Avatar

A Lost Nixie

@agnosticnixie / agnosticnixie.tumblr.com

ADD as an excuse for dilettantism; ideally this is a place where I want to talk about art, tabletop rp, philosophy and houses in the woods. As long as it doesn't turn mostly into "diary of assimilated trans jewish angst" I'm mostly happy
Avatar

House rules that I’m probably going to go with

Basically the firearm rules in the 5E DMG are bad but I understand that 2E’s way of handling guns was overcomplicated

For clarity’s sake, 2e’s handling of guns was that they were essentially stronger, more expensive crossbows that also get to reroll damage everytime you roll max, but also fail to fire on a natural 1 attack roll. I don’t remember if the C&T ones had additional rules over the Ravenloft ones but I also do remember that the ones in Mighty Fortress negated the physical armor bonus from AC at short range which fair.

Instead I’m basically going to go for reskinned crossbows that do blunt damage; light crossbow -> arquebus; heavy crossbow -> musket; hand crossbow -> pistol or something like that. This also happens to make them fairly useful against undead.

I’m probably going to mostly limit the existence of magic items to “mundane magic” type things with a few extremely rare exceptions (but players get one of the exceptions each probably)

Final one is possibly reviewing the armor list a bit and moving Chain Shirt (which is in a weird place) to replace the Studded Leather statline but that’s mainly aesthetics. That or like “Silk Jack” mainly because I kinda like the idea of Ulrika Magdova being a functional light armor aesthetic in my games

Avatar

Second time as...

The Camille Paglia revival basically confirms that we’re in the farce of the Reagan admin

Avatar

Cooking without meds is fun

I ended up prepping too much of some veggies and running with it without realizing I was doubling prep time and especially the sheer amount of energy spent along with quantities.

Avatar

Character families and hooks

Since my rl players are currently working on characters for a home game of D&D, I’ve been wondering whether it’s weird as a GM to suggest players consider having some sort of extended families and maybe a hook or two.

Like I remember characters being inevitably single orphans with no name became such a cliche that a lot of GMs started at least requesting parent names for anything more elaborate than a dungeon crawl, but I kinda wonder how far would be too far sometimes.

As a player my first impulse tends to be having at least some named extended family; as a DM I feel like it can be at least useful for story hooks, even though I suspect a fair amount of bad DMs would only do this for easy expendable cheap drama fodder. At the very least it feels like it makes characters more anchored to me?

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

not sure if you do dnd but if you do which jewish holidays would best fit each 5e class. Im only getting to shavuot=wizards. I know there have to be more

i love dnd!!

I think Purim would be bards. My sister says bards would be Pesach, but I think they’d be Purim because of the themes of performance and lying and all that…or maybe Purim is rogues?

Tub’Shvat is obviously druids. Which makes rangers Sukkot.

Hmm…..

Paladins are Hannukkah. The few yet pious defeating the many conquerers feels like a very paladinic theme.

Avatar
Avatar
heckofabecca

My hot take! Includes some same opinions from you both :-)

PALADIN: Hannukah. Holy war FOR GOD. Take no prisoners, take no shit, as I say. And the absolute garbage quality of most of the Maccabean monarchs reinforces the paladin business-like mindset—these guys aren’t clerics :P

FIGHTER: Simchat Torah. Involves some discipline—restarting of a cycle—but it’s also a party holiday, and as we all know every party needs a fighter. Fighters are the life of the party! (At any rate, you DEFINITELY want a fighter at your Simchat Torah celebrations.)

ROGUE: Purim. Disguise, behind-the-scenes sneaking, heavy emphasis on appearance… Modern observance would like you to think it’s a bard holiday, but Esther is in no way a bard. Esther is modest, for goodness sake! And we all know bards are incurably showy :P

BARBARIAN: Lag ba’Omer. The one day (in Ashkenazi tradition, at least…) where we can rage drop the constraints of the Omer. Targeted explosive behavior (relatively), where we do things we wouldn’t otherwise do in that period. Bonus: also associated with the Bar Kokhba Revolt, which was a terrible idea. Lots of uncharacteristic military gumption, though!

MONK: Tisha B’Av. Rituals, self-control, adhering to key restrictions, all of which fall in line with the highly disciplined attitude of monks.

CLERIC: Shabbat. Clerics are the most pious, and Shabbat is the most ubiquitous holiday. There is no escape from Shabbat. Also, Shabbat inspires great sacrifices for observers, which (per wikipedia) often adds “great rigor” to the holiday (read: shomer Shabbat).

DRUID: Tu B’Shevat. Self-explanatory.

RANGER: Sukkot. Ah yes, we are living on an outdoor pilgrimage to experience something new! We are wandering outside, living outside, etc!

WIZARD: Shavuot. It’s all about the written word, baby.

SORCERER: Rosh Chodesh. Focus on a specific powerful thing (in this case, the new moon) + Rosh Chodesh groups featuring the charismatic Woman In Charge… at least in my experience XD 

WARLOCK: Yom Kippur. Renewing the relationship with—and asking for forgiveness from—a super-powerful being who has granted us things? Need I say more???

