Springhill Care Group : Fool Fridge/ Land Of Serious Topics
Guns don’t kill people; people kill people; and people with guns kill even more people.
They also save more people who would otherwise be at the mercy of the criminals.
SPRINGHILL TOWNSHIP, Pa. — An 85-year-old great-grandmother in Fayette County busted a would-be burglar by pulling a gun, then forcing him to call for help while she kept him in her sights.
Venus Ramey, 82, confronted a man on her farm in south-central Kentucky last week after she saw her dog run into a storage building where thieves had previously made off with old farm equipment.
Ramey said the man told her he would leave. “I said, ‘Oh, no you won’t,’ and I shot their tires so they couldn’t leave,” Ramey said.
She had to balance on her walker as she pulled out a snub-nosed .38-caliber handgun.
“I didn’t even think twice. I just went and did it,” she said. “If they’d even dared come close to me, they’d be 6 feet under by now.”
Hancock County Sheriff’s Investigator Andre Fizer said about an 84-year-old man’s decision to shoot through a house door at another man who was trying to barge into the house: “You could tell he was devastated. You could tell he was scared.” And rightfully so. Twenty-year-old Wade Ledesma made repeated attempts to break in to the house at about 5 a.m. on July 27, threatening to kill him throughout.
Ledesma “tried to break through the front door and also tried to enter through a back door and a rear window of the residence. The resident called 911 and reported that the intruder was trying to force his way into the home…. [The elderly man] held himself against the door to keep [Ledesma] from entering,” reported the Sun Herald.
The resident became tired from holding the door and, worded about his and his wife’s safety, asked his wife to get his pistol. He fired a shot through the door, meant to merely be a warning shot, and he hit Ledesma in the leg.
And those are just the obvious cases.
A few years ago I was at a talk by a Jewish man from Poland who survived WWII because he was able to escape his home before the Nazis rounded them up and was able to get a gun from a family friend. He said that without a weapon he would not have been able to join the partisans and remain safe. He also would not have survived his first night home after the war as some of his “neighbors” knocked on the door in the middle of the night to “invite” him to join them for a party to celebrate his return. He had his rifle with him and leveled at the men during the conversation as he explained to them that he was tired and would prefer staying home…They didn’t press the matter. But he left the next day and never returned. He heard a few days later that a friend of his was not so prepared and was killed by the “neighbors”.
The movie “Defiance” is yet another reminder to Jews that weapons are not something to fear, but to have handy.
In 1928, five years before the rise of Hitler, Germany’s freely elected government enacted a “Law on Firearms and Ammunition.” This law required anyone who owned a firearm, or who wanted to own a firearm, to make themselves known to the authorities. Anyone who wanted to purchase a firearm had to get a “Firearms Acquisition Permit.” If you needed ammunition, you had to get an “Ammunition Acquisition Permit.” When you wanted to go hunting, you had to get an “Annual Hunting Permit.” Every firearm that changed hands professionally had to have a serial number and the maker’s or dealers name stamped into the metal. “Proof of need” was made a condition for issuance of all licenses, not just the carry permit. Mandatory prison sentences were imposed on anyone who professionally sold or transferred a firearm or ammunition without a license. Truncheons and stabbing weapons were subject to the same licensing requirements as firearms, in terms of their manufacture and sale.
As a result of the 1928 Law, all firearms and firearms owners were registered. To take firearms from anyone they distrusted, the Nazis simply did not renew permits. Under the law, their privately created law, the Nazis could now easily confiscate all firearms and ammunition from any, or all, selected groups. The gun law of 1928 had served the Nazis well. It made almost all law abiding firearms owners known to the authorities. The 1928 law on firearms and ammunition helped the Nazis to destroy democracy in Germany, by disarming the law abiding majority, whom they feared.
A right to bear arms is the fundamental right of every law-abiding person to acquire the means to protect themselves even from their own government. One of the first things a government does when it wants to control its citizenry is to control their access to the weapons they need to defend themselves.
Springhill Care Group : Retiring? Just watch this space: Homes for older buyers have never been so roomy | Connie Kane
Perhaps it’s overstating it to suggest that the older generation has never had it so good. But when it comes to the sort of accommodation best suited to their needs, there’s plenty of choice. And a touch of controversy.
A report from think-tank the Intergenerational Foundation (IF) caused a furore by suggesting that elderly people are taking up valuable housing stock by hanging on to large homes needed by young families.
It suggested that tax penalties should be used to persuade the older occupiers to leave.
But developers insist that there is no need for such an approach. Given the right developments in the right places, they say, older homeowners are more than happy to move from larger houses.
According to Beechcroft, which creates upmarket homes with unusually large room sizes in beautifully landscaped settings in the South-East, older people can be reluctant to downsize to a small apartment — or a retirement development of the kind that has communal lounges and laundries.
Beechcroft customers are typically moving from large properties set in extensive grounds and want a new easy-to-maintain home, built to a high standard, space for their furniture and an excellent location.
The sites are usually in market towns or villages within walking distance of shops and services. The company is expanding, with new developments in Petersfield, St Albans and Cheltenham.
