Follow posts tagged #faculty in seconds.

Sign up

International Students: Six Specific Types of Instructors To Look-Out For In Any Faculty Of A University

wikijoo.org

      As an international student who might be paying a fortune for undergraduate, graduate or post-graduate studies, it is your student right to able to appraise and differentiate between a competent and incompetent instructor.

UTSA professor honored by peers as AAAS fellow

image

By Amanda Beck
Senior Communications Specialist

One of the greatest honors a scientist can receive is to be recognized for his scientific contributions by his peers. Andrew Tsin has recently received such an honor by being named a fellow in the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). The tradition of AAAS fellows, an elected honor bestowed upon AAAS members by their peers, began in 1874.

During the 2012 AAAS annual meeting in Vancouver, Tsin will be presented with an official certificate and a gold rosette pin at the AAAS Fellows Forum Feb. 18. This year’s AAAS fellows were announced in the AAAS News and Notes section of the journal Science on Dec. 23, 2011. Tsin is the only UTSA professor to be elected as a fellow this year and UTSA is home to the largest number of AAAS fellows of any UT System University save UT Austin.

As part of the Section on Biological Sciences, Tsin was elected to be an AAAS fellow for his “lifelong achievements in vision research and his innovative role in promoting and administering research and training programs for the advancement of science.”

Tsin serves as the director of the Center for Research and Training in the Sciences and is a professor of biology in the College of Sciences. His research centers on the cause of degenerative blindness due to diseases like diabetic retinopathy.

The Center for Research and Training in the Sciences is the largest research training center at the university, currently housing more than a dozen programs. It is responsible for placing researchers in laboratories and bringing science into local classrooms and to the community.

Tsin hopes that many of the researchers will be students from backgrounds traditionally underrepresented in the sciences. Over the course of his career, he has mentored more than 100 undergraduate and graduate students who have completed degrees and either continued their education or taken on positions as scientific researchers, physicians or educators. Tsin was recently awarded for his leadership by President Barack Obama with the 2011 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring.

###

About AAAS: The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world’s largest general scientific society and publisher of the journal, Science. Founded in 1848, AAAS includes some 262 affiliated societies and academies of science servicing 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal with an estimated total readership of 1 million. The non-profit AAAS is open to all and fulfills its mission to advance science and serve society through initiatives in science policy, international programs, science education and more.

WHEN CNBC POSTS AN ARTICLE CLAIMING THAT UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS HAVE THE LEAST STRESSFUL JOBS IN AMERICA:

[seriously, that entire list is incredibly offensive/demeaning.]

United Academics faculty union looks to establish presence on campus

dailyemerald.com

@AFTunion @AFTHigherEd @AAUP

—-

By Sam Stites

Published January 30, 2012

University faculty, including tenure and non-tenure-track employees, are close to realizing their goal of creating a faculty union after almost two years of planning and deliberation.

The union is in the middle of public employee card-check voting, a procedure that began on Jan. 9 and offers faculty the opportunity to sign in support of unionization. The card-check process lasts 90 days and needs a simple majority for approval.

Economics professor Don Lee teaches his economics 201 class Monday afternoon. Lee is indifferent to the new faculty union. “I just don’t see the purpose,” Lee says. (Tess Freeman/Oregon Daily Emerald)

“We’re hoping to have the card-check done by the end of the term,” said Deborah Olson,union representative and special education instructor. “We’re actually shooting for a higher number. We want more than 50 percent plus one so we have a real clear statement that this is something that the faculty wants.”

United Academics,sponsored by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) as well as the American Federation of Teachers (AFT),is a faculty union that focuses on ensuring a quality work environment for faculty to better serve the students of this state. Many faculty at the University believe that a union is needed in order to bargain for fair and equitable conditions.

“We (tenure and non-tenure faculty) don’t feel that we have a voice in setting the priorities of the academic mission of the University,” Olson said. “We are interested in the quality of the education we are providing to our students.”

She and others are worried that their interests are not being heard at an administrative level and that this union will better represent them and their needs.

“It would provide clarity and an opportunity for the next generation in how to find excellence in the face of the challenges that face state universities,” University professor Louise Bishop said.

Although there are some who aren’t interested in unionization, union representatives say that most faculty members are excited about the prospect of a faculty union.

