“In a capitalist society, the motive behind the production of food is not to feed people, housing is not made to give them shelter, clothing is not made to keep them warm, and health care is not offered primarily to keep people healthy. All of these things, which are and should be viewed as basic rights, are nothing other than commodities—to be bought and sold—from which to make a profit. If a profit cannot be made, usually due to overproduction in relation to the market, the commodity is considered useless by the capitalist and destroyed.”
—“There are many factors driving global society toward a low-wage, low-growth, high-profit future, with increasing polarization and social disintegration. Another consequence is the fading of meaningful democratic processes as decision making is vested in private institutions and the quasi-governmental structures that are coalescing around them, what the Financial Times calls a “de facto world government” that operates in secret and without accountability. ”
—Profit Over People - Noam Chomsky“[H]ospitals almost double their profits when they convert a vaginal birth to a cesarean section. So they make about a thousand more dollars -- this is on average in California, per birth. And so there is a financial incentive there. ”
—Nathanael Johnson on the profitability of Cesarean Section vs. natural birth“Major changes have taken place in the global order in the past quarter century. By 1970 the "affluent alliance" of the post-war years was running on to the rocks, and there was growing pressure on corporate profits. Recognizing that the United States was no longer able to play the role of "international banker" that had been so beneficial to the US-based multinationals, Richard Nixon dismantled the international economic order (The Bretton Woods system), suspending the convertability of the dollar to gold, imposing wage-price controls and an import surcharge, and initiating fiscal measures that directed states power, beyond the previous norm, to welfare for the rich. These have been the guiding policies since, accelerated during the Reagan years and maintained by the "New Democrats." The unremitting class war waged by the businesss sectors was intensified, increasingly on a global scale. ”
—Noam Chomsky, Profit Over People, Neoliberalism and Global Order“A group of prominent Japanese economists recently published a multivolume review of Japan's program of economic development since World War II. They point out that Japan rejected the neoliberal doctrines of their US advisers, choosing instead a form of industrial policy that assigned a predominant role to the state. Market mechanisms were gradually introduced by the state bureaucracy and industrial-financial conglomerates as prospects for commercial success inscreased. The rejection of orthodox economic precepts was a condition for the “Japanese miracle,” the economists conclude. The success was impressive. With virtually no resource base, Japan became the world's biggest manufacturing economy by the 1990s and the world's leading source of foreign investment, also accounting for half the world's net saving and financing US deficits.”
—Noam Chomsky - Profit Over People“all of this is very natural in a society that is, to an unusual degree, business-run, with huge expenditures on marketing: $1 trillion a year, one sixth of the gross domestic product, much of it tax-deductible, so that people pay for the privilege of being subjected to manipulation of their attitudes and behavior.”
—Profit Over People - Noam ChomskyTwo Acts of Terror, Only One Investigation | Dave Lindorff
counterpunch.orgWest Fertilizer was built in the middle of the small town of West, TX, a community founded in the 19th century and named after the first local postmaster, T.M. West. It makes no sense, of course, to put a facility that uses highly toxic anhydrous ammonia as a primary feed stock — a compound that burns the lungs and kills on contact, and that, because it must be stored under pressure, is highly prone to leaks and explosive releases — and that makes as its main product ammonium nitrate fertilizer. Ammonium nitrate is the highly explosive compound favored by truck bombers like the Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. It was the fertilizer, vast quantities of which were stored at the West Fertilizer plant site, which caused the colossal explosion that leveled much of the town of West.
Building such a dangerous facility in the midst of a residential and business area, and allowing homes, nursing homes, hospitals, schools and playgrounds to be built alongside it, is the result of a corrupt process that is common in towns and cities across America, where business leaders routinely have their way with local planning and zoning commissions, safety inspectors and city councils. Businesses small and large also have their way with state and federal safety and health inspectors.
We know that the EPA, back in 2006, cited West Fertilizer for not having an emergency risk management plan. That is, a dangerous and explosion-prone plant that was using a hazardous chemical in large quantities, and that was storing highly explosive material also in large quantities, had made little or no effort to assess the risks of what it was doing. Indeed, it has been reported that the company had assured the EPA, in response to the complaint, that there was “no risk” of an explosion at the plant! An AP article reports that the company, five years after being cited for lacking a risk plan, did file one with the EPA, but that the report claimed the company “…was not handling flammable materials and did not have sprinklers, water-deluge systems, blast walls, fire walls or other safety mechanisms in place at the plant.”
Yet the AP article goes on to say that “State officials require all facilities that handle anhydrous ammonia to have sprinklers and other safety measures because it is a flammable substance, according to Mike Wilson, head of air permitting for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.”
The article says:
“Records reviewed by The Associated Press show the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration fined West Fertilizer $10,000 last summer for safety violations that included planning to transport anhydrous ammonia without a security plan. An inspector also found the plant’s ammonia tanks weren’t properly labeled.”
Then the article gets to the crux of the problem, saying:
“The government accepted $5,250 after the company took what it described as corrective actions, the records show. It is not unusual for companies to negotiate lower fines with regulators.”
Aside from the ridiculousness of West Fertilizer management’s reported assertion that the plant wasn’t handling flammable materials (a claim that the current deadly catastrophe has demonstrably proved was false), consider the incredible response of the EPA to this incredible assertion: The agency, emasculated by the Bush administration, and still a joke under the Obama administration, levied a pathetically small fine, but did nothing to shut the operation down until it put in place critical safety measures.
The other agency that could have acted, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), is even more of a paper tiger than the EPA. Despite their inherent risks and hazards, it is reported that OSHA has made only six investigations of fertilizer plant operators in Texas in the last six years. West Fertilizer was not one of them. In six years, it has not been visited by OSHA inspectors!