Yvonne Hancox, 70, moved to Beechcroft’s Frenchlands Gate in East Horsley, Surrey, from a three-bedroom bungalow with a large garden. ‘One of my main reasons for moving was that the garden was too much for me,’ says Yvonne, ‘and my house needed so much money spending on it.
‘I don’t feel that I have downsized at all. I have two bedrooms instead of three, but I now have two bathrooms, a much bigger kitchen and a nicer dining room.’
Typical prices are £625,000 for a three-bedroom flat or two- bedroom house. Richmond Villages is a specialist with village communities catering to both independent older buyers and those in need of care.
‘A lot of our buyers are moving from the traditional family home,’ says marketing manager David Reaves. ‘It is a big decision, but the typical response we get is: “I wish we had done this five years ago.”’
Richmond Villages provides facilities, such as a spa, hair salon, gym, pool, library, activities room, shop and cafe, as well as care homes on the same site — and a carer agency.
The latest project, at Letcombe Regis in Oxfordshire, has just released the final phase of 34 properties. They range in price from £310,000 to £620,000. It is set in 36 acres, with its own nature reserve.
Retirement Villages is celebrating 30 years of providing accommodation and care for the over-55s. It has 13 locations across the country.
Jon Gooding, chief executive of Retirement Villages, thinks the Intergenerational Foundation report was wrong-headed.
‘Older people should be free to choose how they live and the way to free up the housing stock is by offering them something better,’ he says.
Eileen Osborne, 62, moved from a four-bedroom house in London to Retirement Village’s Roseland Parc on the Rosewall Peninsula in Cornwall.
She says: ‘The house was old, big and took far too much looking after. I was poorly and lonely.’
In her first 18 months she gave up smoking, lost weight, joined a reading group, made dozens of new friends, filled her calendar — and she even sold the mobility scooter she once relied on.
Posted in Springhill Group News | Tags: homecare, Homes for older buyers have never been so roomy, News - Springhill Group Florida Home Care, retirement, springhill care, springhill care group, springhill caregroup, Springhill Group Florida - Home Care
Springhill Group Florida - Home Care | the-looser-it-s-me.net
Springhill Group Care – Providing for all levels of care, balanced with impressive facilities and exceptional staff.
…golden age living and health care at its very best…
At Springhill Care Group, our attitude is to exceed the expectations of our residents and their friends, that offer balanced with impressive facilities and exceptional staff.
At Springhill Care Group, we firmly believe in safeguarding the interests of our clients and we pride ourselves on offering the most resident friendly environment. » Springhill Group Florida - Home Care
Springhill Care Group | Advantages of Home Care
Time is very essential to everybody. We will never know when were going to loose it. Today everyone seems to be very busy, everybody has to live and in order to live one must work for them. But we cannot work and take care of our parents or grandparents who’s getting older and requires more care and attention. We became more concern about their safety at home. It’s not an easy task caring for the elderly, especially if you are trying to do it alone. And aside from work, there comes a time when you will need a break, or just some time alone for yourself. With the constant worry that something may go wrong, the respites and personal time become nonexistent. Sometimes we are left with tough decision, whether or not an elderly family member should move into an assisted living facility is often one of the key questions. Home care for the elderly is an option for caregivers who need extra help while offering the elderly person a good quality of life for the rest of their years.
To make your decision a lot easier, these advantages of letting elderly live in Home care might help you decide:
1. Seniors are getting more sensitive than usual. One advantage of leeting them stay in home care can give them the sense of freedom, and freedom for them could mean maintaining dignity, dignity which is something seniors feels like loosing as they age. This freedom would not be possible in an assisted living residence. This freedom could also mean that those who receive homecare can come and go as they please-for whatever reason. They can also choose their own meal times so they can eat whenever they are hungry unlike if meals are served to them, they might feel like prisoners. They are left with the feeling of they can decide for themselves.
2. It is proven that caring for pets can reduce stress levels and was also proven to have health benefits for seniors. Homes allow elderly to keep their pets and even beloved possessions with them for these possessions are tied to invaluable memories.
3. Visiting hours and even the number of visitors are not restricted; friends and families can visit anytime they please. This would create a more fulfilling relationship between them.
4. Living at home if sick one can spread illness like wildfire. This is of course being assisted with proper precautions. Those who are sick can simply be asked not visit until they are full recovered. And living at home should help seniors stay healthier, as they won’t be subjected to the all the germs that inevitably linger at a place where many people live.
5. Moving to a new place with new people and new routine but homecare allows the elderly to avoid this emotional stress from happening Maintaining continuity leads to psychological wellbeing.
6. Home care is a more fiscally responsible choice because there can be many stressors like, assisted living facilities are costly and the location may be inconvenient, making it difficult for family members to visit. Many seniors have already paid off their mortgage, so moving to a retirement home is an added expense.
7. Most especially and more importantly those who live at home are often happier than they would be living at a retirement home. The familiarity and comforts of home are irreplaceable.
Not to mention the peace of mind that you can get if your elderly is at home care. Home care for the elderly usually includes a trained person in the medical field. Seniors are often cared one-on-one by these professionals. Plus they are very keen about nutrition and exercise, you are certain that your parents or grandparents are well taken care of.