Password help?
  1. block 4
    Two Thoughts About Parks and Rec

    The oddest thing about watching a mockumentary sitcom now is that TV documentaries don’t look anything like this anymore. Mockumentaries show their footage once rather than three times to get us excited about what’s “Coming Up” and we’re invited to believe that what we’re seeing happened and was caught on camera, while real contemporary fly-on-the-wall documentaries are cheerfully blatant in their staged reshoots. The mockumentary format works just because the mockumentary format works. Works to further its own comedy-delivery-mechanisms rather than to be a parody of anything external to itself anymore. It’s Baudrillicious. 

    I know that, creatively, mockumentary sitcoms have always really had more to do with the tradition of  Christopher Guest films than they have with Actual Other Televison Series, but from a British perspective it never looked like that. Over here we had Airport, a fly-on the-wall documentary that looked pretty much exactly how mockumentaries still look, we had a flood of imitators following around vets and stuff, then we had The Office. It seemed a solid continuum of “Here’s a Thing” and “Here’s the Parody of that Thing, but looking back we should have noticed it wasn’t. Back when My Lady Friend was doing her teacher training her and her mates would pretend they were in a documentary called Teachers in Practice and deliver asides to non-existent cameras. This was before The Office, but they’d already noticed that fly-on-the-wall documentaries were a natural format for comedy. Not a thing that could be parodied for comedy, but a format for comedy.

    Which would be all well and good if I bring myself to watch Parks and Rec without thinking, “Why’s someone making a late-90s style documentary about things that are happening now?” I know a big problem with mockumentary sitcoms for some people is, “Why are there no consequences from this being televised in their world?” and this is just That Sort Of Thing really. 

    The other thought I’ve had is that we’ve just reached the episode that intoduces the evil, sexual and ruthless library department and it’s nice to finally see a television show that paints bookpeople as they really are. The last few years may have been mostly about comics for me, and my Now is mostly about television, but in my soul I am a bookperson and we are the ones who’d be Cleopatra.

     
  2. block 11
    The Addams Family and The Munsters, which aired from 1964 to 1966, were more than unconventional. Their characters and premises existed well outside the realm of society’s normal expectations and hierarchy. This was oddly similar to the underlying philosophy of feminism and the women’s liberation movement, which was questioning the demands and results of the traditional power structure at that same time.

    Counterculture

    Everyone knows that the characters on The Munsters and The Addams Family were “quirky, kooky, mysterious, and spooky”, as The Addams Family theme song told us (snap, snap). In addition, though, their bold, non-traditional actions revealed a hint of feminism in the briefly lived monster family sitcoms.

    Amid the visual gags and amusing antics was a subtle, fun social commentary. Who really is different? What is a “normal” family, or a “normal” person? Isn’t there a value in nonconformity? Why should traditional roles be the most important thing?

    No Submissive Housewives

    Morticia Addams was arguably more in control of her altogether ooky family than her husband, Gomez was, and Lily Munster did the exact opposite of traditional housework. Also, she was often found either mediating her husband’s problems or pushing back against his traditional rule. Morticia Addams and Lily Munster were both innovative, strong women – even if they weren’t humans we would traditionally recognize.

    New Models of Family Dynamics

    There was true partnership between the spouses on Cemetery Lane and Mockingbird Lane. Neither sitcom lasted long, and they might have lasted longer if they hadn’t been competing with each other. However, by stripping away many of society’s conventions, these sitcoms were able to look at individual characters as individuals, rather than just as “someone’s wife” or some other traditional societal role. In that way, there was a little feminism in The Addams Family and The Munsters. They were proto-feminist harbingers of the social change to come over the next decade.

    from:

    http://womenshistory.about.com/od/feminismandpopculture/a/Monster_Family_Sitcoms.htm

    YEESS THE ADDAMS AND THE MUNSTERS ARE TOTALLY FEMINIST FRIENDLY yeah

    i mean as far as they could go

    Morticia, Wednesday and Lily always knew how to handle shit around.

    #bb grew up with the best role models# fabulous monster ladies are this girl’s idea of role models#

     
  3. block 5
    What do you think about "Men at Work"?
    Anonymous

    Oh, I tweeted about that a few minutes ago!

