RBC declares war against Canadian workers
cbc.caRoyal Bank of Canada (RBC) is firing dozens of its employees in Canada and replacing them with lower-paid temporary foreign workers. RBC is forcing their soon-to-be-unemployed Canadian employees to train their own replacements. RBC made $7.5 billion in profits in 2012. Also about a year ago, they increased their service fees.
The RBC website insanely claims that it is:
- One of Canada’s “Best 50 Corporate Citizens”
- One of Canada’s “50 Most Socially Responsible Corporations”
- One of the “Best Workplaces in Canada”
- Canada’s 10 Most Admired Corporate Cultures
Don’t be confused into believing this latest scandal is the end of their treachery. If RBC gets away with stabbing Canadian workers in the back this time, they will repeat it over and over, and other companies will follow suit. Even if they temporarily back down due to bad publicity, they will do it again later unless we keep up the pressure. Maybe your workplace is next.
This is further proof that the Conservative temporary foreign worker program is not meant to address the phony “skills shortage” problem in Canada. The Harper-Conservatives’ goal is to kill Canadian jobs and lower wage levels and working conditions across the country. A few Conservative politicians are faking concern and claiming there will be an investigation, but they are only saying this because they were caught. This was no mistake; it’s all part of Stephen Harper’s plan.
————————————————————————————————-
Here is the contact information for some of the traitors who helped make this happen.
RBC contacts
RBC complaint form: http://www.rbc.com/customercare
RBC form to contact the board of directors: https://www.rbc.com/governance/contactus.html
Key figures who are responsible include:
- Gordon M. Nixon, RBC president and chief executive officer
- Janice R. Fukakusa, RBC chief administrative officer and chief financial officer
- Zabeen Hirji, RBC chief human resources officer
Their personal email addresses are not listed on the RBC website, but the RBC email address pattern is firstname.lastname@rbc.com
RBC public affairs manager: mark.hamill@rbc.com
RBC media relations contacts: http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/contact.html#regional
Canadian government contacts
Stephen Harper, prime minister: stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca and pm@pm.gc.ca
Jason Kenney, minister of citizenship, immigration and multiculturalism: jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca and minister@cic.gc.ca
Lisa Rait, minister of labour: lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca and lisa.raitt@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca
Diane Finley, minister of human resources and skills development: diane.finley@parl.gc.ca and diane.finley@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca
Christian Paradis, minister of industry: christian.paradis@parl.gc.ca and minister.industry@ic.gc.ca
Their office phone numbers can be found by clicking on their names at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/MainCabinetCompleteList.aspx?TimePeriod=Current
Stephen Harper’s speech was a chance to be accountable. He blew it | Full Comment | National Post
fullcomment.nationalpost.comSorry is always the hardest word for this Prime Minister, who is now en route to Peru for no apparent good reason, beyond the fact it gets him the hell out of Dodge
The 14 characteristics of Fascism
- Powerful and Continuing Nationalism Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
- Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
- Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
- Supremacy of the Military Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
- Rampant Sexism The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
- Controlled Mass Media Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
- Obsession with National Security Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
- Religion and Government are Intertwined Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.
- Corporate Power is Protected The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
- Labor Power is Suppressed Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .
- Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
- Obsession with Crime and Punishment Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
- Rampant Cronyism and Corruption Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
- Fraudulent Elections Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
Political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt recently wrote an article about fascism (“Fascism Anyone?,” Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20). Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), Dr. Britt found they all had 14 elements in common. He calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The excerpt is in accordance with the magazine’s policy.
First Nations prepared to fight Harper government, Enbridge in international court
vancouverobserver.comFirst Nations peoples from all over British Columbia gathered at the Vancouver Art gallery Sunday to protest bill C-45 and the Enbridge pipeline.
Today I wrote two letters to the government
One thanking the local NDP MP for voting yes to science, and one condemning my Conservative MP back home for voting no.
I did not, however, get much actual work done.
Let them breathe poison!
ipolitics.caThe “Harper Government” is an embarrassment to the country, and I too am “sorry” that a government that doesn’t speak for 60% of Canadians is willing to endanger the lives of countless thousands around the world – many of whom are in developing nations and are economically vulnerable and lack political influence - for reasons of petty and parochial partisanship.
Your votes, Mr. Harper - their deaths.
- SMK
Thousands of Same-Sex Marriages Dissolved by the Canadian Government?
unicornbooty.comUpdate
This does clear up some of my confusion and frustration I am still a little torn. Although, I am fully in favour of Gay Marriage the issue is that if the couple does not reside in Canada where their marriage is legal and live in a country that has made it illegal the marriage wouldn’t even be classified as a legal marriage. It not necessarily the fault of Canada. As one of my friends, learntocheat has written, you can’t go and pick out countries’ law that suit your needs. I do feel that in all countries gay marriage should be allowed however; it almost like trying to cheat the system if you get married in a place and live elsewhere that is illegal. I feel that if they were to marry in Canada and live somewhere else there needs to be some tie to Canada such as dual citizenship or something. I don’t necessarily think the act of dissolving the marriages right or fair but there are lot more issues than most originally thought. This is frustrating, they should just make gay marriage legal everywhere.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/01/12/pol-gay-marriage-foreign-reaction.html?cmp=rss
———————————————————
Being a youth born and raised in Canada I find this move by the Harper Government absolutely horrific. This in my opinion is an extreme abuse of power with no justified reason. This change does not have any positive results and it is just a step in the wrong direction. EXTREMELY displeased with this.
