are they defining sex by just chromosomes? thats so terfy. sex is literally a spectrum :/
You assuming that the reason we don’t want co-ed sports is because we think men are better is a you problem. Maybe you assumed that’s what we think because it’s what you think, but we think that men treat us like shit and we want spaces to ourselves so we can avoid their harassment
ill be completely honest even as a drawing enjoyer i just cannot understand how people can find most anime girls sexy like it would be as if someone handed me a piece of styrofoam with doodled eyes on it and said dont you want to dick that down no. no i dont man why do you
i’ve never even heard of this but on the context of the headline alone i want so much to vaporize everyone who keeps making me read the words “high school sex comedy” or “high school sex drama” or “sexy high school xyz” etc etc seriously i feel like im going insane here. make ANYTHING else im begging you
anyway it’s funny how you can say masculinity is a prison and people generally agree, but when you say femininity is a prison suddenly people think you’re personally attacking every single person who has ever enjoyed wearing lipstick
I PROMISE YOU ARE NOT ASKING FOR TOO MUCH. YOU WILL MEET SOMEONE WHO IS SO OBSESSED WITH YOU THAT THEY WILL GIVE SO MUCH MORE THAN YOU WOULD EVER ASK FOR. AND THEY WILL DO IT ALL JUST BECAUSE THEY LOVE YOU
No they're right actually and they should say it.
The lefts descent into obsession with identity politics means all these boys get from these spaces is essentially being told they're inherently monstrous or will grow up to be so.
12 year old boys are not evil. They're children. And they're susceptible to manipulation from these fucks on the right who have sadly correctly identified that large swathes of the left will ignore and shun them. People turn to extremist factions when they feel ignored and dehumanised.
A 12 year old boy online isn't going to be able to read the nuances in your uber ironic but not really actually ironic "all white men are inherently trash" hot takes. They're going to take that at face value because they're 12 and that's what 12 year olds do. And they're going to feel angry, rejected and judged by your words. And then fucks like Andrew Tate get to swoop in and tell them that you're wrong and start the ball rolling on that indoctrination.
If you're an adult leftist and you honestly think teenage boys possess the wherewithal to purposefully follow dangerous Misogynists like Andrew Tate in order to "preserve their own privilege long term" then I'm sorry to say you're too far gone and I'd suggest logging off and actually trying to have a conversation with a kid who is vulnerable to the grooming of these uber misogynists and treat them as a human being instead of a reflection of an identity you've boxed them into.
You may tick more diversity boxes but you are still the adult. Start acting like it.
Now this is one of my favourite tik toks
Trans ppl really are savants at turning the mundane into the sublime huh
bros this is lit but dream even bigger if u wanna. brew ur own moonshine. become such a regular at the local cracker barrel they know ur order, do the same w the liquor store and the smoke shop. spit sunflower seed shells into a miller light can and grunt at passing youths. drive a tractor down the street. ride a lawnmower down the street. fkn go off my fellow trans hicks GO OFF
Why do you need cross sex hormones to do any of this?
Could you even picture a hick spending money on plastic surgeries these fucking posers want to buy the aesthetic of being poor white trash just like they want to buy the aesthetic of being the opposite sex.
The fucking nerve of it. Trying to buy the appearance of nonconformity just like they fucking buy everything else. That snarl-toothed old man they're objectifying would hock his dip at them for trying to pay him to change their flat.
gen z obsessed with 'looking like someone who does that thing' but not tually wanting to do that thing... poser culture... yea
I guess Transgender people are only allowed to dress and act abnormally now
the point is you can be exactly like that without claiming or trying to be the opposite sex. that is, if youre not extremely misogynistic.
What on earth are you going on about? Do you really think the guy that posted that video believes he couldn’t do these things when he identified as a woman? This is a genuine question, that I would appreciate an answer to, because I am lost.
yes exactly i think thats a big fat reason. and believing theres things or "vibes" you can achieve while being a man but not while being a woman is a misogynistic idea, even if you dont explicitly say so its very obviously a latent idea in these peoples heads that partly dictates their actions
How can anyone read this and not think it’s the most loser-shit they’ve ever seen in their life. How did we get to the point where people fantasize about buying clothes and having a hobby as goal that can only be achieved via sex reassignment
The aesthetic of generational poverty is a gender now, apparently...
