Although the logos is shared, most men live as though their thinking were a private possession.

Heraclitus, fragment III

See clearly with the mind how
Things far and near are one;
No matter how dispersed, Being
Does not separate from Being.

Parmenides, fragment 4
(translated by Richard G. Geldard)

Parmenides commentary II: Thinking and Being

What is there for thinking and for Being is the same.

Parmenides seems to be suggest here that thinking is not an activity that separates oneself from the whole of existence.  The thinker and that which is thought are both unified through the act of thinking.  In the context of Parmenides, thinking is an ontologically unifying activity—thinking arises out of Being, the cosmos being aware of itself. 

Parminides is critical of the common view of change—something comes into existence, then it goes out of existence.  Thinking, for Parmenides, means looking at existence from a larger perspective: nothing is created and nothing is destroyed, things do not exist separately from one another. 

Parmenides then proceeds to explore the implications behind his two principles: Being Is and Nothingness Is Not.

“It is easy to accuse the Pre-Socratics of anthropomorphism or of a naive 'hylozoism,' but in doing so we may be naive ourselves. Goethe shrewdly remarked that human beings 'never know how anthropomorphic' they are. If taking the earth, the place where we are and know things best, as the cosmic center is naive, is it necessarily unnaive to leap to the conclusion that the form of mind to which we have special accessibility is the only form, with the possible or probable exception of some or all of the other animals? Nonhuman forms of mind are difficult for us to interpret or clearly imagine, and the more so the more widely their physical structures differ from our own; but this falls short of proving that there are no such forms of mind. Nature may not be designed for our easy comprehension. So I for one find almost as much naiveté in some common criticisms of early hylozoism as in the thing criticized.”

—Charles Hartshorne, Insights and Oversights of Great Thinkers: An Evaluation of Western Philosophy, 14.

“...I remember being confused by the idea that studying philosophy involved thinking about people who thought the world was made of water.”

—James Warren - Presocratics
Loading more posts...