BARD: Pesach. Wild performance to get your way (start with magic snakes and end with INTENSE DEATH) + incessant retelling of the exact same story. When well done, this story is newly engaging every single night! But for that, you need an actual bard :P

Bonus!

NPCs: Rosh Hashanah. The one holiday everyone goes to shul for.

You know, when I broke this down I considered Bard/Pesach because of the performance and storytelling aspects, and Rogue/Purim because of stealth and disguise. And I do like both of those.

Consider, though: Esther is absolutely a bard.  The modesty thing throws people at first, but consider a) her canonical super-high charisma stat, b) the consummate showmanship of her buildup and reveal to the king of Haman’s plot … and finally c) the fact that, personal inclination notwithstanding, she gains her audience for that buildup-and-reveal by successfully seducing the king.

(I think you may have convinced me on Warlock/Yom Kippur though.)

Avatar
As Trump ordered 5,200 troops to the U.S.-Mexico border to block the migrant caravan, residents of the southern town of Niltepec – who still live among piles of rubble that once were their homes – welcomed the caravan with homemade soup, medical tents, and diapers for children.
[…] Of 1,720 homes in Niltepec, 1,602 were damaged in the [8.2 magnitude earthquake that struck the region on Sept. 7, 2017], according to town officials, while 530 collapsed entirely. At least 100 families are still without homes, they said.
[…] Near the church, three local families gathered at lunchtime in the shared backyard of rebuilt homes to cook an offering of chicken soup for the migrants.
Later, Mariela Escobar, 52, a part-time cleaner, pored over a vat of steaming tamales – “hundreds of them”, she said – to hand out free for dinner.
“People helped us greatly,” said her neighbor, Angela Moreno Galves, 81. “So now, of course, we want to help too.”
Setting out from Honduras on 13 October, the caravan quickly swelled to number several thousand people. The latest estimates put its size at 3,500 to more than double that – matching or exceeding Niltepec’s population of 3,800.
[…] Mexican federal officials seem intent only on seeing the caravan melt away as it moves through the country. The government regularly reports the number of migrants who have applied for refugee status or agreed for assisted bus trips back to their home countries.
The warmth of the welcome in Niltepec stood in deliberate, stark contrast to Trump’s hostility [ed.: and Mexico’s], said Jorge Luis Fuentes, a senior town official.
“It’s a form of struggle,” he said. “It’s a way to demonstrate that rights are universal.”
Avatar
reblogged

Just read that Antonio Burgos, last surviving veteran of the Spanish revolution in Australia, has died today, 31/10/18. Born the year after the Russian revolution, he spent 7 years in a fascist jail before coming to Australia as a refugee, where he remained dedicated to the anarchist cause for the rest of his long life. 

Rest in peace compañero.

Avatar

While putting together the campaign and reviewing the 5e splats

I’m pretty much convinced the Core 3 + Xanathar’s guide is probably going to be all that I need.

Also reading Horizon Walker and loving it, pity I never get to not GM. It’s close to dethroning my opinion that the 5e Warlock is more Bard than the 5e Bard pre-Xanathar could ever be (although the Xanathar specializations come close to making me happy about it) at least for specific bard variants.

I sincerely don’t have a clue what the devs were thinking with their concept of the bard as a full caster with a humongous spell list (compared to sorcerer) and anyone who claims that the bard only got good in 5e just wanted to play a slightly less embarassing wizard.

Avatar

The Count must go

Setup for the home D&D campaig

Lamoral Axel Edmond Ferdinand de Rinigoz, count of Kandertal; he’s not a good lord but then who is, and with his ailing father (the margrave of Rinigovia) a high officer of the royal court (who he’s set to replace as soon as he kicks the bucket), he’s also virtually immune from consequences. He’s been spending the last six months in a relatively impoverished part of Kandertal which has traditionally been neglected for various reasons.

His presence for so long has been taking a toll on the region, his followers have been causing problems for the inhabitants and the tithes extracted are also straining resources. And his extravagant requests to have Pear Orchard Lodge (the old family estate in the area) fixed up and expanded are actually making things worse.

Knowing full well that getting rid of the count violently would cause a crackdown from either the margrave or the king, representatives of various villages have banded together to find someone, anyone, in the region who might be able to get rid of him subtly, but who would manage?

I still need to flesh out the region which isn’t even named in my notes, plus this is going to be open ended enough that I’ll probably leave it open for the group to be dicks and side with the lord if they decide to be contrarians

Avatar

Magic and rituals

One thing that I’m not actually sure is so bad about pre 3E is Vancian casting.

Mainly AD&D’s version of it had incredibly hefty requirements for preparation and memorization that absolutely didn’t lend themselves to taking an 8 hour break or reworking your spell list on the fly (I don’t care how the IE games handle it, any DM worth their salt would have found a way to curtail this).

On the other hand I do admit that I like rituals being a thing if only because they let me an out to not have everyone who has access to some form of magic be an actual mage or casty-hybrid.