'Trans ppl really are savants at turning the mundane into the sublime huh'
No, they're not, because they're ignoring the mundanity of their own lives in favour of chasing a 'grass is greener' situation. When you're trapped in a symbolic mindset, you assign 'feelings' and 'states of mind' to certain aesthetic or narratives ideals, making them hyperreal. That 'old guy' isn't a real man, with hopes and dreams; he's a character, an archetype. You think you're making him sublime by romanticising his life, but you're not, really. You're the woman from Pulp's Common people; other people's lives are props, they are aesthetics to achieve, isolated from real-world cause and effect. That old man didn't just pop into existence, fully formed - he got that way because of circumstances in his life, also mundane, but very real to him, in a way that is impossible to you. If you want to claim his life for your own, you are ignoring your own mundane cause-and-effect that made you the way you are.
When you eat a piece of toast are you thinking 'I like this because it is a nice piece of toast', or are you thinking 'I like this because it reminds me of his lifesyle'? But him eating a piece of toast is both something that's not fundamentally different from you eating a piece of toast, and also, quite literally, world's apart from you eating a piece of toast. You're not going to feel like him when you emulate him, when you imagine what eating toast like him would feel like. Perhaps, instead, the point of eating a piece of toast isn't that it's more romantic when other people do it, but rather that toast is tasty and eating is important for you and your body and state of mind. Maybe, when he's eating a piece of toast, he's also thinking 'I like this because it is a nice piece of toast', meanwhile by emulating him you're, well, not thinking that, are you? Ironic, isn't it?
What you're chasing is not only impossible, but a trap, and take me as a warning. I regret a decade of making inauthentic choices for myself, of turning my environment and people around me into props, of believing that I was getting transcendant joy out of basic experiences that others took for granted. I robbed myself of the ability to be honest with myself about who I actually am and what I actually want to do, instead jamming myself into a box of aesthetic and narrative ideal. That is the exact opposite of turning the mundane into the sublime; it's ignoring the mundane in favour of hoping that you will achieve mastery over your own life story.
i really don’t think socrates would’ve said trans rights
this is what socrates would’ve said about trans rights
the opabiniic method
like theres no point arguing its the same thing over and over and over "i fulfill misogynistic male fantasies because I WANT TO and if you ask me to think about the motivation behind that, or where the ides come from, you're ANTI-FEMINIST. FEMINISM IS ABOUT ME AND WHAT I WANT"
Lmao literally women should be allowed to have female only spaces just because, and not just because of safeguarding from males. Women want to go to a women only gym? A women only club? A women only knitting circle? A women only concert, yoga class, workshop, etc? They should be allowed to without MALES pitching a fucking fit about it and demanding “inclusion.” Women should be allowed to seek out and use female only spaces because that’s our fucking right in this male centered, male dominated, male obsessed society. Just fucking BECAUSE.
"why shouldn't men be allowed in womens chess"
because they're men
"so you're saying women are worse at chess?"
no fuckhead thats a whole different sentence
Why the need for a separated sex chess league?
Why the need for anything? Whats the need for any chess league? Why do anything?
All these famous abuse survivors are all openly bisexual women. And they've all been accused of being liars, manipulative, sociopathic and generally mentally ill (BPD/bipolar) especially. The negative stereotypes the public attaches to bisexual women is coming back to have real world effects on them. Same sex attraction in women has always been associated with mental illness in media, your favorite "psychos" are usually bi or gay coded (Harley Quinn, mystique, Jennifer check, basic instinct, all bisexual femme fatales). That isn't good representation and never has been, especially when men who date bisexual women can use this inbuilt societal perception to discredit their victims in the eyes of the public. A women's bisexuality is considered a threat to men. Bisexual women you deserve love without abuse. We believe you! Keep your head up!
Mabel Hampton and her dog Liberation pouring over documents on the floor of the original Lesbian Herstory Archives located in Manhattan in 1977 | ph: Joan Nestle
Sharon Tate, photographed at Joshua Tree National Park in 1968.
I am convinced that the people on this site have completely collapsed the boundaries of fiction and reality to the extent that it's sullied all reading comprehension and prevents them from engaging sincerely with a text or work of media.
Taboo themes represented in fiction are not 1-to-1 with reality. Incest in fiction does not mean the author condones incest in reality. Cannibalism, abuse, murder, what have you -- these subjects are tales as old as time. Humanity has grappled with the darkest sides of itself in fiction since the inception of language. And being able to engage with such themes, even sympathize for those characters in fiction who participate in taboo acts, is a crucial part of understanding not only how to read and invest oneself in a work of art, but also this aids in understanding the world at large, particularly the concerns of a society at a certain time in history and in the present.
If you cannot look at a fabricated humanity in a mirror and see one's shadow and realize it as a possibility, then one will forever live in ignorance of the world and self.
Hair goals
(pictures of late victorian and edwardian era women)
