Wukan protest leader is made village's Communist Party secretary | Guardian

guardian.co.uk

Very interesting - this is a common tactic applied by the Chinese government to worker’s strikes over the past several years: Combine repression with accommodation (although, usually the leader of the protest will be tortured rather than co-opted).

===

A protest leader in Wukan, the southern Chinese village that drove out the authorities in a row over land grabs, has been appointed as its new Communist party secretary.

Residents applauded Lin Zuluan’s new role as another positive step in their struggle with local officials.

Unrest prompted by the seizure of farmland and accusations of electoral fraud by village heads escalated in December after Xue Jinbo, who had been negotiating with local authorities, died in custody. Provincial leaders stepped in and offered concessions 10 days after police and party officials fled the village in Guangdong province.

Residents welcomed that intervention but remained concerned they could still face retribution and pledges might not be delivered fully.

Chinese protestors win concessions

reuters.com

A Chinese village protest that tested the ruling Communist Party for over a week ended on Wednesday after officials offered concessions over seized farmland and the death of a village leader, in a rare spectacle of the government backing down to mobilized citizens.

Residents of Wukan, in southern Guangdong province, had fended off police with barricades and held protests over the death in police custody of activist Xue Jinbo, whose family rejects the government’s position that he died of natural causes, and against the seizure of farmland for development.

But after talks with officials, village representatives told residents to pull down protest banners and go back to their normal lives — provided the government keeps to its word.

“Because this matter has been achieved, we won’t persist in making noise,” village organizer, Yang Semao, told an assembly hall of village representatives and reporters, referring to the protests. He said protest banners would be taken down.

“They’ve agreed to our initial requests,” Yang told Reuters. But he added a caveat: “If the government doesn’t meet its commitments, we’ll protest again.”

Senior officials negotiating with villagers agreed to release three men held over land protests in September, when a government office was trashed, and to re-examine the cause of Xue’s death, a village organizer said earlier.

Xue’s family and fellow villagers believe he was subjected to abuse that left injuries on his body. But the government said an autopsy showed he died of heart problems. Xue was detained over the land protests that broke out in September.

The concessions showed how eager higher leaders were to avoid the risk of fresh violence and bloodshed, said Ting Wai, political science professor at Hong Kong Baptist University.

“I think the local government did not want to make concessions, and then of course when time goes on, the people became more and more frustrated, and now it is really like a bomb, so in order to prevent the bomb from exploding the provincial government has to do something,” he said.

Underscoring government fears of unrest, in a separate protest on Tuesday in Haimen, a town further east up the coast from Wukan, residents demonstrated in front of government offices and blocked a highway over plans to build a power plant.

State media said on Wednesday the government had agreed to suspend construction, though there was another protest which partially blocked a highway.

Chinese officials sometimes make low-key concessions to local protests, especially after they are over, and also punish protest organizers. But Wukan turned negotiations into a rare public spectacle, watched by foreign reporters and discussed within China — despite domestic censorship of news.

Under a hot afternoon sun, a thousand villagers gathered to hear an organizer, Lin Zuluan, explain the concessions from the government, which they greeted with loud clapping.

He later told reporters that villagers would not suffer retribution for taking part in the protests.

WARY OF GOVERNMENT PROMISES

Some Wukan residents were wary of the government’s promises.

“Our hearts are not at ease,” said Zhong Xianmei, a resident in her thirties. “The dead body isn’t back, are the detained back in their homes? Will their words count?”

Wang Yang, the Communist Party chief of Guangdong, obliquely acknowledged that the villagers had cause to complain, in comments published on Wednesday in the Southern Daily, the official province newspaper.

“This is the outcome of conflicts that accumulated over a long time in the course of economic and social development,” said Wang, seen by many analysts as nursing hopes of a spot in China’s next central leadership.

Guangdong is a prosperous part of China. But the upheavals of urbanization and industrialization have fanned discontent among increasingly assertive citizens, who often blame local officials for corruption and abuses.

Rural land in China is usually owned in name by village collectives. But in fact, government officials can mandate seizing land for development in return for compensation, which villagers often say is inadequate.

