Avatar

Welcome to my dungeon

@dark-kind-of-mystique

+18 NSFW | mainly fandom content | sideblog | sometimes I try to draw

My NSFW sideblog, minors will be blocked, etc. Mainly fandom content (obey me, twisted wonderland, romance club, spn, marvel, got, etc).

Recently began to post my own writing, so it'll probably won't be the best as I'm still learning, so I do drabbles and hc as practice, so feel free to request.

Here is my Masterlist

Following and liking from my main @reconsidering-my-life-choices

Do y’all ever think about how MC probably de-Karened the brothers?

For example, Levi goes to buy the last figurine at demon GameStop and it’s just gone out of stock:

Before Mc: he floods the store, summons Lotan, and drowns a bunch of people.

After MC:

- Mc: Aw, I’m sorry they don’t have it. Why don’t we go see if there’s any other places that got X?

- Levi: *sniffle* Ok πŸ₯Ί

Or Lucifer hits up an antique dealer to pick up a tea set. When he goes home, he finds out that it has a chip in the rim.

Before MC: he either doesn’t give a shit or he goes back and skins the dealer then hangs him from the ceiling a la Predator.

After Mc:

- Mc: This one has a chip in it.

- Lucifer: What? That damn deale-

- Mc: I like it! :D If we throw it out, it might feel unloved and I’d feel awful for not cherishing it the way it is.

- Lucifer: … That’s a whimsical notion, but if you like it so much, it can be your designated cup from now on. (He will love that chipped cup from now on)

Or a restaurant runs out of food and normally Beel would throw a tantrum and eat the staff, but when restaurants run out now, MC just offers to take him home and bake a pie for him and he’s like OkπŸ₯° and leaves happy as can be (and all the staff are intact)

HEY YOU, YEAH YOU! HEAR ME OUT!!

SO, DIAVOLO CAN TELL WHEN A PERSON IS LYING, RIGHT??

SO, IN ONE OF THE EPISODES OF NB, YOU HAVE THE CHOICE TO ADMIT THAT YOU'RE FROM THE FUTURE, RIGHT??

SO, DIAVOLO IS LIKE 'WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY'- RIGHT???

EVEN THOUGH BARBATOS JUMPS IN WITH HIS AUDACITY RADAR GUN AT THE READY, DIAVOLO HAD TO HAVE NOTICED THAT WE WERE TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT BEING FROM THE FUTURE... RIGHT???!!!

Rough day?

β€’ you are strong β€’ you are valid β€’ no, your body looks just fine β€’ tomorrow will be better β€’ eat a snack β€’ drink water β€’ brush your teeth β€’ get up and stretch β€’ take a break β€’ text a friend β€’ make some tea β€’ listen to some music β€’ focus on your breathing β€’ you are allowed to eat β€’ go for a walk β€’ draw/doodle β€’ watch your favorite show β€’ play with your pet β€’ get in comfy clothes β€’ make a blanket fort β€’ take a shower β€’ organize your bookshelf β€’ dust your room β€’ you are not stupid β€’ you are important β€’ don’t pressure yourself β€’ you will finish your homework β€’ everything will get better β€’ it’s ok to be sad sometimes β€’ crying doesn’t make you weak β€’ go to bed early and get some rest

tomorrow will be better.

Obey me! AU concept:

(spoilers for season 2 of the OG game)

So it's canon that there are infinite timelines, and an infinite set of brothers and MCs.

Imagine in one of those timelines they couldn't find the ring of light in time, and MCs powers ended up killing the brothers and MC went mad with grief and power and ended up destroying their timeline.

Now corrupted with grief and uncontrollable power, an emotionally unstable au!MC is on their way to the main timeline to get rid of MC and take their place to reunite with the brothers again.

Yes i got inspiration from 'multiverse of madness'
Avatar

Lucifer: Comparing MC and Solomon is like comparing apples and oranges.

MC: We’re both unique in our own ways?

Lucifer: Apples are superior in every way and all oranges should be eliminated.

Solomon:…..which one of us is the orange?

Avatar

why is explaining a villains sad backstory always taken as an effort toward excusing their actions. why does the conversation need to involve the question of excusing anything rather than just making their present behavior way more interesting by complicating their feelings or their motivations. why is acknowledging complicated feelings or motivations taken as apologism in and of itself. why is everyone so incredibly boring

Mc: Belphie is like a weird cat.

Mammon: Yeah? Why?

Mc: Well, when he is awake he seems rough and responsive, but wants cuddles and attention at random moments. He also likes you to be with him all the time when he sleeps even if he doesn't say so.

Mammon: I see.

Mc: And Satan is an independent cat.

Mammon: Why do you say so?

Mc: You see, he can be calm and suddenly bite you, in his case get angry. He will always be on top of you and looking for pampering but you can never touch him.

Mammon: I see...

Mc: ...

Mammon: ...

Mammon: Is that why Satan and Belphie are asleep on top of you?

Mc: Effectively, I thought you'd never ask, now help me please, I've been here for three hours and I can't feel my legs anymore.

Mammon: Only if this night you cuddle me.

Mc: Deal, but you're not a cat, you're a little bird.

Mammon: *lifting his brothers* I'll live with it.

.

.

β€œAuthors should not be ALLOWED to write about–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative

β€œThis book should be taken off of shelves for featuring–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative

β€œSchools shouldn’t teach this book in class because–” you are an anti-intellectual and functionally a conservative

β€œNobody actually likes or wants to read classics because they’re–” you are an anti-intellectual and an idiot

β€œI only read YA fantasy books because every classic novel or work of literary fiction is problematic and features–” you are an anti-intellectual and you are robbing yourself of the full richness of the human experience.

"you are functionally a conservative" is such a good and clarifying insult

Literally right after I saw this post, I saw another post in a discord chat for BOOK EDITORS in which an outspokenly liberal editor talked about how Nabokov should have never been published because he wrote about p*dophiles and described women's bodies in ways that made her uncomfortable. She described his writing as "objectively terrible" and said she wanted to burn his books. And other editors were bringing up classics they didn't like and talking about how they wanted to throw them in the trash. This wasn't like a light "unpopular opinion!" conversation. This was actual book editors talking about how books should be destroyed and censored.

There is something so scary and toxic in global culture right now. The revival of fascism is influencing everyone's mindset and approach to art, regardless of where they fall on the political spectrum.

I see far more books being censored today than when I was a kid. Librarians handed me The Catcher in the Rye, The Sexual Politics of Meat, and Animal Farm when I was literally 8-11. My mom would never have taken a book away from me. I read everything from the Tao Te Ching to the Qur'an to atheist texts under my desk at school. Teachers thought nothing of it or encouraged it. Books seemed universally acknowledged as sacrosanct to me.

Now I can't find any adults who don't hesitate or want to make exceptions when it comes to censorship. Even the most liberal social activist librarians I know go, "well except for book X..."

Functionally conservative. It's so important to have the language to express that.

Thank you for this addition!

Posts that little sheep bitch mc from om! would make (part 1?)

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ

πŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œπŸπŸ©·πŸ’œ