In Race for Fastest Supercomputer, China Outpaces U.S.

thedailybeast.com

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is one of the great symbols of America’s scientific and military prowess. For six decades, here on this tranquil campus tucked away in the hill country east of San Francisco, where scientists stroll along leafy paths and zip to meetings on bicycles, huge breakthroughs have been made, like the discovery of a half-dozen elements on the periodic table and the detection of a key component of dark matter.

Livermore’s biggest claim to fame involves designing the world’s most advanced nuclear warheads—this was the mission of the lab when it was created in 1952 by Edward Teller, father of the hydrogen bomb. To do this, Livermore relies on powerful machines called supercomputers, which hum away inside top-secret, heavily guarded buildings. The U.S. has long dominated the industry. Which is what made the news that Bruce Goodwin, head of the lab’s weapons program, received last November all the more momentous: the Chinese had unveiled the world’s most powerful supercomputer, a machine five times more powerful than Livermore’s biggest computer.

To most of us, this might sound like no big deal, akin to Apple coming out with a faster smartphone than Microsoft. But to the scientists, industry titans, and world leaders who understand how delicate America’s position as a global superpower really is, this was a Sputnik moment. Only this time, it wasn’t Russia trouncing the U.S. in the space race, but China surging ahead in one of the most vital areas of national security. By running thousands of processors in parallel, supercomputers not only help design weapons systems, they also model climate change, crack codes, and help develop new and life-changing drugs. Cranking out 500 trillion operations per second, just one of Livermore’s supercomputers throws off so much heat that if the air-conditioning system were to fail, the computer would start to melt within minutes.

» via Newsweek

Bitcoin network reaches size half that of Tianhe-1A, quarter of Folding@Home

From Bitcoin’s latest difficulty estimate of a number higher than 50,000, the total Bitcoin network strength compares at about half of what Tianhe-1A, the fastest supercomputer offers.  

Bitcoin ranks at about a quarter as powerful as Folding@Home — the most powerful distributed computing cluster in the world.

The image in this post is created in real time, however the metrics are bing compared from the February 25th, 2011 levels.  Information gathered from Raulo’s comments on the forum.

Previous Posts

US reclaims the crown with the world's fastest supercomputer

image

Suck it, China and Japan… with IBM’s Sequoia supercomputer, we have once again regained the title of world’s fastest supercomputer. Merka.

Read More

Japan re-claims the title of having the world's fastest supercomputer. Fine, whatever, see if I care.

image

A couple months ago, China proudly unveiled what was at the time, the world’s fastest supercomputer that was clocked at 2.5 petaflops. Now, Japan’s K Computer has absolutely smashed that record, computing 8.2 quadrillion calculations per second, or 8.2 petaflops. EAT IT COMMIES.

Read More

[Video] Internet ID, Algorithms, Supercomputers, & Social Media [YouTube] http://mys.tc/120 data information mining analytics

Next-gen supercomputers have huge energy cost

msnbc.msn.com

Warehouse-size supercomputers costing $1 million to $100 million can seem as distant from ordinary laptops and tablets as Greek immortals on Mount Olympus. Yet the next great leap in supercomputing could not only transform U.S. science and innovation, but also put much more computing power in the hands of consumers.

IBM wants to build an exascale computer by 2024

image

IBM and ASTRON have embarked on a huge project with the goal of building an Exascale computer by 2024. Said computer would collect data from a 3000 km array of radio telescopes, streaming an exabyte of data every day. How much data is that? That’s twice as much data as is in the entire internet in a single day. So imagine all the data going around the internet on an average day around the world and double that. That’s how much data is going to be collected and processed by these radio telescopes.

Read More

Guest Blog: Too Hard for Science? Simulating the Human Brain

scientificamerican.com

Supercomputers may soon approach the brain’s power, but much is unknown about how it works

In “Too Hard for Science?” I interview scientists about ideas they would love to explore that they don’t think could be investigated. For instance, they might involve machines beyond the realm of possibility, such as particle accelerators as big as the sun, or they might be completely unethical, such as lethal experiments involving people. This feature aims to look at the impossible dreams, the seemingly intractable problems in science. However, the question mark at the end of “Too Hard for Science?” suggests that nothing might be impossible.

“SDSC’s project is another example of cloud computing expanding the accessibility of high-performance computing (HPC) functionality once reserved for an exclusive set of institutions. Instead of being forced to build out huge clusters inside your own data centers, customers can outsource supercomputing needs to cloud vendors. Amazon offers special cluster compute instances for just such a purpose, and even built a supercomputer on the Elastic Compute Cloud that ranked among the Top 500 supercomputing sites in the world. Another project recently featured by Ars used the Amazon compute cloud to build a 30,000-core cluster for a pharmaceutical company that ran for about seven hours at a peak cost of $1,279 per hour.”

Supercomputing center targets big, fast storage cloud at academics, industry

neat.

Loading more posts...