“I believe that most faculty are pretty enthusiastic, and I think that they see a real need so it has a good chance,” said Scott Pratt,union representative and philosophy professor. “Because of the structure of labor unions, it gives a certain kind of weight to the bargaining unit to actually have a say in how priorities are set.”

He says that a union will allow the faculty to have a larger stake in making decisions, setting budgets and other fiscal and administrative issues that the University faces. The union will be able to make demands and have authority that other groups — such as the University Senate — don’t have.

“This union would give another venue for shared governance in one that doesn’t turn on internal structures alone because it’s set in the context of labor law,” he said.

Faculty across campus will be signing check-cards throughout the rest of the term, and a final decision will be made at the end of the 90-day period. At that point, the state will either approve or deny the request for the University to unionize.

———————————————————-

Also, from the American Federation of Teachers website: 

University of Oregon Faculty Launch Union Campaign

Research and instructional faculty at the University of Oregon have officially launched a campaign to form their own union in order to restore the university’s educational and research priorities. On Jan. 24, faculty members, research associates and post-doctoral scholars gathered at the Schnitzer Museum of Art to sign union cards indicating their support for  United Academics University of Oregon, AAUP/AFT , the organization they have created to pursue collective bargaining.

“Now is the time for all faculty to have a voice in how the university fulfills its mission to serve our students and the people of Oregon,” says philosophy professor Scott Pratt. “Collective bargaining will give us that voice.”

Spending on instruction has stalled while administrative costs have increased dramatically. With the university growing by 4,000 students in the last five years, and class sizes swelling to the point where students are sitting in aisles and on the floor, faculty are upset with management’s inability to improve learning conditions and sustain institutional support for faculty and students. University management has chosen to meet the needs of a growing student body by hiring many faculty into part-time and temporary positions, many of them having just three-month contracts and no health insurance.

“As a non-tenure track instructor, I take my commitment to teach very seriously,” says Tina Boscha, an instructor of composition. “I worked on a ‘temporary’ basis for five years before gaining a nine-month contract, and I have yet to feel a firm commitment from the administration about my longevity at the university. Our union can help me be a better teacher and mentor for students by providing more job security.”

Permanent faculty are feeling the squeeze, too. With top-down decisions affecting everything from healthcare benefits to the number of classes they can offer to meet the needs of graduating students, faculty feel they have little say in how the day-to-day operations of the university are handled.

United Academics is working to strengthen the quality of education and research at the university. A central theme of the union campaign is that “teachers’ working conditions are students’ learning conditions.” [United Academics news release]

January 26, 2012

“The fact is, adjuncts serve a need. They are an ever more popular way for schools to keep teaching lots of students without spending adequate money on that teaching. Schools can continue to build 4-star dormitories and giant ice rinks because they don't pay fair wages to a large percentage of the people teaching the students. The problem is, schools don't have the will or, under current budgeting systems, the resources to adequately fund the need that adjuncts fill. Thus, we all accept and propagate the Wal-Mart logic of the academic workplace." ”

melikhovo

I love the ladies in the attendance office.

In order to complete my application, I had to get the attendance office to sign it…well, they checked my attendance and it (obviously) showed that I was missing from period five on both wednesday and today. And, of course they asked where I was and while I could’ve lied and said I had an appointment or something I told them the truth because I turn in attendance for both my theatre teacher and my swim coach and I like to think that me and the ladies in the attendance office have a sort of faculty/student friendship. I mean, obviously we aren’t friends but we see each other almost everyday. Anyways, They asked where I was and I looked at them and I told them I had to take a mental health day from that class. I mean, I was taking a giant leap of faith. They could’ve given me a referral or something right there I don’t know. But, they just laughed for a good 45 seconds, signed my paper and I went on my way. It was glorious.

MRRS-SCORE program: UTSA faculty can apply for NIH grants

utsa.edu

Feb. 10 deadline: Tenured, tenure-track faculty invited to apply

Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Technology Developed by Mark Prausnitz's Research Group Leads to Startup Company with $4-million Initial Funding

Technology developed by researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University for delivering drugs and other therapeutics to specific locations in the eye provides the foundation for a startup company that has received a $4 million venture capital investment.

