Arrested Governance
- We at the Prospect are quite excited that new Arrested Development episodes are premiering on Sunday. So we only thought it proper to send you off on this holiday weekend with a meme that celebrates all the times when the cult TV show and politics were dangerous cousins.
- Which isn’t hard at all given that the past two weeks have basically been one long episode of Scandalmakers.
- Stan Jones, Montana libertarian, will always be remembered as the politician who “blue” himself.
- Buster Bluth is now working as the vice-president’s aide … in the HBO series Veep.
- Chick-fil-a, a fast-food chain known for its political stances more than most, is hosting events that don’t seem that much different from Motherboy XXX.
- Mr. Pop Pop is tangled up in an epic court case in upstate New York, over the fate of an ice-cream truck permit. The fact that he calls himself Mr. Pop Pop tells us he’s not ready for one.
- New Jersey’s “Operation Swill” has found many a bar that has tried to pass off water or rubbing alcohol as liquor. Maybe they were hoping it would turn alcoholic if they left it out overnight.
- You can always tell a Milford man.
- Barbara Bush doesn’t want Jeb to run for president. Family first!
- Asawin Suebsaeng thinks that the show was the best satire of the Bush years.
- The IRS was involved in the end of the original frozen banana empire.
- During the 2012 presidential election, Mitt and Ann Romney were found to be eerily similar to some Arrested Development characters.
- And no, the S.E.C. still doesn’t have boats.
Read the rest of Ringside Seat here. And happy Memorial Day weekend!
America's Fetishization of Military Service
With the Memorial Day holiday upon us (meaning a three-day weekend, barbecues, and — in my neck of the woods — lots of racing), I find myself struck by a phenomenon in this country that doesn’t get a whole lot of notice, probably because the public outcry would be so massive were it remarked upon:
The fetishization of military service in this country.
To be clear, I am not referring to the troops themselves, nor do I have quarrell with them. The men and women who willingly enlist in our armed forces are to be respected for their bravery, their sacrifice, and their contributions. The issues I am about to outline have nothing to do with them.
Over the next few days, you’ll likely hear many of the same remarks regarding the troops. How their sacrifice has made it possible for us to enjoy the freedoms we have (I’ve even heard in the past people argue how the military service of others allows us to enjoy motorsports — not quite sure how to make that logical leap).
For the most part, these expressions of gratitude will be genuine, and I will also tip my cap to those men and women.
But at the same time, I’ll be left wondering — yet again — what exactly are these men and women fighting for? And why, even as public sentiment toward the wars we’ve engaged in over the last decade has turned, are we still putting the military on such a pedestal?
Is it because of the corporations who stand to benefit from a perpetually-active military? Is it because politicians are afraid to come out and stand against war of any sort, lest they be seen as terrorists-enabling cowards? Is it because we, as a country, can’t bring ourselves to admit that the last 12 years or so of war have been a mistake? Is it because we, as a country, can’t possibly grasp the grim reality of war the way our ancestors did?
Every Memorial Day, just as every Veterans Day, I stop and think: what exactly are we doing with our military? Not just in the sense of sending our young men and women off to battle for whatever reason; how do we spend the money we do for the military? Why do we spend so much? Why does so much of it go to private, civilian companies?
At what point does “Support the Troops” stop meaning send them off to die in yet another war? When does that phrase stop meaning, “Don’t criticize the politicians who made the decision to go to war?”
At what point does “Support the Troops” mean making sure our soldiers have all the equipment they need while on the battlefield, then bringing them home, providing them with quality healthcare, and making sure they can find a job upon their return?
You can’t claim to support the troops, then turn a blind eye when those same people you shipped off to Iraq are now homeless.
Somehow, I doubt those who sell those yellow ribbon car magnets have all that stuff in mind. There’s still a belief in this country — less prominent than it was 10 years ago, but it’s still there — that criticizing a decision to go to war equals a criticism of the men and women fighting that war.
News Flash: That’s not the case.
I know of no other country that directly equates freedom with military service. That our national security budget is larger than that of the next 26 nations combined reflects a national philosophy and identity: we are a nation of war. They like to tell you we’re a nation of freedom and equality and values, but we’re really not. We’re a nation of war.
I understand part of that comes from the founding of this nation: we fought an oppressive regime in order to gain our independence. But instead of merely remarking on the history of that, we, as a nation, have used it as a rallying cry to bloat our defense budget at the expense of … well, just about everything else.
