Avatar

@why-animals-do-the-thing / blog.whyanimalsdothething.com

  Why Animals Do The Thing is a two-part freelance animal science education effort! This tumblr blog hosts informal discussions about everything animals and encourages community discourse. The main website hosts in-depth articles on animal industry topics.

I’ve read your blog for years and I just wanted to tell you this because I think it’s incredibly funny! I play a zoo management game (planet zoo) a ton, I’ve got 200 hours of gameplay, and the whole focus of it is to build and customize a zoo to your hearts content, and it allows for some incredibly granular customization!

Because of that, and my special interest in animal care I’ve gotten a little obsessed with making enclosures that actually would function in a real life zoo. To the point that I’ve been using AZA care guides and zoo care documents to build habitats! I’ve just finished a capybara habitat using the AZA’s animal care manual, and it’s amazing how real it looks!

Just thought you might find it funny!

Avatar

Hello fellow Planet Zoo devotee! I have also put mumble mumble hours into that game. And I, too, find I am building facilities that reflect big AZA zoos - although I think that’s sheer habit on my end! (My work life balance could maaaaybe be questioned. After spending a day grinding through zoo stuff for work projects, I like to take a break and relax… by building and running a zoo!)

So here’s what I really want to know: do the in-game space, fencing, and husbandry requirements line up with the AZA ACMs? I know the game devs worked “with the zoo industry” to get it as accurate as it is, but I haven’t see anything about who. I’ve got some guesses based on things like what species are hard to get with conservation credits - lions and good male giraffe being rare is telling - but nothing concrete. If the game requirements match AZA regs, that would explain a lot!

Yes this is lovely, thank you. :)

Do you do “cuteness”/safety ratings?

Avatar

I do not. I am not a fan of the concept of “ratings” blogs in general, honestly. There’s a couple of reasons for that.

Firstly, I am a Tumblr Old, and every ratings-type blog I’ve ever seen that existed to tell people if animal content was okay or not has imploded over time. Sometimes that has been related to their content/topic of choice, sometimes not. It happened when the first blogs like that showed up, and it’s still happening now. Either way, they seem to be a direct path to endless drama, and I want none of that, thanks.

Second, ratings blogs have to be really, really tightly curated to the expertise of the blogger in order to be trustworthy, accurate sources. And when you’re in a position of being seen as an expert on animal stuff by the internet, it’s incredibly tempting to step outside your area of expertise to pass judgement on things. People like your opinions and want to hear them! You’re respected for your knowledge! It is a seductive, seductive path to being far too comfortable speaking outside your wheelhouse.

This is actually part of why the blog slowed down a few years ago and eventually went on hiatus for a while: as it got more and more popular, people wanted me to cover more and more things, and I ended up kinda paralyzed by the need to do so much research in order to respond to those requests. I didn’t want to spread misinformation, but it was so hard to just say no and not try to answer questions. I’m much more comfortable now setting boundaries for myself about what I know enough to address and what I don’t have the appropriate credentials for.

Third, to do any successful science communication - which is what running a rating blog effectively is - you have to know what you don’t know! This is something that comes with time and professional experience in a field. You can’t speedrun it or skip it. And if you don’t know what you don’t know on a topic you want to write about, you’re at high risk of spreading misinformation. Guess what? I know this one from experience! There were times I overreached in the early days of WADTT, either because I didn’t know I was unaware of something, or because it just felt so good to have people want to know what I thought! (My goal is to find the time to go back and share those posts with updated, corrected content and commentary).

As mentioned above, I do a lot of work to be comfortable with not knowing things. I either do the research needed to find an answer when I run into an unknown, admit I don’t know and can’t answer, or simply don’t engage with the topic if I can’t contribute productively. This is where a lot of ratings blogs run into issues, as they generally reflect just the individual knowledge of the blogger(s) writing them. There’s a big difference between having an opinion that you discuss with your friends, and having an opinion that you share with thousands or tens of thousands of people. If you’ve shared an incorrect opinion about something in a way that’s amplified across tumblr, even if you fix your mistake publicly, there’s no way to stop the earlier misinformation from continuing to spread.

And fourth, there’s that word I keep using: authoritative. Content that provides a rating is very black-and-white. This is bad. This is good. Do support this, don’t support that. Unfortunately, there are so, so few situations involving animals are actually that clear cut. This is especially true when we’re talking about recorded animal media, like photos, videos, and even documentaries, because a lot of the context has been removed. So that authoritative perspective? It’s really just someone on the internet telling you what you should believe.

