when Walter white said "smoking marijuana, eating Cheetos, and masturbating does not constitute plans in my book" he was wrong. this is the moment he really became Heisenberg. if you ask me
I think now that queens dead they should have her stuffed and put on display in Cairo for the next 150 years.
BLAZE REJECTED MY POST WOW LOL
We'll make sure at least 100k people see it for free then.
When I was a kid, I was really enamored a handful of local radio stations--the DJs were hilarious and really nice and would play songs for you, but my favorite thing was this thing one of them did called the 5:20 Primal Scream.
Every day at 5:20 he would take a random caller and let them shriek their head off on the air. No opinions or venting or anything like that, just wordless screaming. Often these were people in traffic or just getting off work. And you got some really adorable people being all "YRAERGH" and then giggling and feeling better after
And I remember one guy who just went "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" for like half a minute and the DJ was like "holy crap you're like some kind of tornado siren". I think about that guy sometimes.
And I think about that DJ. I hope he's doing okay.
[id: a tweet from âkat, your DMâ @kazzbotz. âWhenever youâre obsessed with stopping a prophecy you gotta ask yourself: am I enacting the peophecyâs will? Is my obsession the mechanism by which the prophecy comes to pass?â end id]
âsans isnât as iconic a sexyman as the onceler wasâ where have you been. no, no, iâm serious, where have you been. sans might be even BIGGER than the onceler was
âwell, people shipped au oncelers tog-â WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN
ok. listen, because you guys arenât listening it seems
i am 21 years old. i was on tumblr for the onceler craze. i saw it.
i am telling you sans is bigger than the onceler.
there are mass produced, bootleg au sans plushies. shipping au sanses together is going strong to this day. search âsansâ on tumblr, and scroll for a while
i literally need you to listen to me. sans outdoes the onceler.
the onceler was a tumblr-specific sexyman whereas sans breached containment and became the wider internetâs sexyman
and sans was a good and memorable character outside of the sexymanification, whereas the onceler was very forgettable aside from that
sans is a bigger tumblr sexyman than the onceler. but the onceler is like, a higher percentage of sexymanness per volume or whatever
On Monday night in South London, armed police trapped a black man named Chris Kaba inside a car and executed him through the windshield. He was 24 years old. Today, a protest march demanding justice for his murder was broadcast on Sky News, who reframed it as a moving tribute to the queen by thousands of grieving subjects.
Some of the lowest, most despicable shit I've ever seen from the British media and believe me when I say I've some depraved stuff in the past.
Reblog if your a demon attached to someoneâs thrift store finds
please elaborate
for anyone confused by this, some christian extremists genuinely believe preowned items are potentially dangerous because they likely belonged to âworldlyâ people who may have put demons in them on purpose or accidentally allowed demons to attach to them
when your cooler mutuals reblog your posts like yes i am getting a good grade in friend, which is both normal to want and possible to achieve
just got back from therapy and i think wanting respect & acknowledgement from your respected peers might be normal in an unironic sense
i dont fucking know
Gasp! Little German Boy?!
Tumblr really has evolved as a website if the first personification of the new icon i see is just a little lad instead of a sexyman
art nouveau really slapped and served and they were so right about florals and curves and unconventionality and originality and being inspired by the shapes of nature and wanting to incorporate fine art into home design and rejecting the compulsory conformity of mass manufacturing like every time i see an utilitarian square bricks and metal building i want to kill myself immediately
Enjoying something in fiction does not equate to supporting or condoning it in real life. This is not a hard concept to grasp.
Whatâs wild to me is how completely all European media are committed to pretending that everybody loved the fucking queen. Every colonized country has some variation of a âfuck yeah the bitch is deadâ hashtag trending on social media, a whole stadium in Dublin gleefully chanted âLizzyâs in a boxâ, there are clearly a massive amount of people celebratingâŚ. and it seems like not a single media outlet seems to think thatâs an interesting thing to write about. Not even in a shitty moralizing way. They usually looove generating outrage clicks but now? They just collectively decide it doesnât exist and shouldnât be acknowledged in any way. I found one article in an Irish newspaper, nothing anywhere else.
6 days in and today a Dutch media outlet finally broke the mold. There have been some mild âwell not everyone in the former colonies loves the monarchyâ takes in the Dutch newspaper NRC, but they weremostly listed as âopinionsâ, did a lot of both-sides-ism and didnât really lay down the dirt. But today, Nu.nl, which is one of the largest free online news platforms in the Netherlands (and isnât known for being particularly progressive or critical) published this:
Elizabeth II was onlosmakelijk verbonden met Britse koloniale misdaden. https://www.nu.nl/buitenland/6223718/elizabeth-ii-was-onlosmakelijk-verbonden-met-britse-koloniale-misdaden.html
Hereâs the whole piece in English for you. Not because itâs the best, but because I am so amazed to see this in the mainstream media after all the obligatory mourning bullshit:
Elizabeth II was inextricably linked to British colonial crimes
The death of Elizabeth II has rekindled the discussion in many countries about the British colonial past. During the Queenâs 70 years on the throne, some 20 British colonies gained independence. But critics say the British monarch has never actively cooperated in the freedom of those oppressed countries.
âWe do not mourn the death of Elizabeth.â is how the South African opposition party EFF reacted to the death of the British Queen. âShe never admitted during her reign that the United Kingdom committed colonial atrocities.â
âThe Queen has been instrumental in covering up the bloody history of British decolonization.â So said historian and Harvard professor Maya Jasanoff in The New York Times. âHow big that history is, we have yet to discover.â
During Elizabethâs years on the throne, the British brutally crushed an uprising by the Kenyan anti-colonial Mau Mau movement. Some 11,000 insurgents were killed in the former British colony between 1952 and 1960. Some were brutally tortured. In 2013, about five thousand Kenyan claimants received compensation totaling more than 20 million euros.
33 Cypriot victims also received compensation from the British in 2019. Between 1955 and 1959 they were tortured on the Mediterranean island, which became independent in 1960.
British destroyed documents about colonial crimes. We may never know all the crimes the British committed in 37 colonies in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean. The former colonizers destroyed thousands of documents reporting slavery, racism, executions without trial and torture. This was done to cover up the misdeeds and protect the reputation of the government and the Queen, The Guardian revealed in 2012.
What Elizabeth discussed weekly with the British Prime Minister about foreign policy is also not public. What is certain is that the British monarch has never clearly spoken out against colonialism in public. She didnât get much further than âwe canât turn back the pastâ.
For many, Elizabeth II was a symbol of colonial oppression Elizabeth II stood symbolically at the head of the Commonwealth until her death. This is a voluntary partnership of 54 mainly former British colonies, including Canada, Australia, India, Nigeria, Pakistan and New Zealand.
In reality, the British founded the Commonwealth to retain as much influence as possible over the former colonies. They would still need guidance from the âmore developedâ United Kingdom.
The British queen had no real political power. âBut she did embody her countryâs colonial policies on all her travels,â said journalist and former foreign correspondent Howard W. French. âShe never criticized that.â
Mixed feelings among Commonwealth residents Many Commonwealth residents have mixed feelings in response to the death of Britainâs longest-serving monarch in history. âBad things happened here because of the queen,â a resident of the former colony of Jamaica told the Jeugdjournaal.
âShe never said sorry,â a compatriot chimed in about the former British colonizer. âAnd I donât think it will get any better with Elizabethâs son and successor Charles.â









