“I Would Love TO Do CHUPKE CHUPKE”- Bobby

Amplify’d from www.bollywoodchaska.com

 

See this Amp at http://bit.ly/gCyynu

Tepjf Clarifies That Debates Between Candidates Banned : http://ping.fm/aZejE

Jon Hamm Clarifies His Remarks Regarding Kim Kardashian!

Frankly, we’re just as surprised as he is! After Jon Hamm said in Elle UK that society values “stupidity” and being an effing “idiot” and then cited Kim Kardashian as an example, the media picked up the story like wild fire and made enough of a stink to provoke the reality starlet to stand up […] http://dlvr.it/1K3s3n

Holder Clarifies View on U.S. Drone Strikes

Holder Clarifies View on U.S. Drone Strikes

Siobhan Hughes and Jared A. Favole
Wall Street Journal
March 7, 2013

Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter Thursday to Sen. Rand Paul to clarify the Obama administration’s view on the use of lethal force on American soil, an issue that provoked the Kentucky Republican to wage a nearly 13-hour filibuster against the president’s nominee to lead the Central Intelligence Agency.

Mr. Holder’s letter was described by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney: “Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil? The answer is no,” Mr. Carney said, reading an excerpt during a news briefing.

The letter by Mr. Holder could clear the way for a vote on President Barack Obama’s choice for CIA director, John Brennan. It is a more unequivocal statement of a view Mr. Holder advanced under questioning Wednesday at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

Read full article

A Post From The UnKnown

Read More Over At http://thesecrettablet.com/theunknown/congressman-clarifies-hes-pro-argo-but-its-no-conspiracy/

Congressman Clarifies: He’s Pro-‘Argo,’ but It’s No Conspiracy …

The Connecticut congressman who wrote a letter seeking a correction in the way “Lincoln” portrays his state’s vote on the 13th Amendment says he was not part of any effort to help “Argo.”
Carpetbagger
Google Alerts – conspiracy

New Post has been published on Israel News Report

New Post has been published on http://www.israelnewsreport.net/ynet-news-may-25.html

YNet News - May 25

Report: US traces cyber attack wave to Iran

– ynet.co.il

New York Times reports attacks targetted US oil, gas, electricity firms for months; officials say goal isn’t espionage, but sabotage

Exiled Syrian chemist sheds light on Assad’s chemical arms

– ynet.co.il

Former scientist tells Al-Jazeera ‘we were never were we told that the weapons could be used inside Syria’

Hezbollah No. 2: Assad serious about Golan front

– ynet.co.il

Sheikh Naim Qassem addresses possibility that Syrian conflict will develop into fighting in Golan Heights, says ‘if needed we are willing to help.’ As for Israeli response, ‘we have the power to deal with any foolish act on Israel’s part,’ he clarifies

 

New Post has been published on Tech News

New Post has been published on http://projectopenhand.biz/facebook-clarifies-ban-on-apps-that-use-its-data-to-replicate-its-features-or-dont-share-back-2/1224

Facebook Clarifies Ban On Apps That Use Its Data To Replicate Its Features Or Don’t Share Back

After shutting down data access to several competing apps, Facebook today made two major clarifications to its Platform Policy, banning apps that use its data but don’t make it easy for users to share back to Facebook, or that replicate its core functionality without permission. Facebook Platform Head Justin Osofsky tried to calm fears by noting the majority of developers should “keep doing what you’re doing.”

The full-text of the revised section I.10 of its Platform Policy now reads:

Reciprocity and Replicating core functionality: (a) Reciprocity: Facebook Platform enables developers to build personalized, social experiences via the Graph API and related APIs. If you use any Facebook APIs to build personalized or social experiences, you must also enable people to easily share their experiences back with people on Facebook. (b) Replicating core functionality: You may not use Facebook Platform to promote, or to export user data to, a product or service that replicates a core Facebook product or service without our permission.

This replaces the former policy that read “Competing social networks: (a) You may not use Facebook Platform to export user data into a competing social network without our permission.”

In a developer blog post, Osofsky stressed that Facebook doesn’t plan to remove the ability to use it as a login mechanism, pull profile data for personalization, or allow sharing to the news feed. He explains that “For the vast majority of developers building social apps and games, keep doing what you’re doing. Our goal is to provide a platform that gives people an easy way to login to your apps, create personalized and social experiences, and easily share what they’re doing in your apps with people on Facebook.”