I’d rather teach people how to think about animal content and draw their own conclusion. People gain so much more knowledge from engaging with the concepts themselves. If you just give someone an answer about a video being ok or not, for instance, they don’t learn how to assess the next one themselves. But if you teach them what questions to ask, how to work through what they want to learn, how to assess context, and where to find the information they need, they’re able to do it themselves with content in the future. Teaching and encouraging independent analysis of animal media is a much better way to stop misinformation or unethical content from spreading compared to just telling people some stuff is bad and they should stop sharing it.

So nope, no ratings here. Sometimes I’ll comment on things that my professional background allows me to be comfortable having an authoritative opinion on (e.g. the danger of unmonitored interactions between dogs and babies) but most of the time, I’m going to tell you what I see, what I know, what I don’t know, and what my thoughts are and why. My goal in running this blog and teaching people is about the journey, not the destination.

hi! so, i have a cat, and she is very touchy. like, extremely touchy. in fact, her favorite nap spot is directly in my face.

I'm not joking. I sleep on my side, and she refuses to sleep anywhere other than directly in front of my face. I'm pretty sure she'd sleep on top of my head if she could.

my question is, why? it sounds uncomfortable to sleep like that considering i always end up moving around and waking her up. I understand why she wants to sleep near me, but why directly in my face??

Avatar

I think it’s time for one of my favorite refrains on the blog: cats are weird.

I’m sure she’s got a reason for it. Maybe she likes to smell your breath or know you’re breathing, or she’d rather be close to your head so you don’t squish her accidentally moving around at night. Can we ever know? Nope. We can guess, and that’s all, because cats.

Do you have anything against anthropomorphism as a whole? Or are you just tired of seeing people misinterpret fiction as fact?

Avatar

This is a great question! There’s actually some history that’s important to answer it.

The very truncated overview is that for a long time, the “rule” in science was that animals didn’t have thoughts or feelings. Projecting human experiences onto animals (anthropomorphizing) was pretty much a cardinal sin for a scientist studying them. You did not make that assumption.

As science has advanced, we’ve obviously learned that animals aren’t ruled entirely by instinct and do experience subjective internal states and make conscious choices. Thats’s great! But it’s kind of pushed the pendulum of anthropomorphism too far the opposite direction culturally.

Where we’ve run into a problem is that in accepting animals can think and have feelings, it’s been taken one stop farther into “so obviously they must experience those just like us.” That’s sort of a result of the theory of mind: we can only understand the minds of others through our understanding of our own, and so it’s normal to assume that the minds of others operate like ours. I think there’s also an aspect of love to it - we love animals so much that we really want them to experience things the way we do, so we can share and understanding of it with them.

It’s the type of anthropomorphism that’s an issue when you’re dealing with animals, and what I push back against here. We do animals a major disservice when we assume they experience the world like humans, because we interact with them as we’d like them to be, not as they are. In theory, it makes very little sense that animals with very different evolutionary histories and sensory interpretations of the world would interact with it and experience it in exactly the same manner as a bipedal, hairless ape. In practicality, it means we often give animals what we assume we’d want when we project ourselves into their situation, not what they actually need.

There is absolutely room for and benefit to be derived from what’s sometimes called “informed” or “critical” anthropomorphism, where we interpret an animal’s likely internal experience through a lens specific to its species, its specific sensory perceptions, and its evolutionary history. But for that to happen accurately, we first have to learn to identify and correct our incorrect anthropomorphic assumptions about animals. That’s what I try to teach: how to know the difference between anthropomorphism and science-based analysis of an animals’s probable emotional state, and how you start changing your thinking to the latter.

Avatar

So basically, you’re trying to tell people:

“Just because this animal can do this, doesn’t mean that they do it the same way as us, or for the same reason.”

Yup! The best way I’ve heard it phrased recently is that there’s a big difference between empathy (focusing on how an animal would think or feel in a given situation) and anthropomorphism (focusing on how you’d feel if you were in the animal’s place in that situation). Empathy is a useful tool for understanding what non-human animals and experiencing, but it has to be based on that animal’s needs and priorities - anthropomorphism is going to be inherently incorrect because it prioritizes your interpretation of what the animal is experiencing, rather than how the animal actually is relating to the experience. 

Follow-up question to that post about giraffes having very bendy necks: how do they do that? They have the same number of neck bones we do; are theirs extra bendy or something?

