KRISTEN STEWART WANTS TO BE IN A MARVEL FILM
In a new interview with Yahoo, she said:
“I would love to show people that I can do more than just be ‘Kristen Stewart’ in a different movie, in a different circumstance.” She notes her past role as Snow White in the big-budget fantasy adventure Snow White and the Huntsman could be a jumping off point for a superhero role. “I’m sure I could get on board with Captain America, you know what I mean?… It would just have to be the right thing.”
>> I love the many K-Stew memes out there but in all seriousness I really like this chick. She’s got that “fuck outta my face” look/attitude and I dig that, plus the new movies she’s in are actually good.
But…a Marvel movie? I dunno about that.
CHARLIE HUNNAM WILL PLAY “LA BARBIE” IN A NEW MOVIE
Charlie Hunnam is going to play “La Barbie” in “American Drug Lord” The movie is based on the story of Edgar Valdez, a high school football player from Texas who would become the only U.S. citizen to rise to the level of cartel leader in Mexico. From his base in Acapulco, Valdez, who brought the nickname La Barbie that was given to him by his high school football coach, made $130 million in one year moving drugs from Colombia. He became increasingly feared and allegedly ratcheted up the violence that involved filming the brutal executions of rivals and posting them on the Internet. As the drug riches escalated along with the violence, the rival cartels turned on one another, with the help of crooked cops. Valdez’s life became a “struggle to stay alive.”
American Sniper‘s Jason Hall will pen the script, while Hunnam will produce along with Legendary and Plan B’s Dede Gardner and Jeremy Kleiner. Sarah Esberg of Plan B will executive produce. [Deadline]
>>
Wow. They’re being really generous with the looks for this movie huh. No doubt this will definitely bring attention to Laredo.
POLTERGEIST REMAKE WILL BE A KID’S MOVIE?
It looks like the Poltergeist remake is going to be more family-friendly than the original, which gave ’80s children a permanent fear of trees, clowns, and bathroom mirrors. Sam Rockwell, who will star in Gil Kenan’s ‘reimagining’, told Collider that the film will be told from the POV of a 10-year-old boy. “The 10-year-old boy is really the protagonist this time. JoBeth Williams (who played Carol-Anne in the original) was the protagonist for the most part in the first one and now the kid, it’s really through his point-of-view. So it’s more of a kids’ movie, so I don’t know if it’s gonna be like rated-R scary.” Rockwell went onto describe the remake as more of an “adventure” film than a horror movie. “It’s not like Conjuring type of scary. You know, it’s a different kind of movie. It’s more of an adventure. It’s essentially a child abduction film when you come down to it. I mean, the original Poltergeist is too.” [IGN]
>>What! Like…. what?! What about these gems?
DID NAYA RIVERA CASUALLY SAY SHE’S BI-SEXUAL??
SHOULD MARK WAHLBERG BE PARDONED? THIS PROSECUTOR SAYS NO. HERE’S WHY…
Mark Wahlberg is asking Massachusetts for a pardon for assaults he committed in 1988, back when he was a troubled teenager in Boston. But the attorney who prosecuted him, Judith Beals, says he doesn’t deserve a second chance. Here’s an exert from her Boston Globe piece:
In the 13 years I served in the attorney general’s office, I recall only one instance of a defendant violating a civil rights injunction — Mark Wahlberg. His attack on Thanh Lam and Hoa Trinh showed the same tendency toward serial acts of racial violence.
The two men had no connection except for the fact that they were both Vietnamese. Wahlberg’s repeated racial epithets revealed an equally racist motivation albeit toward a different class – making clear that bigotry harbors no boundaries. But this time, Wahlberg was even more violent, breaking a five-foot pole over Thanh Lam’s head and punching Hoa Trinh to the ground. For this, he served 45 days in prison. Thanh Lam and Hoa Trinh immigrated to Boston after the Vietnam war, believing in this country’s ideals.
Wahlberg’s actions shattered their very sense of themselves, and of the city and country they now called home. But after the case was concluded, one of them told me, “In this country, justice is possible.” I’m glad Mark Wahlberg has turned his life around. I’ve read that Hoa Trinh has forgiven him. But a public pardon is an extraordinary public act, requiring extraordinary circumstances because it essentially eliminates all effects of having ever been convicted.
It is reserved to those who demonstrate “extraordinary contributions to society,” requiring “extensive service to others performed, in part, as a means of restoring community and making amends.” On this, I am not sold. First, Wahlberg has never acknowledged the racial nature of his crimes. Even his pardon petition describes his serial pattern of racist violence as a “single episode” that took place while he was “under the influence of alcohol and narcotics.”