    “Men at Work looks like a really bad sitcom #pointingouttheobvious”

    But, let me elaborate… I’m really into sitcoms (as many of you know), and I love giving new ones a shot. There have been a lot of great new sitcoms this year, but sadly a lot of them rely on “cheap comedy”, where there is no set-up. Men at Work seems to also rely on cheap comedy that transfers into cheap laughs, which doesn’t make for a good show in the long run. I’ll watch a couple more episodes just to make sure, because in some cases the first couple episodes of a sitcom suck and it gets better as it goes.

    I’m a little disappointed, because Men at Work was created by Breckin Meyer (Franklin & Bash, Clueless) and I’ve been looking forward to watch another sitcom/show by him. Danny Masterson (That 70’s Show) is also starring in it, who is fantastic. 

    So, we shall see how it goes. I’m predicting that it won’t make past season 1. However, I could be terribly wrong. Unfortunately, cheap comedy seems to be getting a larger audience these days. An audience that aren’t exactly comedy geniuses, contain little loyalty, and are basically human laughing tracks…but an audience nonetheless. And an audience means a running show.

     
  4. block 3

    watching old episodes of The Nanny in sequel. Brings back memories.

    That was really good TV.

    (I love Niles!)

     
  5. block
    100 TV Shows #19 and #20-One Day at a Time and Hot L Baltimore
     
  6. block
    i fucking hate laugh tracks
     
  7. block
    Terrible Tween Sitcoms

    It seems like everywhere on kids programming you see live action kid’s sitcoms in some way shape or form. Where did it start? And how can we end it?

    Read More

     
  8. block 2
    Community's Coming Back...but Dan Harmon's Been Fired. Good One, Universe...

                                     

    image


    Dennis:  I was feeling good.  I really was.

    After months of network waffling, poor ratings, inter-nerd nail-biting, and Eeyore-like doom-saying, the universe begrudgingly gave me (and everyone else, I guess) a present.  Community was renewed for a fourth season!  Yeah!   People aren’t as unforgivably stupid as I’d thought!  TV isn’t the soul-eroding wasteland we always imagined!  Life is good and there’s no such thing as cancer!

    I mean, sure, the show only got renewed for a short season, and the whole “Chevy being a dick again” development was troubling, but, dammit, this was undeniably good news.  It made my day.  (And go shake your head condescendingly at someone else, judgmental commenter types- good TV makes me happy.)   My lovely wife and I even threw a Community-themed, all-day viewing party (yesterday!) to celebrate, alongside an apartment full of like-minded Greendale enthusiasts, complete with a giant, icy tub of beer, and Community-themed snacks, including my baby’s pride and joy- round puff pastries filled with brie called, wait for it, Annie’s boobs.  (Again, shut up out there.  We’re nerds, we understand that.)

    And then there’s today.  Then there’s this.

    Yup.  They fired Dan HarmonThe creator of Community.Just days after letting us know one of the best shows on TV is coming back.

    Read More

     
  9. block 9
    On The Change In Community

    I was never the biggest fan of the NBC comedy, Community

    When I say that I wasn’t the biggest fan, it doesn’t mean that I disliked the show. I mostly watched it when I found that my friends (dedicated fans, which is an adjective that describes a decent number of the show’s fans) were watching it, and I found Community, for lack of a better term, pleasant. It made me feel good to watch it. It wasn’t centered around the flaws of people and why those flaws made people funny. It was centered around people, and, well, people being funny. The “flaws” weren’t presented as flaws. It wasn’t a gimmick show. It wasn’t a sitcom biology experiment where you put a few different people in a room and hoped the writers could build some semblance of plot around them. 

    And that is why Community was never a ratings darling.

    A “ratings darling” is a show that is very popular, and kills in ratings. It’s a show like American Idol or Dancing With The Stars or NCIS. Those are shows that have a mass appeal, because those are shows that you can expect consistent things from. In the case of the first, it’s a few weeks of people sucking and then a few more weeks of talented people trying not to suck. I’ve never watched Dancing With The Stars, but that’s because I assume it’s awful, so I’m justified. And in the case of the NCIS, they solve crimes. Not a lot happens. It’s a procedural drama. I’m not dissing NCIS, but it’s case opened/case closed. When they pull a bigger risk than AND ONE OF THESE CHARACTERS ISN’T. COMING. BACK., I’ll give it a bit more credit. 