Avatar

Good question! It's a fun one. There are a couple of physical changes in their skeletal structure that allow for such flexibility. 1) Their cervical vertebrae are really long, 2) they have a different type of joint between the cervical vertebrae than other quadrupeds, and 3) their first thoracic vertebrae has evolved over time to function more like an 8th cervical. I love this topic, but we're gonna have to get into some anatomy basics to really do it justice. CW for photos of skeletons / bones below here.

So, first off, let's talk about cervical vertebrae. These are the "neck" vertebrae that go from the base of the skull to right before the first rib (the vertebrae that articulate with the ribs are called "thoracic").

image

Basically every mammal has the same number of cervical vertebrae - seven. (The fact that this is so steady across mammalian taxa is an example of what's called "evolutionary conservation, where traits stay steady across time and lots of other changes). Since species aren't changing the number of cervical vertebrae they have, changes to their shape and size happen instead. Giraffe are a perfect example of that.

Giraffe neck bones are super long. Compared to other mammals, they haven't just been "scaled up" with even changes to the proportions - they're actually very elongated.

Next, these cervical vertebrae actually articulate (a fancy word for forming a joint) with each other differently than the spines of other species. The pieces of each vertebra in the cervical spine of most mammals overlap in a way that allows movement in some directions, but not others. You can try this yourself: turn your head to look over your shoulders, and then nod your head as far forward and then back as you can. As a human, you'll have much more range of motion going forward-and-back movement than side-to-side. That’s because when you want to turn your head, each vertebra can only move so far in that direction, so you have to turn all of them a little bit each to get a real “turn.” But when you want to nod your head, each vertebra can move a lot farther in that direction, so you can go a lot farther. The degree of restriction on movement in the cervical spine varies by species, and gets really technical, so I'm not going to go into it here - but here's an image of the cervical spine a horse to give you a sense of what those overlaps normally look like on an animal with a (relatively) long neck.

Now, giraffe aren't closely related to horses - or really many other non-extinct species - so comparative anatomy research for giraffe frequently compares their physical structure to that of their closest living relative, the okapi. So here's a diagram showing what giraffe and okapi cervical spines look like when compared. Giraffe on top, okapi below. We're going to be talking about the middle five bones for now, which are cervical vertebrae 3-7. (C1 and C2 are oddly shaped because they have to interact directly with the skull, and the two on the far right of each spine with the long bits pointing up are T1 and T2, the first thoracic vertebrae).

You can see that there are some pretty major differences between the two cervical spines, even though giraffe and okapi are fairly closely related! The okapi vertebrae are shorter and squatter and still have a lot of that large overlap with each other. They also all look a little bit different from each other. Where as the giraffe vertebrae don't have a ton of overlap and look really similar to each other for the most part! This, my friends, is where we get into the secrets of giraffe necks.

Joints that need to have a ton of motion in lots of directions are built differently. In the human body, two good examples are the shoulder and the hip. Those are what we call ball-and-socket joints: the bone ends in a fairly round protrusion, which can then rotate within the joint in lots of different ways without physically running into another bone.

Guess what! Giraffe cervical vertebrae also have what are effectively ball-and-socket joints! Take a look at this image from Bones Clones of a disarticulated giraffe spine, which shows it really nice and clearly.

See those rounded bumps on the top of each bone? That's the surface that articulates with the underside of the one above it. Because there’s so little overlap between the parts of the vertebrae the way there is in other mammals, that ball-and-socket type articulation gives giraffe a lot of range of motion at each individual joint in their necks. This is a really unique trait to giraffe - okapi have a similar rounded joint surface, but motion is still much more restricted by other parts of the bone. Let’s take a look at a comparison in the image below. This time okapi (A) is on top and giraffe (B) is on the bottom. 

The surface we’re looking at is that rounded part labeled (1). You can see how in the giraffe (B) there’s not a lot of bone around it, which means there’s more room for each bone to rotate; but on (A) the okapi, while there is that rounded surface, the parts of the bone labeled (2) and (3) stick out even with (1) and will eventually get in the way of motion. 

Giraffe still have one more evolutionary trick up their sleeves that adds to their neck flexibility. Remember how I said almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? And that thoracic vertebrae are defined by being the ones that connect to the ribs? Well... the first thoracic vertebrae in giraffe looks really weird. To the point that there was even a period of scientific inquiry into if they actually had ended up with eight cervicals! Spoiler: Nope, but their T1 is heavily modified, and while it still connects to the first rib, it also kind functions like a cervical vertebra! 