Keystone XL pipeline 'needs to go ahead,' Harper tells U.S. - Politics - CBC News
cbc.caPrime Minister Stephen Harper told an audience in New York City today that the Keystone XL pipeline needs to go ahead and he laid out the reasons why it should be approved by the American government.
Among those reasons is this:
Harper said the project will create 40,000 jobs south of the Canadian border and that can’t be ignored.
Well…we now know unequivocally whom Harper stands with. My question is: what about the Canadian jobs??? I guess Harper doesn’t much care about his own citizens? Why doesn’t he just move in with the Tea Party and someone else can be PM up here: someone who cares about Canadians for a change. Sad!
SAVE JASPER NATIONAL PARK, CANADA!
avaaz.orgShould U.S. or other foreign-controlled private companies be profiteering from our national treasures? The Harper Government plans to privatize a section of Jasper National Park and let an American-owned company blast a 300m metal walkway into our World Heritage mountains.
Ottawa to allow slaughterhouses to process already dead animals
OTTAWA—The federal government wants to allow the carcasses of already dead animals to be processed in slaughterhouses for human consumption, a move that is raising concerns about the safety of Canada’s food system.
The Conservative government is pitching the change as a way to cut red tape and provide greater flexibility to slaughterhouse operators.
But the New Democrats are raising a red flag saying the move invites possible “contamination” of the food supply.
“Under the present regulations … it has to come in alive, be slaughtered on site,” said NDP MP Malcolm Allen (Welland), the party’s agriculture critic.
“Now you can bring in dead stock. It’s okay to bring in that animal into a slaughterhouse, have it cut, wrapped … for human consumption.
“The real fear is how did it die, (and) under what circumstances did it die.”
The proposed changes to Meat Inspection Regulations, outlined in the Canada Gazette, would allow “greater flexibility” to the activities that can be carried out in federally regulated slaughterhouses.
Current federal regulations do not allow meat to be processed from animals slaughtered outside of a registered slaughterhouse.
Now the government is proposing to make exemptions to that rule for animals that cannot be transported to a slaughterhouse alive because they are too aggressive to move or because they are injured.
“It is proposed to amend the (meat inspection regulations) to allow into registered establishments carcasses from food animals slaughtered elsewhere … following a detailed ante-mortem examination by a private veterinary practitioner,” the proposed rules state.
“Such an amendment would be extremely useful for industry in a number of situations, such as when injured animals cannot be transported alive for welfare reasons; or when animals are dangerous, aggressive or difficult to handle and cannot be transported.”
A vet would have to inspect an animal prior to slaughter to confirm it could not be safely transported, as well as determine if the animal is fit to serve as food. The vet will also certify the date of the slaughter and method.
Allen said that rule change risks allowing the food supply to be contaminated by “dead stock.”
“You wouldn’t know by looking at it and nor would the label tell you it’s dead stock because I’ll guarantee you if the label said dead stock, you would never buy it,” Allen said.
“All the regulations before about dead stock not being consumed by humans is for a reason and that was to protect our health,” he said.
A spokesperson for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency cited the example of an animal suffering from a broken leg.
“The cow could be slaughtered on the farm and after inspection at a federally registered establishment can be processed. This meat would be eligible for retail,” Guy Gravelle said.
“As for concerns that this amendment may allow unfit animal into the food supply system, this would not be the case.”
“CFIA inspectors, including veterinarians, are present daily during operations at federally registered establishments to verify that food safety requirements are met. All carcasses are individually inspected to protect the health and safety of Canadians,” he said in an email.
That was echoed by Meagan Murdoch, a spokesperson for Agriculture Minster Gerry Ritz, who called the rule change “common sense.”
“This does not affect food safety,” she said.
- Bruce Campion-Smith, The Toronto Star
Okay, I’m pretty sure I was born a human being and not a crow or buzzard. I don’t want to eat carrion that some guy just brought in and had made into steaks to be sold at Sobeys or Superstore.
I’m a meat-eater, but this is steering me towards vegetarianism big time. If I can’t change my diet, though, I’ll definitely stick to locally-raised meat instead of buying it at any major food store chain or restaurant. :P
Harper Government wants to e-snoop; if you're against that, you are a child pornographer.
A new article in The Globe and Mail looks at how the Tories have found a new tactic when it comes to the Internet: “if you’re not with us, you’re against us”, but with a twist!
“Stand with us, or with the child pornographers” - Public Safety Minister Vic Toews.
According to the article, many provincial privacy commissioners are strongly opposed to this new rule, some go so far as to say that it is “surveillance by design”.
The Conservatives have called it a progression into the 21st century, saying that:
“As technology evolves, many criminal activities, such as the distribution of child pornography, become much easier,… We are proposing to bring measures to bring our laws into the 21st century and to provide police with the lawful tools that they need”.
It’s a short article, but I suggest all Canadians that follow me take a look.
And a few more articles from across Canada about the subject:
CBC article - Online surveillance critics accused of supporting child porn
Halifax’s The Chronical Herald - Opposing bill like supporting child pornographers, Tories say
Winnipeg Free Press - Tories’ access bill ‘warrantless’
Vancouver Sun - Tories stand firm on spying bill
A heartbreaking recap of Broken Harper Promises from his days as a power-checked, power-hungry, minority govt.
trustbreaker.freehostia.comWarning: it is depressing. Especially when you consider all of this damage was done under the minority power. Now, he will be relentless.
I hate Steven Harper and the “Harper Government” more than I’ve ever hated anyone. Even more than I hate the people who voted for him. I can’t describe my feelings towards the people who voted for him but I hope to hell they’re ashamed. Now that what they refused to see before is being thrust up their noses there is no looking away. They are aware and I hope they’re sorry.