However, Osofsky then addresses the issues of apps that use Facebook’s data to compete with it or that don’t contribute anything back to the news feed. “For a much smaller number of apps that are using Facebook to either replicate our functionality or bootstrap their growth in a way that creates little value for people on Facebook, such as not providing users an easy way to share back to Facebook, we’ve had policies against this that we are further clarifying today (see I.10).”

These clarified rules apply to apps like Yandex’s Wonder, which recreates the functionality of Graph Search and Facebook Nearby, and Voxer, which recreates voice messaging within Facebook Messenger, and are not allowed. This week Facebook blocked all API calls from Wonder and Voxer’s Find Friends access.

For the new policy requires a loose interpretation to give Facebook the right to shut down Find Friends access to Twitter’s standalone looping video-sharing app Vine, which it did yesterday just hours after the app launched. Vine allows people to share 6-second looping videos — essentially animated GIFs with sound. The closest thing Facebook offers is standard video sharing through its web and mobile apps and photo sharing through Instagram. The more vague old policy that restricted “competing” apps better covered this enforcement, since Vine and Twitter are certainly apps that compete in the user-generated content-sharing space.

If Facebook in fact sticks to enforcing its new policy to the letter, it should provide some reassurance to developers that the social network can’t go after simply any “competing” company. Considering the breadth of Facebook’s services, a ton of apps would qualify. But if it continues to cast a wide net around apps that “replicate” its functionality as it did with Vine, developers may still have a reason to be paranoid.

Facebook’s new policy against replication could be even more worrisome for developers because of the speed with which Mark Zuckerberg’s company builds products. For example, ephemeral messaging app Snapchat was doing something unique in mid-December. But then in just 12 days, Facebook built Poke, a direct competitor of Snapchat (which some call a clone). Suddenly, Snapchat was violating the new replication policy.

This gives developers who consider using Facebook’s data a tough choice to make. They effectively have to predict what Facebook might build and steer clear. Otherwise months of development by a small team could get steamrolled by the social giant in a few days.

As I wrote yesterday, Facebook’s social graph and other unique data sets are extraordinarily valuable. Handing them over to competitors could endanger its future as the dominant social network. So in some ways Facebook’s increased enforcement is forgivable, or at least understandable. But if it polices the platform too much, it may scare away developers who build apps that contribute content to Facebook. It needs that content to monetize with surrounding ads and inclusion in search.

Facebook’s mantra of “Move Fast And Break Things” takes on a new meaning now that it’s your things it might break.

[Image Credit]

For more on this topic, read:

Facebook Is Done Giving Its Precious Social Graph To Competitors

How Long Til Facebook Clones Vine? No, Facebook Should Have Invented Vine


New Post has been published on Tech News

New Post has been published on http://projectopenhand.biz/facebook-clarifies-ban-on-apps-that-use-its-data-to-replicate-its-features-or-dont-share-back/1182

Facebook Clarifies Ban On Apps That Use Its Data To Replicate Its Features Or Don’t Share Back

After shutting down data access to several competing apps, Facebook today made two major clarifications to its Platform Policy, banning apps that use its data but don’t make it easy for users to share back to Facebook, or that replicate its core functionality without permission. Facebook Platform Head Justin Osofsky tried to calm fears by noting the majority of developers should “keep doing what you’re doing.”

The full-text of the revised section I.10 of its Platform Policy now reads:

Reciprocity and Replicating core functionality: (a) Reciprocity: Facebook Platform enables developers to build personalized, social experiences via the Graph API and related APIs. If you use any Facebook APIs to build personalized or social experiences, you must also enable people to easily share their experiences back with people on Facebook. (b) Replicating core functionality: You may not use Facebook Platform to promote, or to export user data to, a product or service that replicates a core Facebook product or service without our permission.

This replaces the former policy that read “Competing social networks: (a) You may not use Facebook Platform to export user data into a competing social network without our permission.”

In a developer blog post, Osofsky stressed that Facebook doesn’t plan to remove the ability to use it as a login mechanism, pull profile data for personalization, or allow sharing to the news feed. He explains that “For the vast majority of developers building social apps and games, keep doing what you’re doing. Our goal is to provide a platform that gives people an easy way to login to your apps, create personalized and social experiences, and easily share what they’re doing in your apps with people on Facebook.”