So here’s the thing. The thoracic spine in mammals is pretty rigid because that’s what supports breathing. If your ribs (and the things they connect to) aren’t rigid, they aren’t stable enough for your muscles to pull on them, which means your diaphragm can’t contract and create a vacuum that pulls air into your lungs, etc. Movement in this part of the body makes breathing much more challenging, or even impossible. That means that it’s really unusual for a thoracic vertebrae to have much of a range of motion at all. But for giraffes, T1 does! Let’s look at this image below, from a paper looking at the comparative anatomy of C7/T1 in giraffe and okapi. The grey shading indicates a high amount of inter-vertebral flexibility, and white indicates an inflexible area. 

Notice how on the okapi at the bottom, the spiky parts going up (called spinous processes, which are muscle attachment sites) are all parallel and shown in white to be inflexible? But for giraffe, T1′s spinous process isn’t parallel with T2 and T3′s, and it’s shown in grey to indicate - which means that it's actually able to move with the cervical spine when the deep neck flexor muscle (indicated in red) engages. That’s unheard of! Thoracic vertebra don’t do that!! Except, apparently, in giraffe. Here’s a short video clip showing what that looks like when T1 and T2 articulate. Okapi is on the top, giraffe is on the bottom.

Look how much further the giraffe’s spine can move at that T1 joint than the okapi! It’s got a far larger range of motion both vertically and in rotation sideways. 

So all of these physiological changes add up to giraffe necks having a larger range of motion and flexibility starting at the very base of the neck, which is then amplified by each joint in the neck also having more range of motion than normal. Combine that with really long neck bones, and you’ve got an animal that can reach in almost any direction! 

No, really, literally almost any direction. Here’s a fantastic diagram of some of the different ways giraffe necks can flex, reach, and bend. Notice how in the postures labeled MAX-DF, you’ve got both rotation of the neck backwards towards the hind end, and curvature down! That’s not a thing any other living animal can do! 

Fun fact: this last diagram comes from a paper using giraffe neck mechanics as a possible model for the range of motion in sauropod necks. 

Sources: 

This may be a kind of weird and silly question, but do you know how far giraffes can turn their necks? I’ve only ever seen them looking straight ahead or a little to the side, but the neck is so long that I wondered if they could turn to look past 90 degrees..... I couldn’t seem to find anything online!

Avatar

They can (and do) nap with their heads resting on their own butts! Giraffe necks very flexible.

Here’s a still from a video my friend K. Dodge took at Cheyenne Mountain Zoo recently, which is a perfect example of that range of motion. (In the video, it looks like there’s an itchy spot at the shoulder there.)

I wanted to include a photo of giraffes actually napping with their head flipped around onto their backs for you, but I don’t want to pull one without a source off of Google - so if anyone has one they’ve taken themselves, please add it to this post!

Avatar
Avatar

This is Zara at the Peoria Zoo! As I understand it, they don’t typically do this in the wild except when they’re young and have their parents on guard. I think you see it more in zoo populations. Her mom, Vivien, also tends to nap like this.

Yes!!! This is the photo we needed.

I’d agree it’s probably more common in zoo populations since they don’t need to have the same level of vigilance for threats, yeah.

This may be a kind of weird and silly question, but do you know how far giraffes can turn their necks? I’ve only ever seen them looking straight ahead or a little to the side, but the neck is so long that I wondered if they could turn to look past 90 degrees..... I couldn’t seem to find anything online!

Avatar

They can (and do) nap with their heads resting on their own butts! Giraffe necks are very flexible.

Here’s a still from a video my friend K. Dodge took at Cheyenne Mountain Zoo recently, which is a perfect example of that range of motion. (In the video, it looks like there’s an itchy spot at the shoulder there.)

I wanted to include a photo of giraffes actually napping with their head flipped around onto their backs for you, but I don’t want to pull one without a source off of Google - so if anyone has one they’ve taken themselves, please add it to this post!

I've read your posts about wireless fencing / shock collars for dogs, but I was wondering your thoughts/alternatives for similar things for cats? Between people who can't get through doors quickly and an open plan house, I've not found a way to keep my cat from getting out the front door reliably and I'm considering shock collars (I'd talk to a vet first, etc.) But I hate the idea of hurting him, so I just can't work out what's a lesser evil here.

