Ban I.P. Addresses From Your Blog
A couple of weeks ago, I was getting some really vicious and nasty anons so I was suggested this feature on how to ban an I.P. addresses* from reaching your page or any page you choose. What it does is when that person tries to come to your blog, they will automatically be re-directed to a website of your choice. You can be cruel and send them somewhere nasty or like me, I sent them to google.
Follow the steps and install the code below the “<head>” in your theme html.
*You will probably need a statcounter like plug-in to figure out which I.P. addresses.
Initial moves towards banning P2P sites?
onlywire.comArticle by at 2011-09-08 05:15:21
Categorized in Guild Launch,
People who send Pottermore Feedback
If you put reply back
They are always going to thank you.
It doesn’t mean that they are actually actively on the case.
It doesn’t mean they actually care.
It just means they thank you for giving them feedback.
A person gave personal data to Pottermore and they were thanked.
A person reported above person about the personal data and they were also thanked.
Their thanks mean nothing. It doesn’t mean they support you in anyway.
We at a Slytherin group made the mistake of putting our trust in Alice - one of the mods. We thought since she was responding back, she must be on the case.
We were wrong.
Never thought us Slytherins could be overly trusting.
The cheaters will not be banned apparently (because Unicorncat [the saboteur that was bugging Ravenclaw], Magicblood/queenrook [double account] and SeekerJinx [ one of two saboteurs bugging Slytherin] are still online and are well)
Apparently, they are just looking for ways to prevent the situation from repeating itself. They have stopped all the obvious cheats and I’m sure are working on a way to stop multiple accounts. However, I have given up hope on them actually banning anyone.
It hasn’t happened yet and the Magicblood/queenrook complaints happened on week one.
Report the incidences because they will fix the way the person is getting ahead. But don’t expect banning and laugh about how people will get banned. All the people ever mentioned as cheaters are still on the site. I checked and I think Seekerjinx is still blowing up cauldrons. Well, I hope he goes bankrupt soon D<
Just do what you must, and I guess don’t even think about those people. After all, it would just make you angry. I’m going to just brew my potions patiently and hope that karma will make them lose Internet service.
Hey, a Slytherin can dream.
I NEED YOUR HELP
I am being targeted by the University of Waterloo as an activist for reproductive justice. They have banned me from their campus because I attended a counter rally at Stephen Woodworth’s lecture on May 13. I am the only person being banned our of 40 or so activists.
Stephen Woodworth is trying to backbench women and trans folk reproductive rights by redefining an unborn foetus to have full human rights. This Motion, Motion 312 must be stopped. A collective of activists rallied his lectured and this is why the ban is on place. The University is not giving me sufficient reasoning or evidentiary support of this ban, how long it is for, why I am targeted, or any other clarifying questions.
Please read this petition, sign it if you wish, and share it if you can.
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/allow-ethan-jackson-on-the-campus-of-university-of-waterloo.html
Thank you for your support,
Ethan
In a state where almost anything goes, banning brothel ads seems a bit odd
So they have legal prostitution, they just can’t advertise it. I get this is a problem for newspapers, who could use the advertising revenue. And brothels need to advertise because they need more clients?
It seems as though the recession has hit even the world’s oldest profession.
Amplify’d from wtop.com
See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/brbnk
Banning the veil: Is freedom not objective anymore?
theartofunderstandingwomen.comby sludgegulper
Banning the veil: Is freedom not objective anymore?
What is freedom? Is it as Merriam-Webster says the absence of necessity, coercion or constraint in choice or is it the imposition of abstract âliberal values’ defined by set sections of society? Is it a particular or a universal? Questions like these pertaining to cultural ethos and values have come to the fore since rigorous debates concerning the “veil” ban erupted across Europe and the Middle East in recent months.