However, Osofsky then addresses the issues of apps that use Facebook’s data to compete with it or that don’t contribute anything back to the news feed. “For a much smaller number of apps that are using Facebook to either replicate our functionality or bootstrap their growth in a way that creates little value for people on Facebook, such as not providing users an easy way to share back to Facebook, we’ve had policies against this that we are further clarifying today (see I.10).”

These clarified rules apply to apps like Yandex’s Wonder, which recreates the functionality of Graph Search and Facebook Nearby, and Voxer, which recreates voice messaging within Facebook Messenger, and are not allowed. This week Facebook blocked all API calls from Wonder and Voxer’s Find Friends access.

For the new policy requires a loose interpretation to give Facebook the right to shut down Find Friends access to Twitter’s standalone looping video-sharing app Vine, which it did yesterday just hours after the app launched. Vine allows people to share 6-second looping videos — essentially animated GIFs with sound. The closest thing Facebook offers is standard video sharing through its web and mobile apps and photo sharing through Instagram. The more vague old policy that restricted “competing” apps better covered this enforcement, since Vine and Twitter are certainly apps that compete in the user-generated content-sharing space.

If Facebook in fact sticks to enforcing its new policy to the letter, it should provide some reassurance to developers that the social network can’t go after simply any “competing” company. Considering the breadth of Facebook’s services, a ton of apps would qualify. But if it continues to cast a wide net around apps that “replicate” its functionality as it did with Vine, developers may still have a reason to be paranoid.

Facebook’s new policy against replication could be even more worrisome for developers because of the speed with which Mark Zuckerberg’s company builds products. For example, ephemeral messaging app Snapchat was doing something unique in mid-December. But then in just 12 days, Facebook built Poke, a direct competitor of Snapchat (which some call a clone). Suddenly, Snapchat was violating the new replication policy.

This gives developers who consider using Facebook’s data a tough choice to make. They effectively have to predict what Facebook might build and steer clear. Otherwise months of development by a small team could get steamrolled by the social giant in a few days.

As I wrote yesterday, Facebook’s social graph and other unique data sets are extraordinarily valuable. Handing them over to competitors could endanger its future as the dominant social network. So in some ways Facebook’s increased enforcement is forgivable, or at least understandable. But if it polices the platform too much, it may scare away developers who build apps that contribute content to Facebook. It needs that content to monetize with surrounding ads and inclusion in search.

Facebook’s mantra of “Move Fast And Break Things” takes on a new meaning now that it’s your things it might break.

[Image Credit]

For more on this issue, read:

Facebook Is Done Giving Its Precious Social Graph To Competitors

How Long Til Facebook Clones Vine? No, Facebook Should Have Invented Vine


Rehman Malik clarifies Babri, 26/11 remarks

New Post has been published on http://www.todayheads.com/rehman-malik-clarifies-babri-2611-remarks/

Rehman Malik clarifies Babri, 26/11 remarks

New Delhi: Clarifying his controversial remarks on Babri Masjid, visiting Pakistan Interior Minister Rehman Malik said he never compared the 26/11 attacks with the demolition. “I was simply talking about the ugly events such as Mumbai and so many others,” Malik said in a press conference, after his meeting with Union Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde.

On Friday night, Malik had equated the 1992 demolition of Babri Masjid in Ayodhya with 26/11 terrorist attack in Mumbai. “We do not want any 9/11. We do not want any Bombay blasts, we do not want any Samjhauta Express, we do not want any Babri mosque issue and we can work together not only for peace in Pakistan and India but also for the region,” Malik had said in New Delhi.

But a day later he claimed that his statement had been misinterpreted while adding that he never compared the 26/11 terrorist strike with the Babri Masjid demolition.

  • Video
  • Photo
  • Gallery

Malik said that he was only giving examples of ‘ugly events’ such as Mumbai attacks and Babri Masjid demolition.

Bharatiya Janata Party leader Arun Jaitley slammed the UPA Government for not responding to Malik’s Babri Masjid statement immediately. “The senior minister present should have contested that statement rather than him (Malik) having to clarifying his statements,” Jaitley said.

Malik, who is on a three day visit in the country, also said that Pakistan had initiated investigation on Mumbai attacks and made arrests even before India brought up the issues. He added that Pakistan is not backing any terrorist group, including Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Earlier, the Pakistani leader, who termed the talks with Shinde ‘successful’, had created another controversy by saying he is unsure whether Kargil war hero Captain Saurabh Malik had been killed by a Pakistani bullet or the weather.

Loading more posts...