Follow posts tagged #chicago school in seconds.

Sign up

“The probability of the people in power being individuals who would dislike the possession and exercise of power is on a level with the probability that an extremely tender-hearted person would get the job of whipping master in a slave plantation.”

Frank H. Knight, in the Journal of Political Economy (Dec. 1938, p869)

Great article by Deirdre McCloskey

Excerpt from an article on the Chicago School, positive economics, and how value cannot be separated from science.

Stigler: Milton, you’re such a preacher! If people want free trade, they’ll get it. If they don’t want it, no amount of jaw-boning by economists will change their minds.
Friedman: Ah: that’s where we differ, George. We both admire markets, but you think they’ve already worked. In this case the political market: you think what is, is an equilibrium of markets.
Stigler: And why not? People are self-interested, and they vote their pocketbooks.
Friedman: No, people are self-interested but often do not know what their interests are. They need education. The average citizen has no idea that a tariff hurts him.
Stigler: Education! Try educating a lobbyist for the sugar industry.
Friedman: As I said, that’s where we differ. I’m a teacher, and I think that people do some things because they are ignorant.
Stigler: And I’m a behavioral scientist. I assume rationality.
Friedman: And I advocate it.

“I think the government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem and very often makes the problem worse.”

—Milton Friedman

Christina Ramberg

I love how the texture and graphic nature of her works take precedence over (or are the primary focus of) each piece she creates. When I look at her strikingly graphic pieces, the subject or thing being portrayed seems more and more secondary to me. The colors and compositions are very stylized and intriguing as well, because she uses a specific manner of creating rather ambiguous forms. Furthermore, the meticulous details of each work are absolutely breath-taking as they are arresting. 

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

///

RESOURCES:
1. THE RENAISSANCE SOCIETY.
2. ART INSTITUTE CHICAGO. (2)
3. MONDOBLOGO.
4. Adam Baumgold Gallery.
5. ART TATTLER.
6. CHICAGO IMAGISM (PERIOD).
7. KAREN LENNOX GALLERY.
8. LOVE BEACH INDEX.

What We Learn When We Learn Economics by Christopher Hayes

chrishayes.org

Conservatives have long critiqued academia for the ways professors use their position to indoctrinate students with left-wing ideology, but the left has largely ignored the political impact of the way people learn economics, though its influence is likely far more profound. So in order to find out just what students learn when they learn economics, I headed down to Hyde Park, where the University generously let me enroll in “Principles of Macroeconomics” for a quarter.

TLDR: Freakonomics Sucks.

“Of late I have a new and depressing example of popular economic thinking, in the policy of arbitrary price-fixing. Can there be any use in explaining, if it is needful to explain, that fixing a price below the free-market level will create a shortage and one above it a surplus? But the public oh’s and ah’s and yips and yaps at the shortage of residential housing and surpluses of eggs and potatoes as if these things presented problems any more than getting one’s footgear soiled by deliberately walking in the mud.”

Frank Knight, in his 1950 presidential address to the American Economic Association, despairing at the general public’s inability to understand even simple economic truths.
Loading more posts...