyone who isn’t sure about the differences between the artists’ work and would like to learn more.
Fan Bingbing attends the Louis Vuitton Resort 2018 show at the Miho Museum on May 14, 2017 in Koka, Japan.
me trying to find out if someone is gay: so are you, y'know…. a friend of the babadook?
Chris Pine refuses to answer the question “Would you swipe left or right for Anna Kendrick on Tinder?” and instead gives this response
whether u had a crush on aragorn or legolas defines ur Type forever
I read Hamlet back in high school and to this day my absolute favorite thing about it was when Guildenstern was trying to fool Hamlet into doing something or other and Hamlet’s savvy to it but rather than saying “you’re lying and trying to trick me” instead Hamlet outta nowhere whips out this flute and tells Guildenstern to play it.
And Guildenstern is all “I dont know how to play a flute, my lord”
And Hamlet takes a dramatic pause before he absolutely ruins Guildenstern with, “Well thats funny considering you thought you could play me”
this post sounds like im exaggerating but im not it’s straight up canon
incredibly realistic wolf animation,,,,,,,,, 3d animation has come so far these days
Please press play.omg
I KEEP ON GETTING .5 SECONDS INTO THIS VIDEO AND THEN I HAVE TO TURN IT OFF BECAUSE I LAUGH TOO DAMN HARD
Okay, I don’t usually click on videos because I’m lazy that way but this last comment convinced and yes, click on this video. So happy we invented the Internet.
Mom Simone with her 3 meat sons + 1 fashion icon.
I’m watching La La Land and it’s ok but it could be a lot better!
- Ryan Gosling didn’t seem suited to the musical aspects of the role, maybe cast a different hearthrob with more experience in the genre, like Zac Efron
- Emma Stone similarly didn’t seem to thrive with the singing and dancing, so maybe cast someone again with experience and heck why not someone with proven chemistry with zac efron.. maybe vanessa hudgens
- Maybe if the male love interest was into something a little more relatable than Jazz? Like maybe basketball?
- Female character seemed a little flat, maybe if she was also incredibly gifted with math and science?
- Setting of LA wasn’t particularly relatable, maybe if it was set somewhere universal? Like High School?
- Just watch High School Musical
Dead Eyes Howerton
“You remember feelings, right?”
“euuuh i’m james from twin peaks and i’m sad because my bike won’t fuck me and i’m here to make the next five minutes feel like an hour”
Irish people; The faeries aren’t real
Irish people; No fucking way will I go in that faerie ring
Look, I don’t believe in God, but I will not disrespect the Good Gentlemen of the Hills. That’s just common sense.
Between this and the Icelanders with their elves I do not understand what is going on above the 50th parallel.
My general rule of thumb: you don’t have to believe in everything, but don’t fuck with it, just in case.
^^^ that part