    But back to a paragraph and a sentence ago. Sure, there were personality types on Community, but they weren’t pieces of a puzzle in the sense that television shows tend to fit people together. The cast wasn’t made of parallels to one another. There were no hot girl/nerd or sexpot/gentleman clashes for people to look forward to every week. Community was always a bit too meta, a bit too weird for general audiences. I hate to be the kind of person who says “PEOPLE LIKE WHAT THEY LIKE AND THEY’RE DUMB FOR IT” but Community was a little too “out there.” Community definitely didn’t have to be the way it was. It could have fit it’s characters into the stereotypes that, week after week, one could expect definite things from.

    Abed would’ve been a Big Bang Theory cast-off, making nerdy references but losing all the deeper shit. No more talks about “realities” or “time lines.” Way more Star Wars and World Of Warcraft humor, though. And him dressing up as Batman? Milk that for all it’s worth. 

    Troy would’ve been legitimately stupid. Sure, he still would have rapped and been friends with Abed, but it would’ve been more of an  ”ABED, THAT’S WHY YOU CAN’T GET LAID, MAN!” kind of friendship. 

    Jeff would have been a bit older, a bit more sexually aggressive and would have dressed differently. He’d have revelatory moments about his own character still, but they wouldn’t change who he was. He’d say to himself “What if I was a better guy?” and then he’d swig his beer and hit on Britta. Cue laugh track.

    Britta might have been the only character to change over the course of the entire series. Sure, she’d start as a bit uptight, but as soon as the wily Jeff got his way, boy, she’d show that she could get a bit crazy! There can’t be two uptight girls in a group. 

    Annie would stay completely innocent, the youngest member, constantly threatening to sabotage whatever madcap situations the study group got themselves into. Oh, and she might share a tender kiss (turned into something passionate and awkward and HILARIOUS) with Troy or Abed (whoever the audience liked more) when the show had it’s last episode.

    Shirley would have had her sandwich shop, and she would yell about it. She’s the only black person in the group, and God help her if she’s not going to be outspoken about every fucking thing in the world. She has to sit at the bottom right corner of the study table? Is it because she’s black? Abed’s dressed as Batman and spooks everyone. I keep a gun in my purse. I’m from the hood. Get it, America?

    Let me run down the list of things that Pierce could joke about:

    -Viagra

    -His eye sight

    -Shirley and Annie

    -How weird Abed is

    -Viagra

    -His life in his youth compared to his life now

    -Viagra, because there’s nothing funnier in the world to make fun of, as proven by comedy and history repeatedly, than an older man’s limp, failing genitals.

    Chang would’ve been a more strapped-in version of first season Chang. And nothing else.

    Dean Pelton would’ve been about as gay as you can make someone. Have you been working out, Jeff? Maybe back in World War II, Pierce!

    And that is why Dan Harmon was replaced. I’m not a flag-bearer for the man. I’m not going to praise his name because he helped to create a good TV show and was dropped in an email by faceless executives. I’ve read his post about how he came to learn about being replaced and his thoughts on it. He seems well-spoken enough and he seems to have a good sense of humor.

    I’m also not saying that, with new showrunners, Community is going to become the lame joke nightmare that I listed above. I think that it’s going to continue in a similar fashion to how it’s been going. But I think it’ll feel a tad different, if only because the fan base is dedicated, and they’ll sense it. 

    When a machine that’s performed well in the past isn’t performing to par now, why not replace the operator? That’s think that’s what NBC feels. It might be a little more about money or a little more about creative differences, but, for the most part, Community wasn’t doing great and, when something’s not doing great, I think NBC felt that it would be okay to change the people behind that something. Couldn’t hurt, right?

    -Daniel

    http://danielsfunny.com/

     
  10. block 6

    currently watching: the show that had my perception of college all f’d up 🎓 (Taken with instagram)