A shopaholic girl was walking by the river in the jungle and suddenly saw a crocodile and screamed: “Oh my God, LACOSTE!”

Following Brands on Twitter Increases Purchase Intent [STUDY]

mashable.com

 

People who follow brands on Twitter are more likely to both buy and recommend those brands’ products, according to a recent study of online consumer behavior.

The study, conducted by Constant Contact and research firm Chadwick Martin Bailey, analyzed the behavior of 1,491 consumers ages 18 and older throughout the U.S., and revealed a number of details about how people interact with brands on the world’s beloved 140-character social network.

So, just how powerful is the Twitter connection between consumers and businesses? The study found that 60% of brand followers are more likely to recommend a brand to a friend after following the brand on Twitter, and 50% of brand followers are more likely to buy from that brand.

These findings mirror those from a previous report, detailing how consumers interact with brands on Facebook. The study found that 56% of consumers said they are more likely to recommend a brand to a friend after “Liking” a brand on Facebook, and 51% of consumers said they are more likely to buy a product after doing so. The findings from both studies seem to show that customer loyalty is about the same across both social networks.

Any increase in customer loyalty is great news for brands, especially those lucky enough to make the coveted list of followed companies. According to the study, though, the chances of making that list are slim, as only 21% of Twitter users follow brands on Twitter, and of those, 79% follow fewer than 10 brands.

If your brand makes it to that highly sought-after status, you’re in for the long haul — a whopping 75% of respondents claimed that they had never unfollowed a brand on Twitter. This finding, though, contradicts a previous study, which claimed that 41% of consumers have unfollowed a company on Twitter. The trend seems to favor longevity in both studies, however. If a user opts to follow your brand on Twitter, it’s more likely they’ll continue following, rather than decide to unfollow.

When it comes to a consumer’s decision to follow brands on Twitter, exclusivity and access to promotions reign. Here are the top five reasons given by respondents:

  • 64%: I am a customer of the company
  • 61%: To be the first to know information about the brand
  • 48%: To receive discounts and promotions
  • 36%: To gain access to exclusive content
  • 28%: To receive content/information to retweet and share with others

For the most part, brand interaction on Twitter is still largely a one-way process. While 84% of followers read tweets posted by the brands they follow, only 23% claim to tweet about the brands they follow.

The study also found that Twitter users are frequent Internet users overall — 50% of Twitter users in the study reported going online more than once per hour. Of Facebook users, only 34% of respondents reported going online multiple times per hour. Facebook and Twitter users both outpace the average Internet user, though, as only 29% of overall users that do not have Twitter and Facebook accounts reported logging on many times within an hour.

Twitter users even use Facebook more than users who stick solely to Facebook — 60% of Twitter users use Facebook more than three hours per week, compared with 49% of Facebook users overall.

The study offered one final nugget of wisdom that should inform how brands on Twitter approach their content strategies — 67% of brand followers expect unique content from the brands they follow. So get to it, social media strategists!

Overcoming Consumer Inertia by Design

IDEO (mentioned at length in the article below from the WSJ) designed Bank of America’s “Keep the Change” program - the one that takes the difference of what you charge on your debit card and the next round dollar amount and automatically buckets it into a savings account.  e.g. you spend $4.50; it rounds up to $5.00 and then puts $0.50 into savings.

Although I think gamification has been overdone in some web services/mobile apps, I am optimistic about products that build in a deeper understanding of inertia and how to change behaviors. For me this falls in a few buckets: 

1) Keeping momentum on existing patterns.  For example: what if Runkeeper noticed that for the last 5 weeks you’d run 30 miles per week, that this week you’re on pace to only hit 5 miles…and sent you a push notification or email asking if you meant to go for a run and maybe even tentatively scheduling one for you and a friend that usually runs similar times of day and similar paces.

2) Breaking a habit by helping with the choice to do something new. For example: a foursquare app, that, seeing I’ve checked in to the same Italian restaurant for the last 5 Saturdays, suggests another Italian restaurant for me.

3) Combining something you usually do with the opportunity to try something new.  For example, a more sophisticated version of sampling that’s based on your purchase habits.  When I order shampoo from Soap.com, throw in 3 conditioner samples.

4) Using existing data structures to get you to do something you should be doing but aren’t.  For example, Billguard is in this category. I know I should be looking through my full credit card statement every single month, but I haven’t been - until I signed up with Billguard.  Getting an email every single month that flags suspicious activity is a great prompt for this behavior; even in the months when I get everything OK’ed, I’ll typically still go take a look on their site rather than on my credit card issuer’s site.

5) Using data visualization or reframing the data in a more relatable way.  Two examples here: first, Mint.com’s data visualization of your spending puts into perspective the fact that you spend 2x more on restaurants than groceries.  Second, I read an article recently about how someone posted signs showing how many minutes you’d need to spend on a treadmill to burn off the calories in various kinds of soda.  Soft drink sales plummeted in that store by 50% as a result.  Calories don’t mean much. Time at the gym is much easier to wrap your head around.

Enough from me — if you want to read more about how to change user behavior, check out Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard by Chip & Dan Heath.

—-

WSJ Article: How To Keep Your Money Resolutions

Save more. Borrow less.

There’s a reason these two simple-sounding goals land on our lists of New Year’s resolutions year after year: We never seem to make any headway with them.

For help with how to break this cycle I turned to IDEO, a global design consultancy known for solving all kinds of puzzles. Its designers have tackled everything from computer mice to Pilates machines to homes for wounded soldiers.

But some of their most challenging assignments have come from financial-services firms, such as Bank of America, and government agencies, such as the Social Security Administration and the nascent Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, looking to help people do better with their money.