For a community that continues to confront racism and hate crime, we need acknowledgment and leadership, not denial. And while the $9.6 million he has raised over the 14 year lifetime of the Mark Wahlberg Youth Foundation — $2.5 million of which made its way to our community — has undoubtedly done some good, I question whether that truly is “extraordinary” for someone who earned $32 million last year and who has a net worth of at least $200 million. Lastly and most importantly, Wahlberg’s status as a “role model to troubled youth” would not be helped by a public pardon, as he claims. In fact, a formal public pardon would highlight all too clearly that if you are white and a movie star, a different standard applies.
Is that really what Wahlberg wants? A larger public policy question is also at stake: what types of crime do we collectively forgive and expunge from the record? History tells us, again and again, that when it comes to hate crimes, forgetting is not the right path. Truth and reconciliation are all important in moving forward — but not a public wiping of the record.
Not now when hate crime remains so high in Boston; not now when tension remains acute over the unpunished killings of black men at the hands of unaccountable white men. And frankly, not ever. Not in our name. Please.
[Boston Globe]
In 1863 the Negro was freed from the bondage of physical slavery. But at the same time, the nation refused to give him land to make that freedom meaningful. And at that same period America was giving millions of acres of land in the West and the Midwest, which meant that America was willing to undergird its white peasants from Europe with an economic floor that would make it possible to grow and develop, and refused to give that economic floor to its black peasants, so to speak.
This is why Frederick Douglass could say that emancipation for the Negro was freedom to hunger, freedom to the winds and rains of heaven, freedom without roofs to cover their heads. He went on to say that it was freedom without bread to eat, freedom without land to cultivate. It was freedom and famine at the same time. But it does not stop there.
In 1875 the nation passed a Civil Rights Bill and refused to enforce it. In 1964 the nation passed a weaker Civil Rights Bill and even to this day, that bill has not been totally enforced in all of its dimensions. The nation heralded a new day of concern for the poor, for the poverty stricken, for the disadvantaged. And brought into being a Poverty Bill and at the same time it put such little money into the program that it was hardly, and still remains hardly, a good skirmish against poverty. White politicians in suburbs talk eloquently against open housing, and in the same breath contend that they are not racist. And all of this, and all of these things tell us that America has been backlashing on the whole question of basic constitutional and God-given rights for Negroes and other disadvantaged groups for more than 300 years…
And so in a real sense our nation’s summers of riots are caused by our nation’s winters of delay.
Martin Luther King, Jr., ”The Other America.” (Stanford University, April 14, 1967).
MoonQuake Lake Trailer
Paul Walker's Dad Remembers His Son and That Tragic Day...
A NEW DOCTOR WHO CHRISTMAS SPECIAL CLIP
JASON DAVID FRANK RETURNS AS TOMMY/GREEN POWER RANGER FOR POWER RANGERS SUPER MEGAFORCE
LOVED “INTERSTELLAR” ? WELL NOW YOU CAN WATCH IT AS MANY TIMES AS YOU WANT FOR A LOW PRICE
Deadline reports the “Interstellar Unlimited Ticket” will be available to members of the AMC Stubs program at 330 locations. Prices range between $19.99 and $34.99, and members who’ve already purchased single-viewing tickets can upgrade them. In addition to unlimited viewings, these special tickets grant patrons access to all available formats at participating locations. So you can watch Christopher Nolan’s cinematic world relatively end in digital, film, or IMAX.
>>COOL! Still haven’t seen it because I haven’t had time to make a trip out of town to watch it as a 70mm print but I know some dude who’s seen it 3 times already and he’s loving it!
Watch a VERY drunk Johnny Depp Present an Award
Do You Want to Build a Meth Lab? Frozen/Breaking Bad Parody
Charlie Hunnam says '50 Shades of Grey' after SOA would've been a disaster. Via Us Weekly:
“I was going to finish playing a psychopath who’d just lost his wife [in Sons], and five days later I’d be on set playing Christian Grey,” the hunky 34-year-old told the mag for its December issue. “I was like, ‘This is going to be a f—ing disaster.’ It was the opposite of how I’ve tried to ground my career, not stretch myself too thin, and always do my homework.” Hunnam further explained that “there’s a tendency in this Hollywood machinery to take on too much. You end up not being able to give everything you want.” He learned early on that that kind of lifestyle doesn’t work for him. “Since I was young, I’ve been aware that I need time to myself to process everything,”