In Solidarity with the WGA

@blackbird-brewster / blackbird-brewster.tumblr.com

Kit, Queer AF. They/Them. Pākehā/white. 35 and thriving. Autistic, disabled, polyam, Taurus. This is mostly a Criminal Minds blog. Ruler of Je T'Emily Garbajistan. Creator of Queerminal Minds. [AO3: w00t4ewan]

Fooled Around (and Fell in Love) - PART 3

Buying a house to remodel means big changes for the throuple. Tara transfers out of the BAU to focus on the renovation, which means she's spending most of her time with her general contractor, Beck. (Who she definitely doesn't have a crush on...)

Tara's position at the BAU is filled by Agent Elle Greenaway, who JJ feels is completely closed-off and arrogant. She's convinced Elle is hiding something, but can she get through her dislike of this new agent so they can find a way to work together?

Meanwhile, Emily is doing her best to keep up with all the interruptions going on in her life and her relationship, but juggling her partners, her job, and the house renovation begins to take a toll on her. 

How can the three women find a balance that doesn't threaten the foundation of everything they've built together?

Portraits By: @artcake || Design By Me

Fooled Around (and Fell in Love) is a queer rom-com AU that explores coming out at any age or stage, polyamory, and above all else, the love shared between JJ/Emily/Tara.

Anonymous asked:

Is it just some kind of internal misogyny or are so many female characters not written all that well? Like, they seem a little flatter than their male counterparts. The show I just finished is mostly dudes, but there are a a couple main and recurring women. But so many women we see are just there as love interests for the guys and they never seem all that interesting. I know they’re only there short-term, but I just feel like they could be better, ya know?

Anon, it's not internalised misogyny. It's very largely society's external misogyny. Female characters very rarely get given character development like make characters do.

I don't have the capacity to give a full gender studies lecture here. But you should read up on the Bechdel-Wallace Test, then think about it every time you consume media

If media doesn't pass the bare fuckin minimum of the Bechdel Test, then why are you trying to blame yourself for the way the media treated female characters?

Love your self, Nonnie. It's not your fault that the world largely hates people who aren't white cishet dudes. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

as a bi person, the bisexual flag brings me infinite joy and always puts a smile on my face, however as a person who has a Passion for Graphic Design, that undersaturated shade of purple infuriates me when it's used digitally

like, on an actual flag - which was its original purpose - it looks great!

those look fine! lovely, even! with the semi-transparent fabric, the way it catches the sunlight, it looks beautiful!

but now look at how it looks digitally

the pink and blue are so vibrant compared to the sad, lonely lavender!

and let's look at this statement from Michael Page, the creator of the bi flag:

(sidenote: he created this flag in 1998, so if his takes on bisexuality is different from yours, it's okay to notice that! a lot has changed since the 90s when it comes to lived experiences and the way we describe them. but, it's also important to respect his thoughts about this and the way he presented them, even if today, we'd probably not say that bi people "blend unnoticeably into both the gay/lesbian and straight communities.")

so in pantone colors, the pink is 226 C, the blue is 286 C, and the purple of the flag is 258 C.

but...here's the deal

Michael talks here about how the key to understanding the symbolism is to know that the purple blends into both the pink and blue. and on a physical flag, I think you can see that!

but digitally, it absolutely does not blend. it clashes badly, and looks oddly separate from the other two colors.

which got me wondering...what purple do you get if you actually blend 226 C and 286 C?

oh! oh, my god.

look at that! look at how nicely it fits between those colors!

look at it next to the original color scheme! look at how much more vibrant the purple is!

and friends. this is just blending through rgb! you get even more purple variations when you use other color spaces!

let's compare all of them:

(top: original, lab. middle: lrgb, lch. bottom: rgb, hsl)

look at all of the different purple options you can get just by combining these two colors!

if you want almost too-vibrant saturation, you can go hsl, if you want something more relaxed that's closer to the original, you can go lab or lrgb. and if you want to split the difference, lch is bright and violet, while rgb is there with its saturated but darker purple.

anyway, I guess I don't really have a point here? this isn't so much an informational post as it is Me Getting Weird About Colors, but I think it is a useful lesson about how colors look very different on screens compared to how they look on objects in real life.

and sometimes, I think it's okay to compensate for that.

out of all of these, this is my favorite bi flag:

it's the one where the colors were blended in lab color space. for me, the lighter, softer purple is close enough to the original bi flag purple, while also feeling like a smoother blend of the blue and pink

but that's just me! and it might not even look the same to you, since every screen is different, because technology is a nightmare!

anyway, thank you for coming with me on this colorful journey! I will now retreat back to inkscape and make pained sounds about inkstitch gradients until something tangible pulls me back into reality

Finally, color theory that's not in a children's hospital.

