Little Print Shop of Horrors IV by Creative Spark / Blog / Store

This year’s print series theme is Hitchcock Horrors and Twisted Disney.

11.5” X 16.5” prints, limited editions of 100. Available HERE.

All proceeds from the sales will be donated to the Forever Manchester community charity.



http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/11/syria-al-qaeda-connection/2075323/ + http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/world/middleeast/syrian-rebels-tied-to-al-qaeda-play-key-role-in-war.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0






Community ABC’s
↳ D: The Darkest Timeline

"Enough with the timeline crap, Abed! Pierce got shot in the leg and died. Shirley’s a drunk. Annie’s locked in a mental ward because her guilt drove her insane. Jeff lost an arm in the fire. Troy lost his larynx because for some dumb reason he tried to destroy a flaming troll doll by eating it. Life has gone to hell, Abed!" 

ok some thoughts

so Ben C cut his hair, yeah? and it definitely won’t grow long enough for the Sherlock special so WHAT IF THE SHERLOCK SPECIAL IS

  1. A flashback to Sherlock’s drug days and explains how he became a consulting detective
  2. A flash forward to John and Sherlock retiring in Sussex and is like LOOK WHERE THEY’RE GOING
  3. A look at John’s army days and doesn’t have Sherlock in it at all
  4. A look at something else (mary’s background??) and doesn’t have Sherlock in it at all
  5. Just Sherlock wearing a ton of hats the whole time  with no explanation and everyone being like wtf???

or maybe they’re just going to be lame and put him in a wig idk


What Is the Universe? Real Physics Has Some Mind-Bending Answers
Science says the universe could be a hologram, a computer program, a black hole or a bubble—and there are ways to check
The questions are as big as the universe and (almost) as old as time: Where did I come from, and why am I here? That may sound like a query for a philosopher, but if you crave a more scientific response, try asking a cosmologist. This branch of physics is hard at work trying to decode the nature of reality by matching mathematical theories with a bevy of evidence. Today most cosmologists think that the universe was created during the big bang about 13.8 billion years ago, and it is expanding at an ever-increasing rate. The cosmos is woven into a fabric we call space-time, which is embroidered with a cosmic web of brilliant galaxies and invisible dark matter. It sounds a little strange, but piles of pictures, experimental data and models compiled over decades can back up this description. And as new information gets added to the picture, cosmologists are considering even wilder ways to describe the universe—including some outlandish proposals that are nevertheless rooted in solid science:

The universe is a hologram

Look at a standard hologram, printed on a 2D surface, and you’ll see a 3D projection of the image. Decrease the size of the individual dots that make up the image, and the hologram gets sharper. In the 1990s, physicists realized that something like this could be happening with our universe.

Classical physics describes the fabric of space-time as a four-dimensional structure, with three dimensions of space and one of time. Einstein’s theory of general relativity says that, at its most basic level, this fabric should be smooth and continuous. But that was before quantum mechanics leapt onto the scene. While relativity is great at describing the universe on visible scales, quantum physics tells us all about the way things work on the level of atoms and subatomic particles. According to quantum theories, if you examine the fabric of space-time close enough, it should be made of teeny-tiny grains of information, each a hundred billion billion times smaller than a proton.

Stanford physicist Leonard Susskind and Nobel prize winner Gerard ‘t Hooft have each presented calculations showing what happens when you try to combine quantum and relativistic descriptions of space-time. They found that, mathematically speaking, the fabric should be a 2D surface, and the grains should act like the dots in a vast cosmic image, defining the “resolution” of our 3D universe. Quantum mechanics also tells us that these grains should experience random jitters that might occasionally blur the projection and thus be detectable. Last month, physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory started collecting data with a highly sensitive arrangement of lasers and mirrors called the Holometer. This instrument is finely tuned to pick up miniscule motion in space-time and reveal whether it is in fact grainy at the smallest scale. The experiment should gather data for at least a year, so we may know soon enough if we’re living in a hologram.

The universe is a computer simulation

Just like the plot of the Matrix, you may be living in a highly advanced computer program and not even know it. Some version of this thinking has been debated since long before Keanu uttered his first “whoa”. Plato wondered if the world as we perceive it is an illusion, and modern mathematicians grapple with the reason math is universal—why is it that no matter when or where you look, 2 + 2 must always equal 4? Maybe because that is a fundamental part of the way the universe was coded.

In 2012, physicists at the University of Washington in Seattle said that if we do live in a digital simulation, there might be a way to find out. Standard computer models are based on a 3D grid, and sometimes the grid itself generates specific anomalies in the data. If the universe is a vast grid, the motions and distributions of high-energy particles called cosmic rays may reveal similar anomalies—a glitch in the Matrix—and give us a peek at the grid’s structure. A 2013 paper by MIT engineer Seth Lloyd builds the case for an intriguing spin on the concept: If space-time is made of quantum bits, the universe must be one giant quantum computer. Of course, both notions raise a troubling quandary: If the universe is a computer program, who or what wrote the code?

(via What Is the Universe? Real Physics Has Some Mind-Bending Answers | Science | Smithsonian)

you see what’s going on right here? cause I do.
lemme explain you.

Right here Duke just got the news that Jennifer (spoiler alert) is dead. He most definitely sad about that and he’s talking about loss with Gloria. He talking about Jennifer and how she complained a lot about the Cape Rouge but she loved the sea. He’s remembering all the good moments they shared, hell, all of them basically, from the beginning to the end. but theres one thing he can’t allow himself to do.

its to cry.

because’s he’s absorbed the killer cry trouble, right after Audrey gave him back his trouble and in same time modified it so all the troubles his family has absorbed through the years have been activated.

if he cries, people dies.

and he can’t accept that.

and he won’t.


Will Ryan Reynolds Be In It?


Is there a chance he will cameo in X-Men: Apocalypse?




Fingers crossed everything goes well, but IT’S HAPPENING!