I can already tell this essay is going to make people accuse me of not supporting the troops. I know some people are going to read this and think that I hate this country. On the first point, they’re wrong; my definition of “support the troops” just differs from theirs.
On the second point … well, to a degree, they’re right. There are a lot of things about this country right now that I just can’t stand (and if you’ve paid any attention to this blog, chances are you know what those things are). But … I love what this country can be. I love the potential this country has.
I just don’t see that potential being realized, nor do I see us approaching that potential so long as we collectively masturbate over the idea of perpetual war. I’m not advocating for the abolition of Memorial Day or Veterans Day; they are important holidays, and they carry with them important lessons we would do well to keep in mind 365 days a year.
But those days have become national rallying cries for the virtues of perpetual war, an excuse for a nation to shame those who are anti-war (like myself) as cowards, terrorist enablers, and people who don’t even respect the men and women who serve.
These days have become an exercise in chest-thumping, an excuse to stand up and shout, “We’re America, dammit, and our weapons are bigger than yours!”
Which carries its own set of baggage.
To me, a fitting memorial for our veterans and our fallen soldiers isn’t to rush head-on into another war, damn the consequences. It’s to thank them for their sacrifices in the past, learn from the lessons of their generations, and start building a truly free, truly equal America. An America where everyone is free to pursue their dreams, where everyone who has a job is economically secure, where who you love or what you believe is not cause for discrimination.
That’s what our men and women fight for. We’d all do well to remember that, and to maybe — finally — start fighting in our own way for more just, more fair, and less violent union.
But what do I know? I’m just a filthy fucking liberal.
When Barack retweeted Jeb: bipartisan immigration-reform effort goes coast to coast | Naked Politics
miamiherald.typepad.comPresident Barack Obama, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice all agree: Immigration reform is a must.
“Delaying solutions will only make the problem grow. NOW is the time for immigration reform. Join the #iMarch at http://bit.ly/13KCBor,” Bush Tweeted this morning.
The president gave him a retweet.
Arresting Our Children
As if Cameron D’Ambrosio wasn’t bad enough, Kristen Gwynne tells us about another kid being arrested after being entrapped by an undercover police officer pretending to be his friend:
Doug and Catherine Snodgrass are suing their son’s high school for allowing undercover police officers to set up the 17-year-old special-needs student for a drug arrest.
In a video segment on ABC News, [his parents] say they were “thrilled” when their son — who has Asperger’s and other disabilities and struggled to make friends — appeared to have instantly made a friend named Daniel.
“He suddenly had this friend who was texting him around the clock,” Doug Snodgrass told ABC News. His son had just recently enrolled at Chaparral High School.
“Daniel,” however, was an undercover cop with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department who “hounded” the teenager to sell him his prescription medication. When he refused, the undercover cop gave him $20 to buy him weed, and he complied — not realizing the guy he wanted to befriend wanted him behind bars.
The young man is not alone in being targeted:
In December, the unnamed senior was arrested along with 21 other students from three schools, all charged with crimes related to the two officers’ undercover drug operation at two public schools in Temecula, California (Chaparral and Temecula Valley High School).
Thankfully, the judge overseeing the case ruled that the 17-year old could not be expelled. But that doesn’t erase the emotional trauma and psychological anxiety he must’ve endured when he realized he was being arrested for buying $20 worth of weed for someone he thought was his only friend.
When I was in high school, one of the kids on my football team got caught with weed in his locker. The school didn’t call the cops. He wasn’t arrested. They dealt with it internally. He was booted from the team and given a suspension. He returned to school a week or two later. That was the end of it.
Even if we assume that the cops in this case are doing a service to the community by trying to keep drugs out of schools, the proper thing to do here isn’t to arrest the kids. Even expulsion is harsh. How many adults used fake ID’s to buy beer when they were teenagers? How many people opted for a five-finger discount on a candy bar or a pack of baseball cards when they were young? These are, at worst, dumb mistakes that many people make growing up. Teenagers are not exactly known for their maturity, judgment, or impulse control.
