Pradaxa commercial

  • Male doctor: Pradaxa is progress! (smile)
  • Female doctor: (serious face) Pradaxa can cause serious sometimes fatal bleeding.
  • Me: Whoa, wtf but the smiling doctor just said...

Here's something I can't understand

I watch tv and so many commercials come on saying “if you have taken this drug call 1 800 bad drug” and then the next commercial promote this so called “bad drug” this includes Pradaxa, Yaz, and many others. So take that commercial off the air!!! And I see people taking these drugs. Does this bother other people?

Is Pradaxa Really an Improvement Over Warfarin? | Side Effects Lawsuits News

Check out this website I found at sideeffectslawsuitsnews.com

Pradaxa is being increasingly being investigated for dangerous side effects

I hate the fact that...

if this lawsuit took place a year ago instead of now, my dad might still be here. fuck pradaxa man. God I miss my dad. :( rest in peace poobs.

http://www.newsinferno.com/pharmaceuticals/pradaxa-blood-thinning-drug-should-not-be-used-by-patients-with-mechanical-prosthetic-heart-valves/41829

newsinferno.com

Blood thinner, Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate mesylate), should not be used to prevent stroke or blood clots in patients implanted with mechanical heart valves.

Pradaxa Problem Unravels

usrecallnews.com

In the first twelve weeks Pradaxa was on the market, more than 300 serious adverse events were reported to the FDA. Within six months of hitting pharmacies and doctors’ sample cabinets, the number of adverse events skyrocketed to more than 900, including over 100 deaths.

Pradaxa Side Effects Not Worth the Risk

Why put yourself at risk for potentially deadly Pradaxa side effects when the drug may have little benefit? A recent study from The Archives of Internal Medicine concluded that Pradaxa and other blood thinner drugs “provided no advantage over the placebo” for patients with acute coronary syndrome, and were “associated with a dramatic increase in major bleeding events.” In fact, the risk of excessive bleeding were increased three-fold, compared to a modest reduction of stent thrombosis and other heart problems. Patient survival did not show significant improvement after taking the blood-thinner drugs, suggesting that there is little reason for patients to expose themselves to the dangers of Pradaxa side effects.

Pradaxa received FDA approval in October 2010. It was the first new anti-coagulant drug to be introduced to the U.S. in over 50 years, marketed as an improvement to warfarin, another blood-thinner that has been on the market for decades. Both drugs can cause excessive bleeding—however, bleeding caused by warfarin may be stopped by administrating vitamin K, while Pradaxa lacks such anecdote. Dialysis can stop Pradaxa bleeding, but it is a risky treatment when patients are already experiencing severe bleeding. The FDA has received over 500 reports of deaths associated with Pradaxa use by the end of 2011.

Victims of Pradaxa side effects are filing Pradaxa lawsuits to seek some compensation for their injuries or loss. Pradaxa lawsuits allege that the drug’s manufacturer failed to adequately warn patients of its severe side effects and the lack of an antidote. Learn more on http://www.consumerinjurylawyers.com, or speak to a Pradaxa lawyer today by calling 1-877-779-1414.

Still Stuck on Pradaxa

levinlaw.com

Despite the fact that Pradaxa can cause uncontrollable, irreversible bleeding that can lead to fatal consequences, prominent heart specialists are still recommending it to their patients. Some, like Dr. Keith Churchwell, who heads up the Heart and Vascular Institute at Vanderbilt University, are a bit more cautious about it. Others, such as Dr. George Crossley, feel that reports of the dangers of Pradaxa have been exaggerated.

Study Finds Boehringer Ingelheim UnRE-LYable

levinlaw.com

Does anyone remember that great Jimmy Van Heusen-Sammy Cahn song, Call Me Irresponsible, recorded by the late and legendary Frank Sinatra?

Dallas Pradaxa Lawyer Reports Consolidation of Product Liability Litigation

unsafeproducts.com

A motion for consolidation was filed on May 30, 2012 requesting that a Pradaxa Product Liability MDL be established to consolidate Pradaxa lawsuits. The motion for consolidation was based on common allegations against Pradaxa’s manufacturer, Boehringer Ingelheim, contained in cases currently pending in federal jurisdictions the United States.

Loading more posts...