Finally, color

theory that’s not in a

children’s hospital.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

Are you sure about that?

*facepalm*

Outstanding bisexual disaster post. Has never sat properly in a chair.

Went to bed early last night bc I had a bad meltdown that sort of made everything go to mush. But going to bed by midnight meant I woke up at 6.30am with Doom Them, had breakfast, did my morning routine and I'm at my work desk by 8am!?!?! Do NT people know how wild it is to just do this everyday??? This is like a special treat! A holiday! A once a year occurrence. LEt's hope my brain cooperates!

Update: I've already edited/reworked an entire chapter, and I've also written nearly 5000 words on top of that -- all since 8am (that's 4.5 hours). Absolutely gobsmacked by this.

I'm 100% anti 'hustle' and 'productivity' culture. But damn, I DO love days when my body and brain all collab to let me get tons of work done!

Stand Like This for 2 Minutes Per Day from http://jamesclear.com/body-language-how-to-be-confident

No, for real, though—this is a thing.  Not sure about the science behind it, but it makes me feel fancy and powerful regardless.  I highly recommend it.

COME ON PEOPLE, EVERY DAY, DO THIS :D

@reallyndacarter found this old post, and honestly this is something that helps me so much!

Went to bed early last night bc I had a bad meltdown that sort of made everything go to mush. But going to bed by midnight meant I woke up at 6.30am with Doom Them, had breakfast, did my morning routine and I'm at my work desk by 8am!?!?! Do NT people know how wild it is to just do this everyday??? This is like a special treat! A holiday! A once a year occurrence. LEt's hope my brain cooperates!

But it does.

It does… one at a time.  It’d be useful to be able to select more than one. G&T but not higher, M&E only, everything but E for those who just don’t like smut. (btw I just checked and there is none of the exclusion filters showing on the search page at least in my computer)

AO3 does ‘and’ filters.

You don’t filter for M&E. You filter for not the other stuff.

Avatar

I have never seen so many users clearly baffled by and too skittish to push buttons/toggles that are very clearly meant to be used.

If a trusted website has a button and you don’t immediately know or understand what it does, push it. Check out every drop down, every link, every configuration imaginable. Be adventurous. Fuck around and find out. If it breaks the website, they shouldn’t have had that button in the first place. Not on you. Indulge your curiosity instead of complaining it doesn’t do something it absolutely does if you poke around a little.

You’re not going to get a bad grade in filtering by using interface features from AO3, I promise.

Look, there are library systems that don’t have filters as good as AO3. You have to learn how to use Boolean operators (AND OR NOT) and construct a proper query to exclude in several academic databases, and AO3 just performs “NOT” for you by clicking a button.

Do you know how many grad students would love to have the kind of power you have with AO3 in filters?

Ao3 filters are amazing. You can filter out ratings, you can filter out characters or pairings, you can filter out specific tags (as long as it’s an official tag)! (Type it in under “other tags to exclude”)

This is why the antis complaining about seeing content they don’t like on Ao3 is so frustrating. If something squicks you out, filter it, and you never have to see it again! Voila! Or even if it is just something you don’t like. I have High School AUs filtered out because I just don’t like them! It’s an amazing system and makes it so easy to curate your experience.

I was trying to edit ch 4 for Friday, while also writing out a tragic backstory for a character, but got distracted by _someone_ (not tagging you lol) sexting me. And then brain went to horny land and I couldn't get work done.

Which means I gotta push through editing an entire chapter tomorrow 😂

Anonymous asked:

did you say somewhere that ur femslash only? (genuine)

Yep!! This blog is all about my love of the women in Criminal Minds and all variations of their pairings

Jemily - JJ/Emily

Jara - JJ/Tara

Temily - Tara/Emily

OT3 Je T'Emily - JJ/Tara/Emily

Tebecca - Tara/Rebecca

OT3 'Did you say girlfriend?' - Tara/JJ/Rebecca

OT4 - Je T'Embecca - JJ/Tara/Emily/Rebecca (the ultimate combo!)