The way to deal with this behavior is not by putting handcuffs on our children, and exposing them to what Justice Roberts once called “the terrifying force of the criminal justice system.” (See Robinson v. United States ex rel. Watson, 130 S. Ct. 2184, 2185 (2010)). Being arrested is an incredibly fear-inducing experience, particularly for a kid, and almost certainly more-so for a kid with special needs. Even full grown adults collapse into tears at the prospect of being arrested and thrown in jail. It is a humiliating experience, one fraught with various anxiety-inducing accouterments, and liable to inflict psychological damage on those that endure it. That damage was inflicted on 21 kids in California when police decided to slap cuffs on their wrists rather than letting the school and the parents handle it.
And that’s what’s really at the heart of the matter. Pressing criminal charges against someone is a big deal. A huge deal. When you arrest someone, you’ve potentially changed their life forever, even if the charges are later dismissed. Moreover, at some point, you will be placed at the mercy of a prosecutor. Justice Jackson wrote in 1940 that “The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.” That statement remains true today, particularly in an era where America incarcerates more people, by far, than any other nation in the world.
We’re not improving these kids’ lives by taking this approach. Penn Jillette put it best when he discussed the Obama administration’s drug policy:
Do we believe, even for a second, that if Obama had been busted for marijuana — under the laws that he condones — would his life have been better? If Obama had been caught with the marijuana that he says he uses, and ‘maybe a little blow’… if he had been busted under his laws, he would have done hard f*cking time. And if he had done time in prison, time in federal prison, time for his ‘weed’ and ‘a little blow,’ he would not be President of the United States of America. He would not have gone to his fancy-a** college, he would not have sold books that sold millions and millions of copies and made millions and millions of dollars, he would not have a beautiful, smart wife, he would not have a great job. He would have been in f*cking prison, and it’s not a god damn joke.
Do we believe that any of these 21 kids are better off for having been arrested and subject to the “terrifying force of the criminal justice system?” I have a hard time believing it, even for a second.
Video: Anti-Drone Protestor Takes Over Obama's Counterterrorism Speech
buzzfeed.com“I’m willing to cut the young lady who interrupted me so slack, because it’s worth being passionate about.”
Kudos to Code Pink’s Medea Benjamin for speaking truth to power. And kudos to President Obama for handling it so well.
“ I think before his second term is over, we’re going to see a miracle before our eyes, I believe God is going to answer our prayers and we’ll be freed from the yoke of Obamacare”
—Michele Bachmann decides God will repeal Obamacare.“A Tennessee congressman who supports billion of dollars in cuts to the food stamp program is one of the largest recipients of federal farm subsides, according to new annual data released by a Washington environmental group. Using Agriculture Department data, researchers at the Environmental Working Group found that Representative Stephen Fincher, a Republican and a farmer from Frog Jump, Tenn., collected nearly $3.5 million in subsidies from 1999 to 2012....During debate on the farm bill in the House Agriculture Committee last week, Mr. Fincher was one of the biggest proponents of $20 billion in cuts to food stamps in the legislation. At times he quoted passages from the Bible in defending the cuts.”
—- NY Times, Farm Subsidy Recipient Backs Food Stamp Cuts
The worst.
When There Is No There There
m.tofias.netI wrote a post on the implications of “missing” scandal coverage based on Roy Unz’s “Our American Pravda” essay. I wanted to name the post “Trouble Will Find Me” but Colbert beat me to the joke.
Unz conflates attention paid by investigative reporters with coverage. Unz blames the lack of coverage in these cases of government “disasters” on “bipartisan” concerns over blame. Neither of these claims hold-up under scrutiny…. Lack of headlines shouldn’t be used as a measure for investigative attention because media outlets face a file drawer problem similar to the one that affects scientific researchers.
Solidarity with the Chicago Public Schools teachers who must now contend with over 54 school closures today.
School closures are sometimes an unfortunate last resort. Sometimes they are necessary.
But this? This is derailing education to the lowest bidder.
CPS classrooms already often have over 40 students, when research tells us that class sizes much smaller than that are best for already under-served students. I can tell you that at a class size of 40 kids, even the most saintly of teachers is no longer differentiating and meeting every student where they need them - you’re performing glorified crowd control. Some charter schools have noble intentions and will do their due diligence in filling this void; however, charter schools are also notorious for turning away and under-serving SPED and English Language Learner populations. As with everything, there are no easy answers.
This is a sad day for Chicago. Rahm Emanuel, shame on you. We should all be concerned with the systemic dismantling of public education taking place in your city.