Avatar

Tired(TM)

@demonpixierhi

*Rhi (Ree) / she/they / Twenties / anti harassment / no under 18's please* Used to be a cesspool, now I'm cleaning it up and matching who I am now lmao

So uhhhh. I'm back here I guess lol

A lot has changed in the however many years it has been since the great porn ban and right now.

While I try to clean my shit up a bit (I think I might still be following some yeesh blogs from my closeted hateful little snot days), any peeps fancy pointing me in the direction of some good blogs?

Currently I'm into generic fandom memes (AO3 tags, "my fave shipping dynamic", etc), MHA (specifically Inko Midorya, Uraraka Ochaco, and Dabi), and procedural dramas like NCIS, Bones, Body of Proof, and 9-1-1.

Thank you for taking the time to read this, if this somehow finds its way to you.

Avatar
Reblogged

Don't worry @coockie8, you dont have to hide in the tags! :) To answer your question, no I am not autistic to my knowledge. While I am aware that autism is thought of as a spectrum or an "ice-cream bar", I also know that this philosophy can often lead to people with only a few autistic behaviours having the "autistic" label slapped on them.(Not that I disagree with this philosophy I'm just saying it can lead to this.) House is most likely not autistic. Of course he shows some autistic traits (and some traits that people mistake for autistic), but he doesn't have nearly enough of these traits to be considered autistic. House doesn't have any of the *most common* symptoms (trouble understanding allistics, sensory issues, etc). While this doesn't mean he is for sure not autistic it makes it much more likely to be the case because, although he exhibits SOME symptoms, he doesn't have nearly enough of them and doesn't have the most common and indicative ones. My problem with the people I was referring to in my original post (which I probably could've worded better) was that they act as if house being autistic is objective fact, despite the fact that it is unlikely at best.

Bro, I wasn't "hiding", I just clearly don't care nearly as much about this fucking headcanon as you do lmao

House is a show I watch casually and occasionally reblog posts about on tumblr, and as an Autistic person, I understand why some people have the headcanon that he could be Autistic. Is it annoying when people insist their headcanons are objective fact? Absolutely. But you are out here getting so heated over a fucking headcanon to the point you're making poorly worded statements about Autistic people (and I am not talking about your original post) bordering on ableism.

It's a fucking headcanon bro, chill the fuck out, because it's really not that deep

oh no... don't accuse me of being... ableist... :0 baseless accusations! my biggest weakness!!1!1!1!1! Firstly if you'd read what I typed I was specifically complaining about people who claim house being autistic as objective canonical fact, not a headcanon. They're not saying their headcanon is canon, they're actually analysing house as a character and coming to the (wrong) conclusion that he was meant to be autistic. Btw you say you watch house casually (meaning you haven't even finished it?), almost like you're talking out of your ass about a character you don't know the full story of hmmm. Also you're the only one who needs to chill... saying "fuck" a few times isn't going to make your points any more true.

"I have nothing to say, so I will shame you for using naughty no-no words because I Am Chill and You Are Not. I am very unbothered and intellectual, you see"

lol way to not read anything that was said... you only focus on one part I added in response to this person claiming I was mad or whatever. Don't even try to claim I'm being some kind of elitist over house when this person was literally just claiming that I was "talking out my ass" about autism and that I know nothing about it.

Also your ice-cream bar metaphor is really flawed. Most people have some ice-cream but autistic people have more, and in many different flavours to the point where it becomes a "disorder". Btw this "autism can be anything" mindset is so stupid, at the end of the day a psychiatric condition must have symptoms and there is no avoiding that. You're just perpetuating bs that allows thoughts like "everyone is a little autistic" to come about.

You're really trying to psychoanalyse me because I want to disprove people mischaracterising someone from my fav show lmao? But surely you're right... I must subconsciously hate autistics and be an ableist bastard...

ps: Please tell me where I used the no true Scotsman fallacy I would really like to know./gen

I mean, I never called you an ableist bastard. Or even ableist. I just said you were weird, and should probably do some soul searching. I would never psychoanalyse you over your favourite shoe either; shoes are not what I know lol.

What I do know is that, as someone who is autistic, that trying to gatekeep autism is a waste of time. You either catch out the very rare faker, or actively make a hostile space for someone who is earnestly starting to figure out if this is something they are. In my experience, people who do have the hunch they might be autistic... generally are. It's hard to describe to someone who isn't autistic, but it's really hard to convincingly fake a neurological condition. It's a running joke in autistic communities that whenever an undiagnosed friend starts questioning, we give them a peer review lol. If it turns out they aren't, there's a chance they could have some other neurological condition - and all they've done is be incorrect about themselves while they try to figure things out. No harm, no foul.

You are correct that you do need symptoms, but those symptoms are as wildly different as the person who has them. Back to my flawed ice cream bar metaphor, if you get rainbow sprinkles on your ice cream, does everyone get the exact same amount of each colour as you? Well, obviously not. Sprinkles don't work like that. Does that make someone's rainbow sprinkles less "sprinkle-y" because they don't have the exact amount of sprinkles you approve of?

