(TW: numbers - weight, calories)
You know that thing people do when they're talking about eating disorders in a generalized, abstract way and they cite an exaggeratedly low weight or calorie count as an example of what they're saying?
Like, "You'll be 75 lbs and still want to lose weight." Or, "It starts out skipping a meal here and there, then suddenly you're eating 200 calories a day."
Can we cut that shit out?
Mentioning numbers at all can be triggering, but this context in particular seems to result in exaggeration, which is supremely unhelpful. I was severely underweight at my sickest and my weight was still well above the numbers people always seem to associate with anorexia. This made--and still makes--me feel like I wasn't "sick enough," when in reality, I was very, very ill.
Some people with eating disorders reach 75 lbs. Some reach 115 lbs. Some reach 155 lbs. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. There is no magical weight you must reach to have an ED.
Some people with eating disorders eat 200 calories. Some people with eating disorders eat 800 calories. Some people with eating disorders eat 1400 calories. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. There is no magical limit you must set to have an ED.
⬆️ ALL of these people are sick and they ALL deserve help, because they have an ED. None of them are any less eating disordered just because their weight or behaviors may not have reached the worst possible extreme. So can we stop jumping to the worst possible extreme every time we talk about eating disorders?
I feel the same way about anorexia shock pieces, BTW. It's the kind of sensationalist journalism where they'll write about an extreme case of anorexia (almost never bulimia, because for some ridiculous reason, AN-R gets all the attention), detailing the affected individual's behaviors, listing their stats, and showing graphic images of their body just to get a rise out of the reader. It's even in the headline: "22-year-old anorexic woman weighs just x lbs!"
Guess what? Contrary to what those shock pieces would have us believe, the vast majority of eating disorder cases do not look like an emaciated cisgender white girl with AN-R who can hardly stand. Once again:
Can we stop jumping to the worst possible extreme every time we talk about eating disorders?
Because as we all know, eating disorders are highly competitive. When someone uses numbers while giving an example of an ED--whether it's a generic hypothetical or a specific case--any eating disordered person listening will immediately want to "beat" that. They'll compare themselves and feel "less sick" if they can't match an exaggerated number. You all know this, because you can relate.
So let's cut it out, okay? Before mentioning numbers in terms of weight/calories/etc., ask yourself if you really need to, or if it's just going to trigger someone--and definitely avoid exaggeration or sensationalism.
And always remember: if you're comparing yourself to this sort of thing, it's likely an exaggerated oversimplification of eating disorders as a whole. No matter how much you weigh, no matter how much you eat, if you're struggling with your relationship to food and your body, you deserve help. Period. There is no such thing as "not sick enough." I promise.
I love you. Take care of yourself. ❤️