midibuttons-deactivated20230327
Challenge: design a woman wearing a labcoat
Impossible Mode: make her have 0 tgirl swag
[woman who’s never maintained eye contact with a gay person before]: This is for the girls and the gays ☺️
[woman who’s scared of lesbians]: this is for the gays and the girlies 😌
My favorite banned terms on this site are "suicide prevention" and "safe sex"
breadcunt
Fuck nasty and kill yourself inmediately after
Salmon male grindset
Don Ivan Punchatz’s cover art for a 1969 edition of ‘Nightwings,’ by Robert Silverberg
bro you just triggered my deimatic display bro. I’m flaring my wings and bobbing my head while hissing at you bro. please be scared of me
twitter is going to be shut down. half of reddit is locked or completely unmoderated. the entire first page of google search results are ads. tumblr does not and will never have a functioning search system and their content moderation is 100% automated. youtube only shares ad revenue with people who make snuff films for Youtube Kids. facebook is selling your grandma’s social security number under the table for like $5. web 2.0 is completely dead right
im on peach
Today's court ruling weakening discrimination protections for LGBTQ people stands out as extraordinarily strange to me for the simple fact that there was no case. The web designer in question never received a request to create a website for a gay wedding, but instead argued that a hypothetical situation in which she did would violate her rights. I've never really heard of anything like this before— how does she even have standing to sue? Can @radiofreederry or someone with more knowledge of legalese than me elaborate on this?
Melissa Gira Grant, "The Christian Right Is Making Up Wedding Websites to Attack LGBTQ People," The New Republic, 28 June 2023:
In this latest case, there is no website and no wedding—just an argument from an anti-LGBTQ group in search of the court’s favor... No person has hired Smith to create a wedding website. In fact, Smith has never designed a wedding website, according to her petition to the court. As such, there is no client Smith has told she is rejecting due to her stated religious beliefs that marriage is only allowed between one man and one woman. In the absence of all that, ADF has, instead, fashioned Smith as the victim of an injury that has never occurred. So who has hypothetically victimized Smith? A Colorado anti-discrimination law, which, since 2008, has included protections from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. ADF claims Smith’s desire “to bring glory to God by creating unique expression that shares her religious beliefs of creating wedding websites” is thwarted by this law “because she only wants to make websites that comport with her values that same-sex marriage is illegitimate.” Were Smith to get into the wedding website business, the anti-discrimination law “would force me to say things about marriage I disagree with,” Smith wrote in an opinion piece for The Washington Times, when her case was argued at the Supreme Court last December...
Can the court rule on thought experiments?
The "Case and Controversy" clause of the Constitution requires that, for a suit to proceed in court, there must be an actual controversy for which the court can rule.
Because SCOTUS is made up of unelected, unaccountable ideologues, however, they do whatever they want with impunity because neither Congress nor the President have any power over them.
SCOTUS said they ruled on this case "to clarify the [nonexistent web designer's] rights."
This is not a healthy, functioning state.
tonight I heard a flammulated owl and western screech owl in the background of the conversation between a barking spotted owl and a 4 note hooting spottie. Then one spottie shut up and there was a barred owl calling so 4 species all at once. Party
Customer: SUP BRA" IS SURFER LINGO FOR “WHAT IS HAPPENING MAN?/HOWS IT GOING? DMV: BRA? WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE Verdict: ACCEPTED
WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE.
stick yr dick in a girl and there's a horrible grinding sound and blinding pain and when u pull out your dick has been perfectly flattened and embossed with a t rex design and the name of the local natural history museum
imagine if aliens found the dead body of a human being exploded in the vacuum of space and they started making fun of the mutilated corpse calling it “splatter alien” and saying it was the ugliest alien in the whole galexy. and then made stuffed animals of it to sell to their alien kids. that’s what happened on this planet to the blob fish
fight the slander. post pressurized blobfish
still a bit of a weird looking cunt if I'm being fully honest.
couples quarrel
boyfriend: hey baby i have to cancel our date tomorrow something came up
girlfriend: oh i’m just small potatoes. i’m not that importance.
boyfriend: -_-