I’m sure I could think of alternate systems, like the skill-like system that Ars and a few other games use, or alternate casting systems like spell points or even purely blood or reagent powered magic.

Rituals might be an acceptable out honestly to justify paring down spell lists to something more skill-like. I’m thinking maybe a dozen, maybe a few more spheres of magic (broad but not too broad) with magic-oriented classes gaining a certain number and power of them.

On the other hand I can’t say I’m not a fan of spell books, and the idea of spellbooks that are essentially a series of increasingly more powerful philosophical arguments about the nature of the universe intended to ultimately chip at it seems like a thing it would be hard to replicate with.

Maybe if there was a limit to the number of prepared rituals within the known spheres, which would have to be partially pre-scribed.

Avatar

I know houseruling D&D is incredibly basic

And I’m sure some people would just say to use Fate or something (I’ve considered Ars) but it’s definitely hard at times to get around familiarity

I do like 5th edition for the most part but I feel like a bunch of my tiny annoyances with the system could potentially be served better by something that’s closer to 2nd edition; possibly fewer ribbon abilities, magic buffing that’s less taken for granted, none of this at-will magic stuff.

Funnily enough I think a system closer to 2e would also let me get rid of the thing I like least about D&D character building, namely attributes, which as a rule basically did nothing besides limit your class selection unless they were in the extremes of the range (the exceptions to that are carry weight and a few minor things). I’ve never liked that subsequent editions tried to make them more meaningful rather than less.

Avatar

Currently weighing story ideas as initial pitches

1 - A rivalry between two local mages comes to a head as they try to find people to steal each other’s ritual tomes without alerting the authorities to either the theft, the fact that they’re mages, or really anything else about them.

2 - Rumor is that someone would reward anyone who might find something valuable in the abandoned home of a supposedly penniless dragon. Additional rumor is that the dragon might be back in town under a different identity than his old one.

3 - The local count has decided that now was the time to visit his lands, and is either blissfully unaware or utterly uncaring that his little court’s lavish needs are ruining the area. A number of local villages are banding together to find someone who can get them rid of the aristocratic locusts in a way that does not bring royal authorities on their heads.

As a bonus broad background; the Astigian crown is a bureaucratic nightmare; if it’s reminiscent of the mess of certain defunct empires, this is intentional. And with a new ruler, administrators are feeling free to double down as a way to build favor, including levying absurd new fees, fines and taxes to help pay for an extravagant coronation.

Avatar

Thinking about what my roommates like of D&D

Specifically “something seriously absurd”

I have some ideas but I admit I’m a bit struggling about the small details, and how to start the campaign. It’s not that low levels are inherently a massive struggle, it’s also that I do feel that 5e’s starting toolkit is weird to write ideas around sometimes; it makes 3rd and 4th edition assumptions about some things that I’m not a hyper fan of.

Avatar

Thinking of reviving this

For one it’s probably a better idea than going back to LJ anytime I have things on my mind.

Avatar
reblogged

Doctrine that teaches women to hate their bodies is anti-feminist. Truscum doctrine holds that trans women who have penises or masculine features should feel dysphoria over it. Truscum is anti-feminist.

Fuck Truscum.

dysphoria =/= body hate. it is a disconnection from the one thing that assigned gender is based on: one’s birthed sex. one is not outside of their assigned gender without experiencing dysphoria.

i am a transmedicalist feminist, and my beliefs do not contradict each other, whereas yours allow people who agree with their assigned gender through agreeing with the one thing it is based on to appropriate the transgender and trans woman labels. you cannot be transgender and agree with the one thing that constituted your gender assignment.

IS trans woman calling shenanigans on the use of assignment here: Assigned gender has fuck all to do with "birthed sex" and is ultimately a measuring contest, something you would be aware of if you knew what the expression means and where it comes from. Dysphoria is a hell of a lot broader than discomfort about junk, which you would also know if you were as "medicalist" as you like to call yourself (lel). It's also not universally expressed the same, not universally understood the same, and not coped with the same. 

Avatar
reblogged

To My Cis Followers, Regarding the Jenner Interview.

Before this post begins in full, I would like to state that if you are offended, upset, or otherwise put off by this post, then that’s good and I’ve done my job. I will not be saying anything to comfort you or attempt to not hurt your feelings. 

If you watched the interview, you should be ashamed of yourself.

The interview was likely not prompted by a desire to advance transgender rights. Nor was it likely desired for personal publicity.

It was, in all likelihood, prompted by a desire to do damage control. For the past year and a half or so, the tabloid media has been constantly dogging Jenner, ‘reporting’ what causes the most buzz, making life hell for Jenner and their family, and when no 'facts’ were available, speculating and making up information to stir up the most press.

It is disgusting and predatory. It was not motivated by anything other than a baseless, malicious desire to cause a famous person to crash and burn in order to make money. It is an extension of the voyeuristic and gleeful celebrity culture we live in.

If you watched that interview, regardless of your reasons or reaction, you helped to contribute to and validate that culture. And that is a morally reprehensible act.

Think about that.