Avatar

Wireless fencing is a welfare issue no matter what species, unfortunately. This is an old ask, but I’m sharing it so other people can potentially use the solution. 

My best suggestion for your issue is to get an expandable dog pen (often called an x-pen) and use it to make an airlock around the doorway. They open up to be a series of panels rather than a full circle, and sometimes have a gate for humans in them. Set it up so that the door has room to open and close and for a person to move around. That way, you’ve got something that can be a barrier for fast kitties (or at least slow them down). If they don’t have a gate in them, you exit or enter by just picking up the end and moving it out of the way - which also is good for accessibility if the people in your house would have any issues with stepping over a low barrier to go through a gate. X-pens come in heights like 3-4 feet tall, which should mean the cat would have to learn to jump completely over it, rather than land on top and launch from there. 

Now, if you’ve got a cat that is super determined or a really good jumper, this might not be enough - but it’s worth a try if you’re having issues with door dashing. 

Is it difficult for you to remain unbiased and less emotional when answering questions or explaining things about animals?

Avatar

Absolutely! The secret is, I’m not unbiased or not emotional about it. 

I purposefully practice stepping back from my first couple of gut reactions and examining why I’m reacting that way. I let myself be emotional and write it all out, and then I come back to it and edit it. I also have really lovely colleagues who let me use them as sounding boards to work out my feelings and thoughts on a topic before I post. 

A lot of times you’ll see that I do have strong feelings on a subject on the blog, but I try not to represent them as fact or as the only way someone can feel about the topic. Animals are an emotional topic! I run this blog because I’m passionate about them, but part of being an educator is learning to not let your own emotions impact your communication in detrimental ways. 

I'm deeply disappointed with the care of the reptiles at my local zoo. I've worked at a number of reptile stores and have worked with everything from vine snakes to yellow anacondas to caimans. Many of the animals at the zoo are kept in enclosures wildly inappropriate for the species within them and quite frankly if a private keeper kept their animals like that I would report them. This isn't some seedy roadside zoo, it's a AZA accredited facility in good standing. Is there anything I can do?

Avatar

Take photos and reach out with specifics about your concern to the AZA. It’s still not specified on their site who the public should contact regarding concerns, but the accreditation committee is the group that would eventually handle it. In lieu of that, there’s a contact form at this link that you can use to start the process - I’d maybe reach out and ask who to contact, rather than sending the complaint up front. (And if you do get told where to direct concerns specifically, please let me know). 

How do you feel about the "Bark No More"? It's a birdhouse-looking thing that makes a high frequency (only dogs can hear it) whenever a dog barks to get them to stop.

Avatar

Devices like that change behavior through positive punishment, if it’s successful. Assuming the dog associates the start of the (awful, painful) noise with barking, it basically suppresses the behavior by making the result so uncomfortable they stop. If the dog doesn’t associate the start of the noise with the behavior, then you’re just making them miserable with what they perceive is a random and somewhat inescapable stimulus. 

It’s much more effective and humane to figure out why the dog is barking (boredom, barrier reactivity, etc) and solve that problem.

Also keep in mind that other animals and other people may hear it, especially children. I don’t know what frequency that specific device used (I can’t find much on it - I think it may have been discontinued at this point) but I can tell you that ultrasonic deterrents are hell for people with sensory issues. A family member put a few in their garden last year to deter the local raccoons, and the moment one went off when I was outdoors it was an instant migraine trigger. What’s more, because they’re so high-pitched, people who can’t hear them also don’t realize how incredibly loud they are. I could actually hear the deterrent noises from within the house. So they’re a great way to bother not only the animal you’re trying to quiet, but any other animal or young-ish human within hearing range. 

My dog is an emotional support dog and CANNOT stand people being upset. She jumps in your face, holds down your hands, and licks you until you have no choice but pay attention to her. It is very helpful for anxiety attacks, but we didn't realize she'd do this whenever anyone's upset in her presence, so whenever my mom's on the phone with customer service and says "Representative!" the dog LUNGES onto her chest and kisses her face while she tries to angrily explain the problems with our services.

Avatar

This is hilarious, and too cute not to share. 

Congrats on your big cat research being done, seems like it must have taken forever - it's really fascinating and I hope it proves really useful to the field and the protection of big cats.

Avatar

I think you sent this ask years ago, but I came across it today and it cracked me up. Because... I’m definitely still working on stuff related to it! Although it’s currently taking a backseat to a couple of other research projects. 