Protests in China have become relatively common over corruption, pollution, wages, and land grabs that local officials justify in the name of development.

Chinese experts put the number of “mass incidents,” as such protests are known, at about 90,000 a year in recent years.

China’s leaders, determined to maintain one-party control, worry that such outbursts might turn into broader and more persistent challenges to their power.

But even in Wukan, villagers professed faith in the central government. On Wednesday morning, about 300 of them lined the sides of a road into the village, preparing to welcome Zhu Mingguo, the main official negotiating with them.

Zhu promised an impartial autopsy for the late Xue, and “transparent” disclosure in the media of how the villagers’ grievances are addressed, according to a report in the province’s official newspaper, the Southern Daily.

Lin Zuluan, the Wukan organizer, told reporters that officials also agreed that the village can hold democratic elections. In China, village committees are in theory elected, but in practice there are many restrictions — formal and informal — on votes.

These are major concessions from the Chinese government, and probably stem from the Party fear of the movement spreading. Now that the movement has proved it can succeed, hopefully the villagers will continue to organise and news of their success will filter out and encourage other movements in China.

NYT: "Revolt Begins Like Others, but Its End Is Less Certain"

nytimes.com

WUKAN, China — Each day begins with a morning rally in the banner-bedecked square, where village leaders address a packed crowd about their seizure of the village and plans for its future. Friday’s session was followed by a daylong mock funeral for a fallen comrade, whose body lies somewhere outside the village in government custody…

by Michael Wines

There is a wry “Occupy Tian’anmen” joke to be made here, but in reality this situation scares me too much to be funny about it. If history can serve as any guide, this will only end in violence. It appears that the police kidnapped and beat to death the villager chosen to negotiate with the authorities, and that SWAT teams are massing outside the village as the protests continue.

Meanwhile, China has published long-expected regulations requiring all users of microblogs to register accounts with their real names. Among other things, the new regulations reiterate the numerous ways in which free speech can be abridged:

Article 10. No organization or individual shall make unlawful use of a micro-blog to reproduce, publish, or transmit information with the following contents:

(i) violating the basic principles of the Constitution;

(ii) jeopardizing national security, leaking state secrets, subverting the government, undermining national unity;

(iii) harming national honor and interests;

(iv) inciting ethnic hatred or ethnic discrimination, undermining national unity;

(v) violating the state religion policies or propagating cults and feudal superstitions;

(vi) spreading rumors, disturbing social order, or undermining social stability;

(vii) spreading obscenity, pornography, gambling, violence, terror or instigating crimes;

(viii) insulting or libeling other or infringing on other people’s legitimate rights and interests;

(ix) inciting illegal assembly, association, procession or demonstration, assembling to disturb social order;

(x) illegal activities on behalf of civil society organizations;

(xi) contains content prohibited under other laws and administrative regulations.

For reference, here is a selection from the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China:

Article 35. Citizens of the People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration.

I'd call this "Top Three Stories of the Day"

But that’s all a matter of perspective, since there might’ve been important things I’ve missed.  And I’m just a blogger, so…

But at any rate, here’s a few stories that I highly recommend everyone keep their eyes glued to.

  • Kenya’s Samburu Tribe was evicted from their land.  Many of the people within the tribe were also beaten and even raped as a result of this.  The kicker? They were evicted because The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF)-Two American Charities - Bought out all the land for a nature preservation.  Because apparently people who were capable of taking care of the land they’d lived on, and the indigenous animals they’d lived with for years deserved to be evicted from their homes so two American charities could take control of it?  I’m sorry but this is all kinds of wrong, and all kinds of sad and terrible.
  • There is a revolt going on in Wukan, China

    The conflict in Wukan, a coastal settlement of 20,000 people near the country’s industrial heartland in Guangdong Province, escalated Monday after residents learned that one of the representatives they had selected to negotiate with the local Communist Party had died in police custody. The authorities say a heart attack killed the 42-year-old man, but relatives say his body bore signs of torture.