How can this be so? Because the entire health and safety regulatory apparatus of the US, from the federal level to the states and right down to local government, has been effectively neutered by corporate interests, who have used everything from threats of relocating to campaign contributions and outright bribes of officials and elected representatives to buy or win the right to basically operate as unsafely as they like, free of supervision.
As a result, regulation of dangerous plants and factories in the US these days is essentially nonexistent.
That, to me, is a kind of terrorism, and it is far more dangerous to the health and safety of the American people than any foreign or domestic terrorist or terrorist organization.
Yet the bulk of the American people are focusing their fears on terrorists from abroad, or in some cases here at home, not on the corporate suites where the real evil and the real danger lies.
Until we Americans wake up and insist that our elected officials and the regulatory bureaucrats they appoint, actually act in the public interest and not in the interest of the moneyed corporate elite (booting out those that betray us), we will increasingly all pay the price as plants blow up or leak toxic gas, as oil and gas companies wantonly pollute our water tables with carcinogenic toxins, and as nuclear power plants dump isotopes into our environment, all in the interest of profits.
Additional experiences with Gutter Oil
At first I thought it prudent to try not to be seen taking pictures. (Yeah, try that out sometime - not looking like whatever the dominant ethnic group is of wherever you are and trying to take pictures without being noticed! Maybe it’d be easier if I wore a shawl to cover my hair?)
I eventually just went up and talked to the workers and took pictures with them. They were quite open. They said, ‘you don’t have this in the west (because of how people cook)’ and that, in response to my asking about reusing the oil, that its a good thing and ‘very environmentally friendly.’ To what extent they know the end result of their work I don’t know at all. Ignoring for the moment its ending up on people’s plates, the fact that a waste product is being re-used is of course environmentally and economically positive.
It turned out that this wouldn’t be the only time I saw people collecting gutter oil. I came upon people again a few months later, just a couple weeks ago, and again at my former school in Beijing. This time the people were repeatedly watching me as I hung around nearby taking pictures of nothing. I also noticed this time they were looking up at everyone who walked by, in characteristic ‘I’m doing something wrong’ fashion. You’d think that they were nervous about being ‘caught’. Maybe they were, yet this location happens to be in the parking lot of a main hotel/office building on campus, and next to the school’s main square. If you were worried about what you’re doing, you wouldn’t be doing it here.
[what you’re looking at here: 1) Plastic drums to hold the oil. 2) The funnels used to pour the oil into the drums. 3) Several black garbage bags filled with the oil soaked food (?) matter that’s on top of the oil/water in the sewer line. 4) A family working together. 5) The car of some official who walked by without saying anything. 6) Something you can’t see here - the smell. The other time I took pictures of this I didn’t smell anything at all. This time the smell was absolutely foul.]




You could draw a variety of conclusions from this..Perhaps most of the people who walked by didn’t know what they were doing, perhaps they did. Maybe the workers had some sort of sanction or deal with the hotel/college management, maybe they were working on the fly. I don’t know.
These are places where the gutter oil is collected from. In trying to understand who might be using gutter oil in their food, a useful place to start would be knowing who stands to benefit the most from its use. So who would benefit the most by using rock-bottom priced cooking oil? I can think of two main groups: 1) Those who use a lot of oil — Restaurants that produce dishes requiring a lot of oil and those who produce a large quantity of food on a regular basis. Places serving deep fried and stir fried foods of various kinds, and cafeteria’s or places with large numbers of people gathering. 2) Poor people, people on a fixed budget, and establishments with a very small profit margin — Migrant workers, urban poor, students, pensioners, and the food establishments that they either eat at or manage.
side note: [A debate in the China Daily about whether to reduce gutter oil use through subsidizing biodiesel mentions that gutter oil is sold by the original collectors to middlemen at RMB4000 a ton and eventually resold to restaurants at RMB8000, compared to standard cooking oil priced at RMB12000]
Disturbing is where these lines intersect - cafeterias are places that people on a fixed budget (students) eat at and that produce a tremendous amount of food. Since cafeterias are also a place I saw oil collected from, if you followed the logic that it is also a place likely to use cheap oil, you have the potential for an unfortunate and frightening cycle.
In the end any restaurant would like to save money by purchasing cheaper cooking oil. There really isn’t a way to determine who’s using it, unless perhaps you’re oddly lucky to get immediately and thoroughly sick after eating like I did a month ago.
A friend here joked with me recently about how all the toxic things in the environment will in the end make us stronger. I’ve heard different versions of this on several occasions, spoken in a tone by people being quite serious, to wanting to make a dark situation lighter, to just darkly cynical.
On that note, I am going to go have dinner in a school cafeteria.
Profit over People
We are doing this backwards, it should not be profit over people, people should always come first.
You vote with your feet! People think “well I am just one person, what can I do”? You can do everything!!! Choose local and organic- encourage others to do so and things will change!
Choose locally grown foods and local business!!
One of the most terrifying things about living in this time and place is knowing that if a topic is not productive to capitalism it will not be investigated/researched/discussed.
~marijuana research
~birth control for men (which is faster, cheaper, and totally reversible)
~ways to recycle/reuse all the clothing in the world that’s already been made (since companies like Abercrombie burn their unused clothes bc apparently it hurts their image when their items get donated)
~returning to safer birthing practices
~Monsanto.
~we should expand this list, y’all…
The 1 Percent’s Solution
nytimes.comPaul Krugman, NYTimes:
While the austerity doctrine seems to have imploded, austerity has strengthened its grip on elite opinion. Why?