Enlarge Image


Katy Dockrill

“Behavior change is the hardest thing to design for,” says Ryan Jacoby, who co-leads IDEO’s New York office. Anyone who has ever tried to quit smoking or lose weight can attest to that.

So how do you design a way to boost savings and pare credit-card debt? The traditional place to begin is with a budget. But years of research into the minds of financial consumers have led Mr. Jacoby to conclude that budgets have a major design flaw. Because of their emphasis on self-denial (no more lattes!), we are not motivated to follow through with them, so we are constantly failing.

The solution? Think buckets, not budgets.

When it comes to saving, decide what specifically you want to save for. Then, set up separate pools of money, or “buckets,” for each goal and contribute to them on a regular basis. Mr. Jacoby says buckets are more in keeping with how people naturally think about their money. “We resonate with things that are more visual,” he says.

Saving more is abstract. Saving for a trip to Rome isn’t.

Another benefit to having smaller, goal-oriented accounts is that we are less likely to “borrow” from them than we are from a big lump called “savings.” Would you really raid the Rome account just to buy another latte?

Bucketing can work for managing credit, too. “One thing we hear all the time is people lose track of what they spent,” says Mr. Jacoby. A small credit-card balance becomes a huge pile of debt seemingly overnight, with “pizza debt” (or latte debt) indistinguishable from debt you intended to take on in the first place, such as to buy a new couch, he says.

One solution is to use your plastic the way it was meant to be used, paying for pizza and lattes with your debit card and putting the couch on your credit card. Beyond that, some credit-card issuers, such as Chase, let you separate out on your statement the charges you want to pay off right away with no interest (pizzas, lattes) from those you want to pay off over time or even in a certain number of installments (couches).

On the savings side, personal money-management tools, such as Intuit’s Quicken software and its newer online cousin Mint.com, let you set up and track your progress toward specific savings goals.

Online banking customers of bricks-and-mortar bank PNC Financial Services Group, an IDEO client, can identify and save for items they’d like to buy in the future by putting them on virtual “wish lists.”

Online banks, such as ING Direct and Ally Bank, let you open multiple savings accounts with no minimums and no fees, and contribute to them regularly—and automatically—from your checking account. You can even give them nicknames like “Big trip,” “Wardrobe” and “Rainy day” fund.

Then there’s Simple.com, founded by two Carnegie Mellon business school graduates and a former Twitter engineer. Here you set up one account and identify your various savings goals, and the site combs savings vehicles offered by its partner banks and allocates your money for you in (presumably) appropriate vehicles.

To me, bucketing harkens back to Christmas club accounts. If you are nursing a Yuletide hangover, it is worth considering the fact that we used to save money in advance to buy holiday gifts instead of financing our purchases with credit cards. Of course, these accounts often paid paltry interest—and hopefully the new services will do better by consumers—but their value was in giving you a modicum of control over your financial life. And control is what allows you to weather the market’s inevitable ups and downs.

“It’s not about being perfect,” says Mr. Jacoby, as conventional budgets seem to demand we be. It’s about being able to deal with life’s little financial shocks to get back close to center. And maybe even buying a latte from time to time.

Come to think of it, I’ll have a grande.

Think Social Can't Drive Revenue? Think Again!

On Tuesday, May 3rd,  2011, I spoke at 9am and 1pm at the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce’s Annual Business Expo.  Although we speak on the topic of social media frequently, I was still in awe at the level of interest.  It was standing room only at the 9 o’clock session.  One gentleman was so hungry for the information, he sat on the floor.  We had several live tweeters at the event too (thanks @GMCC_Delora, @kristinsjohnson, @MasterLink87 & @credibleconsult)!

Within minutes after finishing the session, a number of people connected with me on LinkedIn and began following us on Twitter.  This was an engaged audience.  If you were in the room, you already have a tremendous competitive advantage over your competition.  Just remember, it’s all about the story you’re living, telling and sharing.  Make it worth hearing and invite others to be part of it.  

Here are some more resources:

 
Connect with us for more information!

“Nothing is so powerful as an insight into human nature... what compulsions drive a man, what instincts dominate his action... if you know these things about a man you can touch him at the core of his being." ”

William Bernbach

That's good news for the rest of us.

nytimes.com

The wealthier consumers are the ones that have the cash to put back in the market; I am optimistic about this trend.

Doctor's Take Chances When People Might Die, But Not When People Might Live

Mmm, can you smell that?  That fragrance wafting under your nose is good old fashioned behavioral decision making, just like mom used to make it.

Let’s compare two hypothetical situations, both posed to a group of doctors (via a New Yorker article:

The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved. Which of the two programs would you favor?

You likely chose the same as the doctors, namely program A because you’re risk-averse.  But if you thought rationally, you’d realize, as My Cousin Vinny so eloquently put it, “It’s a bullshit question”.  That’s right, Marissa, they’re mathematically equivalent.

Now, on to the next example:

The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. If program C is adopted, 400 people will die. If program D is adopted, there is a one-third probability that nobody will die and a two-thirds probability that 600 people will die. Which of the two programs would you favor?

Again, they’re mathematically equivalent, but this time doctors chose program D.

So what does this say about human behavior?  Well, we’re all still cavemen, as much as we try to suit it up and surround ourselves with books, we’re driven utterly by emotion, fear being the strongest.

Don’t believe me?  When’s the last time you took a risk?  A BIG risk?  Maybe it’s talking back to your boss and standing up for what you believe in, maybe it’s quitting your job because you hate it. Or maybe it’s just going up to that guy/girl you find attractive and striking up a conversation.

Regardless, more often than not you don’t take that risk because fear motivates you more than a rational assessment of the situation (“oh. my. god. what will they think of me if I fail…”).

As Mr. Jobs said, “Don’t be trapped by dogma.”

Loading more posts...