The car: liberating? Or ball and chain?
A followup on fossil fuel dependence and climate change / national security — a organization called EnergyTrap has been surveying people and collecting data about Americans’ income with relation to the amount that they have to spend on gas. The first infographic I found on the site was pretty telling, see below. It compares the price paid per household, per state for gasoline in 2010 compared to 2011, using deepening red tints to show rising costs.
2010:
2011:
This article starts with a short video of a guy that “works in security” who spends more than 50% of his income on transporting himself to and from his job. He adds up his travel expenditures (gas, car payment, insurance, tolls) on a whiteboard, while smiling. That short post ends with a comment about Americans and their obsession with driving, debunking the myth that Americans love to drive, claiming instead that it is a simple necessity because there are no alternatives.
It is true that there are few alternatives to personal transportation in this country. But it is interesting to note that the American way set an ideal for the globe, and many nations have followed the US development model, building huge highways through cities and suburbs connecting to them.
Regardless of what infrastructure is already in place, Americans are also marketed an unattainable ideal. I haven’t actually surveyed this, but I’m pretty sure it’s impossible to watch TV without seeing a car ad. It’s definitely impossible to watch sports without seeing 5 car ads. Another infographic from Energytrap.org below shows gas spending as a % of income.
I venture to guess that lots of the people in the lower income range who pay lots for gas are in the same boat. They purchased vehicles when gas prices were lower, and now cannot sell their vehicles for more efficient ones because they will end up losing essential income. Nor can they choose another transportation option, because alternatives are rare.
I don’t mean to say that this data is 100% dependable or that these scenarios hold true for all Americans, but I think it provides a decent snapshot into a growing problem that will only worsen as time passes.
EPA: Fracking may cause groundwater pollution
usatoday.com“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced Thursday for the first time that fracking — a controversial method of improving the productivity of oil and gas wells — may be to blame for causing groundwater pollution.
The draft finding could have significant implications while states try to determine how to regulate the process. Environmentalists characterized the report as a significant development though it met immediate criticism from the oil and gas industry and a U.S. senator.
The practice is called hydraulic fracturing and involves pumping pressurized water, sand and chemicals underground to open fissures and improve the flow of oil or gas to the surface.
The EPA’s found that compounds likely associated with fracking chemicals had been detected in the groundwater beneath Pavillion, a small community in central Wyoming where residents say their well water reeks of chemicals. Health officials last year advised them not to drink their water after the EPA found low levels hydrocarbons in their wells.
The EPA announcement could add to the controversy over fracking, which has played a large role in opening up many gas reserves, including the Marcellus Shale in the eastern U.S. in recent years.
The industry has long contended that fracking is safe, but environmentalists and some residents who live near drilling sites say it has poisoned groundwater.
The EPA said its announcement is the first step in a process of opening up its findings for review by the public and other scientists.
“EPA’s highest priority remains ensuring that Pavillion residents have access to safe drinking water,” said Jim Martin, EPA regional administrator in Denver. “We look forward to having these findings in the draft report informed by a transparent and public review process.”
Source: USA TODAY
Note, Senator Inhofe (who gets 80% of his campaign donations from coal, oil, and gas) goes ballistic.
