Follow posts tagged #inhumane in seconds.
Sign upTuskegee Syphilis Experiment.
First of all, it’s important to understand what syphilis is. Syphilis is a chronic bacterial disease caused by the bacteria Treponema pallidum. It is contracted through sexual intercourse, but the developing fetus can also contract it from its mother.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment was conducted between 1932 and 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama. It was originally supposed to be conducted over a period of six months, but went on for 40 years instead. This was done by the Public Health Service of the US government to track the progression of untreated syphilis in impoverished, rural African-American men who were manipulated and told that they were getting free health care from their government.
The study began with 600 African-American individuals: 399 had syphilis before the study began, and 201 did not have the disease. The men were promised free meals, free medical care, and free burials for participating in the study. They were not told that they had syphilis. They were only told that they were being treated for “bad blood,” which could have described a multitude of illnesses.
The experiment went as the conductors had wanted, until in 1947, penicillin was accepted as the treatment for syphilis. The doctors conducting the experiement were aware that the men in the study could have received this treatment, thus curing them of syphilis. The doctors did not make their subjects aware that treatment had become available, and instead continued the study without any changes. The group conducting the experiment actually went to extremes to prevent their subjects from receiving treatment, even when it had become available to others living in the area.
The study continued until 1972, when the press eventually found out what had been happening the last 40 years, and the truth was leaked to the nation.
The victims of the study were 28 men who had died from the untreated disease, 40 wives who had contracted it from their partners, and about 20 children born to the fathers and mothers with the disease. In addition, 100 people died from related diseases.
25 years later, President Bill Clinton issued a formal apology to the few survivors left.
“What was done cannot be undone. But we can end the silence. We can stop turning our heads away. We can look at you in the eye and finally say on behalf of the American people, what the United States government did was shameful, and I am sorry … To our African American citizens, I am sorry that your federal government orchestrated a study so clearly racist.”
This study was cruel, it was inhumane, it was unethical, and it was racist. Would this have gone on for so long if the subjects had been white men instead of black? No. Would the public have been more outraged if this wasn’t dealing with people of color? Yes. Issuing an “apology” does not make up for the lives lost. It does not make up for the racism, and it does not make up for 40 years of suffering.

President Bill Clinton, right, and Vice President Al Gore, center, reach out to Herman Shaw, 94, a Tuskegee syphilis study victim, during a news conference in Washington on May 16, 1997. [Doug Mills/AP file]
Cats Are Not Lab Equipment, Washington University
care2.comAnimal advocates have been protesting Washington University’s continued use of cats in its Pediatrics Advanced Life Support (PALS) program to teach students how to perform tracheal intubation, but the university refuses to budge.
Highlights:
For students at Washington University, the procedure involves placing a hard plastic tube down cats’ throats, which can cause them to suffer from a number of issues from bruising, bleeding, swelling and scarring to broken teeth, collapsed lungs, chronic pain and death.
[…]
Washington University is the only school using live animals locally – St. Louis University School of Medicine, Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center and St. Louis Community College have all switched to simulators – it’s believed to be the only one left using them at all for PALS training.
[…]
A recent undercover investigation conducted by PETA found that cats may be forced to endure up to 15 intubations during one session, and noted that studies have shown that intubating an animal more than five times in one session can cause pain and trauma. Several students also said that the cats they were working on woke up during the procedure. PETA has since called for a USDA investigation into violations of the Animal Welfare Act, which include using animals where alternatives are available and failing to minimize cats’ pain and distress.
Following the investigation, Missouri-native Bob Barker wrote an open letter to the university urging it to stop using cats and offered $75,000 to cover the cost of two state-of-the-art simulators to help transition the PALS program away from the use of cats – outdoing himself only with an added offer to provide homes for the nine cats currently being used in the program.
The university, which works in conjunction with the St. Louis Children’s Hospital, already has access to simulators, but continues to defend the practice under the argument that the cats are only used a few times a year, are under anesthesia during the procedure and that after three years of “service” they are then adopted out. However, according to Faye, there are no records to verify this claim.
[…]
The majority of schools and pediatrics programs in the U.S. have stopped using animals in their curricula and have switched to human patient simulators that are anatomically correct, can be used repeatedly, do not cause harm to any living being and have been approved by the American College of Surgeons. Washington University’s continued use of cats to train students is not only cruel, but is an outdated practice that cannot be justified when there are effective alternatives available.
TAKE ACTION!
Please sign and share the petition urging Washington University to stop using live animals in its PALS program.
Hispanics are the new negro
- Stephen Colbert: You have said that Hispanics are the new negro.
- Scott Douglas: Yes, based on treatment, because it's just like the Jim Crow laws. Where arbitrary laws, capricious in their application gives anybody the power over you, to abuse you, to hurt you, to harm you.