Follow posts tagged #appropriation, #racism, and #native american in seconds.

“What is interesting, is that the Frida Kahlo venerated by American feminists is a very different Frida Kahlo to the one people learn about in Mexico, in the Chicano community. In her country, she is recognized as an important artist and a key figure in revolutionary politics of early 20th century Mexico. Her communist affiliations are made very clear. Her relationship with Trotsky is underscored. All her political activities with Diego Rivera are constantly emphasized. The connection between her art and her politics is always made. When Chicana artists became interested in Frida Kahlo in the ‘70s and started organizing homages, they made the connection between her artistic project and theirs because they too were searching for an aesthetic compliment to a political view that was radical and emancipatory. But when the Euro-American feminists latch onto Frida Kahlo in the early ‘80s and when the American mainstream caught on to her, she was transformed into a figure of suffering. I am very critical of that form of appropriation.”

—Coco Fusco on her Amerindians piece from 1992 with Guillermo Gómez-Peña

Play

PSA for all non-indigenous peoples (or people who are not members of any cultures that have spirit animals): It is STILL not at all okay for you to be calling anyone or anything your 'spirit animal'.

This has been a post.

#abstract

Excerpts from her Billboard Magazine interview:

On Loving Hood Music and Being “The White Nicki Minaj”:

“A lot of people wanted to try to make me the white Nicki Minaj. That’s not what I’m trying to do. I love ‘hood’ music, but my talent is as a singer.”

On Critics Who Say She’s Losing Herself:

“That’s been kind of a trip: It’s not like I’m losing who I am — I actually found out more about who I am by making this music. I’m going on a journey, and that’s more than a lot of 20-year-olds can say. And I’m still going to change so much. Because I’m not the same person I was six months ago — I’m not even the same person I was two weeks ago.”

On Her New Song, “We Can’t Stop,” Produced by Mike Will Made It:

“I’m 20 years old and I want to talk to the people that are up all night with their friends. It’s based on a true story of a crazy night I had: When I heard the song for the first time, it captured exactly what I was living. I didn’t make this song for the critics, but for the people living it.”

On Her Urban Influence:

“I’ve always wanted country-rock influences, but now I’m moving over to a more urban side. It’s not a hip-hop album, though-it’s a pop album. I’m not coming in trying to rap. It’s more like, ‘I don’t see any girls out there doing what Miguel and Frank Ocean are doing.’”

Excerpt fromsongwriters Timothy and Theron’s Vibe Magazine interview:

Recently, the songwriters of the new record “We Can’t Stop,” which Rihanna passed on and was later given to Miley, had this to say: “When you listen to the Miley Cyrus record that we did, it’s not ratchet but it definitely has a lot of urban feel to it,” Timothy said. “She was like, ‘I want urban, I just want something that just feels Black.’”

Just another PSA for white queers,

appropriating trans*/non-binary/genderfucking terms from native cultures is not okay

if you’re too blinded by your queerness to understand that you’re being colonialist and oppressive i would like you to completely stop everything now and forever

ლ(╹◡╹ლ)

‘ladyboi’ is appropriative

ლ(╹◡╹ლ)

please stop forever

On fat suits, privilege, and oppression.

When people wear fat suits so they can know what it’s like to be a fat person it pisses me off. Because there are MILLIONS of fat people. They could ask us. But privilege is about having access to things that other people don’t. Privilege makes people feel that they should never be told “no.” Privilege makes people believe that they should have access to their privileges AND my oppression whenever it’s convenient for them. And that’s wrong.

So you want a traditional flash style tattoo?

SO! You want a traditional style tattoo? Old school flash style. And you want to get a pin-up style head/pin-up done? GREAT! I think that’s awesome! HOWEVER, in the spirit of “Think before you ink”, here’s an easy guide to help you choose a tattoo that will not only be beautiful, but won’t label you as a racist/cultural appropriator/offensive, culturally insensitive asshole.

Some examples of tattoos that are okay to get:

Here we have traditional pin-ups. My god, look at those beautiful faces, practically begging to be tattooed on you!