The Atlanta-based startup, Clearside Biomedical, plans to develop microinjection technology that will use hollow microneedles to precisely target therapeutics within the eye. If the technique proves successful in clinical trials and wins regulatory approval, it could provide an improved method for treating diseases that affect the back of the eye, including age-related macular degeneration.

The technology was developed in collaboration between the research groups of Mark Prausnitz, a Regents’ professor in Georgia Tech’s School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Henry Edelhauser, a professor in the Department of Ophthalmology at Emory School of Medicine. Research leading to development of the technology was sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

“We expect that targeting drug delivery within the eye will be helpful because we should be able to concentrate drugs at the disease sites where they need to act, and keep them away from other locations,” said Prausnitz. “This could reduce side effects and possibly also decrease the dose required.”

Prior to this development, drugs could be delivered to the retinal tissues at the back of the eye in three indirect ways: (1) injection by hypodermic needle into the eye’s vitreous humor, the gelatinous material that fills the eyeball, (2) eye drops, which are limited in their ability to reach the back of the eye, and (3) pills taken by mouth that expose the whole body to the drug.

The technology developed by Georgia Tech and Emory uses a hollow micron-scale needle to inject therapeutics into the suprachoroidal space located between the outer surface of the eye — known as the sclera — and the choroid — a deeper layer that provides nutrients to the rest of the eye. Preclinical research has demonstrated that fluid can flow between the two layers, where it can spread out to the entire eye, including structures such as the retina that are now difficult to reach.

By targeting this suprachoroidal space using microscopic needles, the researchers believe they can reduce trauma to the eye, make drugs more effective and reduce complications. The new delivery method could help advance a new series of drugs being developed to target the retina, choroid and other structures in the back of the eye.

“This is a significant advance in the field of ophthalmology,” said Edelhauser. “Until now, it has been difficult to target drug delivery to specific locations within the eye. This new microneedle technology enables precise drug targeting to the suprachoroidal space and other locations within the eye.”

In research reported in the January 2011 issue of the journal Pharmaceutical Research, the Georgia Tech-Emory team demonstrated for the first time that this technique can be used to deliver nanoparticles and microparticles to specific parts of the eye. In later research, they also showed that microneedle injections into the suprachoroidal space rapidly resulted in concentrations of drugs and particles that could be maintained for several months.

Between two and three million eye injections are made each year, many of them to treat age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The researchers believe that the microneedle-based technique could be useful for treating both AMD and glaucoma, as well as other ocular conditions related to diabetes.

The $4 million in funding for Clearside Biomedical will come from Hatteras Venture Partners, a venture capital firm based in Research Triangle Park, N.C. Hatteras focuses on seed and early-stage investments in companies developing products in biopharmaceutical, medical device, diagnostic and related human health areas.

“Clearside Biomedical represents an ideal fit for Hatteras Discovery as the platform technology is highly innovative, based on elegant science and the lead product is expected to be in clinical trials in the United States in less than 18 months,” said Christy Shaffer, Ph.D., venture partner and managing director of the Hatteras Discovery Fund.

So far, the technique has been tested only in animals. The Hatteras funding will allow the company to conduct additional efficacy and safety testing needed to seek regulatory approval. The company’s first product is expected to address macular edema and retinal vein occlusion.

Clearside was formed with the assistance of Georgia Tech’s VentureLab program, which helped obtain early-stage seed funding from the Georgia Research Alliance. Georgia Tech VentureLab also helped the founders connect with the company’s president and CEO, Daniel White, a veteran ophthalmic entrepreneur. Before joining Clearside, White was a co-founder of Alimera Sciences, an Atlanta company that is developing ophthalmic pharmaceuticals.

Two researchers from the Prausnitz lab who have been involved in development of the ocular drug delivery technique will also join the company. They are Samirkumar Patel, a postdoctoral researcher and Vladimir Zarnitsyn, a research scientist.

Research leading to the development of the technology has been supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the principal investigators and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH.

Henry Edelhauser, Samirkumar Patel, Mark Prausnitz, Vladimir Zarnitsyn, Emory University and Georgia Tech have financial interests in Clearside Biomedical and its ocular platform. Edelhauser, Patel, Prausnitz and Zarnitsyn own equity in Clearside and the terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University or Georgia Tech in accordance with their conflict of interest policies.

Loading more posts...