    Residents set up blockades to keep out the police and prevent more arrests. Some residents said armed riot police officers were blocking shipments of food and water into the village in an attempt to suppress the uprising. (Click to read more)

  • If you’re an American, you might want to look into what’s happening with This Act. Basically, the NDAA is not only likely to be passing (along with SOPA), but a good chunk of the country probably doesn’t even know it’s happening.  This is thanks to what appears to be a comprehensive Media Blackout regarding the passing of this legislation.  Despite groups like the ACLU screaming till they were hoarse about it, it still appears that a lot of America isn’t even aware it’s happening.  An interesting side note, it’s easier to find coverage of the uprising in China than it is on the NDAA.  I’m not saying that there shouldn’t be coverage of this (there should), but I just find it interesting that American media seems fine with focusing on that, but not problems at home…

Do what you will with these - as always I welcome any and all contributions to developing stories or bits of info you think should be shared.  Both submissions and asks are open.

People's uprising in China chase corrupt officials out of town!

nytimes.com

My people are rising up! Villagers in Wukan are rising up against corruption of government officials who are seizing their land and livelihood to turn a profit.  The people from that area is know for their sense of justice and is the birthplace for a famous revolutionary martyr named Peng Pai (彭湃), who was dubbed the “King of the Farmers Struggle” by Mao

China: Wukan protest leader is made village's Communist Party secretary

guardian.co.uk

A protest leader in Wukan, the southern Chinese village that drove out the authorities in a row over land grabs, has been appointed as its new Communist party secretary.

Unrest prompted by the seizure of farmland and accusations of electoral fraud by village heads escalated in December after Xue Jinbo, who had been negotiating with local authorities, died in custody. Provincial leaders stepped in and offered concessions 10 days after police and party officials fled the village in Guangdong province.

They cheered the appointment of 67-year-old Lin – announced at a meeting of Communist party members on Sunday – as a good sign. He will also lead the team arranging another election to elect a new village committee. Provincial investigators have declared the last race invalid.

“It is a good thing indeed. Most villagers are very happy about this,” said resident Yang Shimao.

“Lin Zuluan was the actual leader of our previous rights protection movement. With this new position he will consider our village’s interests and our people’s interests.”

The Spirit of Wukan

foreignpolicy.com

In September, residents of Wukan accused local officials of embezzling more than $110 million dollars of money owed to them for selling more than 80 percent of the villager’s arable land to developers, and marched on the county seat. Significantly, compared with the tens of thousands of other protests that happen across China each year, local officials fled Wukan on Dec. 11, leaving the town in the hands of the village community. Their success puts them in a risky position, as the Wukanese have challenged not just the local authorities but a basic assumption behind Communist Party rule: that the Chinese people, and especially the rural masses, need authoritarian rule to prevent the country from descending into chaos. Ten days into life without police or party officials, Wukan was almost peaceful — save for the array of police forces that surrounded the town. Still, the gumption of the Wukanese may be a new model for activism in communities across China.

Amusingly enough, this type of autonomy is far more communal than rule by the Communist Party.

One Western reporter compared the atmosphere in Wukan to that of the Paris Commune; a veteran Hong Kong journalist reminisced about Beijing in the spring of 1989, before the crackdown on Tiananmen. He described then an almost intoxicating sense of unity and generosity, where cab drivers drove protestors for free and thieves vowed to switch professions, buoyed by a feeling that all was good and possible in the fleeting moment.

Inside Wukan: the Chinese village that fought back - Telegraph

telegraph.co.uk

For the first time on record, the Chinese Communist party has lost all control, with the population of 20,000 in this southern fishing village now in open revolt.

Makes me happier than ever that I left China. The country is messed up. I hope these villagers hold out against the government for a long time!!

“Have you noticed how many Hong Kong reporters are in Wukan?” he added. “Being exposed to the Hong Kong media in their daily lives gives Guangdong people a better understanding of how the media works and what they can do.”

Canny Wukan Villagers Grasp Keys to Loosen China’s Muzzle - NYTimes.com
Loading more posts...