Always nice when math helps make it all the more clear how ridiculously reasonable the worker demands are.
This is what the studios have brought everything to a grinding halt for.
getting rid of family vlog channels one state at a time let's gooo
Okay yeah I wanna talk about the old lady on the bench bc I can’t stop thinking about that scene. When Barbie sees this older woman sitting alone reading on the bench, her first thought is that she’s beautiful, but of course, she’s not just a person, she’s Barbie, and Barbie has a purpose. As a toy, Barbie existed for the purpose of inspiring confidence in girls, and telling them that they can be anything. When she tells the woman “you’re so beautiful” she’s telling her, partially bc she knows it to be true, but partially bc that’s her job as Barbie, to make the woman with her feel good about herself.
This is why it’s so freeing to her when the woman replies “I know it” with a laugh. Barbie’s job is to inspire girls, but this is a woman who’s lived her life and shaped her identity almost completely divorced from Barbie’s influence. She doesn’t need Barbie to tell her she’s beautiful, she knows. But unlike Sasha, who’s still v young and feels the need to actively reject Barbie’s influence, the woman on the bench is content to share space and time with Barbie; she just doesn’t need anything from her. This moment is one of the first times that Barbie is allowed to experience existence & connection for their own sake and not as a conduit for her own commodification and that is why it’s the most important part of the movie
Yeah you're right. It WOULD be pretty fucked up if you were a swan but you were raised by ducks and you grew up never seeing another swan or even knowing that such a thing as a swan even existed so you just thought you were a duck with something super wrong with it.
Tumblr: No NSFW! You know how it is we banned it because of the bots in 2018!
Also tumblr:
Scalpers: There is a low supply and high demand for PS5s right now. I will buy up a bunch of them at market price just to resell at my new inflated price for personal profit
Average Person: Dude, you’re scum. This should be illegal
Scalpers: There is a low supply and high need for affordable housing right now. I will buy up a bunch of houses at their affordable price just to charge people my new inflated monthly price to live in them, without actually owning them. For personal profit.
Average Person: You may not like it, but this is a valid business practice and a necessary part of adult life. This is our free market at work, and-
Transcript: It reminds me of the “bike to work” movement. That is also portrayed as white, but in my city more than half of the people on bike are not white. I was once talking to a white activist who was photographic “bike commuters” and had only pictures of white people with the occasional “Black professional” I asked her why she didn’t photograph the delivery people, construction workers etc… id. the Black and [Latine] and Asian people… and she mumbled something about trying to “improve the image of biking” then admitted that she didn’t really see them as part of the “green movement” since they “probably have no choice” - I was so mad I wanted to quit working on the project she and I were collaborating on. So, in the same way when people in a poor neighborhood grow food in their yards… it’s just being poor- but when white people do it they are saving the earth or something.“ -comment left on the Racialious blog post “Sustainable Food and Privilege: Why is Green always White (and Male and Upper-Class) (via meggannn). END TS
lezzyharpy
the same thing when you look at the ~tiny house movement~ versus, say, people living in trailers, or even just renting in apartments or sublet housing
This this this this