Hello!

Tumblr is where tens of millions of creative people around the world share and follow the things they love.

Sign up to find more cool stuff to follow

“The self is only a threshold, a door, a becoming between two multiplicities. ”

—Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia

“Philosophy, art and science are not the mental objects of an objectified brain but the three aspects under which the brain becomes subject, Thought brain.”

—Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, “What is Philosophy?”, 1994

How to become a nomad and an immigrant and a gypsy in relation to one’s own language?

-Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature 

“The self is only a threshold, a door, a becoming between two multiplicities.”

Gilles Deleuze & Félix GuattariA Thousand Plateaus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia

“It is difficult to elucidate the system of the strata without seeming to introduce a kind of cosmic or even spiritual evolution from one to the other, as if they were arranged in stages and ascended degrees of perfection. Nothing of the sort. The different figures of content and expression are not stages. There is no biosphere or noosphere, but everywhere the same Mechanosphere...Above all, there is no lesser, no higher or lower, organization; the substratum is an integral part of the stratum, is bound up with it as the milieu in which change occurs, and not an increase in organization. Furthermore, if we consider the plane of consistency we note that the most disparate of things and signs move upon it: a semiotic fragment rubs shoulders with a chemical interaction, an electron crashes into a language, a black hole captures a genetic message, a crystallization produces a passion, the wasp and the orchid cross a letter...There is no "like" here, we are not saying "like an electron," "like an interaction," etc. The plane of consistency is the abolition of all metaphor; all that consists is Real. ”

—Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus (1980)

Integrated world capitalism does not aim at a systematic and generalized repression of the workers, women, youth, minorities… The means of production on which it rests will indeed call for a flexibility in relationships of production and in social relations, and a minimal capacity to adapt to the new forms of sensibility and to the new types of human relationships which are “mutating” here and there (i.e. exploitation by advertising of the “discoveries” of the marginals, relative tolerance with regard to the zones of laissez-faire…) Under these conditions, a semi-tolerated, semi-encouraged, and co-opted protest could well be an intrinsic part of the system.

- Félix Guattari

“When I talk about shit, it is hardly a metaphor: Capitalism reduces everything to shit, that is to say to the state of undifferentiated and decoded streams out of which everyone has to take its part in a private mode and with a sense of culpability.”

—Félix Guattari, cited by Frédéric Vandenberghe in “Deleuzian capitalism”, footnote 7

“The self is only a threshold, a door, a becoming between two multiplicities.” ”

A Thousand Plateaus, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari

“How do people today live in a language that is not their own? Or no longer, or not yet, even know their own and know poorly the major language that they are forced to serve? This is the problem of immigrants, and especially of their children, the problem of minorities, the problem of a minor literature, but also a problem for all of us: how to tear a minor literature away from its own language, allowing it to challenge the language and making it follow a sober revolutionary path? How to become a nomad and an immigrant and a gypsy in relation to one's own language? Kafka answers: steal the baby from its crib, walk the tightrope.”

—Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), 19. Originally published as Kafka: Pour une littérature mineure (Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 1975).

“If desire is repressed, it is because every position of desire, no matter how small, is capable of calling into question the established order of a society: not that desire is asocial, on the contrary. But it is explosive; there is no desiring-machine capable of being assembled without demolishing entire social sectors. Despite what some revolutionaries think about this, desire is revolutionary in its essence--desire, not left-wing holidays!--and no society can tolerate a position of real desire without its structures of exploitation, servitude, and hierarchy being compromised.”

—Deleuze & Guattari - Anti-Oedipus (tr. Robert Hurley and Mark Seem) (Chapter 2, “Psycho-Analysis and Familialism: The Holy Family”).

“Les droits de l'homme ne nous feront pas bénir le capitalisme. Et il faut beaucoup d'innocence, ou de rouerie, à une philosophie de la communication qui prétend restaurer la société des amis ou même des sages en formant une opinion universelle comme "consensus" capable de moraliser les nations, les Etats et le marché. Les droits de l'homme ne disent rien sur les modes d'existence immanents de l'homme pourvu de droits. Et la honte d'être un homme, nous ne l'éprouvons pas seulement dans les situations extrêmes décrites par Primo Levi, mais dans des conditions insignifiantes, devant la bassesse et la vulgarité d'existence qui hantent les démocraties, devant la propagation de ces modes d'existence et de pensée pour-le-marché, devant les valeurs, les idéaux et les opinions de notre époque. L'ignominie des possibilités de vie qui nous sont offertes apparaît du dedans. Nous ne nous sentons pas hors de notre époque, au contraire, nous ne cessons de passer avec elle des compromis honteux. Ce sentiment de honte est un des plus puissants motifs de la philosophie. Nous ne sommes pas responsables des victimes mais devant les victimes. Et il n'y a pas d'autre moyen que de faire l'animal (grogner, fouir, ricaner, se convulser) pour échapper à l'ignoble : la pensée même est parfois plus proche d'un animal qui meurt que d'un homme vivant, même démocrate.”

—G. Deleuze, F. Guattari, “Qu’est-ce que la philosophie ?”, cit. in Gilles Châtelet “Vivre et penser comme des porcs”, 1999, Exils - Essais, pp. 11-12.

“The only question is how anything works, with its intensities, flows, processes, partial objects--none of which means anything.”

—Félix Guattari, in the interview “on Anti-Oedipus” in Negotiations 1972-1990 tr. Martin Joughin
Loading more posts...