“The jurascope is a variation of the mid-90s timescope project and was developed for the permanent exhibition at the Berlin Museum of natural History. Five such media telescopes bridge the gap between the dinosaur skeletons on show and the original appearance of these animals and their natural environment in the jurassic period.” More info on Joachim Sauter’s page

Deinonychus pair in the swamps, by Mark Witton | Print :

“(...) The Early Cretaceous dromaeosaur Deinonychus has been restored so many times that it's difficult to come at it from a fresh angle. I thought one way to do that was to not show it on open plains, but in a backswamp. (...) The arms of the foreground animal are pressed tight to the body in the manner proposed by palaeoartistic Queen of the maniraptorans, Emily Willoughby, rather than held half-folded as we're more used to seeing them. As Emily explains, there is good reason to think the 'arms out' postures we're used to is nonsensical - animals just don't carry themselves like that” Keep reading

Thoughts on Jurassic park/world?

Avatar

In response to gelana78 too:

I know this is going to sound pedantic and I’m so sorry to disappoint you, but I’ve decided to not comment on JW: as a fan of natural history, science fiction, monster movies and Jurassic Park I, I don’t think I’m able to write about Jurassic World without being a raging hater on all those levels. And I don’t think that’s worth reading. I think this blog will be more interesting if I keep my opinions to a minimum and I just continue sharing and trying to promote things I like.

“Here's a new video about sketching chickens. The DVD version has the 40-minute production about the making of the paintings I did for Scientific American. But it also has a slide show and a special 13-minute bonus feature, where I pose the question: "What can we learn about dinosaurs by sketching a chicken?" The abbreviated YouTube video above gives you a sample of that feature”

You might want to subscribe to Mr. Gurney’s youtube channel

No sé si manyas que James Gurney tiene un súper canal en youtube. Tiene un vídeo muy bueno sobre como dibujar dinosaurios llamado "Sketching Chickens, Imagining Dinosaurs with James Gurney" :)

Avatar

Estoy suscrito pero no he visto ése, lo apunto, gracias!

De todas formas le perdí el respeto a Gurney cuando confesó que en realidad quien se lo dibuja todo es su periquito: https://youtu.be/4KIEVIG3B1g

Anonymous asked:

Hello! I was wondering, is the reason that spinosaurus was originally thought to be bipedal because all skeletons prior to the discovery of them being quadrupedal incomplete?

Kind of, yes. But there are lots of articles explaining why spino "changed", take a look at this one:http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2014/09/11/scientists-report-first-semiaquatic-dinosaur-spinosaurus/

How do we know T-rex had proto-feathers? Is there any fossil evidence or is it just an extrapolation based on related dinosaurs? As in, when I see an illustration of a maniraptorid with feathers, I know it is based on sound evidence. But when I see a picture of a large theropod like T-rex with feathers, I am a bit skeptical. When I hear an paleontologist say "We KNOW x had feathers, even though we haven't found any traces of feathers preserved with it", I don't trust them. Thoughts..?

Avatar

Well, It’s not just maniraptorans, Yutyrannus was a “large theropod”, very closely related to rex, and its feathers are clearly preserved on fossils. There’s also Dilong, who wasn’t large but hey, it’s a confirmed feathered tyrannosaurid too. Also, there have been feathers discovered in pretty basal dinosaurs, which suggests that feathers were far more common than we had previously thought.

So yes, saying rexie had feathers is based on an extrapolation, but an extrapolation made from ancestors and close relatives, so I don’t think it’s far fetched. Personally, I’d be more surprised if rex turned out to be completely bald.

Anyway, what do I know?, you better ask here: http://paleoillustration.tumblr.com/questions

I just saw on io9 that researchers have determined that Brontosaurus should be reinstated as a distinct species. Any opinions on that?

Avatar

I’ve only read some headlines, so I don’t know if they’ll bring Brontosaurus back, but I like this kind of annoying changes in nomenclature, they remind me that scientific knowledge is always adjusting, trying new ideas and it’s even ready to go back to old ideas if they happen to explain new data with more accuracy. I find this to be… reassuring. (And Brontosaurus is a great name, there’s that).

Oh, and a submission to your blog: do you know Peter Watts? biologist, hard sci-fi writer. He has some really cool realistic illustrations of his fictional spaceships from the books Blindsight and Echopraxia. Google just gave me this and this, but there’s more somewhere. I think you’ll like his work.

Baltica, by Maija Karala:

“I was asked to illustrate a spread of fossils and reconstructed animals from what the Baltic Sea was like in the Ordovician. They asked for colourful animals, and that's what they got.

In the Ordovician, what is now Northern and Eastern Europe formed a small continent called Baltica, at the time located well south of the Equator. Much of the continent was covered in shallow seas, and there was a rich biodiversity of marine animals. Some of them have been preserved as fossils in Estonia, Åland islands and other places.

Made for Sieppo, a children's magazine published by The Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.”

Chengjiang Biota - the dawn of the vertebrates, by Brian Choo:

“Strange creatures swarm in shallow sea off the northern fringes of the Gondwanan supercontinent. In the unimaginably distant future, this ancient seabed will be exposed as the Maotianshan Shale on the lush flanks of scenic hills in eastern Yunnan (Chengjiang, Jinning and Anning Counties), China. The fossils of the Maotianshan, collectively called the Chengjiang Biota, give a priceless glimpse into the Cambrian Explosion, the comparatively sudden appearances of a bewildering diversity of animal body forms that herald the arrival of the Phanerozoic. It represents one of a handful of Cambrian localities in the world, along with the Burgess Shale of Canada and Sirius Passet of Greenland, to feature extensive soft tissue preservation. The Chengjiang Biota currently includes well over 100 identified species, including creatures close to the ancestry of the vertebrate lineage.”