That said, in regards to the claim that you believe cookie8 is accusing you of "talking out your ass" about autism, I do find it peculiar that the self admitted not autistic person is arguing against different autistic people all agreeing your takes/opinions on autism are uninformed at best. This is why I called this the "no true Scotsman" fallacy. You are being faced with autistic people analysing a character through the lens of their lived experience. Instead of either curating your fandom experience to avoid this discussion (the block button is free) or doing some introspection, you are stamping your feet about how the autistic people are wrong, and how you know what real autism is - unlike us wrong autistics.

Anyway, this probably won't do anything for you. Given you've been pitching a fit about how autistic people aren't giving you grace, while you talk down to them about a condition you don't have. Reblog, reply, idc. If you find that certain shoes fit you, maybe don't whine about how everyone is forcing you into the shoe while you place them on your own feet.

Avatar
Reblogged

Don't worry @coockie8, you dont have to hide in the tags! :) To answer your question, no I am not autistic to my knowledge. While I am aware that autism is thought of as a spectrum or an "ice-cream bar", I also know that this philosophy can often lead to people with only a few autistic behaviours having the "autistic" label slapped on them.(Not that I disagree with this philosophy I'm just saying it can lead to this.) House is most likely not autistic. Of course he shows some autistic traits (and some traits that people mistake for autistic), but he doesn't have nearly enough of these traits to be considered autistic. House doesn't have any of the *most common* symptoms (trouble understanding allistics, sensory issues, etc). While this doesn't mean he is for sure not autistic it makes it much more likely to be the case because, although he exhibits SOME symptoms, he doesn't have nearly enough of them and doesn't have the most common and indicative ones. My problem with the people I was referring to in my original post (which I probably could've worded better) was that they act as if house being autistic is objective fact, despite the fact that it is unlikely at best.

Bro, I wasn't "hiding", I just clearly don't care nearly as much about this fucking headcanon as you do lmao

House is a show I watch casually and occasionally reblog posts about on tumblr, and as an Autistic person, I understand why some people have the headcanon that he could be Autistic. Is it annoying when people insist their headcanons are objective fact? Absolutely. But you are out here getting so heated over a fucking headcanon to the point you're making poorly worded statements about Autistic people (and I am not talking about your original post) bordering on ableism.

It's a fucking headcanon bro, chill the fuck out, because it's really not that deep

oh no... don't accuse me of being... ableist... :0 baseless accusations! my biggest weakness!!1!1!1!1! Firstly if you'd read what I typed I was specifically complaining about people who claim house being autistic as objective canonical fact, not a headcanon. They're not saying their headcanon is canon, they're actually analysing house as a character and coming to the (wrong) conclusion that he was meant to be autistic. Btw you say you watch house casually (meaning you haven't even finished it?), almost like you're talking out of your ass about a character you don't know the full story of hmmm. Also you're the only one who needs to chill... saying "fuck" a few times isn't going to make your points any more true.

"I have nothing to say, so I will shame you for using naughty no-no words because I Am Chill and You Are Not. I am very unbothered and intellectual, you see"

I GOT A FUCKING RAISE THE POTATO WORKED WTF

This potato works. Every. Fucking. Time.

Then bring me luck

the day after I posted this last time I was notified that I was selected for a really cool mentorship gig and got an unrelated glowing review at work

And notice the potato doesn’t guilt you with “if you don’t, something horrible will happen.” Potato wouldn’t betray you like that, because potato is a refined person of good humor and character, and understands that, sometimes, a visit to your dashboard just isn’t convenient right now. Sometimes you just went on a fandom gif reblogging spree or your energy is low, you do not have the time to make your dashboard suitable to guests, and a polite visit just isn’t in the cards. Potato understands this, and doesn’t get upset, or gods forbid, throws a tantrum and wishes ill on your household. Instead, Potato merely stores away their blessings for a later visit and leaves as a good friend should.

Be like Potato. Be a good friend.

i know what i want, potato, come through for me!

MADE IT BOIS!!!

Still open to being spammed until I opt out, and will spam back whenever I have the time!

This is my blanket consent to being spam booped until I opt out. I only hope you'll be alright with me spam booping back lol

need a full body massage a margarita 400mg of ibuprofen a plate of brownies at least an hour in a jacuzzi and 20,000 dollars cash

reblog to give a mutual a full body massage a margarita 400mg of ibuprofen a plate of brownies at least an hour in a jacuzzi and 20,000 dollars in cash

Avatar
tonysopranobignaturals-deactiva

screaming

A coworker of mine shared a story that she interviewed for a place, they asked her if she could become and animal, what would she be. She said dog, because they are loyal, friendly, and protect their family. The interviewer said that's wrong, because dogs are lazy. The correct answer was giraffe, because they reach high for leaves and that's a sign of ambition...

????????