Hey so in Miami at Crandon Park they have old enclosures from the former zoo. They are small concrete spaces that show the sorts of conditions display animals used to live in and many of their walls are now painted with murals of animals. I don't remember if there are any signs on-site specifically talking about the history and explaining the past cruelty but I still think it's cool that they left them as a reminder, especially since that zoo had a lot of controversy in regards to animal care.

Avatar

I wish I had known! I would have gone to see them when I was in town for a conference in 2018. If anyone has photos, I’d love to know more. 

I really think it’s great when zoos preserve their old exhibits as teaching tools. There’s a couple old ones left in Franklin Park in Boston as well, and the old LA Zoo enclosures are pretty well known as well. 

Average person in Texas buys 3 tigers a year” factoid actualy (sic) just statistical error. Average Texan owns 0 tigers annually. Tigers Georg, who lives in compound & owns over 10,000 tigers, is an outlier adn should not have been counted.

Do you have any advice or links to something to help with cat begging behavior? my cat will start yelling at 6am for food nonstop, and if I feed her and go back to bed she will come back and continue to yell until I get up. With a closed door, she will claw at the carpet and still manage to get her face shoved underneath to ensure maximum volume. I've also tried shoving a blanket underneath the door, and it helps, but I more so want to help her behavior. Her vet says diet + quantity is good.

Avatar

I don’t have a lot of advice for this one, but I did read a great post by a fellow dog trainer about a similar issue that might be relevant to you. She was trying to teach her puppy to get up later, but I think you might be able to tweak it to address screaming for food early as well. (Spoiler alert... it does mean getting up earlier than your cat for a while). If you try it, please let me know how it goes!

I just into a really heated moment with a dude on some dating app who had a picture of himself petting a grown tiger 😭 I could have been nicer about it but he was such a prick

Avatar

I definitely use animal photos as a litmus test for that! If people are handling dangerous exotic species free-contact it's a hard nope no matter what else is on their profile. The other one that amazes me and is an immediate left swipe? The number of people who think it's cool to take photos of themselves reaching through zoo fencing to pet animals.

Another great training example. There’s one cardinal rule of baby raising: don’t encourage or let them practice behaviors you don’t want as an adult. Animals won’t understand why something that was always okay before isn’t allowed now, and you’ll be fighting against a very long reinforcement history. I always encourage people to think through what they want the “rules” of the house to be before they even bring an animal home, so they can have in mind from the get-go what they want to make sure they don’t encourage. (This doesn’t mean you can’t modify a behavior when a pet is an adult! But it’s much easier to set things up so it won’t occur in the first place, if you have the chance.)

Avatar
bigshota

@why-animals-do-the-thing shut up it’s cute

I never said it wasn’t cute!

Just that if you’re gonna teach a baby animal to do a behavior like this, you better be damn sure you know what you’re getting into when it’s an adult. If you like being tackled by your dog (and can mitigate that behavior while necessary to protect people whom it would hurt) then you do you.

As you might have seen in the news yesterday (8/19/22), another pet tiger was found in Texas - this time in the home of a Dallas rapper. So, of course, all of the “thousands of pet tigers in Texas” myths are popping back up again and getting remasticated on the bird app.

I’m doing a couple of threads on Twitter about it today, because there were a couple of aspects of the reporting from major outlets I just can’t not fact-check. Like the one in the linked tweet, where a major Houston newspaper got the state’s dangerous animal ownership law wrong. I’m keeping my posts about the topic on Twitter rather than cross-posting to Tumblr intentionally: I’m hoping with enough attention they might correct the misinformation they’re spreading.

How do zoos in warmer climates keep animals that come from colder climates like polar bears comfortable?

Avatar

Cold water temperatures, shaded shelter, ice-based enrichment, sprinklers, and fans or air conditioning! The whole enclosure isn’t necessarily cooled, but there’s plenty of cold or cooler options for them so they can choose what temperature they want to be at. A lot of times the indoor or behind-the-scenes area of a habitat will be kept at a different temperature specifically to allow for that range of choice. 

How it’s done will depend on the species. Some animals, like polar bears, build up seasonal blubber layers, so in a warmer climate they don’t need to put on the winter weight they normally would. That means they’re more comfortable in warmer climates overall, and then they’re given lots of options for temperature choice beyond that. But some animals, like emperor penguins, really do need a very cold exhibit - the difficulty and expense in maintaining an indoor exhibit like that is part of why there’s so few of them in facilities in the US, compared to other species of more temperate penguins.