redphonebox

idk whenever people mention an Asian ethnicity doing something sexual it’s like. Why is their ethnicity relevant.
It’s like are you trying to invoke the image of the “sexually deviant Japanese girl”.
“Japanese” as an adjective implies that there is some way that Japanese people look specifically, and there isn’t.

smallplantfriend asked:

hey so I'm cishet so I try to base my opinions and practices on what actually oppressed people want and I've been using GSRM because I thought people liked that better because it includes identities that often get left out of LGTBQ* (intersex, etc.) and doesn't include allies? in your opinion should I not be doing that? I don't want to use a problematic term but I'm not really sure what would be best

no don’t use  it isn’t even problematic it just is wrong, like there is nothing wrong with the term GSM/GSRM w/e, like, public health research is SUPER IMPORTANT and GSM is used there because researchers need a term better than “this man is a swinger” but it doesn’t equal LGBT+ 

ROBOBEAR’S FOLLOW FOREVER!

*bolded are good friends

tiny-paws stainsonthepage redphonebox shannaaaan shabangles nixxies pazkats jontheangel quivyre reclux neongeonosisevangelion newvulcancolonies bigustin shinjiascends spacedweebs lellyphant bunbijou sweatyfriend pureyiff hakabaib tehsweetheart bearscribbles

themiragechild replied to your post: anonymous asked:you have some fai…

ads are based off your internet browsing history

redphonebox replied to your post: anonymous asked:you have some fai…

would it not be google ads? like they’re determined by the viewer not the blog?

amerrybat replied to your post: anonymous asked:you have some fai…

lol they’re sketchy bc this anon has been looking at sketchy things

Ya got busted, anon.