And look at this! Another non-offensive, beautiful pin-up girl!

And my, look at this! Yet another non-offensive tattoo!

The above examples are the type of tattoo you should stick to: Generic pin-ups with no ties to cultures whatsoever.

Now these next examples are tattoos you should NEVER, EVER FUCKING GET UNDER ANY FUCKING CIRCUMSTANCES, unless you want to be branded as a racist, appropriative ass for the rest of your life:

“The gypsy head”. First off, gypsy is a slur against Roma/etc and is offensive in and of itself. Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, on to the tattoo.

This tattoo is offensive in several ways. First, many Roma/etc were beheaded, making a disembodied head of a stereotypical “gypsy” woman something that calls up antizignanism. Second, it’s a stereotype that was created to strip the many different cultures that fall under the slur “gypsy” of their unique way of life and make them appear as a monolithic culture (similar to the word “gypsy”). This same stereotype (the mythical/spellworking gypsy) has been used historically as an excuse to murder and drive Roma out of the areas they attempt to settle in. Third, it presents a sexualized version of Roma women that contributes to the idea that “All gypsy women are whores”. Lastly, not your culture, not yours to get inked on you.

If you still think it’s okay to get one after this, you’re an asshole, and you may as well stop reading now.

Ah, the sugar skull girl. Yeah, this is fucking appropriative as hell. It takes a part of a culture that, unless you are a part of it, you have no right to. It takes something with deep cultural significance and completely strips it of that meaning. Sugar skulls are part of the Latin American (primarily celebrated in Mexico) holiday Dia de los Muertos (Day of the Dead). Calavera have complex meaning in Mexican and Latin@ cultures. If you give a shit about respecting others cultures, don’t get this shit done. (If I’ve fucked anything up here, I apologize. I’m working off of research I’ve been doing on here and on google, so it may be flawed). Once again, if it’s not your culture, don’t get it done.

Now this one…I’m just gonna refer you to this passage:

Headdresses promote stereotyping of Native cultures.

Headdresses, feathers, and warbonnets have deep spiritual significance.
The wearing of feathers and warbonnets in Native communities is not a fashion choice. Eagle feathers are presented as symbols of honor and respect and have to be earned. Some communities give them to children when they become adults through special ceremonies, others present the feathers as a way of commemorating an act or event of deep significance. Warbonnets especially are reserved for respected figures of power. The other issue is that warbonnets are reserved formenin Native communities, and nearly all of these pictures show women sporting the headdresses. I can’t read it as an act of feminism or subverting the patriarchal society, it’s an act of utter disrespect for the origins of the practice. (see mypost on sweatlodgesfor more on the misinterpretation of the role of women). This is just as bad as running around in a pope hat and a bikini, or a Sikh turban cause it’s “cute”.

It’s just like wearing blackface.
“Playing Indian” has a long history in the United States, all the way back to those original tea partiers in Boston, and in no way is it better than minstral shows or dressing up in blackface. You are pretending to be a race that you are not, and are drawing upon stereotypes to do so. Like my first point said, you’re collapsing distinct cultures, and in doing so, you’re asserting your power over them. Which leads me to the next issue.
There is a history of genocide and colonialism involved that continues today.
By the sheer fact that you live in the United States you are benefiting from the history of genocide and continued colonialism of Native peoples. That land you’re standing on? Indian land. Taken illegally so your ancestor who came to the US could buy it and live off it, gaining valuable capital (both monetary and cultural) that passed down through the generations to you. Have I benefited as well, given I was raised in a white, suburban community? yes. absolutely. but by dismissing and minimizing the continued subordination and oppression of Natives in the US by donning your headdress, you are contributing to the culture of power that continues the cycle today.

from this website.

So there you go. A short (and incomplete) guide to how to get a non-offensive tattoo. Bottom line: IF YOU DO NOT BELONG TO THAT CULTURE, IF YOU DID NOT GROW UP IN IT OR HAVE NO TIES TO IT OR KNOWLEDGE OF IT, DON’T FUCKING GET IT TATTOOED ON YOU!

For further reading, google “Cultural appropriation tattoos”.